Comments by "" (@PappaTom-ub3ht) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. It is already a success
    10
  2. This scenario does not include russia.
    8
  3. How does that slow down their offensive? take a look at the map ivan.
    6
  4. This scenario does not include russia.
    5
  5. Quite big compared to what the russians are able to take. Ukraine has taken areas in two weeks which it have taken russia 8 months to take.
    5
  6. " I use math and compare what I see in the map." Let us see that math...
    4
  7. 6 months for storages to run out. but it will take another full year for battlefield stuff to actually reduce enough for Ukraine to win. my guess is that in two years Russia will loose this war militarily. (with the front not moving much after about a year.)
    3
  8. Iran confirms losses though.
    3
  9. "European brotherly love." Yeah... Germany has been famously nice to Poland during wars the last century...
    3
  10. How would the subjective iranian comment make this more objective?
    3
  11. 25% success rate against the invincible kinshal does paint western weapons in a very favorable light.
    2
  12. who predicted that? Facebook karens?
    2
  13.  @McSpanklez  There are pictures from satelites in space. Gj in calling photographs for lies.
    2
  14.  @chrisparnham  "Where on earth do you get this nonsense from?" from immigration rates into Germany. They are insanely high.
    2
  15. Or they naturally think that no pictures are available yet...
    2
  16.  @gmw3083  "Europe would sure like it but they're paying 5 times more for American nat gas." Not 5 times. not even 2 times. But even at 5 times, europe can afford it without real problems. Still selling oil. But at an insane bargain for countries like india and china. they are ripping russia off.
    2
  17.  @kartikeyatiwari2502  Neither is asking for evidence
    2
  18. @LinusIslamTips " he wrote there aren't any migrants in the army " Where di he write that? Some secret post only you can see?
    2
  19.  @mabussubam512  You seem to be mistaken something here. This is not a competition in just having a higher number of something means one is winning. Russia is getting weaker by the day, while Ukraine is getting stronger. So with time Ukraine will win. And since it has taken russia over 2 years to achieve so little there is no reason to think that they will achieve much more before Ukraine is far stronger thatn russia.
    2
  20. Nothing naive in joining EU. It seems quite guaranteed that they will.
    2
  21. "when Russia has said it isn't. " because russia lies.
    2
  22. @Silver_Prussian "Russia has completed most of its objective" it hasn't even managed a single one yet.
    2
  23. 130? That is almost nothing. At that rate it will take a century for russia to win
    2
  24.  @Garoslol  Nice of you to think that NATO exists in 5 years ;) I doubt Russia does.
    2
  25. Seems like a good bet. russia is doing terribly.
    2
  26. As if wall street journal knows everything
    2
  27.  @AdmiralValdemar  "Why launch any nuke when Russia is winning conventionally as it is?" lol. I know you don't believe this.
    2
  28.  @CyrilSneer123  You should look up what the word collapsing means.
    2
  29.  @kate_love_cat_dog  "Don't worry, the Russian economy is fine" Official interest rate is 21% that is not fine.
    2
  30. The west never said that.
    2
  31. I bet you can't even find a single example.
    2
  32. Russia started development despiste the treaty.
    2
  33.  @IvanToman  Lol. That is Covert Cabal. He did not claim russia was running out of missiles.
    1
  34.  @IvanToman  Do you know what the word "might" means? it means that there is a possibility that they are starting to run low and a possibility that they are not starting to run low. He did not say they were running low. And "running low" is not "running out". Russia did reduce their missile strike a lot, so they probably did run low(not out...) But with imports from abroad and increased production they could later increasae strikes.
    1
  35.  @IvanToman  So you admit to being wrong? he did not say that russia was running out, just that they "might" be "starting" to... "Wars are lost due to underestimating of the oponent." In this you are right. If russia hadn't so severly underestimated ukraine they might have won the war.
    1
  36. More territory than russia has taken in a year
    1
  37.  @robertklimczak5630  "the Russians would win by conquering these countries." Russia can't even beat Ukraine, a country weaker than either of these.
    1
  38.  @robertklimczak5630  "Russia hungry, the Russians would win by conquering these countries." They can't even conquer Ukraine, a weaker country than either of these
    1
  39.  @gmw3083  So? Still can't sell them much gas
    1
  40.  @Dralon98  Succeeded in taking as much territory as russia did in one year. "I don't see the russians redirecting significant troops to Kursk," You should watch the news more... lots of troops being redeployed. Lots of them getting bombed while in convoy as well.
    1
  41. "according to them russia has no army anymore" Doubtful
    1
  42. 25% succes rate at the invincible kinshal. quite good for a 40 year old system using leftover ammunition
    1
  43. Another god...
    1
  44. This missile, what damage did it really do? next to nothing... then how will it matter if they get such a low number as 52 per year?
    1
  45.  @PCGames-387  "yet they are creaming their pants " Putin and russian media are the ones creaming their pants and talking about nuclear war because of allowing these missiles being used on yet another russian territory. The problem for russia is that their are currently on track to loose the war. Adding 52 new rockets with minimal damage potential will probably do nothing to a Ukraine which is showing no signs of breaking anytime soon.
    1
  46. @LinusIslamTips "he implies that these people won't fight for germany which isnt true. " Ok, this is not what you said before that he said. But in addition to you showing the mistake you made, i do wonder how you know that they will indeed fight for Germany?
    1
  47.  @mabussubam512  "Reply with your main account after this to assert dominance." wow. As in dominance is here is of any relevance. btw, you are wrong again. This is my real account.
    1
  48.  @mng8680  They are getting mroe and more modern equipment. Their production of drones are ramping up. Evident by the fact that they defeated the russian navy and is sending drones 1000 miles into russian territory and ruining refineries. Regarding manpower, they recently enforced mobilization.
    1
  49.  @mng8680  "Russia still produces 3 times more artillery shells than all NATO countries combined, and not all shells in NATO are going to Ukraine so" i know. And it is embarrassing. Bad prioritization which has lasted for years. But Ukraine has many factors going for it. Western ammunition is more accurate and actually kill more people per shot. Western intelligence is far superior, so is the kill chain. Here the russians have indeed learned over the past 2 years :( The west has enough of simple weapons to defeat russias army. But only if they choose to actually send it to Ukraine.
    1
  50.  @mabussubam512  "I used all my asset to assert dominance. It takes now not only reading comprehension but actual IQ to understand. I also did your mom and your brother." You showed here that you in no way are trying to prove anything or argue any point.
    1