Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. Let it sink in, Russia is making right now about 1/10 of the shells UK made during WWI. And this joker is saying, a country like 5x the size of UK in WWI, with CNC technology cannot produce more!!!! Really Mr. Joker? Really? Russian economy is overheating? Like what, they will not grow as the fastest economy in Europe? Ukraine capability is increasing? Like its going from zero right now to 1? How? Russia is destroying Ukraine every day, if anything their capability is going down every day. More people are leaving, more workshops are trashed. They have no economy and subside on aid alone. Aid is running low. Maximizing attrition on the Russians when Russians have massive advantage in firepower - this guy is a total joke. Ukraine will have advantage in a year? In what, number of dead?
    2
  2. Exactly, never interrupt your enemy when they are being idiots. Notice Russia is not saying anything to allow Ukraine to move out of Bakhmut. Heck, they are now doing anything possible to keep Kiev in Bakhmut together with circus from Progozyn. The mean grinder must go on - Bakhmut is the best thing that happened to Russia in a while. Its were Ukraine takes epic level losses.
    2
  3. Russia is not on any UA territory. Ukraine needs to withdraw from Russian territory.
    2
  4.  @HR_8035_YEA  I saw videos of people for both - for the war and for the mobilization.
    2
  5.  @Its_shiki_time4876  Yes, on your part. In manouver welfare which Ukraine claims to employ you always advance fast at the start and this was the UA plan as well. This is seen all over WWII - where the first 24h - 72h is decisive. For example, during D-day the first 24h were decisive. After first 24h allies knew they won. Their forces advanced up to 10km deep and diged in. At that time they started to unload supplies and additional troops. The reason why first 24h - 72h are the most important is you simply want to make sure your pressure point is maximal and your enemy has no chance to bring in reinforcements. You can also go deep beyond enemy's defensive line. To counter this enemy should build multiple defensive lines in a deep defense doctrine. We see success of both Russia and Ukraine with fast attack - Ukraine had success during Kharkiv offensive by piercing weak Russian defense in first 24h followed by very quick deep strike. Without any major defensive lines behind main line Russians did not have defense in depth. All attempts to retreat and form defense failed as Ukrainians were too fast. Reserve Russian units only formed defense behind a river many km to the rear (due to UA mistake of turning north). If you do not go fast like you say, enemy will bring reinforcement in time and the battle turns into attrition war. Attrition war favors Russia and is their way to fight.
    2
  6. Which it should - it won the war.
    2
  7.  @TaTvsU  Russia would simply liberate the villages from Ukrainian occupation. In the worst case to protect sovereign Russian territory Russian constitution allows use of nukes. At first tactical then on cities.
    2
  8.  @dIRECTOR259  Spot on. Besides - if they had issues they would not be attacking! Or at least not attacking so hard with such expenditure of artillery.
    2
  9.  @golddigger8759  nah, and what will they exactly do against Russian defensive mine fields? Most of these nations have weak offense. Russia has nothing to worry about these. The main problem is missile sites, but even these are not such a big deal as Baltic are actually closer. Finland essentially is of little problem for Russia.
    2
  10. LOL, no - talk is about unconditional Ukraine surrender. Russia will get between 20 - 35% of Ukraine, no NATO ever, etc, etc.
    2
  11. Main cause of the disaster looks like damage to the dam by early HIMARS strikes combined with high water level. That seems to be 70% probable cause.
    2
  12. 3 months later and this guy is wrong on every level. Every.
    2
  13. Ukraine will not attack Kherson itself as right now Russia is pushing them towards the city of Mikolayiv and I would not be shocked if we see battle for that city.
    2
  14.  @dylanc9174  Bridge is fine. Why pp say its destroyed is beyond me. There are videos from the bridge while ON the bridge - from like today. Not only that there is 2nd bridge available. Finally not only that but Russia has ferries. Not even that - Russia has pontoon bridges.
    2
  15.  @terjeoseberg990  Only deck is damaged. As they hit the deck Russian or local crew fixes it. Main problem now is they hit it at day time targeting Ukrainian crew and killed some workers so maybe they will not be so willing to work on fixing it. In emergency they can just put some beams over damaged section and drive truck onto that. Its non issue.
