Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. But his audience is mostly western woke people that are drunk on idea of Ukrainian victory ;)
    3
  2. I do not think there is much chance Russia can loose. Given Russia constantly on the winning side there is little criticism from its people or personnel. Since chances of Russia loosing are low I doubt we see too much of it.
    3
  3. ​ @johnathanhughes9881  You do not understand that Russia is not doing the most fighting there. Most fighting and most dying is done by people of Donbass fighting for their freedom. There are also Chechens there, Wagner group etc. And then there are Russians. I do not dispute the 60k casualties figures. Nor 80k. Usually for each dead there are 3 wounded so the 80k would suggest 20k dead and 60k wounded. Which does seem very plausible. BUT this is for Donbass + Russia + Wagner etc. Brunt of fighting is by Donbass Ukrainian militia against Kiev regime. So they have taken most KIA and casualties. So my numbers are actually, quite high - i.e. the top estimate of 9k is more then US estimates suggest! Thus I am not "optimistic" at all. As for liberation of Donbass - see above whom is dying - I feel they are not dying to be salves ;) Azov battalion is actually a regiment and there are many regiments. At least 10% of UA forces are Nazi - similar to SS in Nazi Germany. There are pure Nazi - i.e. they believe in racial superiority of Ukrainians over Russians (and anyone else). Standard Nazi stuff. No Russians are no Nazi - they are RED ;) Russia is very multi ethnic, racial superiority crap would never work there ;) Regarding demilitarization, you must be joking about better military - they are sending people with few weeks of training that are turned into mince meat and then sending more. Ukrainian losses are epic high. Some front lines have many "volksturm" brigades just slowly getting creamed. Regarding these two joining NATO - this is actually not a big deal at all - you do not see any epic levels of anger in Moscow at all. Both countries have been somewhat unofficially in NATO since 1991 and they both threatened to join NATO if Russia invades Ukraine. Both are non issues. Neither of them will station (at least they never had such plans before) offensive weapons on their border with Russia - so non threat - non issue. Thus I stand by stopping NATO expansion - expansion to Ukraine. Full success. No NATO in Ukraine. Ever. Well, as for getting Russians out of Ukraine - how about Ukraine leaves Donbass alone? Why are they there occupying? Why they don't leave these people alone in peace? No one there wants to be under Kiev boot. This is why they are being liberated. They are fighting, every man, and many women, for their freedom. Just like US did against UK in their war of independence. Lugansk is already free of Kiev occupational force and soon Donetks will be as well. How can you support oppression? How can you deny people their God given right to determine their future? US won its independence. I think Donbass also has the same right. Kiev regime troops should pack up and leave and then war will end.
    3
  4. Nope. He said no officially few days ago. Who you trust - Putin or someone on the internet?
    3
  5. LOL, "excellent" - they are terrible. They get out played by Russia every time in Donbass. The Kherson is an excellent example of Ukraine getting out played.
    3
  6. 2:07 - Russian Bakhmut offensive is smart while Ukrainian defense there is idiotic. Russian losses are 4x to 5x smaller than Ukrainian losses. Multiple reasons, such as "road of life (or death)" or total Russian artillery supremacy. 2:56 Bakhmut has been a total failure for Ukraine - they have allowed Russia to grind them hard. For what exactly? Ruins? These idiots in Kiev may indeed "counter" and retake the city just so Russians can retake it again! Brilliant. 8:00 no, break through now seems next to impossible. Reason is that Russia has multiple lines of defense and a LOT of mine fields. These things will slow down any attack & reserves can be utilized. 10:00 why don't you mark Ukrainian supply lines? Far longer, no? And within range of a lot of Russian systems. Bottom line is, if Ukraine pushes hard the war may end this year after Russia takes a lot of land with a counter.
    3
  7. B/c idiots like this guy live there?
    3
  8. For Russia.
    2
  9. Guys is comedian - don't expect facts.
    2
  10. Victory for Ukraine now looks like loosing Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, Zaporoze and say Kharkiv. I would say that it would look actually good if they only lost that much. It would also mean victory for Putin. Loss for Ukraine is loosing more or all.
    2
  11. It happens WHEN NATO intervenes. Nukes are response to NATO attack.
    2
  12. Objective is clear, to stretch Ukrainian forces more. Same with Sumy offensive. Ukraine has no reserves. Russia does have plenty. Once Ukraine is stretched more Russia can do breakthroughs. Once they start manover they will take lots of land and maybe Ukriane will surrender. Well played Russia. Well played.
    2
  13. Depends how many pp can Ukraine throw - they are loosing at least 30k a month to various causes - maybe as much as 50k now. But still they can thrown 1000s more. As long as supply of pp is there and west sends weapons it can last for more then a year. I expect Russia to take Donbass sometime by September. But Dniepr river is still far AND Russia does not have man power to annex whole right hand side of Dniepr. So I am confused as to the game plan.
    2
  14. Given the number of videos of Ukrainians begging for stuff I think you are spot on - just switch Russia and Ukraine.
    2
  15. Yes, very old aircraft.
    2
  16. They are out of range. Russia can strike any airfield in Ukraine.
    2
  17. Exactly current Russian plan.
    2
  18.  @dougcoombes8497  What opposite - look at the map and look at the videos from the front and look at say hard economic data. All these are rather reliable sources. Why deny these?
    2
  19.  @mariaf.6601  Economic data shows Russia is doing super good and on the map you do not see Ukraine capturing anything of any strategic value - in fact you are now seeing Russia capturing stuff - in the last few days - shaping operation for next Bakhmut.
