Comments by "Random Thoughts" (@anuragsinha2013) on "UnHerd"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Freddie Sayers, Fiona Hill is not a very good source.
She says things which suit her current narrative and completely dismisses what she was saying years ago.
She says now, America should not have gone to Afganistan, Iraq, Vietnam and Libya etc.
But she supports Ukraine war,
Firstly, America should have absolutely have gone to Afganistan. Secondly, she is a shameless diversion artist who has also suggested that "she has talked to introlocuters from around the world" who tell her America when it doesn't get it's way throws it military weight around to get what they want you to do, while also suggesting that she doesn't agree with those interlocutors about Iraq, Vietnam, Korea, Libya and Syria etc.
So, what is what "Fiona Hill"??, she has a diversion story for every occasion, which ever suits her interest in the NOW she actually goes with that story.
She also tried to spin a bizzare Putin story of him being smelly. If you follow her Career, she's a crazy ideologue and an establishment hack. She's not a great source.
They'll keep spinning this fake Ukrainian rotary club story who got on a boat on thier own gumption and stuck military grade explosives 200 mts in the sea. That's how stupid people got tricked by the Saddam Hussein WMDs story.
Maybe, Saddam Hussein blew up the Nord stream 2 pipeline with his WMDs.
The pro Ukrainian group sounds like the two MAGA hat wearing Nigerian guys who who beat up Jussie Smollett at 3 in the night and threw bleach at him near the Subway where Jussie Smollett had gone to eat a sandwich, and shouted "This is MAGA country".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The American Left and The American Right both want to interfere in the other countries in the world. Where they differ on, is the targets?
There is no Anti war in America, America has been in a war or two every single decade, the marketing of war presidents (by the media) is just different.
So, Lyndon B Johnson becomes a "civil war era" rather than "Vietnam war era" president.
George Bush becomes like a " Iraq war president" unlike Barack Obama who was just a "First Black president".
The media that mainly leans Left markets the democratic party to the population, they just don't see these things clearly.
Also, I've Never bought this Churchillian rhetoric that United States is going to do the right thing after it has exhausted all it's options.
Infact America has never done the right thing (from the Vietnam war or supporting Mujahideens against Soviets), it has merely ended up on the right side by tumbling down to the solution after the rest of the world has come to the conclusion about what they see as a threat of an existential nature which requires immediate attention and a need to come together.
The united states then just hops on to that train, because it's merely forced to take a decision about an matter of extreme importance to the rest of the world, which is what happened during the world war, or War on Terror after it got hit by a couple of planes.
Till then it merely takes care of it's narrow intrest like the power of the US dollar or Oil or countries that pose a direct challenge to American power or its hegemony like (Russia or China).
Obviously, it is in the other side of the rest of the connected world in a different continent, so it can afford to be ignorant and doesn't experience things first hand basis but has a lofty view of things from an Armchair historians.
Trump is very good at reading the room. Trump would care more about Gaza in (Israel Gaza war) than Biden because, in the Trump world the only thing you cannot do is "MAKE TRUMP LOOK BAD" and the war in Gaza in Israel is making Biden look really weak.
He might still be supportive of Israel.
But Still! Trump wouldn't like Israel to make America (or him) look bad.
1
-
Just for Context because we are playing this game of Left Right and Centre is being played.
What is the Left Right and Centre in the "Islamic world."?
(Muslim brotherhood, ISIS, Wahabism, Al-Qaeda, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Iran,Iraq,Turkey and Syria)
Qatar is Muslim brotherhood (Right wing)
Saudi Arabia Wahabi (Right wing)
Libya Arab Socialism under Gaddafi (Left wing)
Syria Ba' athist party Bashar Al Assad (Left wing)
Iraq Saddam Hussein Ba' athist party (Left wing)
No idea who is the centre?
Here in democratic Countries.
On the issue of islam the Left(Radical Left, Far left or Mainstream Left) is a willingful participant in the project,
The Centre is like a frog in the boiling water,
and
The Right seems to provide only token resistance to it.
Islamophobia is the favourite word and a topic of the so called "left wing liberals" who generally dance to the tune of Dirhams and Dinars as self identified Dhimmis.
Islamophobia is by far the stupidest word I have heard in my life.
The left has always found a safe space in authoritarian movements no wonder they have found themselves aligned with Islam.
The Left has always been Crypto Fascist and the recent marches show us that.
Everyone is fed up with academic debates about Islam.
It always starts with the First stage of Militant islam in 9/11(I know it predates 9/11 but just talking about this century).
Then in the second stage the tone changes now they are doing the Political islam and Subversion tactics.
The in the Third stage they will try to sell you the spiritual side of Islam *Sufi Islam*.
But eventually they will revert back to the First stage because the ultimate goal of all three tactics of Islam is the same thing all throughout it's history.
