Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Liberal Hivemind" channel.

  1.  @1216jimmyz  You're absolutely correct. But I would say that the guy has never been a serious athlete of any kind. He wrestled in gym glass, no doubt. But that absolutely does not make him an expert of any kind whatsoever. His "testimony" is idiotic. He's a Dunning Kruger "unskilled and unaware" Credentialed Woke Scientist. He's also a Credentialed Woke Athlete. If you get my drift.
    5
  2.  @TCB690  It's him. He's had plastic surgery many times over the decades since he was cultivated like a mushroom in college.
    5
  3.  @megamus3  The Young Turks was a "progressive" political movement that started late in the Ottoman Empire's history before Germany persuaded it to attack the British during WWI. The Young Turks was ideologically similar to the French Jacobins before the Jacobins organized the "anarchists" that sparked the French Revolution. He's not an Islamist. He's just not that bright. And there are lots of Marxist professors in the US that pursue the same ideas, namely that "concentrations of wealth" are corrupting the US that would otherwise be a "workers' paradise".' The thing is that US Progressives are the ones that created the "New Deal" system of rent extraction with abusive taxes, massive Federal agencies, insane regulatory regimes that come from agreements with Communist regimes around the world, and the whole 9 years, so to speak. If US Progressives got their start by stating that they would "fight for the oppressed workers" by restoring Constitutional liberty of the past (pre FDR) then they would be MAGA. But almost all of them are indoctrinated idiots that are inculcated to think that by following leftist BS that they are "enlightened" or in today's parlance, "woke".
    5
  4.  @PrincessPebbles0_0  Specific citations would be more helpful than that. If she's a journalist she has to allow people to unpack their arguments. And WRT DeSantis, I disagree with his decision to run against Trump but a lot of people thought it was delusional for Trump and his supporters to think he would defeat each Jack Smith indictment. I knew he could because I knew that each one was bogus. But I also didn't think that the DOJ and the cult in power would go all the way to SCOTUS to argue that the DOJ is the final arbiter on accusations against a President who is protected by Constitutional prerogative power. US Presidents have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution and tort claims pertaining to official acts. Obama could not have been arrested for droning that US Citizen. Nor could be be sued. But the family could definitely sue the US government. But according to US DOJ oral arguments to SCOTUS it is "DOJ experts" that must approve of this garbage and or decide when, how and who to prosecute. This is insane. IOW, a pragmatic person could have been forgiven if they thought that Trump's third campaign would just indirectly elect Kamala Harris. As far as "J6" there are almost no legitimate cases against them. The unlawful acts recorded on video all have clear defense strategies. IMO, none of them should have gotten sentenced to prison for even a day and the way they allowed Congress to release prejudicial video snippets should have also led to every felony case getting thrown out. But hearing other arguments is what journalists are supposed to do. It's possible she crossed the line but I'd like to see specifically where you think that happened. If call someone with an otherwise good reputation a sellout you have to bring more than leftwing agitprop tropes with you. She's no Jen Psaki.
    5
  5. Another way to put that is that it's only stating the obvious.
    5
  6.  @johnhughes5281  The other choice would be to give him a psych counseling session and point out his need to reconcile his claims with objective reality. IOW, he does apparently need it.
    5
  7.  @shinigamimiroku3723  Bingo. It's about time people started to understand more precisely what exactly is happening these days and the true origins.
    5
  8.  @TheOriginalFishPond  It's an arbitrary labeling paradigm. It "can't be..." in accordance with "the rules". But "classification" rules are often modified. Counting how many continents we have on this planet runs in to similar problems.
    5
  9.  @derekcostello1016  It's always been like that. The original "right wing" accusation was against Nazis (they were clearly "right wing" Marxists). Now, worse than Nazism (or conflated with) is equal application of the law and due process. Critical thinking leads to these outcomes because "The Patriarchy" made up "rules" to trick the public in to following their "racist" rules like thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not covert thy neighbor and so forth. Plus the Patriarchy put itself in charge of things like court procedures and so forth, all designed to make themselves rich and trick poor people in to working as "wage slaves" under penalty of prison and so forth and they act like there is a moral judge that created the universe that gave them all of these rules. And because this has been going on for so long the case studies don't matter because it's just a "fact" that The Patriarchy and "Rich People" have totally unearned (inherited) power and instead of protecting property and power they should go around sharing their things and making sure nobody is hungry as The Patriarchy says they're supposed to do but do not. So, just because you have a fuzzy story about a black martyr doesn't mean The Patriarchy is not at fault. What I just gave you is Cenk's form of thinking but in a much more coherent explanation that he could ever muster. Dude.
