Comments by "" (@elisabeth5285) on "Chris At Speakers Corner" channel.

@Karen-yr3fb Exactly, Muslims can't accept criticism because then you're immediately an Islamophobe. But ridiculing Christians is ok.....
1
@Karen-yr3fb Exactly, Muslims can't accept criticism because then you're immediately an Islamophobe. But ridiculing Christians is ok. 🙄
1
@Karen-yr3fb Exactly, Muslims can't accept criticism because then you're immediately an Islamophobe. But ridiculing Christians is ok. 🙄
1
@Karen-yr3fb Exactly, Muslims can't accept criticism because then you're immediately an Islamophobe. But ridiculing Christians is ok. 🙄
1
@Karen-yr3fb Exactly, Muslims can't accept criticism because then you're immediately an Islamophobe. But ridiculing Christians is ok. 🙄
1
@Karen-yr3fb Exactly, Muslims can't accept criticism because then you're immediately an Islamophobe. But ridiculing Christians is ok. 🙄
1
@Karen-yr3fb Exactly, Muslims can't accept criticism because then you're immediately an Islamophobe. But ridiculing Christians is ok. 🙄
1
@Karen-yr3fb Exactly, Muslims can't accept criticism because then you're immediately an Islamophobe. But ridiculing Christians is ok. 🙄
1
@zxcvbnm2641294 I have a tip for you. Just because you were born a Muslim doesn't mean you're automatically right. Learn to think for yourself before you allow others to influence you. Read the Quran without Surah 5:101 in your head and dare to ask questions. View and study the life of Muhammad without a preconceived notion so that you can judge Islam with crystal clarity and level-headedness.
1
@QueenQaffir Wow, thank you so much. Do you perhaps also know which Hadith?
1
@youwhat491 Haha no Christian believes that. Fairy tales from the Quran
1
@PsalmThirtynineEleven Thank you very much for this information. I only knew about taqiyya. I'm going to keep it. It is also said by a famous Islamic theologian that it is permissible to lie. I'll send it right away.
1
@kierancho The concept of hypostasis (Greek: hypostasis) has played an important role in theology, both in the Trinity doctrine and in Christology. The unity of Father, Son and Spirit is expressed by the concept of ousia, essence or essence: they are one in essence, homoousios (Latin: consubstantialis). The term "hypostasis" is used for the trinity: one being (ousia), three hypostases or "persons" (prosôpon, Latin: persona; the word "person" here does not have exactly the same meaning as it does in modern times). According to the Council of Chalcedon (451), Christ is one hypostasis or "person" (prosôpon, persona) in two natures, the divine nature and the human nature.
1
@kierancho The simplest situation is that one nature has its real existence in a hypostasis, e.g. the individual nature of a tree exists in the hypostasis of that tree. However, a man may be said to have one human nature on the one hand, and on the other hand that he consists of two unified natures: the nature of his body and the nature of his soul. Now man is one hypostasis in which the two natures of body and soul are united. In a similar way the incarnation was seen: Christ is one hypostasis in which his divine nature and his human nature are united. Before the incarnation, the Son of God was one hypostasis in which his divine nature existed. In the Incarnation his human nature is added to it: the hypostasis after the incarnation is the same as that before the incarnation, but now it includes not only the divine but also the human nature. For the relationship between the hypostasis of Christ and his human nature, the expression "enhypostasy" was introduced: human nature has its existence in the hypostasis of the Son of God.
1
@kierancho The trinity doesn't stop being a reality just because YOU can't understand it. There is no logical inconsistency with the trinity, just your inability to think logically. You make certain assumptions when you try to understand the trinity, just as the people of old assumed that the earth is flat. If you make wrong assumptions, the conclusion will not make sense to you. You have no problem saying that Allah has two right hands and one tibia, but you have a problem with the trinity. If you think 1+1+1 is a good argument against Christianity, know that no matter how sophisticated you try to make yourself sound, no one will take you seriously.
1
@kierancho I said it before. It's because of your inability to think logically. Don't confuse The Trinity with math.
1
@kierancho No, the Bible does not teach that the earth is flat. While the Bible is not a science textbook, nothing in the Bible contradicts science. What the Bible says is “faithful forever and ever” (Psalm 111:8).
1
@kierancho God's Logic Is Different From Human Logic The challenge is to transcend our own logic and understand more of God's logic.
1
@kierancho The latest investigations show that Jesus and his disciples spoke Hebrew to each other. According to Randall Buth (Vice President of the Institute for Bilbical Languages & Translation), Hebrew was the common language in Jesus' day, not just Aramaic. This calls into question the common notion that Jesus spoke Aramaic, and also that Aramaic was the basis for Greek translations in the first century AD. The Bible expressly states that the names of Biblical places have Hebrew roots. Speeches were delivered in Hebrew, which is called Hebraisti or Hebrais in the original Greek text. John 5:2 speaks of the "bathing water of Bethesda" which is a Hebrew name. The inscription above the cross was written in Hebrew, Latin and Greek (John 19). Paul addressed the Jewish crowd in Jerusalem “in Hebrew” (Acts 21:40, 22:2, 26:14). And then there is the name of the angel of the abyss in Hebrew: Abaddon (Rev. 9:11). So don't be so arrogant as to think you have all the wisdom.
1
@kierancho And regarding the Bible, do you think the Bible is unreliable?
1
@kierancho If you search on google it is not written anywhere that it can be proven with 100% certainty that Jesus spoke Aramaic. The scientists talk about: probably Aramaic, Hebrew and Greek. In contrast, Randall Buth confirms with his recent research in 2020 that Jesus spoke Hebrew. (See my previous comment). Do you know better than this man? Don't try to play the smart guy. Randall Buth is director of the Biblical Language Center and a teacher at the Rothberg International School of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and the Home for Bible Translators. He is a member of the Jerusalem School of Synoptic Research. Buth received his PhD in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures from the University of California, Los Angeles (1987).
1
@kierancho You claim the Bible is not reliable. Not according to your Quran. Since the Quran says that the word of God cannot be changed.
1
@kierancho It is insane how you are laughing when you exposed yourself as a dirty taqqiya liar. So stop squirming and making excuses to show me I'm not honest. To be clear, you believe in the Quran as the only ultimate truth. But to protect your lies, you leave out the bit about the Bible for the sake of simplicity. So you go against the ultimate truth (as you yourself say) of the Quran by claiming that the Bible is unreliable. Haha lmao. 😂😂😂
1
@samail1114 That's an opinion, not a fact. And by the way, speaking of false, Allah himself is the best of deceivers.
1
Islam is incompatible with democracy. It is a warring faith that uses democracy to destroy it and establish itself as a global totalitarian regime. The only way to avert the clash between this barbarity and civilization and a world disaster is to expose and demystify the fallacy of Islam. Islam must be taken from Muslims in order for humanity to live in peace.
1