Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "BuzzFeed Unsolved Network" channel.

  1.  @antinwo3664  You made the claim not me - therefore the burden of proof is incumbent upon you when challenged. The onus does not lie with me, or any other party to search for an absent or negative based upon your insistence, at your behest, scientific illiteracy and personal incredulity. To remind you of what you said. You claimed that contrails can only last 35 seconds. I am merely asking you to detail the physical laws that determine this. You also claimed that the sky is full of toxic chemicals as a result of this supposed spraying, naming aluminium, barium and strontium. I simply requested the data, commencing with your claimed strontium. to remind you, it is you that is making these claims - not me. I am challenging you to substantiate them, therefore the responsibility lies with you and no one else's. What's the problem? Two very simple questions that you are clearly incapable of responding to. You referred to 'credible sources'. Start with independently verifiable atmospheric chemistry. Why should a contrail only be 35 seconds in duration? Go ahead.
    2
  2. No, simply contrails. If they persist or spread then you simply think it is 'weird' because that is what the internet has told you to believe..
    2
  3.  @stephenenders2066  On the contrary, it is basic reality that some gullible people can't see past the "baalshit" of junk online internet fantasy.
    2
  4.  @stephenenders2066  I am irrelevant. The known atmospheric science behind contrail microphysics that you don't understand is governed by physical laws based upon fundamental axioms and thereby have a voice of their own.
    2
  5.  @stephenenders2066  Like banging one's head against it.
    2
  6. Hello Keith - nice weekend (on You Tube?). Why have you felt the need to change accounts yet again? You're still very confused. Tube hasn't existed for 'three decades' - I joined it in 2015.
    2
  7. Who is Simon H? - who is Jeff Malone? who is Derek Fischmann? Who is Ray Forrester? Who is Keiv Maartins? ...and so it goes on. Why not just use the one account Keith?
    2
  8. I have one account Keith - since 2015 - which is all I need. Hilarious. You've found it necessary to use three on this thread alone.
    2
  9. Three accounts on one thread alone Keith...and your point about being "weak" was? Could you be Simon H again? that was very entertaining. Incidentally Seigs, you needed to use the adverb too as opposed to the preposition.
    2
  10. And he's back. New account - five comments rabid as ever - same old garbage. Why don't you just stick to the one account Keith? Three different accounts on one thread. What about your supposed chemtrails Seigs?
    2
  11. You Tube hasn't existed for three decades Keith you dimwit - and unlike you I've only ever needed one account which is this one having joined in 2015. Weakling? Ha! Why do you need three accounts on this thread alone to reply to me?
    2
  12. Weakling? Why did you need three accounts on one thread alone Keith?
    2
  13. Wait, are you actually attempting to suggest that the account '365 days a year 3 decades' is nothing to do with you? That's off the scale levels of cowardice, denial and stupidity even for you Keith. You Tube has only existed since 2005 you cretin Seigel.
    2
  14.  Elyjah Stark never leaves youtube  Three decades equals thirty years "you f idiot". What a fool. Get off You Tube, says the lunatic obsessive typing manically from five in the morning with over fifty troll accounts to hide behind. You coward Seigel.
    2
  15.  Elyjah Stark never leaves youtube  Coward. Weakling. You ran away.
    2
  16.  Elyjah Stark never leaves youtube  Coward
    2
  17. "Putz"
    2
  18.  Elyjah Stark never leaves youtube  "FORECAST FOR TODAY…CONTRAILS LONG AND THIN THAT WILL PERSIST AND EXPAND TO FOR THOSE OVERCAST SKIES” - You complete cretin Keith.
    2
  19.  Elyjah Stark never leaves youtube  Bye then Keith
    2
  20.  Elyjah Stark never leaves youtube  Weakling. What a coward.
    2
  21. "Never leaves You Tube?" Hilarious. You complete lunatic Keith.
    2
  22. Keith Seigel brands someone as 'unhinged' 😆 😅 😂 🤣 You deranged coward.
    2
  23. Do you even interact with the real world Keith?
    2
  24. You lunatic Keith. You've been on here since 5.00am your time. You're obsessed man. - Harassment? Ha! Weakling. You needed three accounts to cope with me you coward and now you want to hide behind a video call. If you really believe all this chemtrail nonsense and that I'm some sort of "government agent" - come over here and see me in person Seigs. Problem is, you've never ventured beyond Scottsdale you juvenile imbecile....and now you want to cower behind a video call. Man up "putz".
