Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Liberal Hivemind" channel.

  1.  @ozballa  What country were you born in? Americans don't use terms like "prove innocence in front of a judge". Are you French or Italian?
    3
  2.  @italianmiltyfriedman6264  We already have Federalism. What you're talking about is Progressivism at the Federal level.
    3
  3. People only think that he's smart because, first, that's what they are told, and second, when comics say stupid things that make us laugh we want to think that we're laughing because we have a shared truth of some kind. That's the entire story about Bill Maher. It's not that hard to understand if you consider what I wrote and realize that you can build a career on snark that makes the audience feel superior without really saying anything intelligent.
    3
  4.  @kaizokujimbei143  Exactly.
    3
  5. Economic determinism comes from Karl Marx and his Critical Theory simps.
    3
  6. What really matters to you is nomenclature and symbols. The Nazis had different symbols and so forth but the Italian Fascists were the same kind of "nationalist socialists" that the Germans Nazis were. Their policies were only slightly different because they held colonies in Africa and were not that fearful about getting drained economically by French war reparations under the Treaty of Versailles.
    3
  7.  @RacconCity  Their "Rules For Radicals" bible admits to the same exact thing.
    3
  8.  @SamtheBravesFan  What are the parallels from history?
    3
  9.  @wc3617  He implied that Biden would get let off by the jury, not that he would employ an innocent by reason of mental defect defense. Like Comey, he used defense counsel doctrines in his report and explanations. It's just a verbose version of Comey's No Reasonable Prosecutor trope.
    3
  10.  @MotivatedMan  Remember Kammy's Venn diagrams? It's possible to belong to more than one circle/category. Being a "political opponent" is not a license to commit any treason or atrocity.
    3
  11.  @twm4259  Did you vote for Hillary, Joe and Kammy? You think and write like a typical leftist.
    3
  12.  @super0pickles  So what? He's the only one raging. If we can help people with rational responses and explanations to this cult of sociopaths that seems like a helpful thing and a good reason "why".
    3
  13.  @jenniferandrews8449  They're referencing the Soviet law against Our Democracy. It's not your democracy or your republic. It belongs to them, they strongly imply.
    3
  14. @@keylara4135 They only look for rhetoric that persuades them emotionally that you're on the "right side of history" (meaning the Jacobin-anarchist/Marxist side) or you're "Oppressor" (class).
    3
  15. In government there are no shareholders to vote to send someone in to check. So when someone quits or dies they keep the checks flowing and they get redirected.
    3
  16.  @f87115  Grok tries to sound like me. And if that's the sound in your head while reading what I wrote I suggest spending more time with the dictionaries.
    3
  17.  @melissamurray8307  As a kid I would have said that it's all stupid. I definitely would have said I don't know about these fools because their history is not written but I noticed early on that all Democratic Party Presidents were notorious aholes except for Truman and JFK. When I first heard about FDR I was like, that dude panicked like a mofo and I guess the public was terrified as well. I learned about FDR the same year I heard about War of the Worlds radio show panic. And I sort of thought that technological progress is always a good thing but sometimes the public isn't ready for something new. And I knew that leftists hated Reagan for his attacks on the Soviet Union. I knew instantly what a great man he was. So I just thought all "political discussions" in school in California were idiotic. My parents had a lot of very smart friends and they never discussed politics. So I didn't think the world was full of idiots, just the schools. That's where I was wrong. The world or at least "The West" is now full of freaking idiots. But the kids don't usually follow the parents' or teachers' lead unless forced. They don't GAF. The "Political Identity Group" families are paranoid as hell and those kids are terrorized but I never knew anyone like that as a kid.
