Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "Voice of America" channel.

  1. That settles it then. Clever lad.
    1
  2.  @jjrrhh1983  Nothing to do with me mate - you could verify all this for yourself.
    1
  3.  @jjrrhh1983  Nothing to do with me mate - you could verify all this for yourself. Clever lad!
    1
  4.  @jjrrhh1983  Nothing to do with me mate - you could have verified all of this for yourself had you either the capability or the will. Clever lad!
    1
  5.  @jjrrhh1983  Nothing to do with me fellah - you could have verified all of this for yourself had you either the capability or the will. Clever lad!
    1
  6.  @jjrrhh1983  Class of 2001 there of EP.. Clever lad!
    1
  7.  @jjrrhh1983  Class of 2001 there of EP.. Clever lad!
    1
  8.  @jjrrhh1983  'Sack n crack' - ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  9.  @jjrrhh1983  Class of 2001 there of EP...ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  10.  @jjrrhh1983  ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  11.  @jjrrhh1983  ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  12.  @jjrrhh1983  ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  13.  @jjrrhh1983  ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  14.  @jjrrhh1983  ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  15.  @jjrrhh1983  ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  16.  @jjrrhh1983  ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  17. Class of 2001 there of EP.. Clever lad! ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  18. ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  19. ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  20. ok wise lad! 🌙
    1
  21. Are you lonely?
    1
  22. No they didn't, you fell for a crap conspiracy theory about the origin of the term conspiracy theory.
    1
  23.  @JospehSnal  Not sure what's more predictable and unoriginal here - the crap "tell me ... without telling me" cliché, or an online conspiracy believer accusing someone that challenges their false claims as being "an agent". And no, the CIA did not "create the term" conspiracy. Seriously how dumb do you have to be to believe that? For starters it's not even a term, it's a word/noun.
    1
  24. No use simply saying it - demonstrate why.
    1
  25. What?
    1
  26. What?
    1
  27. Incorrect. There are images from lunar orbit that clearly show the tracks taken by astronauts at the landing sites.
    1
  28.  @matrixrescaper  Incorrect. The Apollo landing sites have been photographed by the LRO. In addition to this, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) SELENE lunar probe has imaged the landing sites which have also been captured by India's Chadrayaan-2 orbiter which photographed the Apollo 11 Lunar Module Eagle descent stage (the orbiter's image of the Apollo landing site was released to the public on September 3, 2021). They were also confirmed by China's second lunar probe, Chang'e 2. All images are consistent with the selenic coordinates, the EVAs conducted and the tracks and disturbance caused by the astronauts and the lunar rovers used in the later J class missions. You could have established this for yourself instead of consuming and regurgitating dumb online conspiracy theory about a subject that you clearly have zero knowledge of whatsoever "brooo". Here, let me borrow one of your puerile laughing emojis - 😆
    1
  29. At 3.7 psi? Righto then. You haven't really thought this through have you?
    1
  30.  @raven_wondervocals2166  "Piccard didn't make it to the bottom." Yes he did. 35,797ft - the ocean floor of Challenger Deep. Would you like the coordinates? "You seem to forget that 80% of the world's oceans are undiscovered." And how do you conclude that? At no stage have I alluded to anything of the sort. What's your point? Incidentally, It's actually closer to 90% and less that 10% has been mapped by sonar. What a bizarre strawman fallacy. "Piccard also said that the Earth looked like a disc with upturned edges" In 1931, Auguste Piccard went up in a balloon to an altitude of 15781 m. At this altitude, Earth’s curvature is still very slight and was difficult to see through the small portholes in his chamber. In a Popular Science interview, Piccard was reported to have said that Earth “seemed a flat disc with an upturned edge.” Flat-Earthers quickly interpreted his statement as if he was telling us Earth is flat. In reality, in another interview, it is clear that he is convinced that Earth is a sphere. In his writings about his expeditions, the word “globe” was also mentioned several times. "so I think you need to pick a lane buddy." And what would your lane be? From the sound of it, whatever online junk conspiracy tells you to think "buddy". My position is entirely clear from this thread. Are you a flat Earther? "Focus on the data if that's the position you want to hold." I'd be delighted to discuss it in detail with you. I suggest you familiarise yourself with it first. "Don't lose your footing to simply argue with somebody." Are you saying that you agree with the false statements made? "Do you have any data on moon dust?" Depending upon your question I'd be happy to direct you to further information.
