Comments by "ricardo kowalski" (@ricardokowalski1579) on "PolyMatter"
channel.
-
136
-
96
-
38
-
24
-
24
-
21
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
9:40 buy privileges
And there it is, in a nutshell, the whole case for anarchism
10:30 "shower employees with perks"
This is a HUGE contradiction. No Google employee would consider food, electricity and gas as "perks"
These are perks only in a society SO POOR that it is closer to Orwell's 1984 (see below)
If China is still so poor that food is a "perk"... it means the GDP numbers are fiction.
=========
In practice the needs of the population are always underestimated, with the result that there is
a chronic shortage of half the necessities of life; but this is looked on as an advantage. It is deliberate policy to keep even the favoured groups somewhere near the brink of hardship , because a general state of scarcity increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the distinction between one group and another. By the standards of the early twentieth century, even a member of the Inner Party lives an austere, laborious kind of life. Nevertheless, the few luxuries that he does enjoy his large, well appointed flat, the better texture of his clothes, the better quality of his food and drink and tobacco, his two or three servants, his private motor-car or helicopter-- set him in a different world from a member of the Outer Party , and the members of the Outer Party have a similar advantage in comparison with the submerged masses whom we call 'the proles'.
Title: Nineteen eighty-four
Author: George Orwell
1
-
1
-
1
-
Once again, a collectivist propaganda video. Trying to hide the failings of government intervention and the hubris of central planners.
1- "college" did not break america...GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION broke america.
Universities have existed and contributed positively to the economy and nation, long before government came and enacted "college for all". The blame and responsability falls squarely on the government.
2- college and university is by definition elitist. Any attempt to change that would take away an essential part of a truth seeking institution. I want elites, I want them to be restricted, exclusive and very hard to reach. What I don't want is government colluding, granting privilege, or being captured by elites.
3- 25:50 "different people to do different jobs"
Trying to hide the core issue that "equality" is a scam. We are NOT equal, never were, never will be. Nor is it desirable to obtain equal outcome. And even equality of opportunity may be counterproductive.
The collectivists have used the word "equality" when they always meant "uniformity". And now they are pivoting away from their failings.
4- Why stop the conversation at "college for all"? Why are we not having a discussion about "high school for all"?
Once it is recognized that we need "different people for different jobs"... some of those jobs DO NOT require high school instruction.
Again, all this is because the collectivists are merely running away from large, very public consequences. They are distancing themselves from their failures. They are NOT engaging in a honest, broad, debate of ideas.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1