Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Business Basics" channel.

  1. You guys have to get over these "war" risk tropes where you're trying to see if Henry V would dare to march against Charles I d'Albret. The goal of every Marxist regime is to both trigger chaos and confusion and at the same time look for revolutionaries to topple all regimes or governments taht fail to submit to what Lenin called the (Communist) Vanguard Party. WRT CCP goals in "war" (some overt use of their military) is to "defend its rights" as if to carry on with these fictional stories of colonial oppression and deprivation (including Taiwan's existence) and the entire "South China Sea" as well. These all represent "deprivation" casus belli stories. They don't have to win any war or battle in order to win increased hegemony and recognition over their bogus claims. They want control over the entire South Chine Sea and submission from Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and so forth. You think the US made up "Domino Theory"? LOL. The part that they've already achieved is that they have loyal factions in nearly every Western democracy on the planet that don't even try to hide the fact that they think China can do anything that it wants to until it achieves "equity" with respect to Gross Domestic Production per capita with the USA. This means that in theory their macroeconomy can grow 4 times what the US reports before anyone can ask them to knock off the slavery and the predatory espionage and so forth. They can't not afford to change their tactics unless they decide to abandon Leninism (single party rule by Communist "councils" and a supreme leader). The most precarious thing about the CCP is the numbers. They're "successful" only for a small elite group and the masses must be kept tightly in check. One false move and the people of China itself will throw out the Communist regime.
    1
  2. This has been obvious since Obama's last year in office. Trump upset the Communists and made them even more fearful of the US. This is why the Communists immediately joined leftists around the world to attack Trump's Presidency with all of the political corruption they could muster. They've been donating to the Clintons since the 1990s and there were helpful in Hillary's Presidential campaign including all of the agitprop against Trump before and after Trump won. Until today, actually. But in terms of "geopolitics" all Marxist regimes rely on total control of their populations and "means of production". When "central plans" start to fall short they must have fallback plans to boost economic output and, just as importantly, reduce hegemony of rivals. The end goal is one consolidated "means of productions" under "Communist Vanguard Party" control. This is what Lenin described as "New Economic Policy" shortly after he found he needed to explain to all of the Russian revolutionaries why Communist Utopian would not immediately follow their total political control over Russia. But anyway, every overtly and covertly "Marxist" regime since then (this includes any regime that sees "evolutionary theory" as requiring regimes to get bigger and bigger through consolidation with eventually only one global regime left as ruler) has used military expansionism to control land and energy resources to fill in dips in GDP growth. But again, the critical thing is not to "get rich" or "compete". They have to maintain the facade of "progress" while at the same time making sure that they only ever rise in hegemony and putting rivals out of business. China wants Taiwan for this reason but this is only because they are a juicy target nearby and the near-term goal is to establish sovereignty over international waters as "exclusive economic zones" for China. They want to defend the "South China Sea" as if this is just a fact through international law that it belongs to China. This is far more important than taking direct political control over Taiwan. If they make war on Taiwan and everything goes well, they will take as much as they can. But the real plan is to create a casus belli that is repeated throughout the global institutions start a big war, and then withdraw in the name of peace, but they will not give up control over these international waters that they have already claimed.
    1
  3. Still won't say.
    1
  4.  @-.-Monster  Well, duh. Capitalism must be deleted, dude.
    1
  5.  @sushi_wolf  You found some debris from a Big Mac Meal?
    1
  6.  @sushi_wolf  But, Capitalism. Amiright?
    1
  7.  @-.-Monster  There's a certain class of people (two classes, actually) that love all of this destruction. They imagine themselves to be rising because of it, in relative terms.
    1
  8.  @kyle6781  Normally, cokeheads worry about their supply. Unless they're also drug kingpins that stash it throughout their hideouts. So it's not really lost. It's waiting to be used.
    1
  9.  @ph8599  "People's Republic" is code for Communist State.
    1
  10. No, you're wrong. They hate each other. Period. They never married. Every attempt to show 'unity' is actually pragmatic only. They don't even hate the USA. They envy any wealthy nation. Russia overcame totalitarian Marxism. The CCP got worse as it became the de facto vanguard party. If you think Putin doesn't understand that...I don't know what to say from here.
    1
  11. There's only one nation, one party, actually, that benefits from the slow destruction of Russia. Do any of you clowns know which party that is? All of the childish warmongering comments are pathetic. Even John Bolton has gone over the edge of clear-minded sanity.
    1
  12.  @PranicEnergy  That's not the only thing that screwed Europe on energy supplies/costs. They're in even worse trouble than that because they're the ones that started this idea about outlawing internal combustion engines. Japan will win that round, which is OK with me because US auto manufacturers were bound to fail since they were the first "woke" corporations since the 1950s.
    1
  13.  @damocles8417  Great. Did you figure out what "navy air force" means yet?
    1
  14.  @damocles8417  The OP was talking about Taiwan. And even the USA has naval air forces. As you already admitted.
    1
  15. Europe is full of dirty players and has been since long before Putin was born. It's never really been stable since the French Revolution.
