Comments by "Myles Platt" (@melsop54) on "Professor Dave Explains"
channel.
-
170
-
35
-
18
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
This is fascinating as a Christian, because most of us simply ignore this information. But if I am to believe that God is responsible for this universe and all it's laws...I'd be ignorant to deny the very laws he created and what they seem to indicate. I've come to accept the age of the universe and it's beginning according to this video. I think where we all, regardless of our positions, begin to assume things is at the singularity that was once everything in this universe. If the universe does have a finite beginning, and a finite size, then it stands to reason that that singularity had a beginning. We can assume it does, or it doesn't and has always exploded, expanded, and contracted...but ultimately (in the absence of evidence of things prior to the big bang) we are making assumptions. If we are to accept it did have a beginning, then we must posture the existence of a beginner. Be it God or an alternate universe this one is contained within. With the alternate universe idea though, we'd have to assume that Russian doll of sorts can go on forever and ever...which would contrast with a finite universe. At any rate, I can say as a Christian, I have become able to reconcile my faith and Science in pretty huge ways. The more I learn, the more I see it actually doesn't effect the reality of my faith personally.
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This may get me flack here, but I'll say it anyway. I'm an Evangelical Christian myself...but I also understand, if I am to hold that position, that God created the laws of physics that govern the universe we are in, I am obligated to accept what those physics indicate lest I deny the work of God himself. I am of the belief that God created the incredible machine between our ears, so I must not just dismiss what that machine can figure out. If the speed of light has never changed (and there's no reason for us to think it has), I am forced to acknowledge the age of the universe as measured based on distances between objects in space. Which also means I am forced to further think about what I am reading in Genesis with regards to creation. If it is a literal historical record of the origin of the universe, or if it is more poetic and parabolic. I compare this to the concept of tithing. Any Christian will agree that tithing can not only be practiced by growing a crop today and bringing the first fruits of it to the storehouse. We are happy to concede that that scripture was written by an agricultural society that mainly bartered and traded cattle/food. As such, they described the underlying truth of the tithing concept from the perspective they had. We SHOULD be able to apply that throughout scripture.
At any rate, I'm ok with whatever flack I may get here for maintaining the Christian worldview, but I am also happy to accept the irrefutable evidence that science provides.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1