Comments by "" (@danieleyre8913) on "The Infographics Show" channel.

  1. 472 things that are weak, speculative and far-fetched.
    3
  2.  @overthis  LOL heed your own advice about reading history books because every one with any credibility states the facts and no the conspiracies, and this is my own conclusion nothing to do with the government.
    2
  3.  @kevingeier3385  Well then you agree wit( falsehoods. The gun was retrieved by the Dallas PD, not the FBI. And it was Oswald’s Carcano.
    2
  4. I agree. These conspiracy theories are all just ludicrous. They’re all based upon baseless speculation, clearly dubious claims, and sought after conclusions. And it’s pathetic how some people are trying to keep them alive. They’re slowly dying out and losing acceptance as the event becomes less relevant though.
    2
  5.  @benhassenabdelghaffar6187  The shot to the head caused a catastrophic fracturing of the skull, so there was no definable “exit wound”. There was however an entrance wound, evident by the bevelling, at the back of the skull. Both shots that hit Jack Kennedy came from behind. It is almost impossible that there was any shooter from the front that somehow escaped definite observation either shooting or trying to escape. Dealey Plaza isn’t actually very big.
    2
  6.  @GodlessScummer  Hmm interesting. I like Oliver Stone’s movies and style. So I enjoyed JFK as a 12 year old. But I never really took it seriously, I guess that even at that young age I was aware that you shouldn’t get history from movies because Hollywood is in the business of entertaining not informing. I remember years later I got into shooting and hunting and more experienced guys told me how the Carcano is actually a very good rifle. I remembered how in JFK in a scene it was derided as being bad and inaccurate. I got to try one at the range for myself and saw that yep it was just a load of movie bunkum. But I also wasn’t surprised, I never thought the movie was being even very let alone entirely truthful.
    2
  7.  @coopersimmons8627  The second shot’s round didn’t come out perfect. Conspiratards always claim it did, and show the photographs of the one side where it looks that way. But they never show the other side where the nose is entirely flattened-away. And they do mention that it lost much of its copper jacket, and that rifling groves are clear and evident. It didn’t hit any bone in Kennedy’s neck, but hit Connally thumbling, so it must have lost a lot of velocity/kinetic energy by the time it finally hit one of Connally’s ribs, and of course more velocity when it smashed Connally’s wrist.
    2
  8.  @david-spliso1928  Here we go, the conspiracy crappola…
    2
  9.  @tomgreen4872  Heed your own advice. And learn that “research” does not mean taking conspiracy drivel as gospel.
    2
  10.  @david-spliso1928  It simply IS true. Go and read their own accounts. Baker saw someone in a vestibule at the exit from the stairwell to the second floor that must have entered it second earlier (thus coming down the stairs). I was wrong about him hearing him, instead he just saw him. The guy entered the lunchroom so Baker drew his pistol, followed him in there and told him to “come here”. The man was Oswald and he turned around and slowly approached Baker. Truly came along, Baker asked if he knew him and he worked there and Truly confirmed that he did. Against this better judgment, Baker let him go, anxious to get to the roof to look for the assassin’s nest. Later Baker realised that he had let the assassin go. Victoria Adams ran down the stairs and out the building before Baker gathered Truly and while Oswald was hiding his gun.
    2
  11.  @HellcatMad  Ahahahaha at how you can believe something so impossible and far-fetched.
    2
  12. Oh yeah, some gangster. Lived in shared accommodation with other struggling middle aged men. Used to gate crash events and try and rub shoulders with prominent people. Had the IRS and various deg collectors after him for a decade. Was in business with his sister. And we all know that gangsters will take a guy out right in front of the city’s top lawmen with no chance of evading capture.
    2
  13. He also cried “police brutality” in the theatre when he was captured. Despite clearly having violently resisted arrest and even attempted to draw his own gun. Hahaha at how you imply that it must be true because he said so, the man was a compulsive liar.
    2
  14. It often surprises me how many Filipinos deny any of their Spanish heritage. Don’t get me wrong: They’re NOT Spaniards, they’re East Asians. But they have a blatant Spanish component to their heritage and culture and tastes and values.
    1
  15. Ah no. The Zapruder film confirms the shots came from behind.
    1
  16.  @overthis  Nope I do not trust the US government. And I am the one here who has actually read up on the facts of this assassination. Enough to know that it had nothing to do with the government.