    2
  25. Drama Queen??? Says Keith Seigel?!? You get funnier by the post. Hurt me? What are you going to do, threaten me with a "video conference call" again? You "effeminate putz". You need three fake accounts to handle me on a comments section. You're a complete embarrassment to yourself and the conspiratorially obsessed clowns you think you represent. Coward.
    2
  26. I can do whatever I want you clown. You know as well as I do you ran away like a coward after your childish meltdown when your trolling was challenged, which is why you now need all these fake accounts and three of them to deal with me on this thread alone. You're gutless and weak and yet you keep attempting to threaten people through your comical accounts over the internet that don't share your paranoid junk. You keep convincing yourself you're intimidating yet you're scared of a trail behind an aircraft and live in fear of a cloud. You pathetic "putz" Seigel.
    2
  27. "Effeminate" - says Keith Seigel that used a picture of Pete Burns as an avatar and threatens people online with "video conferences". You pathetic putz Seigs.
    2
  28. ​ Elyjah Stark never leaves youtube Coward...you ran away. Putz
    2
  29. The "day of reckoning is coming" - What does that mean you deluded clown? you're about to schedule a mass zoom meeting? Putz. You ran away. Coward.
    2
  30. Remember when you said "Steven Senegal" Keith? You putz.
    2
  31. Coward. You're getting desperate. Video? - you effeminate freak. Putz.
    2
  32. You ran away when challenged you coward. Three accounts for just the one thread. Weakling.
    2
  33. You even deserted your Simon H account because you got humiliated yet again. Coward.
    2
  34. Putz
    2
  35. You need me to explain what a cloud is. What line of work are you in, women's clothing? What are you going to do, threaten me with a Microsoft Teams meeting next? You weakling Keith.
    2
  36. No, sleeping and then commuting to work this morning Keith. And again you project your own obsessive weirdness onto others. Likes? I don't even notice them far less add them - couldn't care less Seigs. It really bothers you that much? Yes it does doesn't it. How old are you? It's a comments section for God's sake man...and you spend your time counting them. Man up, you weak effeminate coward. Actually, come to think of it Keith, wasn't 'comment section' another of your ludicrous accounts this year? Along with this one... "If these were commercial flightpaths as ''debunkers'' like to allege, the angle means that half of the planes leaving those trails were landing in the North Sea." Now do be quiet you ridiculous little man, I'm busy. Taunt you later putz.
    2
  37. Putz
    2
  38.  Biff Sanders  You absolute nutcase Keith - what on earth are you going on about now? I've been busy at work since yesterday thought I'd drop by here again at the end of the week to amuse myself and you reply in minutes. How obsessive? Genuinely, you need to get off here, get some professional help mate. The name change - btw - ha! Hilarious. Putz.
    2
  39.  Biff Sanders  And how upset did you get Keith? Effortless. Are you capable of existing outside of You Tube Seigel? - or are you simply here in all these guises for my amusement? At least you've succeeded at something putz. Could you be Simon H again? Please Siegs.
    2
  40. Stalker? You replied to me on this thread Keith. I'm off out this evening - hilariously to Ealing, y'know, the place you pretended to come from as Simon H. Try to actually enjoy your weekend Keith and maybe prise your tortured mind away from You Tube and these debunking videos for a while. I'll do my best to remember to reply to your inevitable half a dozen responses on Monday. If you really believe in your chemtrail nonsense Seigs, then why fritter so much time away on here? Try not to let it ruin your weekend Keith.
    2
  41.  @andrebeauchamp6160  Neither the military nor Bill Gates have ever said that they are "doing it" - as in chemtrailing.
    2
  42.  elyjahstark7549  Well we've had this conversation innumerable times and as I've said before, Agent Orange (a defoliant) has nothing whatsoever to do with the misidentified aircraft contrails that conspiracy theorists/believers term as 'chemtrails'. Operation Sea Spray was the release of bacteria (again at ground level) by the US Navy to evaluate dispersal in the event of a biological attack.
    2
  43.  Elyjah Stark never leaves youtube  Who asked you Keith?
    2
  44. In your head along with your other 55 personalities. Why are you using a different account yet again Keith?
    2
  45. And you clearly understand none of the above.
    2
  46. Keith Siegel is here. We should all be blessed.
    2
  47. Known science cannot be compromised or paid off since it is axiomatic and has a voice of its own The atmospheric science of contrails involves very basic meteorological principles.
    2
  48. "your a shrill" I'd be intrigued to learn, how's that web-development going given that you can't even successfully type a sentence?
    2
  49. Is it? Could you present this supposed proof then? Original objective source please.
    2
  50. Yes, cloud seeding, but this has nothing whatsoever to do with misidentified aircraft contrails.
    2