Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "CNN" channel.

@surelyyoujokemeinfailure7531 Arnold just fessed up this year. Sorry to burst your bubble.
1
@marietellez6021 You sky-screamers are the most nihilistic parasites the world has ever seen.
1
@misterdeadbeat4050 What you see often is these parasitic kooks that make it big in entertainment getting used to Freudian analysis as something to be done in public. Nothing could be more insane. These people don't understand anything at all about objective reality. Supposedly, getting in touch with his "inherited guilt" (Nazi father) helps Ahhnuld understand with Special Nous how Trump is really Hitler's spiritual grandchild or something insane like that. It's one thing if you discuss with your shrink how you keep having such dreams. You're not supposed to sell the public on the "insight" of such whacky personal struggles. But look how many "mass psychosis' victims have been going around screaming at the sky about "TRUMP!!!" since before he was even sworn in. And none of the facts of what was done to him by scoundrels and crooks in DC (John Durham report) have any effect on what they think "the reality of Trump" is. Facts don't persuade them. Dogmatic leftism (Critical Theory and Soviet doctrine of Democratic centralism) replaces all critical thinking.
1
@BoJackHorseman_eatshay LOL. Mormons are Christians? Labor and energy arbitrage that monetizes selling out your own native country is 'smart business'. WTF?
1
Cuomo is wholly ignorant of FISMA legislation and Espionage Act enforcement. He also apparently swallows leftwing 'mens rea' fallacies uncritically. People with specific duties can't use the same mens rea arguments that ordinary 'non experts' can use.
1
LOL. Money is not sentient. Money is a tool that people use honestly or not. We can judge whether people honor their agreements. The fact that "money" is involved is not an excuse.
1
What kind of nonsense is that? You're insane.
1
What abject BS. None of you even know what the rule of law means. And after Durham's report and you sociopaths are still worrying about "Trump" as "fascist". You people understand nothing at all. Only feelings based arguments from an actor that was a very lame governor of California that was the last stop on the way to serially electing doctrinaire Communist governors. "Say yes, we can do it!" LOL. This isn't even compelling for cheerleading practice.
1
People in the UK get arrested for Facebook posts. Who gives a shit what you moronic mushrooms think?
1
Not that many people "in the world" are as dumb as you dupes.
1
It's not true, idiot. You're preaching Chinese Communist Party talking points. China fears him because they know that, for all their talk of "paper tigers", that their entire political and economic paradigm is nothing but a paper tiger.
1
Antwan Harrell, your smack talk is just dumb. Marxist morons don't want to give up the gravy train.. That is what they fear. You're probably one of them.
1
Let's unite by demonizing rule-of-law Republicans and pretending that they're German Nazis! Great idea! I like how he says "Republicans hate Climate Change cuz it's a buzzword!". You leftwing Jacobins start off every thought on the assumption that anyone that disagrees with you or challenges you to understand how to make your case for any kind of suggestion or claim is deluded. This comes from Freud and Marx. Leftwingers understand nothing!
1
@herbertcumberbatch7323 You're again testifying to your own ignorance and delusion. Imagine it's possible for any ordinary person to read and reply intelligently to what I wrote. I guess it all hinges on how you define "productive". LOL. Kind of up to you and your own little cult of one.
1
We know that they're lying when we catch them in lies. Some of us know how to read the FOIA-derived evidence. Some of us know how to audit our own government and its claims. Comey is the epitome of the Peter Principle in government. I can't say that he's lying because I don't know that he's smart enough to know it himself. They're all such ignoramuses that only know how to defend Brain Trust dogmas. Functionally, Comey is an idiot. He says things that are false, constantly. His "leadership team" is corrupt and probably just as deluded. They're a bunch of cry-bullies. They probably do feel persecuted as they defend their own power to abuse the public trust and protect corrupt politicians that also feel persecuted because they're feel that they're just oppressed Social Justice warriors and delusional crap like that.
1
@Manuela Costa Lima You're talking gibberish. Why can't you define and or defend patriotism in objective fashion? Because you're incapable. You have no standards. You just have an intuitive sense of who your enemy is and you're wholly incapable of thinking for yourself. You're a collectivist lunatic. You can't even define "values of democracy" in your own words. And the gold standard for US law and "values of the republic" is NOT "law and order" but "the rule of law." I'm 100% confident that you have no idea what either term means and hence you have no hope of explaining the differences. Yet you see yourself as "enlightened" with respect to "Trump supporters." You're an idiot. Learn about your blind spots first before you launch ignorant rants.