    5
  10.  @laymansview5246  Attacking a Senator that betrays their constituents is against MAGA and for totalitarianism? You sound just like a Jacobin Progressive.
    5
  11. The only rights that are never lost are due process rights. But those rights are situational.
    5
  12. ​ @dl7509 Unreliable? Enemy action.
    5
  13.  @bugwar5545  Recognize snark.
    5
  14. @The13thRonin Dude, no. This entered the "corporate" realm under FDR. They are basically coerced by legal duties pertaining to DC regulations and fiduciary duty arguments that are presented to their Boards that are "inclusive" of "stake holders" and so forth and what happens is that even if all the Board Members realize they're getting pressured illegally it is legal and rational to cave in because as a practical matter the US government can "regulate" and sue them out of business completely and therefore fighting a losing battle goes against their fiduciary duties to the shareholders. Why do you think Elon Musk drives them insane? First he defied the pressures to unionize US auto manufacturing at Tesla. Even in California. Second, he bought Twitter and used his unfiltered opinions to sort of lash out at what he is slowly discovering. IOW, his Critical Thinking in social matters and politics was stunted by too much exposure to Hollywood and Silly Con Valley. Trump is an exception to the rule as well and you can decide on your own why his life experiences prepared him to stand up to this Marxist cult. Most cave. BTW, even that real estate crisis taht magically bloomed for Obama was set up by DOJ "organic" lawsuits and consent decrees pertaining to "red lines" and statistical disparities for "disenfranchised" people that don't own their own residences. Do you actually think that the banks want to be regulated? LOL. This all happened under FDR's New Deal where he was going to save society from the "chaos" of economic liberty under the rule of law. The embedded Fabian Marxists have had the upper hand since then. What's new since Clinton is that the Marxists expected more Communism from Bill, not less. They were pissed at Bill by the time his second term had ended. They actually pinned their hopes on Hillary radicalizing the White House. She tried. But anyway, it's normal to have 2 terms of a Republican after two term of a Democrat. So they had that phase ready. The WTC attacks were something every Communist dreams about. Every global war is the next likely "international workers' revolution". They worked Bush over with "nation building" programs on the one hand and "war criminal" accusations on the other. Obama appeared as a Magic Nee Grow (it's a literary trope) at just the right time and he also had a radical, angry Marxist spouse. Even though Hillary's campaign of 2008 was planned since Clinton's first win, the cult pivoted to Obama for obvious reasons and decided to put Hillary in as the third consecutive Marxist Presidential term. You have no idea how and why Trump triggered them. People still don't get it. Trump was proof that their entire "arc of history" Fabian Marxist scheme was delusional. Trump is Hitler not because he's anything like Hitler other than the fact that Hitler loudly opposed Soviet Vanguard Party Communism in Germany. Even Reagan, fighting the Soviets, did not crush the CCP. Trump threatened to extinguish the true Vanguard Party and the DNC Marxist cabals all in one term. Hence, COVID.
    5
  15.  @deadnorth8648  Tide Pods?
    5
  16. I've never trusted any particular person or party. Trust is an earned thing. But I have never, ever voted for a Democratic Party politician. Having said that, I also accept a version of the "pendulum theory" in that you can't have one party rule even if you consistently identify that party as clearly superior. You have to give each new generation and chance to learn from their mistakes and also to show each new generation why the other party should rule for at least half the time. The US Constitution itself leads to a government that should not rely on having the very best in power. The strength of the USA is it's vast power developed through the cooperation of free market commerce and charitable works. But the longer term trends make me less tolerant of the evil US Democratic Party. I didn't favor Obama over McCain but neither did I favor McCain. I didn't bother to vote. And I'm glad that I didn't. But what I noticed about the Obama era was that almost right away they had people murmuring about "Tea Party racist". And then in 2009, less than a year in, I heard from Jimmy Carter's own mouth the idea that the Tea Party doesn't mind Obama's policies (like socialized medicine scams!) so much as that fact that they're latent southern racists. So I started paying more attention and I realized that these people are not well-intentioned fools. They're evil parasitic liars. Obama himself is just going along with it because that's how he was groomed to think. I don't even think Obama is the worst among them. Hillary is the most evil of the past 30 years. Although Biden might be worse, we just don't have all of the evidence to make comparisons of the various Mafia crime families to see which one really is the worst of the worst. But the point is that although I've always been highly skeptical of people that make specious claims, even while I was still in grade school, over time I have noticed that these people are, just as I have said, harboring parasitic Marxist depravity in a cult like fashion in order to seek power and be in a position to parse out "social justice" in exactly the same fashion as Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro and so forth. They are in the most prosperous nation on earth and they never found a way to simply be successful by their own standards and joined with the cult of blame shifters that tell stories to explain away "the rigged system of Capitalism" and how they have the magic solutions. They know that they're lying but this is OK because they are telling the truth about how much hatred is in their hearts for the people taht they envy and want to destroy. The example of "Get Trump" is just a crescendo in the same mode of operation they have used for each generation. I did not want to come to the conclusion. Everyone in my family defends Democratic Party politicians and only my elder brother is willing to denounce the crooked policies and actions. But even then he just admits to me here and there that I have been right all along. The "Twitter Files" was the very first time he actually brought it up to me and basically said you've been right all along.
