Comments by "Trevor Crook" (@user-ft2bt9kw7x) on "Military Summary" channel.

  1.  @benjammin3381 ukraine is destroyed how is that helping ? You want to help you make Ukraine negotiate two years ago . Nato was using Ukraine to try and destroy Russia . They failed
    43
  2. Evil homosexual
    26
  3.  @ProcaviaCapensis-ts8ub Nato attacked Russia using Ukraine as its proxy . Bad move
    22
  4.  @MegaAsmodey the Russians are saving their best troops for Kiev. Those prisoners are kicking ass though
    21
  5.  @redscope897 But the Kherson front was when Russia only had 160,000 troops in Ukraine at the time . Now they have 600,000 and total air dominance . Russia has not declared war on Ukraine this is a limited operation only In a war things would be different . Much more destruction . Ukraine would be flattened
    19
  6.  @eliascharisis9556 Ukraine had 40 million now 18 million . People have fled to avoid the war
    17
  7.  @vrijsenwouter  Virtually all reputable analysts accept Russian sources more likely true than not . That Russia is winning is very obvious
    17
  8.  @duncansmith7576  why would Russia break the Minsk agreement . It was between ukraine and the Donbass regions not Russia ? If Ukraine is of no value to nato militarily why were they in Ukraine and bringing in weapons training the Ukraine army . Nothing you say adds up
    16
  9.  @S1nuDTFY America air to air missile Aim 120 used by all American advanced fighters range 160kms speed Mach 1 RT37 air to air missile used by Russian advanced fighters . Range 400 kms speed Mach 6 Does that look like western weapons are superior ? Next we can compare air defence systems and surface to Surface missiles if you like ? 😁
    12
  10.  @Nothing_to_write0  Russia acts within the Geneva convention . Ukraine breached the Minsk agreement and now suffer the consequences
    12
  11. The patience of Russia is unbelievable with all this provocation
    9
  12.  @Jin-1337  Ukraine breached the Minsk agreement breached the Istanbul treaty . Of course Ukraine is to blame
    8
  13.  @BENDEL420  Russia didn’t attack nuclear facilities
    8
  14.  @user-jg6bd7se8u  If the Russians were occupying the nuclear plant how can they attack it ?😁
    8
  15.  @mikael.wilhelm  Memorandums are not legally binding The fact that German reunification happened, one condition of the agreement that you say never existed, that was concrete evidence that there was a verbal agreement . But only Russia honoured the agreement The declassification of the documentation from that meeting confirms it
    7
  16. ⁠ @dWFnZWVr According to an American general Russia is much stronger now than before the war . The Russian army now has 1.2 million troops expanding to 1.5 million by the middle of 2024 Weapons production has massively increased already replacing weapons lost on the battle fired Also the Russian economy is stronger You fail to see that Russia has not declared full scale war and only had one part mobilisation They have only used 10% to15% of its military power in theSMO Why hasn’t nato entered the war directly if Russia was weaker now . .? What you say doesn’t add up
    7
  17. Russia has the overwhelming advantage in fire power and air power . War is very mathematical and your numbers don’t add up You can say anything but if it’s not true it makes absolutely no difference to the facts on the ground . Like believing you have a million dollars in the bank but you have $ 3.00.
    6
  18. The storm shadows are totally ineffective
    6
  19.  @mikael.wilhelm It was a verbal agreement which was recorded in print . You can read the meeting text online. Verbal agreements are legally binding . Even without an agreement moving towards Russia is a stupid idea and threat to the world Part of the agreement between Russia and the west was that Russia allow Germany to be reunified . German reunification is proof there was an agreement Even when something is in writing it isn’t necessarily legally binding . The Budapest memorandum for instance was not legally binding according to the Americans . Written memorandums are not legally binding. Whereas verbal agreements are BTW . The first ones to breach the Budapest memorandum were the Americans when they breached Ukrainian sovereignty by staging a coup in 2014
