Comments by "Ameni0" (@Layde36) on "Emil Cosman" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21.  @bdd2195  well really this is war and these losses were always known to occur during such conditions and love how you westerners never stated any losses from the Ukrainian side as losses are threefold and so high that they are even drafting women into the war by this October as they have ran out of civilians, compare that to the losses by the US during their so called Iraq and Afghanistan invasion which you westerners still support and justify which the losses on the western side over the course of many years piled up on more than thousands while you wiped millions of Iraqis soldiers and civilians and not to mention Vietnam war which the US has suffered significant losses around the same as Russia around 50k also invading North Vietnam and civilians protested against the losses suffered just like Russians are, the war is very similar with the exception of now Russia which will soon win this war with the 300k mobilized troops which had sufficient military training in the past compared to Ukraine throwing civilians onto the front with a few weeks of training which nearly doesn't qualify for an infantryman which they also have to use advanced weaponry requiring further training, western media loves to claim how they fought back Russia while their NATO forces are the ones who secretly pretending as Ukrainians or foreign legion forces lead the offensive against Russia, so it's obvious many of the Ukrainian forces have ran out of men and only fighting with NATO forces who had sufficient training to operate the equipment that Ukrainians fail to use correctly due to lack of training
    1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38.  @awpetersen5909  you claim Russia to do these practices of pushing Russians onto foreign countries yet you won't mention anything about other countries like Britain doing the same as many ethnicities also share British ancestry in Ukraine in the past? Why the double standards then? It's obvious throughout history countries choose to rejoin with various nations as they share similar cultures or with different reasons, claiming Russia is using soft power to exploit other nations while they have better multicultural states together helping Russia progress which the west constantly denies by cutting off Russian contact with foreign countries like Syria or Afghanistan which could have been a direct link for trade relations with Europe which it had a positive relation with like Germany which betrayed it anyways with Sanctions by US, if you westerners can't see the soft power imperialism carried by the US i can't explain much here to change your minds, the US has been doing the same thing with Taiwan which had a good relation with China yet turning it into an enemy against it even if they share cultural relations with, you westerners can't seem to understand that countries share cultural and social relations with each other and willing to join which in this case you could explain about the relations with Ireland and Scotland with the United Kingdom which many still want to leave yet aren't able to, why can't you westerners mention anything about those nations then? It's pretty double standards when you mention about a country's history as them doing something evil while you can't look at your own states which have the same flaws which you don't correct and lecture other states and interfere in their affairs, if you claim Russia is invading under the pretext of liberating ethnicities, then does it make it right to give those who were oppressing those ethnicities more weapons like providing weapons to Neo Nazis like Azovs or Banderites fascists in Ukraine? And make billions off this conflict by corporate lobbyists who are getting richer day by day?
    1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46.  @jedisenpei855  can you cite your sources as to why you think Ukrainian morale is high especially when they have lost majority of their forces at the start of the conflict? Many of the commanders you claim are long gone from the conflict and any losses you claim Russia has suffered Ukraine has suffered even threefold or more, Russia already knows the topography of Ukraine especially when Ukraine formerly was from the Soviet Union and it would be ridiculous to assume they wouldn't know their own land which they were part of the country itself ? Maybe you don't understand the fact that many being mobilized in Russia have former military backgrounds and they aren't just average citizens who are just thrown into the conflict like Ukraine is doing? Ukraine in the first few months of the conflict already had a lower morale than Russia did and were lacking military gear and resources as to rely completely on US and EU as a proxy against Russia, even going as far as to salvage Russian MRE as many of the supplies they had had been poorly made or spoiled due to long hours of trying to hold off Russian military, how using nukes will be bad for Russia whereas it will be bad for literally everyone and all you will be doing is assuring mutual destruction which Russia isn't willing to do unless NATO being directly involved which will be a complete violation of the UN charter, you westerners make it obvious you like to be loud and spout our nonsense which your broader public, so maybe come up with factual information instead of being childish and claiming Ukraine is winning as it's far from touching Donbass let alone dream of reclaiming Crimea with its nazi regime which you westerners love to support Nazis of course
    1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1