    5
  17.  @utley  LOL. An LM video, eh? You're a big fan otherwise. Is that right?
    5
  18. Blatantly. Nobody really knows how many in total are stolen by the party of OC.
    5
  19.  @DemocracyOfficer2485  You think they're wrong because you have a pulse. You're a bot alright.
    4
  20.  @monkeygraborange  Forgiveness is something that happens in good faith relations. Not public relations and not in bad faith politics.
    4
  21.  @hellscornalien8286  Canadians should try to vote for joining the USA under the US Constitution. It's not the craziest idea, if you think about it. You guys still have a king. And your legislature can order anything based on a simple majority vote because you have no judiciary to protect you and even in Britain there is the theory that the king is consulted on legislation and can sound the alarm if he disagrees. The British monarch means nothing to Canadians. You have all of the worst aspects of the British political system without the same sense of "tradition and stability" that should keep the Trudeaus and similar Marxist demagogues out of power.
    4
  22.  @MrMajikman1  She followed the Bush "Texas Progressive" plan.
    4
  23. Here is the actual answer, and it's not a good one. Critical Theory Marxism invaded our academies decades ago. The original academics were primarily German Communists fleeing from the emerging Nazi movement but they weren't ready to stroll over to Stalin's Russia. Lots of people of that time (and today) still think Marx was a freaking genius. What they want to figure out is what "phase of history" we are in and how to overcome the problems faced by earlier movements. But they fail to understand uncertainty theory. Or put another way, they accept dogmatic beliefs on imaginary "scientific" conclusions. Mostly these are built on dogmatic views of Darwin's theories. If I finish a primer on what you need to know it would be too long to post here. But basically you need to know where "science denier" and Marxist "othering" and so forth come from. They truly believe that anyone that disagrees with them is suffering from Cognitive Dissonance in part because they're told they have Woke Science and everyone else as deleterious mind mutations or Oppressor mutations in their gene/meme history. Any opinion is a bias unless cleansed by Sociology or Political Sciences. So you then have to fully understand Marxist Trigger/Dog Whistle theory. It means no humans can understand reality unless fully vetted by Settled Science. Think about all of the stupid nonsense you've heard about Climate Change and Fauci's take on The Science and you understand that it all comes from the same place in the minds of corrupted atheist demagogues.
    4
  24.  @eugenetswong  Canada has the same (Soviet Communist) problem that California has. Most American patriots in Canada support MAGA just as US Citizens do. They want America to be the land of the free. It's not rare for the US to lead the way, as you well know.
    4
  25.  @patrickancona1193  I've been to "hills" in Hawaii but hillbillies?
    4
  26.  @debanydoombringer1385  You have no idea what you're talking about and you don't even understand what "legal rights" means. To the extent that you think it's "standard" that might be true but that doesn't make it legal.
    4
  27.  @Bunnahabhain18  Cite the document with direct quotes and page references.
    4
  28. @nate4923 The problem with that theory is that you have no idea, apparently, how to critically analyze the required texts. I never paid any freaking attention to their spoken rhetoric. They're almost all blithering idiots. I would refer to the texts and then respond to that. It helps if they can't ever intimidate you as a student. You easily see them more realistically. And when you say "using politics" what you mean is that socialization has been politicized in our schools. How do you think that happened? Go back further and read the theories of the original supporters of "public education" and who they cited for "wisdom". Going back to your original sentence, you are correct that THEY do not bring politics in to class. The people ruling over the republic did that. They are in a sense just as much victims of all of this stupidity as their students are.
    4
  29.  @prodigalpriest  Yeah, but Our Scientific Democracy cherishes his service to the Progressive status quo.
