Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @CrazyGaming-ig6qq  Russia should liberate Donbass by this winter. all of it. As per current advance.
    1
  2. OF course not. Russia won that war.
    1
  3. Where? Its on Twitter. Works well - moving forward! In reality Russia and allies started their own offensive in the area and captured multiple towns threatening city of Mikolayev. So "counter offensive" is more Russian thing which may end up with either taking the city or at least blocking it. Total failure for Ukraine. How on earth phase three is Ukraine "initiative" when Russia and allies are moving forward??? Is this a joke? Finally, if Russian logistics is so bad how on Earth do they manage to push Ukrainians off in Kherson? HOW??? Magic?
    1
  4. Its too late - Ukraine is on the ropes. Also they are loosing more troops in defense than Russians in offense - roughly 2 to 1. This is due to Russian fire power. This is moving towards 3:1 as Ukraine is running low on ammo and equipment.
    1
  5. This guy is such an idiot. Why would Russia invade any part of Finland, specially in the north? Why? Why even test there anything? Why? How to even do it? Lol. Also NATO may react as commitment is low. Article 5 is hot air as it is super weak. It is mostly based on US political will. Also why this guy talks about Russia, not Russian block, majority of humanity.
    1
  6. Vote for Trump - lets end this war.
    1
  7. Russia army seems to be in great state - look how they smashed Ukrainian offensive!!! Leopards burning together with Bradly IFVs.
    1
  8.  @philliptemple9841  I went to deep state UA maps and they are making huge advances. In one day they managed to advance as much as they did for the entire month. In one day they advanced more then the Kursk offensive did per day over two weeks. Within days they advanced approximately 10km. There is no evidence of "huge cost" but there seems to be plenty of evidence of huge UA losses especially to Russian drones. As Russian electronic welfare capability went up even deep state admits only 10% of UA drones make it anywhere close to the targets intended for. Ukraine does not need to surrender if they don't want to. They simply will be overrun and destroyed. Either Kiev regime will be replaced by Russia friendly dictator or after even more de population all of Ukraine will be absorbed into Russia.
    1
  9. Wait, did not they run out of missiles two years ago ;)))))))))))))
    1
  10. Relax, western people are super easy to play with using propaganda. They defy logic to believe.
    1
  11. You do know Soviet Union was communist not a monarch so communists... won, right?
    1
  12. Well we know there are surrender negotiations as Ukraine clearly lost the war. West wants to surrender the least, Russia wants to take the most.
    1
  13. Sounds like him! Loosing Baghdad was a plan to trap Americans in Iraq!
    1
  14. Zero.
    1
  15. Well, that would put Russia in front, 5 confirmed kills vs. 8 confirmed kills - so already half of F-16s to be delivered are down.
    1
  16.  @tuehojbjerg969  I mean no confirmed kills for either side. I bet neither side lost a single aircraft.
    1
  17. Not really - if flanks fall Russia would leave. They are not as stupid as Ukies.
    1
  18. Russia can mobilize more but why? They are not pushed by Ukraine in any sense. They have more equipment as well - to mobilize and equip 300k more troops. BUT the limiting factor here is artillery - Russia cannot attack decisively in more then few places as they are limited to maybe at most 30k shells per day. If Russia mobilized and used another 300k these troops would suffer higher casualty rates - maybe even as high as Ukrainian casualty rates. Putin does not want that - there is no hurry - Ukraine is getting weaker every day - no need to speed up the war at a cost of 1000s of dead - which would look bad at home. Let artillery do its work. Of course things can change and Putin may be forced to mobilize more. Either way Ukraine can only count on a miracle to turn things around.
    1
  19.  @thomasjgallagher924  Ukraine did not take any land back in the last 6 months and only lost it. Ukraine took massive losses in equipment and man power. Ukraine has zero path to victory. Not exactly sure what they are waiting for as miracles are rare and far between. By end of summer huh? Like the war was supposed to be won before the winter? Then by spring? LOL. What can Ukraine do by end of summer exactly? They are weaker now than they have been during Kharkov and Kherson offensives. Russia is much, much stronger. If by end of Summer you mean that Ukraine will be forced to the table - I agree - but why wait? Ukraine defeat is inevitable given that it cannot sustain losses while Russia can. Ukraine cannot replace lost troops. Russia can. Ukraine cannot replace lost equipment - Russia can.
