Comments by "Kate S" (@KateeAngel) on "Second Thought"
channel.
-
328
-
133
-
90
-
68
-
56
-
55
-
39
-
34
-
28
-
19
-
17
-
Overpopulation is not an issue if only current number of people is taken into account, but it should be number plus growth rate. We would not have an overpopulation problem if number of people was the same, but growth rate was 5 times smaller.
Also, it is not simply overconsumption, it is economic inequality! That is the main problem!
And if you value wild ecosystems and over species and biodiversity, you may actually see, that even if we eradicated overconsumption and inequality totally (which I doubt is possible), and if population growth was zero, then with current number of people and current technology we would still damage wild nature a lot, simply in order to feed and give comfortable life to everyone. I don't know about you, but for me it is unacceptable.
15
-
12
-
10
-
9
-
7
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Current civilization based on capitalism is a giant trash producing machine, we destroy complex ecosystems, which existed longer, than our whole species, to extract resources, which afterwards are made into things, which are used for few years and them discarded, due to planned and perceived obsolescence, and as we see here, even unused working things are often discarded. Most recyclable trash is not recycled, it just accumulates. As a result, on a really large scale of time and space, we function as destroyers, we destroy more than we create.
I recommend reading article by Schramski, 2015, called something like "Rapid discharge of Earth battery..", just type it into Google. It looks into how we destroy potentially usable energy supplies, especially biological ones
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1