Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1.  @beecnul8r  You all knew. LOL. You live in a fantasyland.
    4
  2.  @mattstarf4294  Um, are you supposed to be a sane person?
    4
  3.  @LaurieLT88  Machiavellian actors do that all the time.
    4
  4.  @davidbaker1918  You're an endless fallacy generator. Does it pay well?
    4
  5.  @davidbaker1918  More fallacies. So, China has no "democracy" nor "rule of law". Did you know that or not? Japan has "democracy" and functioning courts even if they haven't "evolved politically" the way you want them to. If you think the FBI is "only doing what the actual Constitution allows them to" then you obviously have absolute no idea how the Bill of Right works nor the Constitutional framework that must be followed for ANY "government" institution to claim to operate legally. All "governing" powers come directly from the US Constitution. If you claim that the FBI is actually fully within the law then the burden of proof is in fact on anyone that makes such a claim. The President's powers are frame by the US Constitution and if you claim Trump acted unlawfully the burden of proof is on you unless you have a specific example with a legitimate explanation for how you think he exceeded his Constitutional powers. And any time the Federal government accuses a siting President of violating the law the proofs must be very high indeed because the Constitution protects elected officials with a buffer of "due process" called Impeachment and Conviction (removal). "...you don't think Trump should be above the law do you?" Can you even debunk ANY of your own fallacies? I've actually refuted and debunked every single claim that you've made.
    4
  6. FDR's New Deal, WWII and Cold War is pretty much when it happened and few people were alarmed or even thought too hard about how close FDR was to Stalin and how much they both disliked Churchill. By the time this was being discussed they figured out that smearing McCarthy in crazy ways would make critics look crazy. Dogmatic materialists always get suckered by Marxist "realism" on "wealth distribution" and so forth and they took over the teachers unions and colleges. They have a lock on K-12 as you see being discussed to this very day. Critical Race Theory starts off by accepting decades of Marxist "criticism" as "facts of disparity" and then maps "racial divisions" to the dogmatic Marxist "class war" claims between the so-called (global) bourgeois and global workers (or "Third Estate" as the French Jacobins formulated the previous socialist scheme). That's what US voters allowed. And pretty much how they were indoctrinated. Anyway, the so called "Deep State" (a term activelly used during the Cold War by US State Department as applied to "developing democracies" around the world including Turkey, Japan and so forth) is what the media during FDR's epoch called "Brain Trusts" and now we just think of them as "Federal agencies" that keep growing in number, scope and budgets. That's how.
    4
  7.  @natedagr8257  Everyone must prove their worth when it comes to official power and warfare. And even the worst "racist" in the military were disruptive at times in training and cohesion. But when the bullets start to fly their "racism" evaporates. Sometimes forever. And good training does something similar. Critical Race Theory does the exact opposite. It teaches people that 'rank and file' are like animals and must behave precisely how "Dear Leader" directs them to. Because y'all are RACISTS even if you don't know it! That's CRT.
    4
  8.  @traciball3090  It's a scare quote. Meaning "traci has balls" is not a serious person. Not a serious thinker. A clown.
    4
  9.  @boazmunro478  Since you have an obvious "perfect choice" alternative, let's hear it.
    4
  10. Trump needs to go in to office with a job termination hit list. In the first hour.
    4
  11.  @cdhak2631  Notice he thinks it's about competing feelings. These people are insane.
    4
  12. I'm not sure they teach people how to become honest reporters/journalists. They're credentials prove that they're trained to do the opposite.
    4
  13. The critical thing is controlling Congress to be in a position to Impeach. Even if he's not removed the process will help expose and manage all of these problems and fantasyland "FDR II" will be no more. And the DOJ must be reformed. Perhaps starting from scratch.
    4
  14. Apologize for what?
    4
  15.  @BobM.-to9ji  There's no way to "show the facts, evidence and proof" according to forensic standards online. Psycho. If you don't understand what you're even asking for then that is hardly anyone else's problem.
    4
  16.  @PennyLane_Bryant  Racism is treating humans according to supposed membership of a "racial" collective. Hence, the only "reverse racism" is not treating people like members of "racial" collectives. BLM is inherently racist, as an example. They're not trying to "reverse" anything other than perceived "racial inequality" as determined by their own irrational talking points. It's also based on Marxist definitions of "equality" and Marxism is definitely about treating people as "class" members and a perfect ideology for people that love to exploit racialist paranoia and get everyone to fight with each other and ignore true petitions for "rule of law" justice according to resolution of specific case grievances.
    4
  17. You like Communists?
    4
  18.  @redandre5964  It's in the Communist Manifesto and in many bills put up by "Democrats" in the US Congress.
    4
  19.  @mikefrancis8223  Communists.
    4
  20.  @LLYY106  He's the best Speaker since Gingrich. And I can't say who might be better than those two, if anyone.
    3
  21.  @thomaswinston6671  If you believe in Jesus you know that God is not on the side of the father of lies. The one that you follow is the father of lies. You should not worry do much about Trump.
    3
  22.  @whatever-t7vl  You're clueless.
    3
  23.  @jdarst100  Explain your problem with Republicans, if you can. Or are you simply pro-criminal, pro-rebellion, pro-destruction on the insane assumption that something better will magically rise from the ashes of whatever you destroy?
    3
  24. ​ @CC777PATRIOT JFK and Truman were exceptions that prove the rule. Democrats hated both.
    3
  25. @judydarwin4342 Not both. In our legal system the courts hear yea and nay for each proposition. In accordance with careful rules. Justice itself is supposed to be applied equally to all, not to "both sides".