    1
  31. What?
    1
  32. Last time you checked? You mean the last crap conspiracy theory video you watched or junk social media meme that told you what to think? A studio is it? Where? Hollywood? or was it Shepperton or Pinewood perhaps? But wait, what of Area 51 Nevada? Hang on, wasn't it supposed to be the Arizona desert? Death Valley? or surely Devon Island Canada? No, no, surely it was Cannon AFB New Mexico? You goons can't even get your stories straight. I guess it depends on which conspiracy theorist you allow yourself to be duped by. Got to say though, that must be some 'studio" to convincingly replicate, uncut, the 1/6th gravity and the vacuum of the lunar surface - not to mention the precise reconstruction of Theophilus in The Sea of Tranquility; the Head Crater vicinity, Ocean of Storms; the Fra Mauro Formation near Cone Crater; the eastern edge of Mare Imbrium, Hadley Rille; The Descartes Highlands; and the eastern edge of Mare Serenitati in the Taurus Littrow Valley. Shout out to the props department too, that managed to fashion fake moonrock consistent which each of those six landing sites and collectively fool an entire branch of science called geology for over half a century in the process.
    1
  33. Russia did not put the ISS in orbit - what the hell are you talking about?
    1
  34. Money.
    1
  35.  @papalegba6796  Ok chatbot.
    1
  36.  @papalegba6796  Your point? How many accounts do you find it necessary to have? You're really not that bright are you.
    1
  37. "Rogozin is right." Rogozin is a nutcase. This'll be the same Dimitry Rogozin that was personally removed from his position of Director of Roscosmos by Vladimir Putin himself for being a complete liability and an embarrassment to the Russian Federation. Takes some doing that. Rogozin is a notorious troll with zero science and engineering background. For years he has invited condemnation and derision on Russia through his ludicrous claims and constant stream of online bullshit. This is an individual with such pathological and irrational detestation of the west that he makes lunatics like Medvedev look sane and rational in the process. So Dimitry Rogozin claims as part of his far-right ranting and bile spewed over Telegram that the moon landings were faked? Well no shit. "They didn't land." On the contrary, there were nine manned missions to the moon and six landings. It would have been at least ten had it not been for the near catastrophe and aborted landing of Apollo 13 and the premature cancellation of the programme and with it, Apollo 18, 19 and 20. The landing sites were, in chronological order: Theophilus in The Sea of Tranquility; the Head Crater vicinity, Ocean of Storms; the Fra Mauro Formation near Cone Crater; the eastern edge of Mare Imbrium, Hadley Rille; The Descartes Highlands; and the eastern edge of Mare Serenitati in the Taurus Littrow Valley. "There is more evidence that they were nowhere, except in the studio." Except you goons can't even agree where that was - why? because you have no evidence whatsoever beyond the dumb online conspiracy videos that you mindlessly defer to. "VOA=CIA" Does your Mum know that you're on her work laptop without permission?
    1
  38. Bleated the gullible believer in dumb online conspiracy theory.
    1
  39. No - the Apollo moon landings were all fraught with danger and plagued by technical issues which is why no one claimed anything of the sort. I'm assuming you mean the covid vaccinations? Actually, they prevented 14·4 million 95% credible interval deaths from COVID-19 in 185 countries and territories between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 8 2021. Of these, 0.053% had an adverse reaction. In the EU alone, those that suffered a fatal reaction to vaccination represents 0.52% of the 2,169,191that died of coronavirus. Death has occurred at a rate of approximately 5 cases per one million vaccine doses administered. This includes cases of anaphylaxis, a severe type of allergic reaction that can occur after any kind of vaccination. To put this into perspective, there are 120 deaths per million from road accidents per year on all those "safe and effective" highways in the USA. Presumably, you don't drive or allow yourself to be driven then?
