Comments by "Golden Croc" (@GoldenCroc) on "penguinz0" channel.

  1.  @RedHaloManiac95  You are making progress but you arent all the way there, you are still confused over who said what. I had to quote the other guy because of what you wrote, there was no other choice. I can only assume, if I give you the benefit of doubt you are at full mental capacity, that youtube have mixed up the comment order you are reading (it does that sometimes) because what you write still doesnt make any sense if the comments are read in the correct posted order. I read the comment absolutely correctly, though it seems perhaps you still didnt. He was and is, absolutely defending tik tok, Its all there in the posts above. Nevertheless, thats not even what my posts were about really, they were about answering if suicide rate would go up if banned: Which it is a mathematical and statistical certainty they will, in the short term. Secondly speculation on the reasons why someone would say the couldnt. I have made no comments about any article or what any kids are or arent saying. Thats it. Nothing else has been written by me, except as a reply to other people for things that arent related to the issue itself, but the posting. Such as this post.
    1
  2. They arent "taking her side" per se, they know well shes in the wrong. Its just that most people dont care what happens to other people, thats how. So it really doesnt matter to them, no matter what she had done, even if it was much worse than this.
    1
  3.  @totallynottwo5727  @peanut said much of the same as what I am going to say but long story short, making videos about someone isnt harassment. No matter how many and no matter how critical. Never mind the law finding it crystal clear, further back all the way to just a scant decade ago the vast majority of people in the US would find the concept of this being harassment laughable. There were prime TV shows with millions of viewers that made fun and mocked the same people as a standing joke for years at the time, and just about nobody batted an eye and had any problem with it. Just because someone says they were harassed, doesnt make it so. Legally, it takes some form of 1-1 interaction, and repeated as well. I.e the lowest possible thing that could be considered such is repeated unwanted DM:s/phonecalls from one person to another, and a lot of them as well. Not interacting directly can never be harassment. Now on the other hand, what she did is not only a clear moral overstep in the public eye, it is also of questionable legality for various reasons. Conclusion: A moral end legal non issue on one side, vs a clear overstep on the other and of questionable legality.
    1
  4. Yeah, but thats what an addict would say, isnt it? We will not abandon you in your time of need. Your disguised cry for help is coming through loud and clear. Expect an intervention in a few hours.
    1
  5.  @sc0ner783  Why should the "previous generation" that followed him care? I doubt more than a miniscule minority did.
    1
  6. Zuckerberg is the lizard, Elon is just some kind of 5th dimensional extragalactical jellyfish visitor in human form... or at least, he is making his best attempt to mimic one.
    1
  7.  @haridaspalleeri6765  Fine by me. But I dont. A crafty merchant is always en vogue.
    1
  8. Isnt Tik tok the internet version of lord of the flies? As in: The clueless kid version of what they think adulthood is like? This seems to be just a facet of that. Bonus points for the actual adults on there making videos also stuck in pre-teen world.
    1
  9. Think about who watches and pays for these shows in japan, and it should be clear why. They are catering to a market, its far from random.
    1
  10.  @The_og_moonwalker  Yes? Seems like a reasonable question to me.
    1
  11.  @The_og_moonwalker  Yes, which is why I replied to both in a similar way. Did you both misread the OP, perhaps? What is strange about, as the OP is asking, animating a manga? Its done all the time after all.
    1
  12.  @The_og_moonwalker  No, just trying to explain the best I can, since there were multiple post about similar things. Anything else was, unfortunately, unintended.
    1
  13. Oh how naive..... getting to the summit of Everest has been a rich mans "pokemon trophy hunt" since literally forever for westerners, its just gotten more visible with social media and I guess have expanded to even more clueless fame seekers. Sherpas have been as good as carrying people on their back both up and down since the 1960s, more or less. Think of the 19th century western big game hunters in Africa, same exact deal. A nice lion head to hang over the fireplace to boast about to your guests.... Thus was it always with most "adventurers", driven by bragging rights or greed.
    1
  14.  @ballsdeep420  Well, the foundation is what wrote, as far as science is concerned. Numerous psychological and evolutionary studies about this, its the accepted scientific explanation currently.
    1
  15. I guess the Venn diagram of people that sometimes watches charlies youtube videos and people who watches Dream isnt quite 100٪ overlapping, because I have never heard of him.
    1
  16. ​​ @decomoreno No, it is including a general "euro" VAT. Thats always the case for euro msrp:s. Any more than that is beacuse of nationaal market.
    1
  17. ​@@Vnce3Our techonology is more advanced compared to the Romans, the ones running it isnt. This is where the whole disconnect lies, the aliens are pretty likely to be a "higher life form".
    1
  18. I was nervous as heck that something would happen in the last seconds, to setup a cliffhanger.
    1
  19.  @linamouzi6335  oh crap, is that so? Yeah that seems concerning. Hope for the best I guess.
    1