    3
  26.  @johnh.tuomala4379  They can call it what they want but there's no question they must rely on Marxist dogmas like his labor value theory and all of the "disparity" dogmas that are piled on that one.
    3
  27.  @joseph_bunnyman318  Specifically, what? I'm pretty sure you don't even know what Communist actually means.
    3
  28.  @joseph_bunnyman318  You can't even define equality in realistic fashion. You think that your lexicon is authoritative because you don't know the difference between Utopian dreams and facts on the ground to mark discernible progress. That's why so-called "Progressives" destroy everything that they control and take credit for the things people already would do if given a chance to. And in many cases they take credit for things people already were doing. Like when Progressives pretend that they are the ones that liberated the slaves during the US Civil War. A rational standard for "equality" is "equal application of the law". If you want to go beyond that you must be very precise. Instead you conflate Utopian dreams with "Communist achievement". You should ask yourself why. But you never actually hold yourself accountable for rational goal achievement. You need Communism to shift blame away from deficits you feel about yourself.
    3
  29. Nietzsche would not consider himself one of the sane creatures. His mind was blown and he attempted to explain and organize his dysphoric thoughts. Insanity was not "the rule" of institutions, factions and cults until his age arrived on the scene. He just didn't know how to read history through a sane, rational lens. He's one of the original "trigglypuffs".
    3
  30. Thank you for reminding us of the PC talking points. I sometimes forget to read the Talking Points Memo from the CPP before commenting on YouTube.
    3
  31.  @AuditioningByHeart  The Insurrection ended in 1865. Get it?
    3
  32.  @christineflower1918  Your logic is truly moronic. Truly.
    3
  33.  @christineflower1918  "Woke" is the latest meme that your cult propagates to show alignment with the neo-illuminati cult organized under the Communist Manifesto and Critical Theory academic pseudoscience.
    3
  34.  @christineflower1918  Everything that you wrote is based on delusion. Everything. If you want to parse line by line I'm willing if you are.
    3
  35. Try to focus.
    3
  36. The thing is that they're not even criticizing real historical racism other than in the context of blaming "Patriarchy" and "Disparity" also known as "Capitalism" to Marxists. The US Democratic Party also blamed "Patricians" (IOW, activists in "The Patriarchy" collectivist construct) for the US Civil War to free the slaves. They claimed it help them commercially because they had so much "capital" advantage to destroy the slave plantations not based on principals but selfish commercial and political interests. This is the same Democratic Party formed to defend slavery and secede. It's the same party. They last the battle and moved immediately to KKK and Progressivism. Sometimes the same actors on the same day would be "Progressive" by day and put on white sheets that same night. Not just fringe lunatics. Even Huge Black (FDR's first SCOTUS elevation) was a KKK Progressive that made it all the way to the Supreme Court of the USA. It only became controversial to talk about KKK after staunch racist LBJ pivoted to "The Great Society" and they all pretended taht some big "party swap" happened some time between 1968 and 1972 when the Communist wing started to come out of the shadows of the DNC.
    3
  37.  @Encyclopedist  State what you think the lie is. Didn't you just defame Rudy Giuliani?
    3
  38.  @davidbaker1918  LOL. You're so ignorant. So, Glasnost was a Major Service Pack and the whole Soviet Political System was then rebooted. Just like when playing The Sims.
    3
  39. @PGB55  Your specific criticism is what?
    3
  40.  @staciacrick3373  You have some assumptions built in as fact claims. So, you're as biased as these corrupt lovebirds. And you obviously respond to the Black Victicrat virtuous-victim rhetoric and presentation. They also teach that in law school but normally prosecutors aren't expected to strike that pose on the witness stand.
    3
  41.  @keno33141  It helps when you're not caught lying.
    3
  42. Vincent Takeda Care to explain yourself?
    3
  43.  @robloughrey  You know she ran or President in the 2020 primaries, right?
    3
  44.  @DakotaLoving  Giuliani accused Biden of criminal actions and incompetence. That's not defamation when you are referring to actual evidence in support of your accusations.
    3
  45.  @marthell6159  There's more than enough evidence in the public domain already to file a Civilian RICO complaint. More than enough. Your stubborn ignorance is meaningless. If you actually had any interest in knowing how anything works you'd study it first before asking stupid questions. Are you a US Citizen?
    3
  46.  @CarlMartin-hw3ev  The point made is that the debates should be out in the open where the public can monitor and immediately lobby their own representatives and so forth. That's as "direct" as it gets. There's no such thing as a large republic taking everyone's arguments before holding a vote. The closest to that would be a State petition that is voted on by registered voters in a given state. There's no way in the USA to hold an election for a nationwide petition to be passed in to law. So, yeah. There's no "direct universal vote election" for the House Speaker either.
    3
  47.  @lakeliving2013  LMFAO. Constitutional scholar that lies about what actual Constitutional scholars say in Congressional hearings. You people crack me up. Too bad you're allowed to vote, sometimes.
    3
  48.  @renoirrandy7241  Because it's fundamental to checks and balances that if Congress is purging its own that it follow strict rules. They're not supposed to subpoena each other. The most they can do is investigate for cases where they want to purge their own or Impeach a Judge or Executive Branch Cabinet member. This is supposed to prevent them from what they've been doing nonstop to Trump.
    3
  49.  @tjCAUk  Forbes got the video from CNN. The CNN watermark notice is in the upper right hand corner.
    3
  50.  @kaiserwilhelm1938  If you had started and ended with "I don't know..." you'd be in a much better position than you are now. Now extend that "rational uncertainty" to include what you know about IQ testing. It doesn't involve "take a look around" at all. Your rhetoric is inherently, well - not high IQ - nor is it "learned" outside of meme propagation.
    3