To subjugate the indigenous peoples bring them in the fold of islam and establish Sharia.
Because essentially it's about Islamic Supremacy.
It's basically as simple as Islam vs the Kaffirs and everything else is a smoke show.
In the Sunni world all Shia' will be put under the sword.
None of what "Islam" has to offer is actually Great including the Iranian regime which had an uprising with the Islamic Left Communist party.
There are 3 power factions in the islamic world or middle East
1) Saudi Arabia
2) Iran
3) Turkey (Ottomans)
Cut the head of all the 3 snakes and you will get a desired result in the in the region.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
https://youtu.be/_WyfsRVgk2Q
China is not winning.
China has already won.
Some people in Washington DC don't understand why India, Russia and others align themselves with China and blame other countries rather than themselves for siding with China which is apparently USA' largest trading partner.
China Won and you guys made them Win, Because you wanted to win against Soviet union and Russia.(and drive a wedge between Russia and China).
That didn't happen.
That didn't work with China.
Congratulations USA! You succeeded in making them the biggest economy in the world. Because you thought, if you open up markets to them and welcome them in the WTO, somehow economic progress would make them a "democracy" and They'll seperate themselves from Russia.
China' behaviour is a lot like imperial Japan and America itself (imperial japan was also helped by America).
People in Washington, don't understand why was Donald Trump' Foreign policy so successful.
It was successful because Donald Trump was already living in a multi polar world unlike the current administration which is living in the past and thinks it can somehow manifest a unipolar moment into existence.
I'm always sceptical of "Western thought leaders" especially the ones that come across as the ones bullshiting you like
1) Christine Fair
2) Niall Ferguson
3) Ian Bremmer
4) Fiona Hill
5) Anne Marie Slaughter
6) Anne Applebaum
7) Peter Zeihan
8) Michael Mcfaul
However, Elbridge Colby comes across as someone who knows what he is talking about.
Basically the argument he's been making about China, for a long time is a non violent one (take that as you may).
Basically he's been saying that China is creating a Monroe doctrine of thier own.
That's what the RCEP, SCO, BRICS, China' Trade with African union (Cobalt mining for Electric cars), China's Middle East policy(Oil and Natural Gas), China' Trade with South America (Lithium Triangle), thier Space program, Artificial islands etc. etc. is all about creating a Monroe doctrine.
Someday, they are planning to cut America off the global trade and that would lead to the fall of the American Empire the same way it led to the fall of the "European Empires" with the rise of the American Empire.
And, He's not wrong.
It's a simple argument rooted in reality.
There is less war mongering, less theoretical Political philosophy and more Real Politik.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just for Context because we are playing this game of Left Right and Centre is being played.
What is the Left Right and Centre in the "Islamic world."?
(Muslim brotherhood, ISIS, Wahabism, Al-Qaeda, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Iran,Iraq,Turkey and Syria)
Qatar is Muslim brotherhood (Right wing)
Saudi Arabia Wahabi (Right wing)
Libya Arab Socialism under Gaddafi (Left wing)
Syria Ba' athist party Bashar Al Assad (Left wing)
Iraq Saddam Hussein Ba' athist party (Left wing)
No idea who is the centre?
Here in democratic Countries.
On the issue of islam the Left(Radical Left, Far left or Mainstream Left) is a willingful participant in the project,
The Centre is like a frog in the boiling water,
and
The Right seems to provide only token resistance to it.
Islamophobia is the favourite word and a topic of the so called "left wing liberals" who generally dance to the tune of Dirhams and Dinars as self identified Dhimmis.
Islamophobia is by far the stupidest word I have heard in my life.
The left has always found a safe space in authoritarian movements no wonder they have found themselves aligned with Islam.
The Left has always been Crypto Fascist and the recent marches show us that.
Everyone is fed up with academic debates about Islam.
It always starts with the First stage of Militant islam in 9/11(I know it predates 9/11 but just talking about this century).
Then in the second stage the tone changes now they are doing the Political islam and Subversion tactics.
The in the Third stage they will try to sell you the spiritual side of Islam *Sufi Islam*.
But eventually they will revert back to the First stage because the ultimate goal of all three tactics of Islam is the same thing all throughout it's history.
To subjugate the indigenous peoples bring them in the fold of islam and establish Sharia.
Because essentially it's about Islamic Supremacy.
It's basically as simple as Islam vs the Kaffirs and everything else is a smoke show.
In the Sunni world all Shia' will be put under the sword.
None of what "Islam" has to offer is actually Great including the Iranian regime which had an uprising with the Islamic Left Communist party.
There are 3 power factions in the islamic world or middle East
1) Saudi Arabia
2) Iran
3) Turkey (Ottomans)
4) Azerbaijan
5) Qatar
6) Pakistan
Cut the head of all the first 3 snakes and you will get a desired result in the in the region.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1