    2
  16.  @terjeoseberg990 HIMARS is a rocket system. Maybe you want to read more about it - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M142_HIMARS and educate yourself.
    2
  17. Ukraine will surrender? Seems like a good idea.
    2
  18. I come here for comic relief.
    2
  19. This is such a cope. It was a failure as it was attack of desperation of weak UA army against well defended front line and well armed troops.
    2
  20. This is why stock market in Moscow collapsed almost 10%. This is why Putin was avoiding it so long. It will be a big hit to the economy.
    2
  21. So once Ukriane surrenders what will you say 😅😅😅
    2
  22. There is no such thing as "free media" anywhere on this planet.
    2
  23. What man power - Kiev independent said that population of Ukraine is 20m. If you look at population graph there is 3x less (more actually) 25 year olds than 45 year olds.
    2
  24. Morale in Russian army is great, Ukraine, not so much.
    2
  25. Better Zielinski to Moscow.
    2
  26.  @jamesthomas4841  they did win. We are just waiting for precise info what they won. Will Kharkov be Russian? Maybe Odessa? Will UA disintegrate?
    2
  27. Balanced comedy!
    2
  28. No, Ukraine refused!!! Russia asked for international help in the area. Ukraine refused! Ukraine refused Turkish proposal - Russia welcomed it! stop spreading fake news.
    2
  29. There are zero indications Ukraine can turn around a war it has lost. It has not done anything in Kherson to suggest that they can do anything more then a local counter attack. I do not see any danger for Russian forces around Kherson. There is currently zero chance of cutting off supplies. Essentially the question now is where all the Russians have gone. And what will Russia's next move be. Where will they attack?!
    2
  30. But they themselves DO NOT want to interact with the west - they see west as double faced and treacherous. This is why they did a total break in relationship. There is not will in Russia to deal with the west for decades - they are turning totally in the direction of Asia. And why, do I sense that opinions of around 3% of the world that US makes up should matter? Why should US have a SAY in world matters. And why the west, that under US leadership, making whopping 13% of the planet is there to rule them all?! I say the world needs to unite and put west in its place - and that is not at the helm of the planet. End of colonial era. All people are now free or should be. No more dictating to the word. Finally, US started massive wars - were is the outrage at the measly 3% that is a world dictator? Why US is allowed to exist - why no prison USA?
    2
  31.  @williamwang9154  I am sure Russia will not mind, they put minefield on their side, just in case anyone scales the wall.
    2
  32.  @pinkyfull  In Kharkiv Russia had two brigades over like 100km front line and no defense in depth at all. It took this for Putin to finally realize he needs mobilization. Its not like Putin did not make mistakes.
    2
  33.  @celebrim1  Ukraine also does not have pilot nor mechanic fleet to do so. Nor number of bases nor air defense systems.... Also Russia has best and largest air defense network on earth.
    2
  34.  @celebrim1  Russian air defenses are considered by almost everyone including me to be the best in the world. This does not mean it cannot be defeated or losses will not happen. S-400 is not used to take out small drones. Israel does not fly through Russian supplied air defenses at all - they are not that stupid. They use terrain masking and a good mission planning even vs. 50 year old systems Syria has & that is only when they have to be close - most of the time Israel uses stand off weapons. Location of slightly newer Syrian air defenses is well known by the Israeli as Syrians are not exactly good at hiding stuff. Remember that Israel managed to destroy in the past 100s of missile sites without almost any losses - while at the same time NATO over Yugoslavia later on with better tech could not really touch the same old systems. Using ME as an example is foolish as one could say that M1 Abrams tank is total junk as in Iraqi hands it was junk. They lost 60 in 3 days. To ISIS in pickup trucks.
    2
  35. They have now standard rat catcher bus!
    2
  36. Oh yes, take popcorn and watch the comedian.
    2
  37. Attacks in some cases, for few days, taken out 5% of Russian capacity. More or less non event. At least much smaller than say scheduled maintenance.
