Comments by "Golden Croc" (@GoldenCroc) on "Asmongold Clips" channel.

  1. ​​​​​ @Disconnected66 I will give you a reply: Your reasoning regarding this does not make sense. There is nothing wrong with attributing some things to a person you heard it from, its not at all inconcievable Asmon would be the one that came up with it, thus no need for searching about its origin. Secondly, some people dont seem to realise knowing quotes like that is but a niche interest, just as anything else. Nothing more. Its a cultural bias that well read people really should recognise...
    1
  2. For people that are "well read" and know this quote by heart, and are shocked other dont know: I wish you would have read a bit more about psychology, information science, statistics and cultural differences. Its seems you havent read enough of that, or forgotten, since you have drew this erroneous conclusion. To use your own phrasing: I cant believe you dont know basic level general statistics and how cultural norms influence learning and what you take an interest in. Unbelivable how you can be ignorant of this! Now what?
    1
  3.  @damianwozniak3798  What? The logical leap of your reply is a bit too much for me to bridge, I am afraid. You must have misunderstood something.
    1
  4.  @Disconnected66  There does what? I am not sure I follow, did you mean to write something else? "Disagreeing with that is fundamentally disagreeing with what you just said in your comment. " - As per above, disagreeing with what, exactly? "Also, it takes 3 seconds to verify something. 3 seconds. literally. There's no excuse for ignorance IF you also are attempting to make a factual statement." - Yes, thats the IF though. Was anyone attempting to seriously do so? You didnt tag anyone specifically, and the OP doesnt, if you read it again. In any case, I see no one claiming "its his quote and no one elses". There is a vast difference between thinking something and claiming something is 100% true, after all, and a large spectrum between it. But trust me, you do/use the same overarching concept yourself all the time, in other areas that you arent as familiar with. All humans do, its necessary for us to function to make assumptions about all manner of things literally every single second of our lives. You might just be quite sensitive to this specific subject, that fine. Its like any professional in their field watching a TV show and get upset how they got it so wrong or "hollwood-ize" it, but when its a subject they are not as familiar with they buy it hook, line and sinker.
    1
  5.  @EldestZelot  As are we all (uneducated in general), including you, in the vast amount of areas there are. Its nice to have some true equality among humans.
    1
  6. Do they really think its real though? Has to be some pretty darn uneducated people if that is the case. Or do they just want it to be real?
    1
  7.  @nathanpm  Just as a note, it is by definition "normal"... Now if that could be said to be a good thing or not, is another matter. But its perfectly "normal" according to the definition of the word.
    1
  8.  @LymbicSystemuwu  Just a note, your post got auto hidden, except for in my notifications. With that out of the way,; no I am not justifying anything. No stance nor judgement taken. I am simply explaining the reality of how it is.
    1
  9.  @LymbicSystemuwu  Lots of people in this comment section struggles with what is quite common in some circles it seems, and this seems to be triggering to them? My apologies if you werent one of them.
    1
  10.  @reportimortal  And I am telling you, when at least a million people fit the bill, some which live in places were most people do the same, that is by definition pretty "normal", especially in those areas. Thats what the word means. Better to write "bad thing" if that is how you feel, instead of "not normal" which isnt accurate. btw, your comment was also "auto hidden". I think youtube picks up most swear words these days, even shortened ones like the you wrote.
    1
  11.  @reportimortal  Settle down and read it again.... no need to get so worked up. You can live you whole life in parts of US and have the same experience as I wrote earlier, only meeting people that goes years, nay, decades between eating a fruit. That makes it pretty normal in some areas, yes. Nothing more to it. No judgements were made by me, just stating numbers.
    1
  12.  @trashiemoviestar  Read my posts again, there are qualifiers in them. Focus on the last one I made, it sums it up.
    1
  13. ​ @justsomeeggsinapot1784  You, and the ones who liked your post, should think a bit about what use it is typing a comment and having it be not visible or removed. Not much, I would say. There is your answer.
    1
  14.  @justsomeeggsinapot1784  You sometimes literally cant do anything else. Thats why its not silly.
