General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Forbes Breaking News
comments
Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.
Previous
4
Next
...
All
@23520Mimi You're totally ignorant of the law.
3
@Deltron6060 No, we have not done what Russia is doing. That's not true at all. Although we should occupy and demilitarize a zone of up to several miles deep in to Mexico of the southern border. And then if Mexico steps up (after all of the crying) and takes their own border security seriously we can allow them to move in to run their side of that border. And the reason European borders are so unstable is because they don't have stable political systems. The most stable is the British islands. Islands. Not one historical monarchy has really taken a clean break from authoritarianism of the past from a time when authoritarian monarchs were pretty much the only thing possible for any "prince of the realm" or stable sovereignty. Leftism is not in conflict with authoritarian rule. They want to create new authoritarian regimes to replace the historical monarchies and "received culture" institutions. All of Europe is stuck in false dilemmas about how to "modernize" in accordance with the Jacobin Marxist cultists. They do not believe in rule-of-law democracies (which be necessity means you have a republic with a clearly enforceable written constitution).
3
@robyoung-pl1gq And you are, what?
3
@georginamoreno345 How old are you?
3
@Shei-vei That's why rulings require a majority from the panel. That's why there are 9.
3
@PeachysMom Bootstrapping fallacies born of nothing more than fallacious social theories.
3
@MrDuane-lr8dm It's called preponderance of evidence. They're supposed to weigh the complainant/petitioner's theory against the respondent's on equal terms. Do you see anything missing from "the norms" or not?
3
@millroyboy07 Which "it" did "he" admit to?
3
@somekindaguy2184 What exactly do you think "government employee(s)" means?
3
@edwhite7475 Treason is already a capital crime. Everything on the list is either protected by the Bill of Rights or already outlawed but not enforced. It's not "corporations" or "lobbyists" that destroy the rule of law. The gold standard is not "anything that I feel is against Communism". It's the rule of law. Communism destroys all property rights and all legal rights that are used to protect your private property and freedom. Recognizing more precisely how our Constitution was created and why and then defending those principles that seek to protect and continuously improve liberty under the rule of law automatically keeps Communists out. Communism is the utter destruction of all individual legal rights. Everything is politicized. Anything can be ruled "against the law" if it conflicts with their "from each, to each" policies and verdicts. You see that this is already how they act. It's just that our legal rights are still defensible. They're not going to be persuaded by emotional appeals. Ed White's list is already part of the Communist agenda. What replaces all of this is known as the Administrate state. The Administrative state is the legal side of what is known colloquially as the Deep State. Under FDR it is State Department doctrines that began to creep in to the massive projects for domestic economic recovery. Which is to say that all legal rights were put on the back burner for the sake of this or that or the other thing. Creating new "emergencies" like Climate Change and Covid shutdown panics is what keeps that ball rolling. The end game is having total control over elections so that those too are mere puppet shows. Patriots need to take control of elections from school boards to the White House under the rule of law. Purge all lawless actors. It's a daily thing. But first learn how it works and how it is supposed to work. Review what it was like between the Civil War and WWII. That's the only way to clearly understand what the Communists have done so far and how to beat them.
3
What does top Jewish leader mean? Just about can be classified as "Jew".
3
@Rickmon01 Equity means unified government power under the Soviet system.
3
@Rafeusmaximus "...when democrats speak their eyes are GLUED to a script."
3
@kippwieland6464 I'll make it really simple. People cross borders illegally for two reasons. First is for "social spending" arbitrage. Second is for some kind of militant revolutionary objective. Sometimes one or the other and very often to exploit both. Drug couriers and human traffickers also sometimes cross illegally but they are just transporting contraband and don't try to engage in domestic politics of any kind, usually. Sometimes Marxist lawyers "guide" individuals that combine all 3.
3
@redandre5964 Those "minor reforms" are based on the agenda and the implied value system of the Communist Manifesto. Marxists do not believe in individual rights. Period. Neither does the party of slavery.
3
@Texasirishboy Not new. Just forever in evolution.
3
@gtb2009b Learn what, clown?
3
@diannbrown7665 He volunteered to defend the Constitution, sociopath.
2
@cherylmcnutt9905 What kind of stupid question is that?
2
@Yaqeen2013 Yeah, we need to run the place based on your delusions.
2
@mrrey8937 Democracy doesn't mean anything other than the basic concept of citizen rule. These assholes think "democracy" needs special mob leaders. They're literal mobsters. But they use "woke" language on the theory that "Social Darwinism" created these "political conundrums" that they can't ever explain.
2
@jackielobin7100 What white nationalism? What does that even mean?
2
@randalgc Why is confidence in a Trump victory delusional?
2
Wrong.
2
@maxstrongCW For example? And have you been to college yet?
2
@maxstrongCW Nor you.
2
@maxstrongCW Make your point honestly of you can.
2
@christianlibertarian5488 The problem is that these controversies are entirely worldview based. These US Progressives still see "blacks" as "victims" of slavery that they are responsible for. But because they think Evolutionary Theory is some "special science" that only "woke" can understand and "manage" that they should be allowed to make up all of these supposed solutions. Even the term "Affirmative Action" is abused. It comes originally from a Presidential memo and meant "don't be exclusionary" in looking at Federal employees and applicants for employment. The "outcomes data" was used in mendacious lawsuits and somehow AA came to stand for racial quotas. Even "diversity" came to stand for using outcomes data as "proof" of alleged corruption of "the system" as if they are looking at farm animals and "equity" in "distribution". They dehumanize everyone. Even themselves. They have what I call a low view of humanity. IOW, they expect so little of themselves and others. They have no confidence in their own abilities and hold even lower views of anyone that disagrees with them. Life today is so easy that they can hide behind these problems and then use these cult-like dogmas to defend whatever station in life they've arrived at. And then retreat in ignorance.
