Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. This guy is to facts as pig is to flying.
    14
  2.  @johndonaldson3619  Then you are in the wrong place. This is UA fantasy propaganda channel.
    14
  3. I come here to make fun of the author and pro UA crowd.
    11
  4.  @johndonaldson3619  Watch some neutral channels so you will not be shocked when Ukraine surrenders or Russia removes Kiev regime by force.
    11
  5. 7:06 - why would it take Russia 6 months to a year to take Pokrovsk? Ukraine is on the ropes. They don't have man power to defend the city. City does not have any fortifications. I say this year it will surely fall. We see who is right.
    8
  6. They have no blackouts and fastest growing economy in Europe....
    8
  7. What? You should say its Russian strategy.
    7
  8. What Ukrainian advance? There is no advance. HIMARS caused superficial damage to the bridge that was fixed in 1 day.
    7
  9.  @philliptemple9841  Russian forces are advancing on about 500km front. Everywhere. They have an advantage in everything. The main question is will Ukraine surrender or will continue resisting once Russia captured whole river line.
    6
  10. The sky was blue bird - i.e. not even single cloud and there were 1000s of people on the beaches. So I think we can safely assume no cruise missiles were used. No one noticed any helicopter activity either so we can remove commando strike. I also doubt it was a missile such as ATACMS - it would be noticed as well - as you mention at least attempt should be made by air defenses and if not then 1000s of people should see something. Finally craters left by the strike are beyond massive - we are talking about crater diameter of well over 30m and depth of maybe 5 or 6. Big enough to swallow an airplane. Certainly not HIMARS (see strike on bridge) and certainly not small SRBM. If it was Ukraine all I can think of is a drone attacking ammo dumps.
    6
  11. Nah, much easier would be to apply EU values equally in say Baltic states, making democracy there would allow local ethnic Russians be treated as humans. It's hard to explain to your own that you need to fight for justice when justice is already there. I.e. EU has to follow its own laws.
    6
  12. LOL, 100% propaganda. Delusional one. I come here for comedy.
    6
  13.  @sjs9698  For political reasons Russians are very adverse to any losses - thus the heavy use of troops from Chechnya, mercenary units, prisoners etc. combined with heavy use of artillery to wipe out enemy at absolutely minimal cost. Russian strategy also does not seem to care much about land gained as they retreated a LOT since the start of the war. This is in difference to "no step back" strategy of Zielinski whom refused for UA troops to retreat from multiple cities. This has caused massive casualties which now result in UA not having enough troops to defend massive front line. The disaster operation at Kursk only quickened Russian advance. Despite this UA command lead by Zielinski still refuses to do a general retreat allowing Russians to create more meat grinders which Ukraine cannot afford.
    6
  14.  @jnygaarddk  When they hit some oil depots and caused little fire helicopters were filmed - and it was not over a busy beach area.
    5
  15.  @thedutchfoxxx  All these 3 you mentioned failed.
    5
  16. Turkey would invade Greece 😊 More likely that Russia would come to Greek aid than say Poland.
    5
  17. How??? Russia has air defense and 100x more missiles. Ukraine cannot play now any game.
    5
  18. Short story, Russia is winning big on the battle field, Ukraine is getting creamed.
    5
  19. I see it exactly the other way around.
    5
  20. Ukraine main issue is personnel losses. No new Ukrainians were shipped from the west 😅😅😅
    5
  21.  @hecmen7298  history legends, weeb union. Non crazy pro UA would be blond Australian guy. Crazy pro Ukriane would be this guy and Denys.
    5
  22. LOL!
    5
  23. It now means unconditional surrender. Nothing else.
    4
  24. No. The warning in the aircraft is for either airborne band radar or ground based radar. There is no distinction between "this radar is connected to medium range or long range" - as this is unknown to the aircraft. And said radar can be used with either - a lock is a lock. Most likely scenario is that no Russian aircraft were harmed as there is zero evidence of anything and prominent Russian bloggers denied any aircraft were harmed.
    4
  25. Yeah Germans also thought same way. Incompetent Soviets.... And then smash, they have shown brilliance against Germany. They have shown excellent command. They executed operation after operation perfectly. This is how we see Ukraine war today. As well organized operation.
    4
  26. LOL, and yet Ukraine managed to break through last year near Kharkiv all without air superiority. The problem is Russians are diged in, they have (as per Ukraine) 10:1 artillery superiority and were expecting the attack. Sending few F-16s would not make any difference at all.