    1
  15.  @yt_nh9347  For anyone with a bit of experience or who isnt willfully ignorant, her objective is as transparent as a fresh pane of glass, its not speculative or projecting at all. Level 1 Basic psychology and biology, This kind of pledge is part of human DNA since before humans were humans. As I said, its part of every religion or group there ever was. It doesnt have to be wrong, but its irrelevant to the subject. Again, as said above. The "leaders" are just that, leaders of our society, specifically the USA in this context. I did not assume she was ordered to do anything, what gave you that impression? She is doing it of her own volition, thats what displaying fealty is all about. I dont see how your last sentence of your post is relevant to the discussion at hand, but sure. Of course not. She inserted the part of the post pertaining to "tesla" as a virtue signal. Thats it. Thats what the discussion was about. By the way, your post seems/might be hidden, only accesible from my notifications. Be careful to not fall afoul of youtube guidelines regarding wording.
    1
  16. Couldnt your post be applied to yourself, thus making it void? Or are you calling yourself pitiful as well?
    1
  17.  @puccimane1017  Your second paragraph is about right. Its all content. Thats it. Nobody cares all that much. From the video he is reacting to, to he himself. The content must flow. Thats my point: I certainly dont see any "trolling" from anyone involved in the video you are commenting under. So yes, in a way you are the chump for reacting to his content which effectively seemingly is "ragebait" to those that react your way, isnt it?... And yes, in the same way I am also the chump whos reacting to your comment to no real use, which type was also kind of predictable to appear. But I am aware of that and assume your comment was made in earnest.
    1
  18. Would it really? Seems on par with postulating that water might perhaps be wet.... Yeah, its not a exactly a long shot, is it?
    1
  19.  @roostre5254  Well I disagree, the music is super awesome originally. A matter of taste I suppose, but it fits better I think. All a question of what you are looking for.
    1
  20. ​​ @gtomanga every race thinks others look the same. Chances are, you are in a "white" majority place and thats why you didnt know. Its normal human stuff.
    1
  21.  @bluegamer4210  Absolutely its fair, and I applaud it. I just find it seriously unlikely any real world consequences will bestow her, and thus it may well be as described in my first post; a net benefit for her.
    1
  22. @VashTheStampede117 You might want to read my posts again, a bit more carefully. Your conclusion doesnt fit nor is relevant to what I have written at all.
    1
  23.  @GBValode  I would have thought that was pretty obvious from the last part of my first post.
    1
  24.  @Matty80822  ?
    1
  25.  @Matty80822  Sure. But that doesnt change that I am right. Which seems kind of relevant.
    1
  26.  @Matty80822  It seems likely you just misread/misunderstood my first post, as did many others. Not saying thats the case for you, but I blame low attention span on the failure to comprehend it properly by those posters.
    1
  27.  @purpleey  Not at all, it simply seems you failed to comprehend what I was writing properly when you made your reply. Read it again and, if needed, think about it some more and it will hopefully become more clear.
    1
  28.  @1101-g3k  Read above, please.
    1
  29.  @eiji862  276 comments in total, and quite some time and multiple ones of mine later, I am honestly not exactly sure which one you are referring to. Perhaps the one in which a person stated something like "there are laws about this sort of thing"? If that is the one you are talking about, I am not saying at all what you think I am. He can say what he thinks, thats fine. But almost everyone knows about these laws already, so its mostly irrelevant to the discussion. He also, among many others doint the same, wrote it in a way like any law matters in a vacuum. They do, in fact, not. They matter only as long as they are followed and policed. Which was my point, and I have written of it in my other posts: Unless something concrete and substantial will follow, the law is effectively meaningles and might as well not exist. If it wont change reality in any way, it may as well not be there. There is no god ordained thruth that things must happen just because a law is presumably broken. So again, its fine to speak out. By all means. I do it myself all the time. But people were talking about it as "done deal" that she would have consequences of any magnitude coming her way. Not the case at all, in reality. Same as with any laws, its far from a given. Many people throughout history have gotten away with literal murder, after all. And in this case its much less severe, has a very questionable case for evidence and a need to find tangible proof of any one affected. As well as someone willing to pick up the case and put it through a court. All this points to it being less than likely. Thats all. As I have written in my other posts above as well.
    1
  30.  @timesup6302  Its described in my comments above, quite clearly I think. If you truly have read them all, quote what part is hard to get and I will get back to you. But I really think the point should be obvious. P.S.: 😁
    1
  31.  @Chublet123  No, not at all.
    1
  32.  @deleteduser38179  Its called "understanding reality". Some do a bit better, some do a bit worse. You are welcome to prove me wrong, it would please me to see this some serious ramifications coming her way. Not seen any so far though?