    1
  20. Kursk was a brain dead move for PR reasons that cost massive loss of equipment and lives.
    1
  21. @Olaf Sigurson Russia won the war at least 6 weeks ago.
    1
  22.  @enpakeksi765  These objectives were stated by Putin at the beginning. Verifiable objective (since "denazification" as an example is hard to verify) is control of all of Donbass. Putin already liberated Lugansk and is well on his way to liberate Donetsk. As a bonus he also captured most of Kherson, Zaporozia and large portion of Kharkiv.
    1
  23.  @mariaf.6601  Economy growing at fastest rate in Europe according to World Bank. There is no budget deficit - Russia - like China - have a surplus. This is not the west ;) Imports and exports are doing well - heck exports to many places in EU have... grown. Most companies stayed in Russia - only about 7% left. Exchange rate is fine - Chinese value yuan low as well - it boosts economic growth and lowers cost of war. Remember they have positive trade balance - in difference to the west. So lowering your currency makes pp pay more for the war. They can always sell some surplus currency to push ruble up - but why?
    1
  24.  @mariaf.6601  the western world bank is good with money. So it would be strange if they lied to make Russia look good. Russia's reserves are growing, which is normal as they are surplus trade balance country. If they sold reserves we would know about it, they do not and let Ruble fall. How can you deny even western data about Russia? Who do you trust then, just propaganda. This is not some Chinese or Russian stuff. It's a western stuff. You are deep in belief that Russia is failing same as the idiots that were saying since April last year that Russia will run out of missiles or idiots that made jokes about chips from washing machines. So far nothing was shown to be true. With Ukraine pushing hard front lines stay static clearly indicating that they cannot push Russia out. Western economists show Russia is not going to collapse. What is your plan, to the last Ukrainian?
    1
  25.  @solimaro  Isn't it? Whole west is trying to defeat Russia with Ukrainian hands yet it fails - who would have ever thought! Either Russia is strong, or NATO is weak.
    1
  26.  @gingerlicious3500  And did they give Ukraine tanks???? Nope. NATO knows that if it pushes very hard China will get involved into a war of attrition and a proxy. They know they cannot win that. Who is saying all this BS about bad Russian economy when they are doing like 100x better than NATO predicted??? Russia may not be a great country - may be a shithole country - but at least its a country - Ukraine right now is not. Russian economy recovered already - as per world bank. Russian military does not need to recover from anything - they have not collapsed at all. Losses in say air power are ... a whopping 1 year production ;)))) I.e. since the war lasts now over a year Russians recovered all losses ;) Losses from tank combat may take longer - few years - but it also means Russia will have better tanks. Once Russia wins the war do you really think the victor will suffer? How can anyone sane think Ukraine, in a war that is crucial to Russia's survival can win is beyond me. Its like a grown man fighting a 10 year old an pp betting on the 10 year old - in a fight to the death. Less than 300 tanks committed for year 2 of the war. Almost no new artillery systems. Chronic luck of artillery shells, with no new major numbers coming in. Epic level losses of military personnel. Tiny air force. Soon running out (as per west) of air defense missiles. And yet there are pp that think... Ukraine can win. Russia did not even mobilize too hard. Please, enlighten me as to why Ukraine would win? Other than a miracle please. Win is defined regaining all land prior to 2014.