    2
  38. Well, the peace deal centers around not allowing NATO into Ukraine. As well as making sure any Nazi tendencies of Ukraine are nullified in rather "assured" way. Also Crimea is transferred to Russia. Donbass was supposed to go back to Ukraine .... but it seems now this may not be possible as after almost 2 years of war no one exactly trusts Kiev. Author here is total joke - Russia DOES NOT NEED ALL LAND - OR EVEN MOST LAND. Come on. Be real. We know what last year the document said about peace deal.... we KNOW. it was signed by both sides.... thus we know author here is dead wrong. War crimes? Sure Russia does not mind at all prosecution of war crimes - remember that Ukraine did a lot of war crimes. Also no one cares too much about some criminal Ivan - these guys will probably get themselves into a Russian prison anyways. Reparations???? Sure - Russia can pay a deal of $$$ for removal of sanctions. Again, author here is.... crazy! I actually expected Russia to pay something like 100B over period of 10 years. Yes, in fair world Ukraine would pay, but world is not fair. Why war needs to continue as long as Putin is in power - if Putin died today war would not be affected. Putin has not a lot of connection to the war. New Russian president would continue the war as it is in best interest of Russia to do so ... come on.
    2
  39. NO!
    2
  40. Germany first.
    2
  41. Phase 3 will start once all of Donbas is taken - so probably at least a month away now. I assume phase 3 will be taking Kharkiv - but I could be wrong - it may be Odessa.
    2
  42.  @andersjjensen  Russians already taken Kherson - you mean Nikolaiv. Problem is Russia and allies are not taking heavy casualties and costs are low. But costs for Ukraine to hold the line are immense. This is why Russia is in no hurry. Let them bleed. This it may still take many weeks before all of Donbas is taken. Kharkiv will probably be taken but will be a huge operation - I expect something like 6 months. I also expect Odessa to be taken - also 6 months. We see. You never know exact times in war. At the beginning of 1944 Germans were still doing OK - then Soviets did Bargation and it was all over - front moved a lot. Same break may happen here, Russians do a major break through and Ukraine may loose tons of land in matter of a week.
    2
  43. then I guess Russia also forever.
    2
  44. And its PPP representing production is larger than Germany. Fastest growing economy in Europe as per world bank. Keep that in mind.
    2
  45. Russian regular army is well trained and has no issues - they easily cut and slice through UA lines. Problem is too few of them. General mobilization main issue is economic downturn. Russia would easily smash Ukraine but be set back 10 years. US game plan is to sacrifice Ukraine for such mobilization. And Z is willing to do so to push forward US agenda.
    2
  46. He has - he is like comic for pro Ukraine point of view - I am waiting for his video explaining UA surrender ;)
    2
  47. Russia taken the city on 21st. The battle is over. Any retaking of the city would be a new battle for Bakhmut. Otherwise a whole war would be one long single battle. The best joke here is that Bakhmut is somehow a "drain" on Russia and attacking it by Ukraine is not a drain on Ukraine - what? Heavy cope. The main idea of the battle for Russia was to severely deplete Ukrainian reserves and destory as much troops as possible while at the same time gaining very defensible position from which future attacks can be lead against remaining cities of Donbass. Russia accomplished its mission. Not sure why Ukraine was there - PR? Ukraine failed as everyone can see the city they said will never be taken ... fall. Bad PR.
    2
  48.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  Well, I guess almost none now ;) They do have around 10 brigades left for the "great" offensive. After that ... nothing.
    2
  49.  @richardjoseph9002  Ukraine is further and further from its objectives while Russia is on home stretch. War win or loose is based on getting your goals or not getting them. Thus Russia is clearly winning and more or less won already for some time - same as Allies were more or less winning and already won by 1944. All that was needed is to do the final stretch. In WWI people were not as stupid as now or in WWII - Germany instead of dragging it out quit early - and even by WWI standards it was late (all other central powers quit before it). Sure it was later used by Hitler etc. But what was the point of dragging the war for say 2 more years to make sure allies are near or in Berlin? Ukraine should admit they lost and cut their losses.
    2
  50.  @johndonaldson3619  but all neutral channels and all sane people say Ukriane lost. I am trying to save you from yourself. And from this propagandist.
    2