    1
  33.  @aaronkristo858  I think you must have heavily misunderstood my post, or else you wouldnt be asking me this question. What in one or several of my post(s) is it you took issue with?
    1
  34.  @NinjaBray  Yes? What of it? Hard to shake the feeling that you, as many others didnt get my post(s) at all. Otherwise I dont see why you would post something like that in reply to me, it bears no relevance to anything I have written.
    1
  35. @NinjaBray  No, as I said you misread/misunderstood it entirely. For example, I have never, since the start said anything to the effect that would contradict the law you are quoting. So what is the relevance in posting it like I have? Try reading again, it seems you mixed up a lot of things for some reason. Not trying to be rude, but thats how it is. Read again and see for yourself. My first and second post already contain all you need to know, and should be easy enough to understand if read with a cool, relaxed mindset.
    1
  36.  @polocatfan  Who said it wasnt? I think you misread.
    1
  37. @NinjaBray My last post before this one wasnt that long, surely you can read it if you can type a just as long of a reply? In any case, now read this again: The post wasnt about morals per se. You have misread and misunderstood. It does bear a big relevance, in fact the largest one, since the original comment talked about "lack of self awareness" which means a person does something they wouldnt do if they wre more clever or thought about it more. I then replied how thats not necessarily the case at all, and gave example as to why that may be. Your post shows to me you, sadly, totally misunderstand my posts for whatever reason. I havent implied anything of the sort you seem to think. Its fine not reading everything, but then I would advise not commenting based on a misunderstanding thats easily rectified by reading the text a bit more carefully and taking a step back and truly take in the words that are in it.
    1
  38.  @a-my9ql  I am "pretty good at car engineeering"... yeah they are not very good compared to many other manufacturers, certainly their older models. This is true. They are a bit better these days, but still below average. However, why bring it up in this context? Makes no sense... unless its just an empty virtue signal. I know what I think.
    1
  39.  @a-my9ql  One can certainly suspect they dont have any statistical data of the sort, nor interest in it, no. But its more the non sequitur of bringing it up in the first place thats the tell. Its totally irrelevant in the context, so why bring it up? The likely answer is clear; to virtue signal. I have quite a bit car engineering experience, but thats not really necessary in this case. Just being able to access and read data of various kinds pertaining to the cars is enough. Doesnt even have to be very granular. You will find I am one of the least biased people making comments on youtube when it concerns vehicles, if I do say so myself. Not a particularly high bar though... What I do is pretty well summed up in my channel info text. Somethings are good, some things are bad with every vehicle, none is perfect, none is totally bad. And, of course, its all in what the customer expects themselves. If there is anything specific you want to know, let me know and I will answer to the best of my ability.
    1
  40. Pretty good correlation with being "smarter" than average though.
    1
  41. Its outside his comfort zone, thats all. Everyone has got one, thats his.
    1
  42. It would have been bad optics to do anything else.
    1
  43. So being cringe is worse than being a "grape"-ist etc? Unusual opinion but ok...
    1
  44. A nice illustration of the fact that also women can have autism, or perhaps in this case, feign an approximation of it.
    1
  45.  @RichardDemattis  The UN isnt forced to do anything it doesnt want to do, nobody can force them. Consequently, nations dont have to accept their own citizens back if nobody forces them to either. Many, many examples of countries not accepting their citizens back right at this moment and nobody doing anything or even saying a peep about it. The laws and rules that are written on papers are just that, and can be ignored at will by the powers that wrote and enforce them. Thats just the way the world works, and always did.
    1
  46. "Token AI"
    1
  47. To be fair, literally the majority of people would fall for this (or something similar with their favorite celebrity). Humans arent smarter than that. So I can forgive him.
    1
  48.  @Philpot1992  There is a large proportion of people that, at least subconsciously, think Internet didnt exist before they got their smartphone with a data plan, so about 2011-2017. I am not kidding. Its a pretty common psychological function for people of all ages to think "X thing didnt exist before I knew about it/got access to it"
    1
  49.  @thisguy103  They did. He is right. Now it could be argued people dont understand what they vote for... But that just shows they shouldnt be voting in that case.
    1
  50. They should have voted differently then. ""The price of liberty is eternal vigilance." <- people in most democratic nations have been failing that vigilance test spectacularly for a long, loong time now.
    1