Comments by "Ameni0" (@Layde36) on "Emil Cosman" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14.  @LeadLeftLeon  judging by how well advanced the Russian military was in the old USSR days and how even today some European countries like Slovakia or Germany still prefer Soviet Era weaponry with how cheaper and sufficient it is to use than NATO equipment which is expensive due to political reasons in the US and bureaucracy involved overall and production also being very limited as the US chose to have more attention on quality than quantity, Ukraine in all honesty isn't in the same position as Vietnam where they had the topography and geological distance from Russia being closer with contacts from China which also close with Vietnam provide them with reinforcements which gives them sufficient advantage over South Vietnam which still was much further away from the US, Ukraine still has to take weeks if not months to gain newer NATO equipment which Russia targets directly and keeps track of any further intervention from NATO via their foreign legion forces or other NATO personnel establishing bases to train new recruits, Ukraine in this war hasn't been able to gain nearly enough territory as much as Russia did judging by the timeframe it took to finally launch an NATO-assisted offensive after six months of fighting so it's unlikely Ukraine has any advantage over Russia especially when short-sighted victories may boost morale but not understand the long term implications of how the war will go, especially when Russia has already started mobilizing men from former military backgrounds to be trained within weeks which is more than sufficient enough to conduct another offensive against Ukraine, Ukraine even if it does mobilize women in this conflict wouldn't nearly be enough to cover up the losses they suffered in the initial months of this conflict especially when training them and providing them knowledge of how NATO equipment should be operated will take more time than what they have currently
    1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. Ukraine isn't even close to annexing Donbass let alone try to annex other regions and even Crimea which it boldly claims it can annex, it's obvious Russia is conducting fixing operations and letting temporary losses on slide as to prevent Ukraine from contact with Donbass which it's only cowardly managed to shell various areas of Donetsk, the partial mobilization has shown to be continuing and unless Ukraine tries gaining any territory on Donbass which even if has few areas of Donetsk still has a long way to go against Russia which can claim it back with reinforcements and support creating a buffer zone between Ukraine and Donbass, the nuclear threat is obviously towards the west with how any further escalation and interference by Western forces will lead to use of nuclear weapons as NATO has no jurisdiction on foreign soil, as for referendums being tampered with,you people forget the fact that many of those regions have majority of ethnic Russians and few Ukrainian and other ethnic groups so the majority vote isn't going to be fabricated especially with how Ukraine for these past 8 years has been treating the Russian ethnic by censoring their language and replacing Ukrainian as the primary language in schools, warping history of the Soviet Union even if claimed to be evil as according to westerners is still denying history while shelling regions of Donetsk and Lugansk republics, by these factors it's obvious why many would choose to join Russia than stay behind corrupt leaders in Ukraine who have been shown to have offshore bank accounts with the Pandora papers being leaked and various other corruption scandals known locally by the public
    1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44.  @QuentinKLEau  i mean the concept does sound good but has flaws in regards to how it will be conducted especially when privatising everything has shown to be disastrous especially when on the medical sector it should not be about competition especially when it comes to saving lives and any research should be done extensively as to avoid shortening of facilities available for the average citizen, like example in various hospitals especially private ones they provide you with different levels of comfort and how you recover will depend entirely upon the environment you are in, i seen people who barely get a decent sized bed to recover after a surgery and they often are placed in uncomfortable positions as leverage against the families of those affected and force them to pay more as to gain more profits or those cases of vaccines for viruses like Rabies or Polio or even the recent COVID and other terrible diseases which not taken at the earliest is fatal now being expensive enough for people not being able to afford thus many forcibly choosing between being in debts or their lives and the fact the person life is being treated as a price tag in the medical sector and it's the same with any sectors which involves physical labor where you are determined and given basic needs based on your work even water in some hospitals are price taged and really it shows how dangerous and reckless these policies will be if capitalism was applied on the wrong manner with human lives, yes artificial products like with entertainment and other consumption related sectors like food products which don't involve physical or mental human health can be considered under privatisation but also with similar quality management as the FDA does as not to have health effects, but with lives and resources which determines development of an nation should not have corporate elements into it especially when it's dangerous for the people causing civil unrest and wars eventually
    1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1