1
@markgreen4612 Moron, The gold standard is "the rule of law" not law and order. Checks and balances is not having traitorous underlings violating civil rights under the color of law and then braying about "institutions and stuff" to trigger you socialist idiots. Comey derived his power from the EB. The President runs the EB. Comey could only lawfully launch initiatives under Presidential powers. The moment Trump was sworn in he had specific duties to report all such initiatives to Trump. He failed to do so because of "reasons" that he's trying to justify to this day. And Comey has also failed to cooperate with Constitutional oversight powers of Congress. YOu love traitors. I find it hard to believe that you love patriots or even know what it means to defend the US Constitution and its democratic institutions. Congress checks presidential powers in all matters. The courts may protected selected petitioners. States may sue the Federal EB in certain realms. That's checks and balances. Lying traitors holding press conferences with corporate media (and their transnational owners and interests) is NOT checks and balances. The voting public is to check the government through the Constitutional levers of power. You know NOTHING that is true.
1
No. You are a liar. The intelligence agencies are not lying. The political leaders are lying. The evidence itself is not hard to read for those trained to do so. Neither is the law that governs "cybersecurity." It is all of the people speaking to the press with weasel words and mendacious summaries that are lying in increments and by the time you morons parse it the lies become complete.
1
@N_Jones "Climate" models are based on weather patterns, numbnuts. Weather changes constantly and so does climate.
1
@nicholascrow8133 You're actually helping Malthusian Communists trigger everyone.
1
Jake Tapper is a moronic puppet.
1
Like you'd know.
1
@merlin8537 They are using a different lexicon. But they are not the intelligent ones. Neither are you. If you don't recognize precisely how they are using doublespeak to promote an agenda and a particular worldview you are one of the idiots. They're straight out of Orwell's Animal Farm and you don't even know who the Pigs are.
1
Idiot, No Republican EVER said "we will never talk to __________". We simply don't let others dictate terms, you fool. Nixon opened up China and Reagan made peace with the Soviets. All of the other idiots entered in to treaties intended only to reduce belligerence, not open up Communist societies.
1
They're so dumb they can't even explain their own theories.
1
You're an idiot. We have not "normalized" relations with anyone. Another false binary. You people are just so stupid. You have no clue what diplomatic or paradigmatic language sounds like and you have no idea what the factual analysis behind any legitimate criticism would be. You don't even know what legitimate means. You don't know what critical thinking is.
1
Cuomo is a moron that doesn't know what 'fact' means.
1
And a quiet military build up. And expansion in to what are considered international waters. They're already encroaching on sovereign territory of smaller Asian nations. This is going to lead to war if unchecked. Getting the regime to turn away from totalitarian central plans, allowing workers to move up as they earn it, and ultimately allowing workers to vote and open elections is the only way to solve these problems without war.
1
Moron, You have no idea what you are talking about. There is no "rule of law" between sovereigns. Sovereigns rule their realms. Some sovereigns claim to rule under the doctrine of "the rule of law" and most of them just straight up lie about what that means. You thinking that the WTO represents "the rule of law" (as opposed to "rules based world order" as a mere ideal) shows that you have no clue what you're talking about. "China has experienced many collapses as an empire. China knows where the problem is and we are open to telling the truth, but the USA just don't want to listen." China has no "rule of law." China is ruled by the Communist Party. Since you're completely unfamiliar with the discourses you don't even know what the terms mean. The rule of law implies that all humans must live under the same rules and that the weakest aggrieved person can follow a transparent process to bring evidence to court and get justice under a transparent system. China can't even conceive of such a thing. And that is the root problem. Chinese inhabitants don't even have enforceable natural rights to participate in such discourses. They are ruled by a regime and are policed for thought crimes and can not argue for justice using evidence and a transparent egalitarian legal framework. You can't even conceive of such things.
1
Because of the economies of scale. Nobody chooses to do business in China INSTEAD of in the USA. Don't be such an idiot. Everyone wants to own the global markets. The difference is how that is acheived and what people expect the rules to be. --->>> Nobody chooses to do business in China INSTEAD of in the USA.
1
That's a false binary. The debate is actually who should issue and enforce regulations. People that are against EPA power are against the DC agencies conflating all "government" power as an attack on State power and a de facto attack on egalitarian democracy in favor of their "Brain Trusts" democracy (altruistic fascism).
1
You're an idiot. You think "capitalists" are greedy when they have to obey our labor and environment laws but Marxists are "altruistic" when they facilitate all of the bad things that we outlaw.
1
Comply completely with what? What state ever "complies completely" with hand shake deals or even ratified treaties?
1
@andallraryantba8020 We're talking about NK and its alignment with the Chinese Communist Party and you can only babble about "Trump's empire." This is why we can't have nice things.