    1
  27.  @agffans5725  Exactly - almost nothing is sent anymore. May I remaind you that west sent something in line of over 600 artillery systems during first year of the war, and there are no pledges for more than 100 for 2nd year. In order to fire 5000 rounds of ammo per day you need around 1.7 million rounds per year. No do your math and see that artillery shells are NOT coming. 8000 rounds for 19 howitzers is not much at all ;))) Usually these fire around 50 rounds per day. So supply sent is for... OMG - a whopping 8 days. Maybe 10 days if they stretch it out ;)))) Yes, Ukraine will get all ex. Polish and ex. Slovakian fighters - I do expect that the west eventually will donate few dozen F-16s. The donations do not fully cover Ukraine losses which are much more. Ukraine lost over 70 aircraft (quite confirmed - not some Russian source) with almost half of these MiG-29s. If you want to know exact types, just use wikipedia. This is pro western source - so real number can be much higher. Essentially Ukraine is toast. They are not getting a lot of tanks, artillery or even IFV. They are not getting air defense systems. Sending more "wonder weapons" will be of similar help as the one in Germany in 1945 ;) Sending weapons only prolongs the war. Russia is clearly winning and sending more to keep war going is certainly not making the end of the war in sight. 1000s more will have to die. Why not simply start negotiations? Ukraine does not enter NATO and transfers all land with majority RU population to Russia - Russia transfers all land with majority UA back to Ukraine. Simple. Why does Ukraine fight to be in NATO???
    1
  28. Well, Ukraine is loosing the war. It has no allies with troops deployed. And has no way to retaliate.
    1
  29.  @morstyrannis1951  Russia called UK and France and made it clear to both than any attack on Russia will lead to direct attack on them. And if they want nuclear exchange, they got it. Next move, UK and France. They have been warned. And I am sure Xi in France few days ago clearly explained to the French that Putin is not bluffing. Russia clearly told both little dogs they will be smashed. Maybe you were not paying attention. So far little dogs took note and backtracked rather quickly. China and rest of the world would certainly not let the west get away with this - the so called free world moves to Asia - not anywhere in US or EU. West better take note.
    1
  30. He is a mad pro Ukraine propagandist. His job is to spread fantasy.
    1
  31. Russians have accuracy as well - have you seen all these krasnopol hits? Also Russia won in 2023 the artillery battle inflicting higher losses on Ukraine then on itself.
    1
  32. Who cares?! So US passes 60B in aid. They only thing it will do is prolong the war. Better not pass any aid and force UA to surrender now, then say 2 years from now when there is nothing to really surrender. Heck, it feels that even now its too late and Ukraine will never rise up again. Their losses dwarf anything in WWII. By Kiev Independent.
    1
  33. Maybe - but I believe this is to show Ukraine that if they do not freeze the conflict he will annex half of it.
    1
  34.  @keithpalmer4547  LOL! Based on what? The fact soon they will be outnumbered? War ends when ether a) both sides are to tired of it and end it in the middle. b) one side gets smashed Since Russia is way too powerful it will not be the one smashed. so either Ukraine gets smashed or both sides get too tired and have a political solution. Neither of these are seen as victories for Ukraine. Also in 6 months Russian mobilized troops will be fully deployed and in 6 months it is Russia and her allies that are going to smash some Ukrainian butt.
    1
  35. DPICM is not that great against enemy artillery as it cannot damage things such as mobile artillery - i.e. mobile artillery is very resistant to DPICM. Towed artillery not so much - but good luck doing any major damage to towed piece with DPICM. Heck, DPICM cannot even take on hardened trenches - as these have sandbags which will resist DPICM or simply make DPICM irrelevant. If DPICM was so great we would only see DPICM - but its not - it is mostly good against soft targets such as trucks or troops in the open or troops in shallow trenches / fox holes. It is also not good in build up area - as houses will resist DPICM and apartment buildings are all but immune.
    1
  36.  @s4ss  US as many others have zero caring about "submunitions don´t explode and great unintended minefields" - the main caring is a) is it effective. If it was so great all shells would be submunitions. So why they are not? "DPICM has a potential destructive effect on armored vehicles due to the shaped charge bomblet, but it may require a very large number of shells to have an effect against targets like tank formations to the point of futility;" Cluster ammunition is nothing new - Ukraine has already used it extensively - got more from Turkey and Russia used it extensively as well. Note that these bomblets are no more dangerous then so called petal mines so widely used mostly by Ukraine. All artillery systems (mobile) are specifically designed to resist such bomblets. Same as all field fortifications. This is an old weapon system - used since 1950s and a lot during 1960s. It is thus very well known.