    2
  20. Exactly - this is why Ukraine is loosing the war badly now - they are not "running completely out" of things they are running low on a lot of things all over the place & are unable to replace losses. Russia is winning as they are able to easily replace all of their losses. It is a classical war of atrition where you are out rating your enemy.
    2
  21.  @gingerlicious3500  Exactly - they are based on air power - they cannot supply artillery for a Soviet style war. They simply do not have the capacity to do so - thus you just proven my point that NATO is running out. You said it yourself.
    2
  22.  @gingerlicious3500  LOL, NATO has no plans of supplying large number of air assets. US did not even supply the 31 tanks it promised - it delayed till 2024 ;)) "Not to mention that NATO has a much larger industrial capability than Russia and is beginning to expand its plant for artillery." not at all - Russia has shown it has a much larger capacity and NATO did zippo so far to expand its production. There are no plans in any major NATO country to radically increase artillery production. NATO just keeps Ukraine on a drip feeder waiting for inevitable collapse. Once Ukraine starts clearly collapsing NATO will strongly suggest negotiations and whatever they lead to it will be called "Ukrainian victory". There - come back to this comment predicting the future when it happens.
    2
  23. Bakhmut was around 3m - Pokrovsk is bigger (its two cities actually) at over 100k population but I recon at most a month to take it as UA is spent.
    2
  24.  @krjohnson29  Umm 3m == 3 months ;) "Bakhmut was around 3m - Pokrovsk is bigger (its two cities actually) at over 100k population" -- need to read more carefuly what I wrote, "Pokrovsk is bigger" and "at over 100k population". I am actually not pro Russia but pro common sense - Russia is winning the war and propaganda machine trying to say its no is becoming out of control.
    2
  25. none.
    2
  26. More or less. I mean its like saying - what if Hitler turned things around in 1944????
    2
  27. FYI, so far confirmed in this war it was Ukraine blowing dams - it was said that the dam near Kiev was blown and river was the defender of the nation. No talk about Ukraine drowning (and admitting) 1000s of animals.
    2
  28. The dam was repeatedly hit by HIMARS. Why don't you go and fix it yourself under fire first from HIMARS and then from Ukies on the other side of the river. How about maintenance from 1992 till 2022 -- we all know Ukraine did not build anything from Soviet times so maintenance was non existent for the dam. The gates were also damaged - you can read it in old Russian reports. If you want the truth, and only the truth - google for damage images. But be warned, you may not be able to handle the truth.
    2
  29.  @EliasRinghauge  Ukraine was not and is not interested in any UN truces over anything. Even now they are not interested in say any UN effort to jointly save civilians etc.
    2
  30.  @larshildebrandt3835  how could they manage to maintain it when it was under fire? Ukraine hit the dam with Himars multiple times, proven by pictures. When Russian troops moved out of the other side of the river there was no agreement on management. Russia did not damage the dam, Ukraine did. Ukraine even now refuses any UN involvment. So how is this all Russia's fault?
    2
  31.  @idoit5067  Nope, they rejected.
    2
  32.  @greenl7661  like Ukraine would have agreed to it, Lol. They have refused to agree to any such zones. Why do you think Russia would mind?
    2
  33.  @greenl7661  Russia is totally fine with it. UA said no. UA said no to presence of any observers or UN troops. Last time I checked it was UA attacking the power plant not Russia that controls it.
    2
  34. Like Ukraine, whom shelled NPP many times cares about "nuclear disaster" - you only hear "nuclear disaster" from RT.
    2
  35. LOL!
    2
  36.  @blazunlimited  No they did not. Also their prominent account for such news regarding Su-34 - fighter-bomber on Telegram denied any losses. This account is the one that listed all other losses. So Russian side - both official - and unofficial denied any losses. This has forced guys on youtube to backtrack - say military summary channel reported "loss of 3x Su-34" but today he said that it is unconfirmed and he does not know.
    2
  37. Good guys won - winner is always the good guys.
    2
  38. Around 100 sq km taken by Russia in last 24h.
    2
  39.  @dinodudedanny6324  Who exactly owned the dam from the time it was build - starting in 1992? Ukraine... who did not maintain it? I do not recall Russia having control over it from 1992 till 2022.
    2
  40. Clear answer now is yes. End of video.
    2
  41. No, he kept them out of a fight as the losses would be high and public opinion would hate such a move. Now, with public opinion turning he can use conscripts more freely as support for more sacrifice is there.
    2
  42.  @rogerthat4545  Not inch by inch - in the last 48h they got like 3 towns.
    2
  43. In short Russians won the war, are moving forward and Ukraine is on constant back foot without any chance of winning - hence they lost. Operation looks to be over by September.
    2
  44. Imagine what is US military!
    2
  45.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  Speaker is just a good Bagdad Bob. His idea of offensive is going back to trap the enemy ;))) This may be an idea on tactical level (Russians did it south of Izium - they moved back, UA moved in, Russians wiped them out with artillery and moved back in). But not on larger strategic level.
    2
  46. NATO. EU is just an economic union. Its not a big deal. When Ukraine joins in say 50+ years I doubt anyone in Moscow will loose sleep over it.
    2
  47.  @stream2watch  Sure wiki.
    2
  48. Yep, soon Ukraine will advance to Polish border!
    2
  49.  @BTinSF  I think Ukraine will now be lucky to hold 50% with left bank going to Russia + Odessa.
    2
  50. Much less than Ukraine!
    2