1
Trump is not targeting private industry anywhere near the way that FDR did. At least Trump attacks people that are arguably in serious need of Antitrust investigations. Summers is an idiot and I would almost say a liar because I find it hard to believe anyone can be so ignorant about history. Trump is not Mussolini. He's more like FDR hitting actual culprits rather than alluding to "corporate fascists" that simply can respond by sending out more lobbyists since the public doesn't evne know really what FDR was alluding to other than scary "disparity" memes. Trump takes his case(s) directly to the people. We know why he's hitting Bezos. You have to be a moron to think it has nothing to do with Amazon's sprawling empire and use of the Washington Post as a stealth form of lobbying to the public. It's about lobbyists posing as journalists and the monopolistic practices of the Bezos empire.
1
Perhaps it is but your feelings do not trump the First Amendment. You're a de facto traitor to the US Constitution if I use your own method to judge you.
1
'...was that comment directed towards me? If so, that didn't make any logical sense.' Did you refer to anyone as a traitor just for defending enforceable speech/expression rights? The OP did. However, you did come pretty close. I didn't call you a traitor because you didn't use that language. However, your analysis is almost as flawed as the OP's. Did you write this? "@Six Yeah the British flag is part of history tooooo, wonder why no one fly's that flag? Own IT! the flag is racially motivated it's not about preserving history. History is preserved in BOOKS and MUSEUMS, not hanging off the front porch crying about birth rates. These same people have the nerve to get mad at someone taking a knee when the National Anthem is played. Hello the rebels were against America as a whole, they were against what our great country is today. They were fucking traitors, and you want to stand behind that shit? It is the "UNITED STATES" that's what makes us great. If you want to glorify a time when we were divided, why don't you divide your ass from "MY" country. Yeah the one I actually fought for, you fake ass patriot! There is a big difference between remembering history and glorifying it. General Lee didn't want statues of members of the confederate army. He also said put the rebel flag up and never take it back out because it would be a sign of treason! You talk about preserving history, but it takes a "BLACK" man to tell you about "YOUR" history you and many people conveniently ignore! Go back and study your history, it's 2018 this information is out there." Yeah, a lot of people in America fly the British flag(s). WTF are you talking about? The only problem is replacing the US flag with another, disparaging it openly, or flying an enemy flag during a time of war.
1
"It is a traitors flag on top of supporting slavery. " Moron, I did not say that I support any historical movement or symbols. I pointed out that when milestones are reached and wars end these histories become past and people have evolving and complicated views. If those views of history are a problem for me I don't use childish shaming. I offer appeals to the intellect in order to change minds, not shame 'forbidden behavior' so that the morons go away and organize behind my back as Victicrats. You do not even know how to effectively defend your own interests. Your behavior does not lead to changing of minds or personal growth. It is divisive and regressive. "The choice is still there so the crap about free expression is just some more BS. " The legal doctrine of free expression is rooted in the moral doctrine of offering honest arguments to defeat flawed ideas. I did not reference the legal doctrine. "Attacking what that flag represents, is not a straw man." If you cite history and cite your own feelings as your own feelings that is not inherently fallacious. When you cite your own feelings to project what some symbol means in a universal sense (claim) that is inherently fallacious. That is related to "straw man fallacy" when you project your own feelings to condemn others without sufficient evidence other than your own claims. "#Swastika how many people still see that as a religious symbol?" I don't know. But it was a religious symbol long before the Nazis worked it in to their stupid iconography. The point is that icons and images only have the power that you give them. Again, if I see someone IMO using symbols stupidly I call them out intellectually. "That's what it started as," Right. "...until Hitler got a hold to it and changed it's meaning forever." No, he did not change its meaning. He used it for his own ends. But it doesn't actually mean anything until humans define it. It's just a symbol. It's really just a simple framework for a symbol. The symbol itself has absolutely no power until you and other triggered fools give it power. During the postwar tribunals did they charge people for flashing that symbol? No. Because in the end it's irrelevant. The symbol itself has no power not handed over willingly. You choose to allow it to trigger you. "Ideologies are tied to symbols if you embrace the symbol you embrace the ideology." That's incoherent logic. Tolerating free expression is NOT embracing symbols or ideology. More often than not it's the exact opposite. You simply do not see past your false binaries of "for or against Nazism" or slavery or whatever by following your strict rituals for showing allegiance to your Victicrat cult. "If I'm on Mars you must be from across the galaxy, because you clearly don't understand human behavior." I'm explaining it more clearly than you are. I understand why you're triggered. You don't even understand your own emotional reactions to symbols.
1
What is wrong with you lunatics? The Republicans held a majority and simply, honestly informed the world that they would not confirm anyone. That's nothing like the minority party lying and smearing a candidate to take unearned power.
1
Not only that but it's entirely possible that he learned about the complex issues pertaining to trade with China as part of the circumstances that led to business pressures. A lot of these incompetent idiots just project their own simple views on to Trump. Trump can't be smarter than they are...because...
1
He's not starting a trade war. For crying out loud. Do you not even pay attention to your own logic? He's actually acknowledging the trade war that has gone unanswered since the 1990s.
1