2
@ucalledmecrazy2 All Congress has to do is defund the DC office and each new US AG gets to rehire all of their own FD HQ staff. And max tenure for any "management" level officer should be 4 years. The field offices will fall in line before the new law even takes effect. They'll know who the short timers are. And on top of that State AGs run the IGs (therefore, more like State Internal Affairs investigators) for Federal field offices. It's so simply, really. Everyone is fooled by the inertia of history. Very few people look at this problem without thinking that Marx was right and that we just need more Marxist socialism. The DNC cult keeps doubling down on "New Deal" Marxism.
2
CRT is a religion. Period.
2
@joseph_bunnyman318 Bless Communists for what, exactly?
2
@joseph_bunnyman318 You're a typical dogmatic loon. What evidence do you have to support your circular claims? Zero. Industrialize means exactly what it says. It's not "code" for increasing GDP metrics. I know exactly who has "industrialized" what and why. The actual history is not that difficult to understand and it contradicts everything that Marx wrote. Marx's "historical materialism" stories all made certain assumptions about cognitive dissonance from the very beginning. British and Dutch royal charters were "models of capitalist exploitation" that "scientifically" predicted what "economic disparity" would do on increasing levels. Actual industrialization did the exact opposite. The so-called class war was totally imagined. You won't comment further because you don't know how to make rational, verifiable claims. All of your "Reasoning" is based on doctrinaire lunacy. You're welcome.
2
@joseph_bunnyman318 LOL. Give me an example of Communist industrialization. Like in Russia or China. You don't even know how to cite a region that your "books" talk about. It doesn't matter if you regard "books" as "factional" or not. If a book does not make verifiable claims then why bother? Just keep reading Star Wars and kooky leftwing tripe to inspire you. It's just that thinking people won't take you seriously. And hopefully kooks like you won't get paid by taxpayer-funded schools to push your delusions on a captive audience like K-12 students. For Communists progress is about death of monarchy and death of their real and imagined adversaries. They pick up the leftovers and take credit for any "gain" or trend upwards of the craters that they create. It's just pseudoscientific Jacobinism. And even more childish than that.
2
@joseph_bunnyman318 LOL. You did not mention any sources whatsoever.
2
@joseph_bunnyman318 The 5 Year Plan. Which one? First man in "space". Communism didn't build that. The US and the Soviets both were racing to be "first" in rockets and basically spy satellites. This was all built on technology taken from Nazi Germany. Without Mao, what? Oh please. That's a religious belief. Mao's "great leaps" were, basically, about genocide. You don't really know anything that's true. Also, Russia was never "Third World" and that is a term you also totally fail to understand. Third World, according to modern Jacobins, is the modern corollary to the French Third Estate under the French "ancient regime". First World correlates to "industrialization under Capitalism" and Second World is "industrialized under Communism (or socialism)". These are silly paradigms that can perhaps form the beginning of an explanation for understanding major currents in the history of political controversies and how certain demagogues motivated their followers to achieve political power and "success" under the cult's new value system and analytical paradigms derived from this new value system. Basically, you're a sucker for fairy tales. You memorize chapter titles but don't understand the actual claims nor strength of the evidence and arguments for those views and dogmatic claims. (Still no sources mentioned. At all.)
2
China tells me that that question is racist.
2
@ericdunlap494 Name the police that died and the official cause of death.
2
Energy independence is critical but we still have to keep the oceans safe for safe freight transport.
2
SCOTUS should have been limiting their power since the beginning. The Proggy Justices empowered these Agencies (since FDR) for the same reason they protected chattel slavery.
2
@Logan91S Sometimes "word salad" is a mendacious trope that reflects the idiocy of the commentary rather than the target.
2
@thechiefwildhorse4651 What makes any land yours?
2
@GM6.7 They impeached Trump for no valid reason. Twice. Congress should be pressured every day to impeach both of those morons for good cause. When they don't they can accept the results at the polls. But if we just "aw shucks" the whole thing they'll get away with these insane double standards where you can't blame corrupt criminal Demon Rats for anything at all.
2
Diversity used to mean overcoming racialism. Now it means cultivating and directing it.
2
Maryjane Rodriguez What assistance is being denied, specifically? You mean the ones Brandon left behind in Afghanistan? You people are precious. Aren't you.
2
@handleyourface Yeah, but based on precedent alone nobody takes this oath seriously. If they do it's because they have already determined that they don't want to behave like treasonous liars in any case. And also, just by promoting the doctrine or meme that "MAGA" aka "bitter clingers" aka "Capitalist Oppressors" aka "White Supremacists" or "Patriarchy" and so forth as "de facto enemies" you can justify anything these Communists have been doing for darn near 100 years. All pretending to defend "The Constitution" of their imagination.
2
Two cents to rub together. That's all you have.
2
@wysetech2000 Citation needed.
2
@gcolnr Psycho, who made you Omniscient Political Science Expositor?
2
@MischellU Stop lying. Nobody is as ignorant as you pretend to be.
2
@lilzabug Why did you vote for Trump if you claim he's a liar?
2
Previous
4
Next
...
All