    3
  18. Not "law" but Constitutional Amendment. I can write it myself. Because it must have a clearly enforceable standard and an enforcement paradigm. So a few bullet points for national "integrity" standards and how it is enforced (by States with Federal oversight) and an explicit right to petition Federal judges in an expeditionous manner to order forensic audits. And outlaw all nonpaper ballots. And require fingerprints associated with the IDs and imprinted on each ballot with specific ink and paper requirements. Just the lies alone about these completely unlawful (from the perective of FISMA) digial ballot systems, from the client hardware to the way they are networked, tells me that these criminals have never had any intention of allowing any audits. That's the lesson they got from Gore's mendacious crusade to "cure" ballots in Florida while blaming "Republicans" for "stealing the election" from him. They get worse by the day. And it didn't start with Gore's loss, actually. But we'll just limit that conversation for now.
    3
  19.  @Sheriffryewhiskey  So, your point is that it's difficult to get admitted in court?
    3
  20.  @ABD-pc3jf  That relies on a plain reading of the US Constitution.
    3
  21.  @shelbysittig1047  Divided government is not supposed to be "of one (hive) mind".
    3
  22. ​ @AA21-J Find a sponsor to move you to Cuba or China.
    3
  23.  @Man-vs-Metal  Our goals must obviously be realistic. But what the OP suggests is turn those goals on US Citizens first when US Citizens are paying for it.
    3
  24.  @trumpy9223  You obviously never had anything like an ordinary high school education. Unless you live in California or Vermont.
    3
  25.  @b00g3rs21  A more effective communicator than Larry Elder? Broh...good luck with that.
    3
  26. Wibipedia ​ @ShiroColdkeyesTheHedgehog 
    3
  27.  @solorollo9756  That belief came from the idea that "democracies" must have central economic plans to deal with competition from the "fascist" central planners. And fascists also held elections. So, lots of false dilemmas from these hive-minders.
    3
  28.  @jasonbarnett7747  Is this a tort court?
    3
  29.  @cantdance9786  Shifty eyes. He's nervous. He has the mind and paranoia of a criminal worried that he's going to get caught. The video eventually reveals why he's so nervous.
    3
  30. He read from a script.
    3
  31.  @Libertad59  A trope is very similar to the concept of Dawkins's "meme" theory. Except that the word predates the Materialists' need to explain their worldview. So, a trope would be something that authors might discuss when writing or critiquing a film, article or play. Tropes are considered useful for telling stories as long as the audience doesn't interpret it as a stereotype. A stereotype is a trope that overtly communicates that "communities" alluded to are all very similar with little variation. Similar to how the sound received in your left versus right ears is almost identical yet there are tiny, irrelevant differences only to let you know about position, not differences between one "hippy" and another. So, having a typical "hippy" in your story might or might not be stereotyping but it would definitely be a "hippy" trope. You're not really trying to discuss the details of your character as a specific, individual thing. Agitprop tropes appeal to all sort of fallacious presumptions. Marxists are dogmatic atheists and think they are Masters of Science because all of their beliefs are based on this presumed mastery as evidenced by their "knowledge" pertaining to zero gods. Science Denier is a very common and idiotic agitation propaganda trope. It's not a question, challenge or debate. It's an IFF (Identify Friend or Foe) label. Notice there's no room to argue with them. You have to come completely to their side just to prove you have a 3 digit IQ, according to their dogmatic worldview. Your disagreement with them in their feeble minds signals to "Science" that they won the debate and that you are incorrigible or a lying Capitalist. Possibly both. By the way, it originally meant something communicated that is figurative rather than precise and realistic.
    3
  32.  @redhed9776  Adam followed as well.
    3
  33.  @megamus3  Oh yeah. It was a serious "question". Do you pray to Xi or Joe?
    3
  34.  @jaodasilva7993  Buzz words are derived from jargon that should have meaning but are used rhetorically to demonstrate that the propagator is in the know or what have you. Fascism isn't really a buzzword. It's an agitprop trope with the specific intent of "demonizing" rivals for power. In the beginning it was just an allusion to (ancient) Roman greatness that they suggest is derived from unifying behind the dictator. No dictator, no fascism. Marx himself suggested that the exact opposite thing would happen. That the "working slaves" would overcome the Capitalist class and it would just be a more or less binary class war. Lenin and Stalin created "soviet" Communism which means rule by (woke) councils and the Soviet Communists (including China) always have a freaking dictator that makes Mussolini seem benign by comparison. The first "woke" dictator was actually Napoleon. Marx's class war was a slight modification and simplification of Jacobin political philosophy that reduced the French Jacobin "Three Estate" paradigm (The ancient regime aka monarchy plus the institutional church oppressing the disenfranchised "Third Estate") down to a global 2-class war analytical paradigm (Capitalist vs Wage Slaves and now Oppressor vs. Oppressed).
