Comments by "DailyBeatings" (@DailyBeatings) on "Inside China Business" channel.

  1. When China is on par with other semiconductor manufacturers, which is only a matter of time, China will also use subsidies and their cost will be 50% of the US subsidized price...🤣
    7
  2.  @hclau218  There's nothing wrong with subsidizing nascent technologies to promote certain industries for economic growth, environmental concerns, or even self-reliance. The problem with the US is that they're giving subsidies to mature profitable companies to move production to the US, which completely distorts the semiconductor market.
    7
  3.  @GregDeman  US only has 1,200 soldiers in Syria. At it's peak the US had 170,000 in Iraq, which would be considered an entire army...😎
    7
  4. If China stole the technology from Boeing the wheels and doors would be falling off...🤣
    7
  5. No, they'll till the crops under and get subsidies from the government.
    7
  6. China already has the Shenyang WS-20 and the CJ-1000A is in late stage developement with a certification target of 2025. These are facts that can be easily verified...😎
    7
  7.  @coliv2  So the US has two possible outcomes: a) Recession hits, rates reduced, foreign investor flee, and US living standards fall due to the closing trade deficit. b) Recession hits, rates the same, foreign investors do not flee, and US living standards fall due to a devalued currency.
    7
  8. Because in the US they make policy first, then find experts to validate that policy. It's the reason those getting it so wrong keep coming back...🤣
    7
  9. ​ @rtzx12570  Did I say Indonesia stopped the export of processed nickel?🙄
    6
  10. US scores its own goal, again...🤡
    6
  11. Nobody is buying the neutered Nvidia chip except Alibaba and the reason is that they already have a large array of non neutered chips obtained before the sanctions. These new chips are only to expand their existing CUDA environment.
    6
  12. Thanks for re-uploading...:face-blue-smiling:
    6
  13.  @mervynsoo8353  As defined by the US? Of course...🤣
    6
  14.  @firstlast-pt5pp  Not really. Buy a pre-made circuit board then load with a firmware like Ardupilot, which is popular and open source. Done.
    6
  15.  @obiwan5781  Indonesia did this with their ban on raw nickel export. Now refining occurs in Indonesia with a partnership that includes Chinese companies. Australia could have a similar outcome with rare earth refining. What where you saying about garbage?🤡
    6
  16. These tariffs serve a multi-purpose function as follows: 1) It allows the EU to give deference to the US in their hybrid war with China. 2) It generates revenue for the EU since we all know the end customer pays the tariff. 3) It doesn't exclude Chinese manufacturers who will just set up shop in Europe or some other tariff free zone. 4) It doesn't promote massive retaliation from China since the tariffs are not outrageous and punitive like US tariffs. 5) It allows the EU to keep their zero emissions goals with somewhat of a delay.
    6
  17.  @colberthunter12  People can decide on their own and don't need you, or the US government making up their minds...🤣
    5
  18. How the did that port get built after the overthrow of Castillo?🤣
    5
  19.  @eloquent-code  I highly doubt anyone is going to invade Canada any time soon, except for some Molson since that's pretty good...🤣
    5
  20.  @pendulmonium  It's because of the political environment and not the reality of economics.
    5
  21. China is the lowest cost provider due to economies of scale. Unless China does something incredible stupid that's not going to change any time soon...:text-green-game-over:
    5
  22.  @MetaView7  "Oooh please Guys, more please!" - I wouldn't wish that visual with Yellen on my worst enemy...🤮
    5
  23.  @TheGreatAmphibian  This entire argument hinges on the assumption the Chinese will not be able to build their own lithography equipment. Based on technological accomplishments in the last few years plus their gigantic pool of talent it's a fool's bet to believe lithography will be the only hurdle China will not overcome.
    5
  24. First...
    5
  25.  @mingouczjcz3800  Costs will increase, however the savings will be greater than a complete ban of Chinese EV imports. It allows the US auto industry to continue with new competitors and better products. It's about striking a balance, which is a win-win for everyone.
    5
  26.  @mingouczjcz3800  Of course there would be savings because Chinese manufacturers are more efficient. Elon Musk has been incorporating Chinese manufacturing processes from Tesla Shanghai to Tesla Fremont because Shanghai is way more efficient. This isn't an assumption, it's a proven fact.
    5
  27. It's Gargamel's sister...🤣
    5
  28.  @10lauset  It cost Canadian taxpayers 7 million to keep all the juicy details from the court record out of the public...🤣
    5
  29.  @nextechsolutions5955  Maybe those "tricks" should work on giving the F35 a fully combat operational rate better than 29%...🤣
    5
  30.  @DCZ-o5m  We all know that Australia is at fault for distancing themselves from China. If the relationship was more amicable you could see movement in this area.
    5
  31. Gargamel's sister...🤣
    5
  32. The last Intel chip I purchased was a Core 2 Quad back in 2009. Everything since then has been AMD. Now the comparison between the two is not even close...:text-green-game-over:
    5
  33.  @ngheanchoong  ...which the US can pound all they want...🤣
    4
  34.  @juliahello6673  Everyone in China is using LiDAR for Level 4 and 5, except Tesla. Government is most likely going to mandate the technology since the cost is now negligible due to economies of scale.
    4
  35.  @michaelfung4629  Ouch...🤣
    4
  36. "Goldfinger, he's the man. The man with the Midas touch."
    4
  37.  @marcusclarkson5520  I suggest you work on your own country's problems since China doesn't have an inflation issue and appears to be doing okay. Income is up, exports are up, property prices have stabilized, and all other metrics look pretty reasonable. I don't think China should take any advice from someone in a country that's screwed up as bad as you say.
    4
  38.  @ZweiZwolf  That's perfectly fine since it falls under the USMCA. However since EVs are highly automated you could have the factory in the US and the labor difference would be minimal. Everything needs to be taken in account before choosing a site for production.
    4
  39. Enjoy your technological ghetto...🤣
    4
  40. You mean what the US thought were missile silos...🤣
    4
  41.  @liongjiahwong5478  They won't be able to read the writing on the drone when it flies past them at Mach 6...🤣
    4
  42. Slap a Volvo badge on the Zeekr and viola, import time. Plymouth Laser and Eagle Talon were also victims of badge engineering, but the Mitsubishi Eclipse still sold better...🤣
    4
  43. Gargamel's sister...🤣
    4
  44.  @sinic1978  Absolutely, and depending on the source desalinization is a treatment solution.
    4
  45.  @bjorntorlarsson  "They haven't got a chance to compete with Elon Musk. " - Didn't Musk say something similar about BYD some time ago? How's BYD doing in the NEV sector?
    4
  46.  @NooeeeNNN  Of course the free Honda Civic because I can get interest on the $10,000 I still retain plus I have the value of the free Honda Civic, which is worth more than zero...🤣
    4
  47. Stanford University just got caught stealing some AI code from none other than Tsinghua University. What a delicious irony...🤣
    4
  48.  @scopscorpion  China going the LEAP route allows for maintenance technicians to work on their aircraft without re-certification. You also have the spare parts question since another supply chain doesn't need to be duplicated when you have a new engine.
    4
  49.  @TheGreatAmphibian  According to Safran the C919 uses the Leap-1C, which is their latest engine. It also outperforms the Leap-1B, which is available on the Boeing 737 Max. Once again facts that can be easily verified...🤣
    4
  50.  @henkjan673  USG can ban services provided by DeepSeek, but they can't ban the source code because it is considered free speech. This has been tested in court, so there is precedent and it's almost impossible to have precedent overturned on first amendment issues...🤣
    4