    1
  17.  @nigelliam153  I’ll explain it: He never existed. It’s just conspiratard drivel.
    1
  18.  @nigelliam153  Okay I will explain it: Neither of those are true they are both just conspiracy blather.
    1
  19.  @HellcatMad  Yes yes that’s why Marina remembers taking the pictures. The far fetched nonsense out there. It’s like the plot of a comic book or crummy movie.
    1
  20.  @HellcatMad  Hahaha you don’t even detect sarcasm.
    1
  21.  @TonyRocha-c5m  Well what was he then? A Marxist?
    1
  22. He was a psychopath.
    1
  23.  @positivelycurvedpikachu  All of the undeniable evidence points to Oswald. Many Conspiratards have been trying since the 1960s to debunk it, but it’s always been pretty desperate stuff. All of the theories that Oswald didn’t act alone, or that Oswald didn’t do it (conspiratards often contradict themselves by holding both positions) stand up to little scrutiny and all come down to speculation that is squally far fetched.
    1
  24.  @marilynhadley322  Yes yes according to that credible source Lee Oswald himself.
    1
  25.  @thomasraftery409  Oswald was heard coming down the stairs by a policeman and the building manager, and tried to slip away and hide in the second floor (where he was not supposed to go). And they caught him but unfortunately let him go.
    1
  26.  @david-spliso1928  What are you talking about? I’m telling you accepted fact. Hahaha at how you’re acting as though this is some far-fetched thing that I have come up with. To repeat: Baker saw Oswald entering the lunchroom from the vestibule through the door. Thus Oswald must have just come down the stairs. Did you even read what I had typed? You seem to imagine that Oswald was already sitting in that lunchroom when Baker entered or something. If that was the case; Baker and Truly would have never even set foot on the second floor let alone seen Oswald! The only reason Baker went to the second floor was because he saw Oswald entering the lunchroom. Oswald wasn’t supposed to use that lunch room ever. The second floor was where all the clerical affairs were handled, and warehouse staff like Oswald were only ever supposed to go there for a good reason. Oswald used the lunchroom for blue collar workers on the first floor (the “domino room”). Furthermore: Oswald uncharacteristically did not even bring his lunch that day. And no Dorman did not see Baker and Truly seconds after Adam’s left. Where did you get that? There is a mountain of evidence against Oswald of which this sighting is merely one small part of. He worked in the building. He oddly took “curtain rods” wrapped in a sack to work that day. He resembled the shooter as observed by bystanders on Houston st (in fact they gave the description that helped him get caught). He left that workplace after the shooting inexplicably. He soon later caught a bus during which passengers and the driver saw his frantic mood. He owned the assassination weapon. His prints were found on the weapon and all over the nest. The weapon was matched to that used in the assassination attempt in general Walker. He later shot patrolman Tibbit for no good reason. He violently tried to resist arrest. The list could continue. There is no chance he would avoided the chair had meathead Ruby not murdered him. The theories that he did not act alone are ridiculous enough. But to say he didn’t do it must come from either being utterly uninformed or from you suffering some sort of disorder.
    1
  27.  @david-spliso1928  And that is total BS what you claimed about the X-ray technician and differences in holes.
    1
  28.  @HellcatMad  Let’s just say you talk, and believe in, hilarious nonsense.
    1
  29.  @armorstef  What “women”? The Warren commission began its investigation and interviews within a week of the assassination, and compiled the report and its conclusions 10 months after the assassination in September 1964. Interviews with witnesses were completely public and recorded both on on audio tape and on film. So your claims are impossible.
    1
  30.  @thomasraftery409  Yeah the “magic bullet theory” as proposed by Conspiratards was dead on arrival back in the 1960’s, there was nothing relatable about magic about it. It hasn’t stopped conspiracy clowns desperately clinging to it in the 6 decades since.
    1
  31.  @richpiana8020  Nope. The “magical bullet” is just some deliberate obtuseness from the conspiracy clowns. Where they deliberately put the limousine occupants in the wrong positions, don’t account for angles and the downhill gradients, etc. it works on people who are spatially-challenged. In reality it is easy to see the straight line between the snipers nest, Kennedy’s neck and Connally’s chest. So no unlike most people who believe in conspiracy theories you are wrong.
    1
  32.  @jamescrane7034  Yeah Ruby had no choice because Ruby was an impulsive buffoon with no self control.