    4
  30.  @DirtyDudes66  Pardoned for what?
    4
  31.  @jamesgolding1485  You're the clever one here, eh?
    4
  32.  @mb9326  The truth of your simple comment is critical to understand before trying to figure out any Demon Rat politician or sycophant.
    4
  33.  @fett_420  Correct. The problem with the FBI is that they are responsible for "state security" and "Federal law enforcement". For state (national) security they don't need to follow any due process norms, but, this also means that judges are not supposed to allow the evidence gathered to be used in criminal prosecutions. The FBI over time has decided that they can mix and match these rules as needed. So in terms of prioritizing national security they are supposed to get the facts and deprioritize prosecution. But here they just bypass all due process protections and then talk then in to pleading guilty. It's blatantly unconstitutional but also SNAFUBAR. But what is really new is unofficially treating "right wing" voters as "national security threat" just by simple association. They're lawless Stalinists now. The idea was that sometimes you have to employ a little Stalinism to beat Stalin. Now the idea is you have to employ a little Stalinism to beat Trump and any threat to the ruling regime of "The Deep State" and the party that they protect (basically Demon Rats and RINOs to create this story of a "two party system"). Norms and stuff.
    4
  34. If you actually get people signed up to attend they will pay for it, yes. It has to be deemed effective at "reeducation" AKA fomenting dissatisfaction with "status quo Capitalism". Or "patriarchy" or "bigotry" or some other BS label.
    4
  35.  @hmartin751  False dilemma.
    4
  36.  @Bunnahabhain18  Revisit elementary school.
    4
  37.  @mortem-tyrannis  You're talking to one of those Special People.
    4
  38.  @vitovitale8325  Due process rights are situational. Once granted US Citizenship you must make the case that it should be stripped and then she or he can be deported. The same goes for a Permanent Resident status.
    4
  39.  @Thomas.3698  Our Democracy has Our Rules of the Law. Bro. Rulz n lawz, man.
    4
  40. Yeah, it's stupid. No rights are absolute in the sense that you can still get dragged in to court. But the burden of proof is on the others to show how their rights or prerogatives win the lawsuit. On the other hand, the 2nd Amendment is the most emphatically "absolute" in the sense that there's no "due process" wiggle room. For example, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause..." Not: "...shall not be infringed".
    4
  41.  @IHFM2024  Wrong wrong wrong! How about all caps? WRONG!
    4
  42.  @BootsOfConcrete  Plus the video being discussed was up many hours ago. LOL.
    4
  43. Because he rhetorically defends Catholicism. They loved his dystopian Mad Max stuff. And even in Lethal Weapon they loved when he palled around with his socialist costar. Once he made Passion of the Christ they wanted to put him right up their next to Jesus.
    4
  44.  @jakeroper1096  How are they not conservative? There's nothing more conservative then jamming up Congress so that no bills can be sent to the Senate or the White House.
    4
  45. ​ @jasonbarnett7747 Better than yours.
    4
  46.  @markiskool  Worse is if he used "guilty" in any claim of some finding.
    4
  47.  @iamaronman  The US founders probably had in mind Martin Luther, the Peace of Westphalia, the Church of England and the Cromwell-led AKA First English Civil War. But they were also aware of the abusive monarchy in France and the oppositional factions. But today we talk about "the separation of church and state" as if it's taken verbatim from the Constitution and it's not. It's an analogy. But the other point is that having a "faith" in something is not "religiosity". It used to be taht people could talk about disagreement in faith and religion and just agree to disagree, but not always. It's politicized religions that were defended with arms. The doctrine of "separation between church and state" can be inferred directly from the words of the Biblical Gospels. This doctrine is not at all anti-Christian or antitheist. It's anti-coercion. It's freedom of thought. Before Jesus you have what Marxists call a "nation building project". As atheists they think it's illegitimate just because it's ipso facto fraudulent. But if you follow the texts the coercion and politics in Judea ended with the call to "go in to all the world and teach..." And "always be prepared to give a reason". Most of what people teach about Christianity is wrong. American colonialists were skeptical, but not stupid antitheists.
    3
  48.  @matthewwilliams9028  The US government needs "boosting"? It's already full of boosters. Who do you think already collects all of the taxes? And what do you think "go green" means? They want all of the green, for sure.
    3
  49. @ Total True History, bro!
    3
  50.  @snex000  LOL. Did you see him play or not? Was there a surcharge for the sermon nobody has been told about yet?
    3