Comments by "VoidX" (@aus-li) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
LizardMan 2500 When FDR was elected, his reforms definitely helped the labor force. I didn’t say anything about FDR, as an individual, stopping the entirety that was the Great Depression, which meant the world.
You could say the same about WW1 and the US making the most money, since we didn’t join until 1917, a year before the war was ending.
It’s still a fact, lol.
No, the federal states that are anti-abortion are mostly Bible Belt states. That’s why theocracy is correlated with the issue. It’s the women’s body, so again, I have to disagree.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
LizardMan 2500 No, I just gave examples. The main point is that it should be a human right to do what you want. That’s what liberalism stands for, human rights.
If we’re talking about Japanese Americans during WW2, the same happened during WW1 with German Americans. But what happened to the Japanese Americans were far worse (more than two thousands Japanese Americans died), and that is something I don’t support when it comes to FDR; his wife didn’t support his decision either. During WW2, Italians and Germans were also put into interment camps along with the Japanese.
It’s all about factors, yes, and that is something we may have differences in, but I still support human rights. If the mother chooses not to have the baby, then she should have the right to not have it.
It’s not entirely banned in all of the US? Abortion is still available, but there may be boundaries depending on the state.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ajmal Ali Islam does not “ban” slavery, however it does ban female slavery. There are tons of contradictions in Islam, so I wouldn’t take Mohammed seriously. Slavery was extremely common back then, so that’s irrelevant.
The crusades were indeed about religion. It was in the name of Allah and jihad to wage war against their enemies, who are non-Muslims/disbelievers. The Holy Land was one of many factors in the crusades, it was also about competing on what religion was the best (which was between the Roman Catholics and Islam), and conquering more land.
Allah “forbids” a lot of things, doesn’t mean it’s necessarily true. He “forbid” fighting amongst each other, which automatically failed. For example, the Ummayyads were Sunni Islam, while the Abbasids who overthrew them, were Sunni Islam, but relied on Shia support to establish their empire. So no, it wasn’t for “territorial gains”, it was for Allah and Jihad.
If you’re looking for a link about the “rules” of practicing under the Ummayyads: https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/spain_1.shtml
No, again, Saudi Arabia is the one who is accountable for terrorism, especially in modern times. They teach Wahhabism Salafism, which is from the Quran. But the Hadith does add more fire to the flame, as they talk about killing Jews, while the Quran basically states they’re inferior.
You want to talk about minorities? What about the zero-tolerance policy against Jews in Saudi Arabia? While in Israel, Muslims are free to practice their religion (and they’re 18% of the population)?
Yes, look above for my link about their stance on non-Muslims. Doesn’t matter, you still agreed with me, so there’s no point in making an argument for no reason when I stated a fact.
They were tolerant of others practicing their religion only if they followed the rules.
Sorry, I don’t believe that. They still invaded for Allah to compete with the Christians. Radicalism was created in the 12th Century, with an organization called The Assassins.
I never said they were “decent folk”, now you’re putting words in my mouth. And you’re contradicting yourself by saying they were “conquering disbelievers” when you said they couldn’t simply do that unless they were “defending” themselves, or they get it from the Hadith. Wrong. It’s for Jihad.
Again, Mohammed didn’t like Jews that much, as he thinks they’re inferior and points out that Jesus was in favor of Allah. I don’t understand what you mean by how tolerant they were for “non-Jews” and “non-Christians”? You mean Muslims, then?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1