    3
  35.  @warzshadow9701  They don't take a position because they're easily confused and turn away. It's not that they don't care. It's that they feel they have no influence or hope to understand. Some democracy we have, eh?
    3
  36.  @hillbillypb1522  He was possibly allowed near some big telescopes at some point. Again, that's not "science". Not even "the scientific method" that they want to claim ownership of.
    3
  37. She thinks Critical Theory victicrat stories are "Social Science". That's what she was told.
    3
  38.  @ak_getright9905  But also alludes to light patterns and even any unexplained "forces" that affect the witnesses or their instruments/sensors. "Alien spaceships" is always the least logical theory. Always.
    3
  39.  @biohazard4995  Who is Fod?
    3
  40. Did Chuckles imply that tariffs are going to drive GE to move all production to China? Because of some Capitalist Conspiracy? WTF?
    2
  41.  @michaelzell5905  What isn't the metaphorical currency of a "dying empire" since according to certain theories all empires are continually expanding and expiring since the entire universe is doing just that?
    2
  42.  @Dr.Gainzzz  That's true only because the US middle class is unlike any other for the simple reason that the US Constitution protects everyone's property and due process rights. The rich/poor dichotomy is true everywhere only to the extent that there are people with power everywhere and underneath them people without any political power at all. The middle class is a third choice between king and peasant. Under the British system there was an actual "landed" class that basically came from inheritance of lands granted originally by the monarchy. So the "Landed Gentry" could be regarded as "Middle Class" because they don't have the king's wealth but their not poor. But generally people assigned "Landed Gentry" to the same class as the monarchy except taht they were not of the royal family itself. But the middle class as a term evolved from people who were not landed gentry but neither were they peasants. This in theory represents the entire US population because nobody has land grants from any monarch. And we don't have any peasants that have no property rights. For the US system the Marxists decided to have a "scientific" way to create these categories as "proof" that the US is not a classless society. They use economic data and arbitrarily decided that the lowest percentage of citizens in terms of income were "poor" and then they constantly make up garbage about who is rich and who is not poor but not rich. Nor to US "Political Scientists" distinguish between rich SJW's like Pelosi (she's just SJW class) and "Fat Cats" like Trump that are "Capitalists" and "not woke". India is much, much more complicated. You have a lot of clans and traditions about who can do what and who can even associate with one another. That's not conducive to the creation of a national "middle class". In the French Jacobin political paradigm they are mostly "Third Estate" (same idea as Third World) and these factions are often fighting each other. The connected rich people consider them Untermensch but unlike the German Nazis they don't consider their underclass to be dangerous. But if the USA had the same total population we would always produce many times more engineers and professionals because most Indians are not of the "class" that can even go to engineering and law schools and so forth. India is also "exceptional" in that sense. IOW, you can't just toss about these "social science" tropes and make informed comments about what it's like there. I hear that the disenfranchised classes are managing to get some to the schools but how would I know to what extent that is true? What I do know is that the last nation we should help to "develop" is any nation that refuses to even consider holding elections because the workers are regarded as chattel. Communists hold more slaves now than the US Democratic Party ever did. Why would we help the regime get richer so they can afford to enslave even more people? How is this different than "Industrialists" that help Germany rebuild after WWI and now have their names smeared because of WWII? I think helping the CCP is far worse than helping the German Nazis. Of course it all changed when the Germans sunk some of our ships, a clear act of war. But people are so stupid emotionally about all of these things. The traitors are the ones that sit around fighting over trivia while the CCP has US corporations building "hi tech" factories over there. Worse are the ones that put programs in to place to ensure that our energy prices go up and China has even lower energy prices as a result. And programs to force Americans to buy Chinese electric cars and so forth. It's so freaking obvious. Why would anyone give any thought to what's happening with India when China stole most of the jobs their fighting over. Deal with the CCP first. And completely. Then stop worrying about India or any other "democracy" that is struggling to develop economically.
