Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "Voice of America" channel.

  1. Concorde was fake because Air France/British Airways can't go back and forth between London and New York at supersonic speeds.
    1
  2. Is this actually a cry for help?
    1
  3. The "problems" that you allude to relate to completely different modern designs and technologies.
    1
  4. The objective evidence.
    1
  5.  @SwiftLikeASamurai  "Many facts pointing to th other side as well." Then you'll have no problem whatsoever presenting your singular most compelling and irrefutable supposed "fact" then that the Apollo moon landings were a hoax. Naturally you'll be keen to avoid the same old obligatory, predictable dumb online conspiracy theory that is consumed and regurgitated ad nauseum by those with zero knowledge of the science, technology and the history of the Apollo Programme and has been debunked over and over and over again. So do you have anything vaguely resembling your own thoughts or observations based upon informed understanding that objectively proves that the Apollo moon landings were faked? Or do you simply have personal incredulity and arguments from ignorance like all the rest. One "fact" please. Go ahead then.
    1
  6. There isn't, so why are you under the impression that the flag was blowing? - other than the fact that dumb online conspiracy theory told you what to think.
    1
  7. Over a third of a ton of moonrock does.
    1
  8.  @salvation4all313  "Correction. Those are earth rocks." And to think, no one noticed. ...Except that entire branch of science called geology. Petrologists, mineralogists, geophysicists and independent analytical laboratories the world over continue to demonstrate otherwise, but lets listen instead to a random, insignificant nobody on the comments section of You Tube. "Don't be duped" Said the gullible believer in dumb online conspiracy theory that allows internet grifters to tell them what to think about a subject they demonstrably have zero knowledge of whatsoever.
    1
  9. No use simply saying it - are you able to actually refute the contents of this video or are you simply another drive-by troll?
    1
  10.  @slbenson5206  So sorry, but to clarify, are you attempting to claim that the near disaster of Apollo 13 was staged to galvanise public interest in a programme that was also supposedly faked?
    1
  11.  @ServantOfTheAlmighty7  Some puerile emojis? Clever lad! Nope. I suggest that you familiarise yourself with the schematics and specifications of the construction.
    1
  12.  @ServantOfTheAlmighty7  Are you familiar with the range of professional help that you can access?
    1
  13.  @eymb8825  Actually - you are technically correct. No human has ever left Earth's atmosphere since the geocorona extends up to 390,000 miles, as tenuous as it may be. Your mission is to spread superstition and archaic nonsense that was never intended to be taken literally. And on the contrary, the joke's very much on you for believing such crap. (Note the apostrophe that you omitted. It's a contraction).
    1
  14. @avestaone-lo3de "And I suggest you familiarize yourself with the Van Allen belt" Which one? There are two, with a third that is transitory. What about them? Let's face it, the only reason that you've actually heard of the belts in the first place is because some online con artist grifting junk conspiracy theory told you what to think about them. if you have a shred of integrity then I'd like you to honestly ask yourself the following questions: 1/ How much do I genuinely know about the Van Allen Belts? - their shape extent and distribution? Energies and intensity? Type of radiation? 2/ What do I actually understand by alpha and beta particle radiation and shielding against it? 3/ What have I understood about the actual structure of the Command Module and the materials that it was fashioned from? 4/ What have I learnt about the trajectories flown by each of the Apollo missions and their passage through the belts? 5/ What do I know about what James Van Allen himself, (and his soviet counterpart Sergei Vernov) had to say about the belts and the Apollo missions? 6/ What have I done to challenge my preconceptions and the claims made by online conspiracy theorists in relation to the VABs? If the answer to these questions is nothing, then obtaining the answers will prevent you from humiliating yourself in the future on a public comments section with no actual prior knowledge about the subject whatsoever. "and the footage of your heroes FAKING distance from Earth from inside your beloved Apollo 11." 'A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon'? Is this serious? You mean footage that had long been publicly and commercially available years before that renowned con artist, liar and grifter Bart Sibrel tampered with it? How gullible does it get? Can I recommend you watch the entire TV transmission rather than the 2 minutes that Sibrel allows the viewer to see. Also listen to the astronauts radio communication during this time, something again Sibrel doesn't allow the viewer to hear. Interestingly, if you can be bothered to view the entire footage (remember, this was available on DVD via Spacecraft films in the late 1990's well before Sibrel release of his claimed "never seen before" footage) you will see the image of earth was filmed through a rectangular window and not the circular window Sibrel claims. You will also note that we can see the entire west coast of America and much of the Pacific Ocean - something not possible for a spacecraft in low earth orbit. And finally, Apollo was easily the brightest object in the sky (bar the Sun and Moon) and if it had remained in low earth orbit for the duration of the mission it would have been observed by thousands - and yet it wasn't. However, what we do have is observations of the spacecraft in cislunar space. The whole low earth orbit claim is demonstrably false. Sibrel harvests stupidity for profit, and you are the target market.
    1
  15. I can assure you it did - as did Intrepid, Antares, Falcon, Orion and Challenger
    1
  16.  @yoskarokuto3553  Said the gullible believer in dumb online conspiracy grifters and extortionists.
    1
  17. What does that have to do with a Programme that originated before his term and is backed by scientific, independent and third-party evidence? Donald Trump "couldn't be trusted and lied about several things", that doesn't mean any of the 500 infrastructure projects initiated under his administration are fake.
    1