    1
  37.  @s4ss  But its not. It has a range of less than 30km - vs. 44km for regular rounds. Also the bomblets do not posses a lot of destructive power - we are talking about what, a single Oz of explosives? That is 6x less than hand grenade! M777 have survived single hits from older kamikaze drones (!) So when attacking artillery you mostly are attacking personnel or tow vehicle. As well as ammo storage. If dealing with self propelled stuff you are far better off to use regular artillery or use some kind of smart round. All bomblets that do not hit self propelled artillery due to their tiny charge - even if they fall right next to it - are harmless. All bomblets that do fall onto the artillery system may produce only small amount of damage - even if they penetrate they actually need to penetrate something of note - if they go over the bombardier they may burn his face - so what. This would be much better against say MLRS system where multiple tubes could be damaged leading to cook off. Again note 2/3 of the regular round range. Best use is infantry in the open supported by Humvees. I.e. Ukrainian infantry. Against a spread out platoon you can take 1/4 of them out of combat with a single round.
    1
  38.  @s4ss  Base bleed can be applied to other types of rounds to increase range - here it is used as the round without it would have even less than 30km. The gun used is 52 caliber. Roof armor is good enough - even when bomblets penetrate they do not have a lot of power behind them. Let me put it this way - during WWII at the very beginning Poland used anti material rifle against tanks. In one episode such rifle kept firing at a tank. The tank finally stopped and crew bailed. The went to inspect the tank. They found out that ALL rounds fired at it penetrated and create nice 1 1/4" holes in the armor. The last round killed the driver and thus the tank stopped. Moral of the story is size matters. The bomblets will produce damage but you need a LOT of them to either cause cumulative damage or get lucky to hit and damage sufficiently something critical. Also since bomblets need to hit directly and any near misses are useless how many bomblets out of say 64 will actually hit the SPG? Bomblets should be distributed more or less evenly - and over wide area - say the area is 150 ft by 150ft. So we have one bomblet per 350 sq ft. So chances of hitting the SPG with even 1 are 50-50.
    1
  39. Yep, UA surrender coming soon.
    1
  40. Nah, Russia is taking in 30k per month, they are fine.
    1
  41. Russia will win. Doh. Come on. Like I said, Ukriane lost and now in full retreat. This collapse will only accelerate. This guy propaganda is such a joke. Him and Denys should open their own channel.
    1
  42. War of attrition works great for Russia - this is why Russia has chosen such war. There is currently no danger in Kherson of any supply cut - anyone thinking such is delusional.
    1
  43. Why does US?
    1
  44. Yes, possible soft target for such nukes.
    1
  45.  @Lizardo451  I watched news almost every day from the start.
    1
  46. Not possible. Putin is too smart for "leaders" such as Biden.
    1
  47. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL! Ukraine is winning war of attrition? Really? They are loosing it BAD. Russia picked this war of attrition as it guarantees them victory in the long run. This guy is an idiot.
    1
  48. But none of Russian soldiers will be knifed per day as many are actually former Ukrainians fighting within visual range of their homes. Who is going to knife them? Their wives? Maybe their grandpa? Cousin?
    1
  49. Russian plan is very good. It may lead to end of the war this year.
    1
  50. Russia also claimed 6 downed UA aircraft over the last week or so. Both sides provided same evidence - like none. Given total luck of evidence and similar use of glide bombs today as yesterday I think that Russia did not loose what UA claims. Imagine if Ukraine could do what they claim - to take down Russian jets with patriot - they could have moved it all over the front - move it to Donbass and down aircraft there, etc. Why is this not happening? Russia lost few aircraft some time ago in a single day - but that came with actual video as proof - aircraft were filmed. Now we have none.
    1