    1
  40. Area 51 this time? I thought it was supposed to have been staged in a Hollywood film studio? or was it Shepperton or Pinewood perhaps? But wait, Nevada? what of the Arizona desert? Death Valley? or surely Devon Island Canada? No, no, surely it was Cannon AFB New Mexico? You goons can't even get your stories straight. I guess it depends on which conspiracy theorist you allow yourself to be duped by.
    1
  41. Irrespective of that, odd that an individual with such a pathological detestation of America and the west nonetheless acknowledges the veracity of the Apollo moon landings don't you think?
    1
  42. "the gov't thinks the public are "uninformed" idiots!" In your case, what could possibly have given them that impression?
    1
  43. How interesting. Overwhelming? Fascinating. Would you mind presenting your singular, most irrefutable and unequivocal piece of "overwhelming" evidence that Apollo did not land on the moon? Naturally, it goes without saying that you will be eager to avoid the same old predictable, obligatory, dumb conspiracy theory that has been gullibly consumed and regurgitated over and over and over and over again and dismissed and debunked innumerable times. Clearly you have something original and new to say that isn't a product of ignorance, scientific illiteracy, incredulity, parroted off some grifter or online con artist and without any knowledge whatsoever into the science, technology and history of spaceflight and the Apollo Programme. Excellent. I'm all ears. Go ahead then, let's hear your revelation.
    1
  44.  @marinabasco9280  I could ask you the same question? But to return to my original one, why are you cutting and pasting this rubbish across multiple comments sections. All of it has been dismissed and debunked innumerable times.
    1
  45.  @marinabasco9280  No, it's a comments section. You have someone asking you why you are trolling this cut and paste nonsense all over these videos. If you don't like the response, then don't do it.
    1
  46. Yeah - in particular, entire branches of science, specialist fields of expertise such as aerospace engineering worldwide, Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalists, Nobel Prize winning physicists over 10,000 private capital/enterprise organisations and each of the 76 other space agencies on the planet Righto then. Is it just conceivably possible that they might know slightly more about the subject than an insignificant, random, gullible Dunning Kruger afflicted believer in dumb online conspiracy theory with zero knowledge of the subject whatsoever that doesn't even know that there was supposed to be more than one landing?
    1
  47. "nasa and other agencies (yep european and japanese who are usa bi ch,es sure) u hated it or not only russian can confirm moon landings in 1960-1970" The Apollo landings have been confirmed by India, China and the former Soviet Union/Russia. Also, they took place between 1969 and 1972. And please, could you at the very least attempt to post using coherent written English. "if a russian space chief said no proof that means something is fishy there" What do you mean by "Russian Space Chief"? This is Dmitry Rogozin, a man with a pathological detestation of the west that is such a liability that he was removed from office by Vladimir Putin himself. That takes some doing. "even more looking at all the problems spacex is facing to control the rocket with current technology" Who said rocketry was easy? The Apollo Programme was preceded by multiple rocket failures. If you are referring to Starship, it is a new design which is continually evolving and undergoing ongoing testing and validation. Space X did precisely the same thing with Falcon. "make u wonder how they made it with a 16 bit pc 60 years ago" What does this even mean? Were you to actually be familiar with the design and purpose of the AGC in addition to the Real-Time Computer Complex (RTCC) which was an IBM computing and data processing system at NASA's Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston using IBM System/360 Model 75J mainframes, plus peripheral storage and processing equipment, then you wouldn't be "wondering" or feeling the need to waste your time posting such uninformed garbage.
    1
  48. "Apollo missions were total bullshit" The incontrovertible scientific, independent and third party evidence demonstrates otherwise. "those were ai computers looking at the photos, photos fake!" Why do you goons insist on parroting this? "Oh but the government would never lie to get funding would they?" A government lying to get government funding? You're not that bright are you.
    1
  49. What in particular are you challenging about the contents of this video? Who ACTUALLY believes someone like Dmitry Rogozin?
    1
  50.  @papalegba6796  So is your social security that you claim.
    1