Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @rmdomainer9042  Russian telegram channels mean nothing. Same as other channels online - same channels say they downed 100 Ukrainian aircraft - do you believe that as well?
    1
  2. There is little evidence stuff was really shot down - there is little info about whatever anyone died. There is ZERO evidence of ground fire at all - none - not even single fire between Wagner troops. All we got is helicopters and aircraft but no ground action? Putin did not accept this - Progrozin is no longer in Russia. Exile is standard way of dealing with anyone in power that rebels. This has been done for 100s of years in Russia. As for Lukaszenko - nope - he was not the main man involved - there are pictures with Russian generals casually chatting.
    1
  3.  @larshildebrandt3835  no talk about how Ukraine damaged the dam and the gates? Russia multiple times said both this and shelling of the nuclear power plant are disasters in the making. So I guess now we have to look for a lucky UA artillery hit to the diesel generators to have a little meltdown and I am sure you błame Russia for not taking out all M777 in the area.
    1
  4.  @greenl7661  NO. That is a lie. UA explicitly denied ANY presence of UN troops. You can Google it. UA said NO. Same as UA said no to any negotiations.
    1
  5.  @andersjjensen  Yep, how delusional one has to be to think that Russians shelled themselves.
    1
  6. Correct - Ukraine has no people left due to huge losses and has no ammo or equipment even for these troops they have.
    1
  7.  @jesan733  no, this is quite new. Maybe two months now. You are confusing it with western propaganda that said Russia will run out of missiles, tanks, etc. That started in April or May of last year but somewhat lost steam.
    1
  8. Are you also stupid?
    1
  9. Wolf! Wolf!! Wolf!!! .............. Wolf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BOOOOOOOOOOOOOM Yeah, no more UK.
    1
  10. Both claims are a joke. No proof for either.
    1
  11. With eventual surrender of UA - in rail car?
    1
  12. Yes, the stakes are high - once Russia wins it will be the end of western backed international rules and start of world backed international rules. End of the west, beginning of the east!
    1
  13. Who cares who will be the next US president. Ukraine lost the war even if its mickey mouse.
    1
  14. LOL, 70% it collapsed due to damage from previous strikes by Ukraine and high water level 20% Ukraine blew it up to bring attention away from failed offensive (same as attacks on Belogrod were done to take news away from fall of Bakhmut) 10% it was Russia in an accident as no sane person would do it deliberately. Vast majority of damage from this is to the lower Russian side. Almost all dead are on Russian side. Long term damage is on Russian side. Satellite phots support collapse on its own theory. This is why US is not saying "it was Russia" - if they had even a blip of evidence they would point a finger.
    1
  15. Try what again? They did not try again after win with Fins. Main goal is to keep NATO out of Ukraine. This needs to be written in stone.
    1
  16. Sure and they can then take same amount from assets west has. Also this will be political suicide for the west in views of the world. UK tries to dance around the issue by saying founds will be frozen forever - but this is not realistic at all.
    1
  17. This shows Putin is rather strong and secure leader. I.e. western propaganda repeated here is a joke. Any leader that survives a military action against him is coming out stronger. The whole situation is done by Wagner with a little though - they did it in a such a strange way, pp are questioning whatever this was a "real" operation. So far this is seen as 50-50. Main reason why pp don't think this is maskiruvka is b/c it is so well done - i.e. if this is fake it was done very, very, very well. This would be best run operation in Russia / Soviet Union ever.
    1
  18. Nah, I doubt the losses on this stretch operation will cave Ukraine in faster. Yes, they are taking a beating and all they are getting is a lot of media attention plus are forcing Russians to act. But all they are getting is extra time for like 10x Russian losses. Time for what I ask?
    1
  19. They are smart - they send troops to Donbass - Kursk is just forests and villages. Once Donbass is taken its game over.
    1
  20.  @philjameson292  Sure - Putin does not need soldiers to occupy Ukraine - he will simply incorporate large parts of it into Russia or all of it as needed and use local police to deal with any limited insurgency. As you noted any OUN resistance vs. Stalin did not reach much beyond 1950 and calling it resistance is a stretch - it was more they managed to hide in holes for 5 years before security forces found them. So yeah I don't think it will be a problem for Russia - not a problem at all.
    1
  21.  @philjameson292  How does that related to Ukraine? Last time I checked they were part of Soviet Union with over 50m population and there was no resistance. Now they have 20m in Zielinski Ukraine. Neither in Iraq nor Afghanistan nor Vietnam US had 30% or more of Americans living there. Once again, Soviets had Ukraine - all of it - without any insurgency. Now its just a shadow of what its been. There is more partisan activity in Zielinski Ukraine fighting US sponsored regime than in Putin Ukraine fighting Russia. So I fail to see comparisons to Vietnam at work her - especially given that its Kiev that has more issues than Moscow.
    1
  22.  @philjameson292  You do not understand this war. This war is more of a civil war not a war of different people. " If the population doesn't want you there then you ain't going to stay." - they key is the "if" if the population does not mind you staying there - as is the case here, you can stay. Putin, if needed, can seal the border so no weapons will flow. The situation can be best modeled by civil war in say Spain - how many troops do Spain need to use to keep insurgents at bay? They had a war in 1930s you know. Or if you don't like it, Chechnya - I don't see huge insurgency there - do you - and by far they are significantly more fight in the locals there than say Afghanistan. And yeah, you need to work on your English skills.
    1
  23. This is the same BS that Germans talked about in 1941. That Soviets are weak, that Stalin will fall, that all it takes is ONE kick. Blah Blah Blah. Putin will not last forever. But his replacement will continue similar policies as they are good for Russia as a country. No one, that is a true Russian, a patriot, will simply let Russia disintegrate or disappear from the map. Personally I think Putin is going to be seen as one of the greatest leaders Russia had.