    5
  20.  @RobinHarris-nf4yv Russia is losing ? 🤭
    5
  21. Russia doesn’t seem to be doing much in Kursk
    5
  22.  @Daniel-vw7mw  It is a Russo nato war
    5
  23. How much further to the Dneiper ?
    4
  24. Well it’s about time Russia woke up
    4
  25. The Americans only get off the couch when they want a beer or a doughnut
    4
  26. Nato can’t save itself let alone Ukraine
    4
  27.  @michalzajic2555  The Istanbul agreement is established fact . The details of it are online. . The losses of both sides were in the leaked pentagon papers confirmed by Mediazona. Ukraine losses according to the pentagon seven times higher than Russias
    4
  28.  @MegaAsmodey  it was part of the Istanbul peace agreement. There was no major battle in Kiev
    4
  29.  @exyugo made it home safely after achieving nothing
    4
  30.  @andyglastonbury6032 Memorandums are not legally binding . The Budapest memorandum was based on Ukraine being a peaceful neighbour . Which they were obviously not . So Russian invasion can be interpreted as legal
    4
  31. @ Nato will not take one step eastwards . The words are written down in black and white. You can find the documents online These days Nato doesn’t have the manufacturing capacity, raw materials , advanced weapons , tactics or political will to be a serious threat to Russia
    4
  32.  @oconnem1  Deaths of civilians in this conflict very low . 10,000 according to UN. Ukraine should have abided by the Istanbul agreement then know war
    4
  33.  @TheRealBillBob Wagner was supported by Russian artillery and air power and were under the orders of Russia . Without that they wouldn’t have taken Bahkmut . They are just infantry
    3
  34.  @thestealisreal3734 Putin just got voted in . Not dictator . Maybe the west should mind their own business
    3
  35.  @FBugle Political prisoners in America Jan 6 protestors . Persecution of Trump . Assange
    3
  36. So that justifies liras murder ?
    3
  37. Ukraines negotiating position is weaker now than it was a year ago
    3
  38. I think it is obvious that Russia are fighting Nato forces directly . Sheep dipped Nato troops dressed as Ukrainians
    3
  39.  @Valarmorgolis  German reunification is actually concrete evidence that there was an agreement. Russia fulfilled its part of the agreement the west did not Wilhelm brings up that old chestnut the Budapest memorandum which was a written agreement but not legally binding . So Wilhelms claim that only written agreements are legally binding is nonsense Verbal agreements are binding . The fact that half of the agreement was actually carried out ( German reunification ) is evidence that an agreement was not only reached but partially implemented. Wilhelm will never accept this because it destroys his false narrative about Russia being in the wrong . Russiaphobia on full display
    3
  40. The west is truly evil
    3
  41. Russia could have done this two years ago
    3
  42.  @JayBirdal-bs5lz About 70,000 Russia dead . Over 600,000 Ukraine losses . So your number is correct but attributed to the wrong side . Russia was willing to give all the land they had taken back through the Istanbul agreement. So your claims about Russian imperialism is nonsense . Imperialists don’t give land back The Istanbul agreement is established fact its details easily accessible Russian losses were 60,000 according to the leaked Pentagon papers confirmed by Mediazona. Pentagon also said Ukraine losses seven times higher than Russias Michael Zajic
    3
  43.  @michalzajic2555  The Pentagon is my source for the respective losses of both sides . and the details of the Istanbul agreement freely available online
    3
  44.  @atsstaaatsssatss4501  I will tell you the difference . In a war Russia would have taken out the Ukraine leadership . There would have been no foreign politicians or celebs visiting Kiev . All government buildings , all command and control centres , electric grid , telecommunications Water supply , bridges , rail system would have been destroyed . And instead of going in with 200,000 troops Russian would have gone in with 750,000. See the difference to what has actually taken place ?
    3
  45.  @andyglastonbury6032 The main working language in Ukraine is Russian . All major cities Kiev , Odessa were founded by the Russians . Lvov was Polish
    3
  46.  @Daniel-vw7mw if Putin wanted all of Europe he wouldn’t be in Ukraine he would have gone through Belarus straight into Poland . Much easier route. Your claim is nonsense
    3
  47.  @Daniel-vw7mw  Ukraine can Punch back but there will be consequences. Remember Russia is being very restrained in this conflict that could change
    3
  48. The new Argentina president is a fraud . Pro globalist and WEF
    3
  49. What are you basing that view on . .?
    3
  50.  @ussindianapolis487 There is already a no fly zone over Ukraine
    2