Comments by "David Himmelsbach" (@davidhimmelsbach557) on "RFU News — Reporting from Ukraine"
channel.
-
@harissuta1280 The Kremlin is now bragging about counter-attacks retaking villages that -- yesterday -- the Kremlin asserted had never been lost.
So much for Moscow credibility. It's in shreds -- on the floor.
Now just cope.
As for UA casualties -- they must surely be up... right along with RA casualties.
The kicker is that the RA is still isolated in the Kherson oblast. The UA is having a field day shooting up bridges and ferries.
EIghty-years ago the Luftwaffe was shredded as it attempted to supply 6th Army. For at least the first four-weeks, the Krauts hung tough, thinking that 57th Corps would punch through. It never did -- of course. Then the 6th Army hung on in despair. The bottom finally fell out nine-weeks into the campaign. In the tenth-week, the Krauts were out of horses, out of luck, out of time. Done.
That epic defeat is seen by all historians as THE critical reversal for the Nazis.
Well, Putin has gone Adolf. There's no doubting that. And like his mentor, he's taken over command of his invasion -- rather directly. It shows. Ahh... the master's touch.
Putin is frantically training a new corps -- some place east of Moscow. Let's say it's 20,000 strong. If so, it'll barely be enough to replace the souls lost in the pocket. Some coincidence, no ?
Putin has not choice but to replace the lost corps trapped in the pocket. That's what the new trainees are all about. They'll be either sent to the southeast bank of the Dnipro -- or -- (Putin's fantasy) to Donetz. Either way, figure on these boys arriving just in time for the rain to turn Ukraine into a mud bath.
The UA needs to do it's thing by early October, too. So, I'd say they are motivated.
The buzz is that the RA has lost 3,000 men as casualties, POWs and KIA... so far. NASA heat maps show UA counter-battery fires lighting up the RA -- especially up north.
The UA is now claiming ~80 freshly dead tanks. Somehow, that stat seems low. That's only two BTGs worth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pepito281scorpion9 To me, the war is in a total state of flux.
Other than Putin has blown it -- totally -- I don't have a 'fix' on how things will play out.
I do know that all dictators have glass jaws. They can deal out punishment -- but cannot take any. That's why Putin & Coy went ballistic over Kaliningrad. Lithuania was hurting his pride.
Remember, at all times, Putin is so narcissistic that no morals apply to him.
Like a two-year-old, what's his -- is his; what's yours -- is his.
There are simply no end of posters who agree with his strong-arm conqueror ethos. They don't have enough brain or study to realize that in the 21st Century an aggressor nation has to get the assent of all critical counter-parties. Otherwise, they'll co-ordinate against him.
Napoleon was the first tyrant to establish the dynamic in modern times. He was the first to put an entire nation under arms.
(Levée en Masse)
He could do this because French mathematicians had solved statistics as a discipline. Previously, monarchs did not how many boys were hiding from the draft in this or that village or county/shire. Now, Napoleon did.
It's my belief that at some point, Putin is quite likely to take his escalation all the way up the scale -- Nikita, style. He's figuring on Biden to blink, to cave. But, Biden is not the decision maker.
What Putin clearly does not know is that the USA runs best when its president is on automatic pilot.
FDR had suffered so many micro-strokes that he was a dead-man-rolling from late 1943 until he died. All during that period, the US was run by a collective leadership -- with the Pentagon in almost total control of policy. It was George Marshall who selected the stop line for Eisenhower's armies... not any civilian authority.
Biden is walking -- but a bigger basket case than FDR. Putin should really be terrified. The Big Decision won't come from Biden. It'll be made by the Pentagon, itself. (Based on the historical record)
Unlike Nikita, I seriously question Putin's ability to crawl back down in the face of doom. Like Adolf, he's the kind of fellow who'll crack-up first. You KNOW he has a very, very dark view of the World, and everyone in it. He has all the levity of a mortician. No wonder his skin crawls thinking about Zelenskyy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Krauts were able to hang-up the Anglo-American offensive across the Rhine for WEEKS -- by playing the river level card.
It didn't change anything, of course. All during the hiatus, the Anglo-Americans simply piled up equipment, ammo, troops.
Putin is racing against Mud Season. The RA psychology has totally changed. Now, Putin is trying to stave off a total fiasco.
But, the loss of an entire corps, 25,000 men, is certain. Putin won't even allow the boys to flee.
If history is any guide, the total count will exceed all expectation.
1
-
1
-
The highway bridge is only 30 kilometers from the front line. This means that it's in range of Caesar and PH2000 howitzers.
Rockets are thus, a waste. If the Russians really CAN hit anything with their S-400 system -- they'll go broke shooting at 155m rounds.
The Russians have lied so often that I can't accept ANY of Moscow's assertions. Verification is required.
IMHO, they are lying -- again. The radar returns from any American MLRS missile will be tiny, too tiny to deal with via a SAM.
The only Russian defense asset that could possibly work would be a CIWS type Gatling gun.
I've read that the Russians have their version of this war machine.
It would be firing blind into a pre-calculated arc of descent. (Spent slugs would be raining down all over Kherson, so... stay indoors.)
The Russians would have to cobble up some anti-artillery radars to dope out whence the rockets came.
The Ukrainian style is to launch missiles, one after the other. By missile three, the arc, and the timing, would be evident to counter-battery radars.
I seriously doubt that the Russians can stop the first rockets.
As stated, the UA is going to have to shift to Caesar. Two-rounds, and its gone.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jeff-sp1fy Why?
Lend-Lease means that a LOT more money will be on the way.
So, abandoning Kyiv is not ever going to happen.
BTW, American politicians ALWAYS get their 'cut.' So, their grifting does not affect policy.
It is Macron and Scholz that wish to cut and run. The very thought of subsidizing Kyiv for the next five-decades -- upon its entry into the EU -- has them gagging. For the UK and US, EU membership for Ukraine does not touch their purses.
As for NATO, now that Putin has invaded for conquest, the financial floodgates have gone full-open. Keep in mind, that the vast bulk of Lend-Lease aid is spent inside the USA. It just becomes a bump in America's DoD budget -- as a practical manner. American military gear is sourced across the entire nation -- as a matter of politics and grift. As long as Putin is shooting and raping civilians in Ukraine, there is no chance that Lend-Lease funding will be curtailed. It will ONLY ramp up. The weapons permitted will ONLY ramp up. The quantity permitted will ONLY ramp up.
And then, totally new stuff will be engineered.
The Latin-Cyrillic monogram business is about to explode. So many weapons, so many labels.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1