    1
  16. In any venue that suggests it operates in accordance with "law" (and that includes treaties) there is something called clean hands doctrine. Nobody has clean hands here. Triggering a NATO response would be insane. It's already involved too much with all of the stupid provocative talk. If Joe Biden still had his brain functioning (not sure he ever did) then he would be the first one to blame here.
    1
  17.  @noname72390  This is closer to WWII than to WWI. Other than the weapons involved. IT's paranoia all around and slow boil provocations brought us here, still without many people realizing who benefits from all of these provocations and weapons launched, not to mention death and destruction.
    1
  18. ​ @TheEasternCat  In what way is that? The CCP is a collection of sovereign "united states" living under a written Constitution with an independent Supreme Court? Who knew?
    1
  19.  @jorgelouis709  I think people really don't understand "invasion" threats. It's not NATO that threatens Russia. It's all Marxist politicians in power. Marxist theory suggests that only one regime can win in the end. For Marxists the world is like Mad Max's Thunderdome on a global scale. Every Western power has Marxists influencing foreign policy to some degree or another. China doesn't even really want to occupy Taiwan, never mind any other nation that doesn't even speak any Chinese languages. What they want is enough domination to ensure that they're rule is never threatened and that nobody can ever say no to the CCP regime when they want something like natural resources, control of ports and so forth. Not many Westerners understand what Putin is all about. He saw the failures of Communist political paradigms and he doesn't want modern Russia to go down the same path as the Soviet version. Putin inherited quite a mess.
    1
  20.  @fabp.2114  That dude is on drugs. They don't even want to invade the Americas. They want political control over the USA. They already control every leftwing political party and "liberation movement" in the world.
    1
  21. Thank Biden for what?
    1
  22. As Communist espionage goes this case is pretty tame. I suppose this is supposed to convince US Citizen's that the FBI is totally on it as the CCP transfers terabytes of engineering data out of the USA on a daily or even hourly basis.
    1
  23.  @kith00000  More stupid tropes. Was WWII fought to "meddle"? Fighting in every country? LOL. For sure the cult that runs DC has gone off the rails but the programs were put in place to end WWII. And unfortunately FDR thought Stalin made a great partner for that project all while colleges were slowly taken over by deluded Marxists. And you only ever hear about "meddling" and not when we ladle out funds on an annual basis. The theme song at the UN is "Money, that's what I want". Was the creation and support of the UN considered "meddling" back then? How about now? The US does have many "meddling" politicians and bureaucrats but my answer to that is "just say no".
    1
  24.  @McSlapped  Try drug rehab.
    1
  25.  @stevebriggs9399  They don't believe in "rights" at all. "Rights" ideologies come from the premise that there are rules to determine who is righteous in a given conflict. Without some organizing doctrines there are only powers and prerogatives. Even in Europe under "Christendom" righteousness was only considered spiritual and in cases of conflicts between those of the same class. We now call this tort law. The king had powers and his accusations could not be taken lightly. The "rights" discourse in terms of legality started to come in to play when some of the king's close allies asked for rules when the king levied an accusation against them. This early charter took a long time to evolve in to the notion that all people living under a righteous governor should also have areas that could not be infringed without justification. So, you're right but it's far more extreme than simply rejecting rights of individuals that make up the masses of workers and peasants and so forth. And by the way, Communists are exactly the same. Communism and China got along well until too many people realized that it's just another hypocritical emperor with a new story.
    1
  26.  @V1brationCanine  It's getting that way. Socialists in the West don't believe in rights either. They're getting more and more like the most desperate Marxists.
    1
  27. Communist expansionist regimes are expansionist by definition. So the question is, is the CCP inherently expansionist? LOL. These planned "attacks" have been underway for decades. Actually, the "revolution" was never deemed complete. They're Communists. Does anyone understand what that means?
    1
  28.  @henli-rw5dw  They lied quite a bit about Covid and many other things. They lie by omission as well. Marxists start off by declaring everything but Communism to be illegitimate and based on lies. So they are merely "defending the people" collectively in accordance with this dogmatic belief system.
    1
  29.  @mfndjdjdjdh  They portray Marxist regimes as morally righteous. Not "powerful".
    1
  30.  @mcredwolf925  Everything is political according to some. You don't understand your own lexicon. And if you want to know what I'm talking about you need to read the entire comment that you're apparently replying to. At that stage you might come up with an intelligent question. Political means pertaining to the polity or "governed domain". Everything "effects politics" in some way. So your comment/question is quite stupid given that I clearly responded with an explanation of my view that did not require any agreement on what "political" actually means.
    1
  31.  @TomReitano  I think what Putin is figuring out is that Stalin was not too bright. It was apparently Stalin's decision to give nuclear weapons to the CCP. If not for that the world would be very different today. Putin is not "afraid" of NATO. He's afraid of the CCP that is encircling Russia.
    1
  32. Clinton and the British Parliament were deluded at that time and some of the things they set in motion are still causing disasters they won't accept blame for.
    1
  33. They did not kick "America's ass". They demoralized our troops (who should not have been subjected to a draft) and the hippies demoralized each other and made a bunch of trouble. And LBJ should never have sent troops there to engage directly militarily. But Vietnam did defend their sovereign homeland quite effectively and that's a good thing for Westphalian sovereignty that the "world order" is supposed to be based on. Without it the UN is just a puppet show.
