Comments by "adamnesico" (@adamnesico) on "Knowledgia" channel.

  1. ​@ytrッ That is a lie, other societys showed good feelings and love previously.
    2
  2. @ytrッ of science, yeah. Of love... Suffice to say, the almogaver, the antecesor of the conquistador, was created by the andalusis.
    2
  3. @ytrッ to Laura??? What means? Most developed humans 1000 years ago were the chinese. Their amount of slaves was far lower than in Ummah, they had better tech... they could had started the industrial revolution if they would had wanted.
    2
  4. @ytrッ not the majority, there were more scientists in the house of wisdom if Bagdad. Is a insult to them that u forget them.
    2
  5. Shameless liar, muslim too behaved as inquisition. In dact they don’t need it becsuse its already in their mind.
    2
  6. What did u smoke?
    2
  7.  @muhamadthemotorcityfarmer6016  sadly, yes.
    2
  8. It could had been worse. For many native americans was.
    2
  9. Spread by the sword, yes like Islam. Difference: Christianity spread peacefully the first 350 years. Islam spread peacefully only for how much? 12 years?
    2
  10. 1 we dont, they are diverse, some hace fair skin, others are very dark. 2 first european farmers came from Anatolia. Therr you hace why.
    2
  11. Feel the pain you inflight to others.
    2
  12. You lie. Muslims enable dimma.
    2
  13. A lie.
    2
  14.  @alialammar7080  Israel has created techs enjoyed by all world.
    2
  15. Another liar.
    2
  16.  @small_mak6942  Again you only compare you with who is worse than you. What a mediocre way of think.
    2
  17.  @small_mak6942  And that askekez are the mist common jew proves that in fact were they prospered more was between europeans.
    2
  18. ​ @MalikAbdullah1325 yes, it came by sword. Today is fastest breeding religion.
    2
  19.  @Omarrah3214 to be honest, turks has the same broad genic composition as europeans.
    2
  20. No, this is no proof, when you study deeper you see that both sides ended behaving the same, ths video doesn’t show the almohads, who tried to wipe the other religions in Iberia. If you must lie yourselvesfor be proud, then ur pride is based in lies.
    2
  21. @ytrッ Read the muqqadimah.
    2
  22.  @sazescalar  yes, unlike you, christians dont kill apostates anymore. That makes you now the most intolerant faith.
    2
  23. Not for 700 years. Never was a full dominion.
    2
  24.  @youwhat491  according to you god is an ego later who needs the abyect submission of minions. No surprise all your rulers are capricious arrogant tyrants who think they gave the right of do whatever they desire.
    2
  25. Liar
    2
  26. You did all those things, so why do you blame?
    2
  27.  @chefar  Better? In what? In fanaticism?
    2
  28. Im sure you wont say th same aabout the fall of all the cities conquered by Temur. For you, as long as the land remain muslim, any bloodbath is permisible.
    2
  29. Yeah, wich was ending, Both Ibn Battuta and Ibn Khaldoun saw the last years of splendour be4 fully enter in stagnation.
    2
  30. LIAR Any chinese king was more tolerant. And christians and muslims behaved the same, after 450 years of dominnance, dhimmis out.
    2
  31. Liar, the first thing muslims did is to eliminate every other eligion in Hejaz. A lot of other people were religiously more tolerant. You are so terrible that for feel better you compare yourselves only with who are worse than you.
    2
  32. For example?
    2
  33. Like you did, and you don’t care, hypocryte.
    2
  34. What makes hou think that? And how reliable?
    2
  35. You have no shame. Readd the article of jews and Sudan, nad th eone of the preacher alMughaili. They were directly killed, not even tried to convert them.
    2
  36. And without Europe arabs would be still cleaning ur poo with the hand, bathing with sand instead of water, sending their kids to the dines for not die of cholerae killing pilgrims for eat, and having no idea how their wife looks.
    2
  37. And olive was present here from ancient times, and europeans didn’t lesrned to bath from u, u, endogamic sand hick.
    2
  38. You are wrong, christians fought each other as much or even more. For the 1212 battle wich defeated the muslims, king of Castille had to ask the pope fir a truce so whoever didn’t joined the crusade wouldn’t atrack the others. And still the truce wasn’t respected, after the crusade they had to defend against the ones who were invading them.
    2
  39. Liar, they forced them to convert. You never speak of ur own crimes, you lack sense of guilt.
    2
  40. United Ummah? It was never united.
    2
  41. So, you praise colonialism when its done by your people. Hypocrite.
    2
  42.  @youwhat491  countries belong to their inhabitants, hypocrytical desert supremacist who forbids other people to inhabit his lands but is always eager to invade others.
    2
  43. The elites were foreigner colonizers. Arabs and berbers weren’t native. They had actively worked for destroy natives culture. Tell me, how nany centuries will take you 4 accept the israelis as the true lords of Jerusalem?
    2
  44.  @mathiassunyenetto3818  don’t generalise. Umayads only mixed in the end. The first 2 centuries they were proud of their racisl supreamcy and never married iberian women. Many taifa dinasties too proudly identified as non iberian. There was a clear difference if sides, one was native, the other had a foreign culture brought by colonialism and lead mostly by a colonial foreign elite.
    2
  45. There was a golden age. Of course a medieval culture had medieval brutality.
    2
  46.  @T.m513  you are saying only the viewpoint of the natives. Andalusis lived better than europeans, their society was mire developed. For them it was a golden age. If course, colonized people didn’t were benefited.
    2
  47.  @T.m513  18th century? Where u got that? Wich ideas in common? Do you have idea of slavery in other nations? China had few slaves, unlike in Islam, slavery wasn’t a fundament of their society, enslavers weren’t praised and there weren’t slave markets. At least as i know. NO. Not like a wife. A man could kill his slave and face no punishment.
    2
  48.  @T.m513  Executed fir kill a slave? historical examples? I know examples, although certainly those were either monarchs or a man kissing the ass of a prophet.
    2
  49.  @T.m513  thats not true. All muslim rilers used chastrated slaves in the harems. Egypt had a big population and imported slaves. Neither there was population shortage in Magreb. India too had its own slave commerce, and not just for the army, too sex slaves, and others taken as war spoils. Far better? Enough to say, europeans learned chattel plantation slavery from the muslims.
    2
  50.  @T.m513  a hadith says a man killed a slave becase she sooke bad about Muhammad. Mujammad aproved. I don’t remember the siurce for next: Abd el Rahman 3 order to kill a slave just hecause she gave hum a bad eyesight wgen she ordered her to sexually serve him. And Mulay Ismail killed slaves just for relax when he was angry. You haven’t said me any historical example of a man killed for kill his slave.
    2