    1
  33.  @kevingeier3385  They didn’t take a different gun. The gun within the building was photographed before and during retrieval. It’s the same gun that Oswald photographed himself with and the same that was shipped by Klein’s sporting goods.
    1
  34.  @kevingeier3385  Hahahahaha what on earth are you talking about? None of the witnesses were dead within a year. The fantasies that people believe and circulate…
    1
  35.  @Ricey167  What are you talking about? How on earth could the CIA have any contact with me? I accept the fact that Oswald acted alone because I am informed enough to know that that’s what the evidence overwhelmingly supports. It was an easy assassination for Oswald, the only help he needed was the ride he tricked Buell Frazier into giving him that morning, You don’t accept the fact because you either are gullible and have been misinformed by charlatans or because you’re a failure acting out an inferiority complex. The CIA have no relevancy to the Jack Kennedy assassination.
    1
  36.  @Ricey167  What are you talking about? How on earth could the CIA have any contact with me? I accept the fact that Oswald acted alone because I am informed enough to know that that’s what the evidence overwhelmingly supports. It was an easy assassination for Oswald, the only help he needed was the ride he tricked Buell Frazier into giving him that morning, You don’t accept the fact because you either are gullible and have been misinformed by charlatans or because you’re a failure acting out an inferiority complex. The CIA have no relevancy to the Jack Kennedy assassination.
    1
  37.  @Ricey167  What are you talking about? How on earth could the CIA have any contact with me? I accept the fact that Oswald acted alone because I am informed enough to know that that’s what the evidence overwhelmingly supports. It was an easy assassination for Oswald, the only help he needed was the ride he tricked Buell Frazier into giving him that morning.
    1
  38.  @Ricey167  Yes yes well done you figured it out. The CIA showed up at my doorstep one day, I felt so honoured that they singled me out. I accept the fact of Oswald’s guilt because I am informed of the facts. You do not because you are both uninformed and naive.
    1
  39. Oh okay. So why was he the only book depository employee that couldn’t be accounted for? Why was the snipers nest found on the same 6th floor where the clients he was assigned to fetch were stored? Why was the assassination weapon his rifle? And why was it also found in the 6th floor? Why were his prints all over the nest? And his palm print in the rifle? Why did he match the description of the shooter seen by witnesses in the window? Why did he flee the crime scene without notifying anyone? Why did he later shoot policeman JD Tippit? And violently resist arrest?
    1
  40.  @shermbloom879  I think it was the 1980s, after her children had left home, that she changed her mind about Lee having done it, not in the 1970s. As I have long understood it: The conspiratards reached out to her and kept offering her invitations to their conventions. For years she didn’t return their messages but eventually she caved and started attending them as a guest. My understanding is that she had come to believe that Lee was part of a wider conspiracy also involving people in New Orleans, not so much that he was framed. It is very sad but vulnerable & alienated people are susceptible to these creeps and their misinformation.
    1
  41. She is still alive and lives in a satellite town of Dallas.
    1
  42.  @Fullsendfilosophy  Well be afraid there because she is still alive and kicking. Marina Oswald Porter.
    1
  43.  @MrBullethead63  She only changed her mind years later. At the time and for the years afterward she accepted that Lee did it. She only changed her mind years later after the conspiratards managed to get her to come to their conventions. Awful people.
    1
  44.  @chickenfist1554  Oswald had sent copies of the pictures to several left wing publications. So the FBI agent assigned to keep,an eye in him, Hosty, already had copies of the pictures.
    1
  45. That is a long debunked myth. Marina Oswald has never denied that she took those pictures. Dumb red herring.
    1
  46. That was debunked a long time ago.
    1
  47.  @thomaskallmyr  What?! Assassinated how? She overdosed on her pills.
    1
  48. The US could have won had they looked at the how the British were handling Malaya and Northern Ireland and emulated them.
    1
  49. Hahahaha what?! How do cigarette butts prove anything? Cigarette butts probably just blew over there from the car park (smoking in public was common back then) or people had a smoke there in the shade. And cigarette butts don’t biodegrade very rapidly; they stay there for months looking fresh-ish. There could not have been a second shooter in the car park. They could not have escaped definitive notice neither shooting nor trying to escape.
    1
  50.  @jetcat132  Oh yeah. They grasp at any straw and look for any excuse to disregard real evidence. Unfortunately they are for real. One thing that is very obvious is that few of these people have any appreciation of just how small and compact Dealey plaza actually is.
    1