    1
  24.  @allanmason3201  There are videos of Russians doing just what you described. Trucks, buses - no issues. The missiles on Antonovsky bridge did little damage as well - Russians simply replaced the deck with ... new deck - so new concrete blocks. A crane lifted old ones and disposed of them while then placed new ones.
    1
  25.  @allanmason3201  Its not patched up - they actually replaced the deck - so its better then what it used to be. Its like they did not fix a tire, they just replaced with brand new tire.
    1
  26. But Ukraine cannot bring the war to such point -- not even within 1000 miles of it. Putin knows he won the war. It is clear. All he has to do is preserve. Same as Stalin knew in 1943 he won. We are in more like 1944 in WWII timeline - it is obvious Ukraine lost the war.
    1
  27. They pushed through 1st defense line. Then there is the 2nd, and after that only weak defenses. Then it can go quick.
    1
  28. How west is using propaganda .... well, you are watching it right now!
    1
  29. Probably will be Russian citizens soon.
    1
  30. 😂😂😂
    1
  31.  @bananian  The looser mostly lies and twists. Russia is clearly winning the war. There is no need to do any major lying. Using on pro UA channels you find a lot of BS. I mean what else can you show? I have said Ukraine will loose this war right after they ended negotiations in 2022. I was sure of a loss when Russia mobilized 300k fresh troops. Now its only question of time - there will be strong western push to end this by Spring 2024.
    1
  32. Which shows why it could not be Russia. They have nothing at all to gain from this. Its a disaster for them. Dozens of civilians killed. 1000s of troops needed to run. Lots of equipment lost. Lots of positions lost. Defensive mine fields lost. etc. etc.
    1
  33. That would assure nuclear strike by Putin - i.e. if I was Putin I would immediately strike with heavy nukes all possible areas - ensures total destruction of Ukrainian state.
    1
  34. Its quite a modern aircraft - less than a decade old. Way ahead of the electronics in old F-16s.
    1
  35.  @superwout  But a 1980s F-16 is not contemporary western jet. Su-34s - depending on which one it is, is few years old - maybe a decade, not 40! Please, I hope you are not suggesting Russia is 40 years behind the west in avionics. Same BS was repeated during both Korean and Vietnam wars - but it was quickly corrected. Neither MiG-15 nor MiG-21 proven to be junk.
    1
  36.  @superwout  Ukraine is getting the old stuff - that is a fact. So not sure exactly which ball game you are talking about. Not only they are getting old F-16s, they are not getting 100s of them but less than two dozen.
    1
  37.  @enpakeksi765  Maybe, maybe not. Didn't they have an election where "no more war" party won? Once they form government they are very likely to cancel any help to UA.
    1
  38. Would not change the war. There never was a chance for UA to win other that Russian economy collapsing.
    1
  39. Exactly - Russia has 7x more ammo for its artillery.... not to mention aviation and missile troops. This will not change in favor of Ukraine but in favor of Russia.... Defeat of Ukraine is certain.
    1
  40. Ukraine never had any chance of prevailing. I think this is obvious now.
    1
  41. Yes, but longer than borrowed time of EU.
    1
  42.  @dpelpal  Based on what exactly??? When was last time US faced any real enemy? WWII??? US lost almost every war its been in since WWII. Soviets / Russia won almost every war they have been in since WWII. Russia is supported by Asia, in which there is China whom has 55% of worlds industrial power. Who supports US? Nobody.
    1
  43. And proof of that is??? Reminder - you don't beg for foreign volunteers if all is going well - and that is what UA does ;)
    1
  44. In Kherson offensive Ukraine soundly lost. Badly. Here we have a repeat of this but on a larger scale. The offensive is almost over now. I expect Russia may go on a large counter before rains in September. The war may be over this year - but if Ukraine manages to drag it into 3rd year we may see some major Russian gains followed by strong push by the west for Ukraine to settle due to fears Kiev regime total collapse is close. I also expect full general mobilization in Ukraine soon.
    1
  45.  @enpakeksi765  Kherson was a loss when Ukraine tried to take it by force in a failed offensive. It was almost as bad as the current attempt.
    1
  46.  @enpakeksi765  Russia retreated from Kherson AFTER the offensive - as they could not do it under pressure. They retreated as it was expensive and risky to keep forces there over the river. Risk was clearly exposed by failure of the dam - which was attacked by Ukraine multiple times. The main bridge was also attacked multiple times forcing building of additional bridge which was also regularly attacked. Also Russia probably no longer was interested in threats to Odessa so keeping troops on the other side of the river lost strategic reason. Almost all decisions by Russia are cold and calculated while many of Ukraine decisions seem to be mostly drawn by PR value. Russia so far never fought in any position where it has no advantage - they retreat.
    1
  47.  @enpakeksi765  Actually the main objective was or should be to destroy Russian forces on that bank of the river. You can see what dam did - if it happened when Russians were on the other side they would loose 30k of their best troops - or close to it. Russians moved out in good order. Ukraine can celebrate taking some land back but they know they cannot cross the river to get more land and they are looking at their new border. At most minor victory for Ukraine and a setback for Russians they cannot threaten Odessa for a while - through I would not count out Russia cutting Ukraine from the sea yet.
    1
  48. No clue. Maybe take over US? Seems logical!
    1
  49. Yes, they have taken usual number - these are not used in Ukraine. No Russia is not using humans lives - that would be Ukraine. Air assets were transferred to Ukraine - dozens of aircraft, dozens of helicopters.
    1
  50. Who cares what UA wants - Russia won the war. Either UA surrender or Russia takes all it wants.
    1