Comments by "ricardo kowalski" (@ricardokowalski1579) on "PolyMatter" channel.

@omnomnom5359 trust in who? Why would the cpc have a "trust" issue...if they had been achieving their goal of "fast development"? If you believe that total control is not the goal, then we disagree.
1
@omnomnom5359 as I said. If you believe the cpc has "legitimacy" we disagree. And if you also believe it is a function of government to solve the "trust" problem between citizens, we disagree even more.
1
It's so cute when they argue that "private banks" collect the data and run the SCS... while ignoring that ALL business and banks are government controlled and at the CPC's beck and call. It is a communist state, with a communist party...remember?
1
@omnomnom5359 "rightful"? As "god ordained"? Pray do tell, what is the name of the opposition or alternative party that the cpc beat in the last elections? The cpc is the ruler of china, that is a fact. I do not dispute that . I dispute the legitimacy. If you have no interest, then is YOU that should not answer You forget that segregation was law and ordered by the government. Had the government not CREATED segregation, there would be no need to "remove" it
1
@omnomnom5359 legitimacy does not come from keeping enemies contained in a cell, or an island. Legitimacy does not come from external powers. Legitimacy comes from the consent of the ruled. ONLY. Funny how you don't care, yet you answer. Even funnier that you elude questions. Your attempt to confuse "de facto" violent rule with legitimacy has failed. Maybe try again? As I already demonstrated, not only government must not meddle with the problems of "society"... Everytime they meddle they create or make the problems worse. After that liars, such as yourself, pretend that government "ended" segregation...or slavery...or apartheid... When all these "problems" are creation of government.
1
@TheZachary86 besides ad hominem, do you have something to say? Don't talk about ME. Try to talk about what I said.
1
12:57 "no strings attached" JA JA JA JA Pure populist universal basic income propaganda mixed with outright lies Poverty is no longer a problem, we already know what has to be done. (see below) That is why they want to sell it now on "equality". This content is political propaganda, paid by some country that has no friends ===================== What has happened to poverty in the last 20 years? Image result for world poverty reduction last twenty years Correct answer. The proportion of the world's population living in extreme poverty has more than halved in the last 20 years. In fact, rates of extreme poverty have dropped faster than ever before over the last two decades – from 29.5% of the world's population in 1997 to just 9.1% in 2017
1
@jeffbenton6183 Timor already squandered one oil boom. Australia had nothing to do with that. Timor already demonstrated that it does not follow it's own best interest.
1
@jeffbenton6183 Germany's failure in 1933 was not in making a "democracy". They did THAT well enough. They voted and supported inmoral rulers. It was the government the german people wanted. What Germany failed to do (and it is being shown in real time right now) is to become a REPUBLIC. I care not for democracy, much less for "representative" democracy. It is the REPUBLIC what matters.
1
@abcddef2112 yeah... it's something like that.
1
@iamthinking2252_ I do not know about NATIONS not existing. I am talking about democracy being flawed.
1
@jeffbenton6183 a republic doesn't need to be democratic. A republic is a system of institutions that places the law above everything. A democracy is just "american idol", nothing more.
1