    1
  34.  @grampsstories  What "Russian interference" are you alluding to?
    1
  35.  @darkriku12  You don't make any sense. At all. The issue is how conflicts are resolved. "Corporate mindset" is just gibberish since there is no such thing except in the minds of people that take the language and precepts of Freudian psychology and try to take their "personal truth" feelings and convert them in to facts about the entire world.
    1
  36.  @darkriku12  So, you don't see any significant differences and therefore your testimony is worse than useless. Any and all human institutions have the human factor involved. Bravo. MBA-style mindset. LOL.
    1
  37.  @servant-of-cats  You're talking about "for profit" corporations that are for making profits? I'm pretty sure we all know about this.
    1
  38.  @RayBlazar  No, it's not. Only leftist Marxists in the West get triggered by Russia contending with Ukraine over borders. The CCP is the king troublemaker since the Soviet Union dissolved itself and held elections.
    1
  39.  @RayBlazar  Russia is threatening to match the escalations from the Euroloons and leftist American regimes.
    1
  40.  @AHusBandWifEO  Every Western power has at least half of its "democratic" leaders employing "Social Darwinist" doctrines. You know, progress comes from "selective pressures" and "survival of the fittest". So, therefore, war is good for progress (is what many believe and say only in off the record comments).
    1
  41.  @Chess_and_Universe_Astronomy  It seems like India has a growing neo-Marxist wing.
    1
  42.  @mdogdope  We still have elections, in theory. So things can change back to the proven policies. The so called "petro dollar" was destroyed intentionally from inside DC.
    1
  43. Half of DC is MCGA.
    1
  44.  @animejanai4657  The CCP has more control over US elections than the US Democratic Party on its own. All of the "dirty hands" actors are country level social justice criminals. But the US Citizens don't come up with these schemes. They don't decide who will run for office in the US Democratic Party. The first US President they fully controlled was Bill Clinton. Obama thought he followed "International Consensus" but doesn't understand who controls that. The handlers that controlled Obama now control Biden and all of the bureaucrats loyal to this "Social Justice Arc of History" (Fabian Communist) agenda.
    1
  45.  @marloncebo242  Planned pandemic. But that was more like a Hail Mary pass. This time they want to take control of the "South China Sea" not to get Biden elected again but before anyone can replace him. The irony here is that if they attack before Biden is gone they will take everything that they need for the next 20 years. At least according to their own planners.
    1
  46. Right. But people don't seem to understand what the Russian Communists began to do between the first Russian revolution and second and how they responded to the end of WWI. Do you realize how many "Islamic terrorists" went to college in Soviet Russia? So, many Islamists believe more or less that the critiques of "Westernism" are valid and at the same time they think that the Communists are "useful idiots" of the Islamists while Communists believe the reverse theory. That is why OBL was our good friend when he fought the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan while at the same time, when suitable, he targeted enemies of the Communists as well. And used Marxist Critical Theory dogmas to justify his actions. All in the language of what we call "Liberation Theology" when it springs up in the Western world. OBL also rejected his own Saudi government once it shunned him to defend the Saudi Kingdom from Kuwait. He saw this as a "lack of faith" and an insult to OBL's own bona fides. If you need arms to liberate yourself from any nation that holds real elections you might want to question your own beliefs before you start useless wars. Especially if you never even once try to negotiate with lawmakers and voters over whatever your dispute is. But your bottom line point is critically important. All of these "liberation" and "terror" movements favor the CCP now. They used to be skillfully cultivated and directed by Russian Communists. The CCP while pretending to embrace "free trade" stealthily took over all of it. On every continent although the CCP and Mao were always masters of Communism in Asia not counting the eastern side of Russia.
    1
  47.  @snowdroog1  You need to spend more time with a proper dictionary. OTOH, as a typical "whataboutist" Marxist, you've achieved your aim here. The one valid point is that you are correct that the Marxists did goad the US in to failed "nation building" paradigms.
    1
  48.  @CrusterfunkShenanigans  Nothing in the material world is infinite. Time is infinite but our exploitation of it is not. And time is not material. We use laws of "material" to measure relative time. And only a Prog equates military expenditures with escalation of resistance/defense when our military is already more effective than Russia's and China's combined. And we don't even have to counter them in "world war" scenarios. Our "decline" is purely from malice and stupidity of our own pseudo "patriotic" leaders. And Russia will never work in lockstep with China for the sake of Chinese hegemony. The war in Ukraine is about Russian containment of China. China accepts it because China still expects to gain control over what remains of Ukraine and Russia keeps control over its gains. And just about every nation that holds elections wants us to keep China contained and with its very weak navy. Marxist traitors are embedded everywhere so that conversations get difficult to follow if you have no real idea what you're talking about.
    1
  49.  @ТарасМакаренко-ф3ш  Money is not freedom in China. Money is not freedom under Communism.
    1
  50.  @RobertoChavez5-j3o  Who are you replying to?
    1