    4
  27. Chechnya is a major allay. There are no other fronts. Belarus is unlikely - they are not as stupid as Ukraine. No one else wanted to join grand war against Russia and rather negotiate. Ukraine already lost the war - we are waiting till September to find out extent of the loss.
    4
  28. Russia is advancing and in front of victorious Russian panzer there is a lot of Ukrainians running.
    4
  29. Russia won the war already like two months ago. Ukraine "win" is simply re-defining loss as win. Such as, sure we lost half the country, but we got to keep the other half!
    4
  30. Comedy - same as Denys.
    4
  31. Sure, he will. Once Ukraine surrenders.
    3
  32. This one would be unconditional surrender. Germans trusted Soviets in 1945.
    3
  33.  @martstam2016  War of 1920 is complex as there were multiple "Russians", multiple factions which we can see as "Ukraine" or proto Ukraine as well as Poland. Everyone fought with everyone else. Oh and there was also US involved as well as Czech legion and lots of other strange stuff. Oh and everyone switched sides few times - in 1920 the RPAU were enemies of RKKA so I wondering whatever he just mixed things up a bit or its not precise which part of 1920 he is referring to. For the most part RPAU were communists... just "different". Its really hard to tell what was going on.
    3
  34. Ukraine offensive has failed & it is ending right now. Russia is now doing as many advances now or more than Ukraine. Saying the "offensive by UA" can still succeed is a massive cope. In the last 24h Russia has made significantly more gains than Ukraine. For example, Russia managed to finally operationally encircle Avdiivka. They also managed to cross Oskill river and held on to a bridgehead near Zerebrianski forestry. Especially operational encirclement of Avdiivka is huge - it feels like Avdiivka is the next Bakhmut. 13:07 - Russia loves attrition - so I would certainly NOT mark Ukraine goals as attrition - these are Russian goals - which they succeeded in.
    3
  35. Nope, it was a good move. It served as pressure tactics vs. Ukraine. First two, then two more, maybe another counter offensive will add one or two more. It shows to Kiev they will be taken apart. He left plenty of room - what do you mean? And why replace Putin? New Kremlin ruler will show strength by pushing Ukraine harder.
    3
  36. Remove the "mine" crap and just concentrate on previous shelling and water level as well as luck of maintenance for 30 years.
    3
  37. Not really, Russia is moving forward in Donbass and most Russian troops were pulled back. So now its mostly UA vs UA war.
    3
  38. Well, public opinion in Russia has 2 effects: 1 support for war increased 2 more people are volunteering to serve Not sure how that helps Ukraine.
    3
  39.  @MTStingray  On one side, people claim bloggers from Russia admitted it - so it must be true, but when they deny it, it must be a lie ;) Ukraine has zero proof but whatever they say is gospel. I think people on this channel are insane.
    3
  40. Nah, Hitler did terror attacks, these are aimed attacks against military targets. One out of 40 missiles dropped on a mall. Maybe it was shot down. So what?
    3
  41.  @stream2watch  Modified version is still in production.
    3
  42. The whole offensive is stupid. They should have stopped it at week 1 after it was clearly failing.
    3
  43.  @nvelsen1975  Genral Zaluzny - commander of UA forces stated on video 10:1. I think it is more like 5:1. I.e. Russia as clearly seen from the map is smashing Ukraine attacks quite well. I mean in the last 24h Ukraine on video lost few dozen vehicles - on bloody video! In one run you can count 11 smashed vehicles. in Just one column.
    3
  44.  @jimdake6632  Soviet doctrine - if we cannot fly, no one flies.
    3
  45. Why change, they won.
    3
  46. Yes Ukraine created a dilemma for itself. Either call Kursk a failure and retreat herby creating PR disaster and lesser gifts for the war effort leading to quick defeat OR keep Kursk alive and lose Pokrovsk enabling Russians to move in any direction with ease thereby leading to defeat. So what would you pick?
    3
  47.  @eeeertoo2597  Germany lost by 1944 - everyone knew it, even by 1943. Yet the war kept going for a long time!
    3
  48. No its comedy channel.
    3
  49.  @hecmen7298  history legends made pro UA videos. His latest one is very pro UA and actually has false UA info in it. Willy OAM is light pro UA. Weeb only reports front line changes and has conservative commentary. He did report any pro UA stuff religiously. This channel is like Denys, delusional propaganda. It's comical edition.
    3
  50. He is super pro UA propagandist. Even when they start storming Kiev he will still say UA can win.
    3