Comments by "" (@danieleyre8913) on "The Infographics Show" channel.

What a bunch of garbage. The Marines never said any such thing. Oswald’s mother (a white trash nightmare called Margueritte) saved his marine shooting card, and he scored 212 out of 250, which qualified him as sharpshooter. So he was a very good shot. The entry wound on Jack Kennedy’s skull was on the back, it was a glancing shot, so it splintered off a large section of scalp. That’s why the brain matter went forward.
1
@BitCoiner-q2h Actually the head initially moves forward for the first two frames after the headshot in the Zapruder film. It then snaps back after the first two frames. That very likely could be due to a neuromuscular reaction, or due to his back brace. If you ever do much hunting you will know that when animals get a fatal shot in the head; they are likely to suddenly and involuntarily twitch and contort about a half second after the impact. You can even often see it in execution videos of people. The fact is that his brain matter and blood went forward, indicating the shot came from the rear.
1
@golfinspired2058 The book depository does not align squarely with elm st, the corner turn is 135 degrees, so Oswald could not shoot down with too steep an angle. His first shot was actually when the limo was near the top of the hill, not long after it turned, but it must have ricocheted off of either the overhanging lamppost arm or a branch. Much of the round hit the curb in front of some guy further down the hill and he got injuries. And people saw other fragments hit the road close to the limousine. It is about at frame 160 of the Zapruder film, you can see a little girl running along the limousine suddenly stop and turn to look up towards the window.
1
@jamescrane7034 Be honest: You’re not listening to researchers, you’re listening to conspiracists. Yes it is true that after the motorcade had sped off; policemen on the scene and some civilians within a minute ran up to the car park beyond the Bryan pergola and the fence at the top of the grassy knoll (the knoll itself is actually the little grassy hill, where there was nobody). While nobody thought that they saw anyone there (except for Jean Hill’s jumbled account); they thought that the shot could have come from there. Bear in mind that Dealey plaza isn’t actually a physically very big place, and the car park is for the book depository. And that there was some echoing down in the lower area of the plaza. Of course they found nothing. No spent shell casings, nobody hiding. And nobody saw anyone leave from there. Also don’t forget that policeman Marion Baker ran into the book depository immediately after the shooting. And gathered the manager Truly and began ascending to the 6th floor. And even encountered Oswald, who tried to slip and hide away from them on the second floor.
1
@jamescrane7034 "Researchers"? You're being very generous there. Be honest they're just conspiracy clowns.
1
@jamescrane7034 You’ll take McClellanf’s word. But not those of his colleagues who say he’s full of it. Well done. Yeah at first reporters said people were running to the grassy knoll. But they found nothing, so nothing was there.
1
@jamescrane7034 You listened to con artists.
1
@jamescrane7034 Yeah that’s right. And as an example: You have bought all of this conspiracy twaddle at face value without applying any critical thinking for yourself.
1
@jamescrane7034 Critical thinking: If this one guy McClellan made claims about bullet wounds, despite examining them not even being his job, and none of the rest of his colleagues corroborated it, then most likely he is either wrong or lying. Especially if he didn’t make these claims until a long time later and was known for being an attention seeker.
1
@jamescrane7034 Hahahaha at least you’re being honest. I did my own assessment. I looked at the evidence, filtered out the far-fetched speculations, and drew the natural conclusions. You on the other hand have an emotion interest in maintaining the pantomime. Even if they did some DNA analysis on the artefacts that proved beyond doubt that it was Oswald: You would still claim conspiracy.
1
@jamescrane7034 Try learning reading comprehension.
1
@jamescrane7034 No. The bias here is with you. On the basis of claims from one doctor at Parkland; you jump on a conspiracy where Kennedy had a frontal entry wound that flies in the face of the actual autopsy done later at Bethesda. Conveniently overlooking how these claims are not corroborated by any of the other doctors and medical staff at parkland, how he didn’t make these claims until many years after the event and overlooking his personality. And of course overlooking the near impossibility of a frontal shooter. And you tie it into an objectively far fetched conspiracy involving swapping bodies. See that above? That is what actual critical thinking is. And why? Because you want there to be a conspiracy, probably for warped emotional reasons.
1
Hahahaha yeah side with the commies. As if that was ever happening.
1
@BenStevenson-c4z Ahahahaha ah no he didn’t at all.
1