Comments by "r baxter" (@rbaxter286) on "Sabine Hossenfelder"
channel.
-
I helped build 3 in the 70s that were YEARS behind and hundreds of millions over budget and situated in an area with a mushrooming population. Oh, and two were on a river that had flow decreases in the summer so they had to cut power ..., all because the project save tens of millions not having to build a new transmission line for them. Guess who has to pick up the $$$$ for the power they have to 'import' because of that screwup?
Oh, oh, and because the utility on two of them ignored their OTHER units, those units got shut down by the NRC for general incompetence and arrogance to regulators. How much more money do you think that utility incompetence cost the rate payers? We'll not discuss their horrendous waste handling practices and the like.
All of this was in a era where a huge talent pool of nuclear construction was present, and YET they couldn't get my 3 plants finished near time and budget NOR could the 2 Georgia Power plants get finished on time or budget, but needed an emergency flare to the industry to dig them out of their hole.
NOW, guess which utility considered itself qualified to build the nuke vendor's LATEST, GREATEST, FASTEST, SHINIEST PLANTS, yet they STILL went $Billiond and many year OVER?!
If you don't have the experience, the industry and the people who got their golden retirements from it will snow you every time with lies, promises, and marketing.
50
-
45
-
43
-
28
-
16
-
12
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
The overruns and slipped schedules will be AT LEAST as bad because, just like every project I've been involved with from nuke plants to smaller ones, the vendors will lie about costs, the what-used-to-be-called AE (architect/engineer) group doing the integration design, the engineers and techs on the site, the craft on the site, and anyone else involved will STILL have the tacit desire to LIE THEIR BUTTS OFF to ensure a long gravy train throughout the entire process. And, I'm talking about Lies of Commission and Lies of Omission.
In case I hear the ole "but why would they lie and jeopardize the project?!?!", I point to VW and the diesel HIGH CRIME, ENRON and it's idiocy, and Siemens and their HUGE bribery scandals. I can include any number of incompetent/looking out for their paycheck US nuclear projects and equipment vendors/AE Firms, too.
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Let Poland be the SOLE update. The 'experts' and 'engineers' are either INCOMPETENT and/or ECONOMICALLY ILLITERATE and/or ...
... SNIFFING OUT A PAYCHECK ... as they have REPEATEDLY DEMONSTRATED OVER MORE THAN 50 YEARS!
AND, GE?! They are the same who designed that execrable containment on their FIRST TRY of the BIG BWRs at Fukushima, too!! That containment was a running sore in the nuclear industry for DECADES with structural flaws and the like.
The US DOE has just CANCELLED an SMR installation, and I don't see ANY small utility being able to support or sustain INTEREST to support the infrastructure for nuclear power, technically and regulatory ..., even with the NRC trying to crawl to their RETIREMENT with JUST ONE MORE series of regulatory jobs.
Small Modular Reactors (spit) will be 'economical' just like the B/S 'advanced reactors' were 'economical' in the US ..., until NOBODY COULD AFFORD THEM except some poor fools here in Georgia. Even the Good Ole Boy ethical cesspit of South Carolina CANCELLED the reactors.
SMRs are just another B/S 'Murican PR and MARKETING Campaign by people who can't make a buck elsewhere.
Nuclear power is back wherever the NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY AND LOBBY ARE STRONGEST AND $$$$.
If you haven't worked IN THE INDUSTRY, you really need to get some 'expert' opinions from people who have the inside info on this that is not particularly 'bright and shiny'. The tech is nifty, but the continued support required and the need to maintain small groups of expert knowledge have ALWAYS been an albatross around utilities' necks. Let's finally put a stake in the heart of the Admiral Rickover Zombie.
You do an excellent, unsurpassed job on Real Science, why don't you practice some of the 'attempted falsification' that makes Real Science so robust by focusing it on this Big Business tech ghoul?! The OLD units may have been mistakenly removed from service, BUT THAT IS NO REASON TO SEW ANOTHER CROP OF NUCLEAR DRAGONS' TEETH TO POISON THE FUTURE!!
2