    2
  43. LOL. The CBC still wants more DEI. No way!
    2
  44.  @DEPORTER_SUPPORTER  Who are you supposed to be replying to, 'bot?
    2
  45. Right. He hates Biden. Wow.
    2
  46. This is what Trump was Impeached for investigating. The Trump Impeachment was in fact a criminal conspiracy to obstruct the investigation in to this Biden (and Clinton, and Obama, etc.) criminal enterprise.
    2
  47.  @jefferyindorf699  I've heard that plain English is racist. Very racist. They say.
    2
  48. The Strategic Oil Reserves problem is superficial relative to the actual agenda. The Communists in the USA and China have been trying to destroy US manufacturing since long before Trump pointed out that Romney was wrong about Russia as the "...number one geopolitical foe." They slowly used "Deep State" agencies, including the EPA, to ramp up "regulatory arbitrage" (costs differences in various nations) and then played directly with energy arbitrage first by scaring Western leftists about using "fossil fuels" at all and then by getting involved in Venezuela and Iranian politics in order to get Western nations to "embargo" so that the international markets would funnel cheap energy towards Chinese manufacturers that are all owned according to Lenin and Mussolini's socialist "Corporatist" economic model. With no "bill of rights" the CCP doesn't have to follow any "due process" to seize whatever profits or control that it wants at any given time. They do allow "profiteering" to the extent that it keeps the charade going. But the CCP's motive is not "profit" but building an unchallenged dominance, a virtual monopoly, on all important manufacturing for the entire world. And of course this also requires an unchallenged military dominance for the time when some "liberal democracy" like the USA realizes what it let Clinton, Obama and Biden do in the name of "post Communist" era where all foreign policy is evaluated based on a nation's position vis-à-vis the "Global War on Terror" and "with us or against us". China is "against terrorism". Bush let them do what they wanted to do. And China started positioning itself to became the main beneficiary of all the Middle Eastern political chaos. And then Obama came along and slowly got "woke" with respect to who "the real terrorists" are. Bitter clingers and so forth. IOW, by the time Trump came along all leftist "thought leaders" understood that Trump was leading a new kind of Reactionary Capitalist White Supremacist Terror Movement" of the radical left's imagination. There's no such thing as "global capitalism". Marxism is all about rants against property rights in light of the "woke" view that all religions are nothing more than mendacious political systems that use fake morals arguments to shame people in to complying with the property rights regimes of "power". The problem is that property rights have never been the same from one nation to the other. Especially once fossil fuels became such a major factor. No monarch ever exploited control over mineral wealth in the USA to keep for himself and pass on to cronies. The same goes with productive farmlands. And yet we're supposed to be the worst "capitalists" based only on stupid Marxist "disparity" stories. Marxism has zero legitimacy in the USA and yet the USA is basically, according to all leftwing storytellers for at least 100 years, is the chief "root cause of multigenerational poverty". The most effective stories rhetorically all center around slavery. But that only works because it's supposed to symbolize "...how capitalism really works" by making workers "wage slaves". Marxists call contrary evidence "false consciousness". The whole thing is so easy to debunk that it's scary how few politicians are sounding the alarm. They must not care enough and think it's OK to follow the Social Justice Arc of History because they expect to be on all of those new Social Justice Councils that control everything.
    2
  49.  @user-cg7dg7uv8f  His cognitive dissonance is rooted in the fact that he believes that cognitive dissonance and "acceptance" are all that there is and that he just chose a team to run with as he "evolved" in to adulthood. And his team is losing. Destroying itself.
    2
  50.  @zoefree3950  You are dead on. The thing is that it used to be that everyone understood the role of comics and their "commentary".
    2