General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Sky News
comments
Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Sky News" channel.
Previous
3
Next
...
All
Nah, they can use the road more to the south. I fail to see why they need to use the road right next to the river. Also all roads in the salient are now less then 15km from any Russian artillery - so quite close.
1
Not according to the map. Well outside of artillery range.
1
@orlock20 Russia has shown they can replace the losses, but Ukraine, for about a month now, cannot say the same.
1
@GoblinFM If Russians were so inept, please let me know how on earth they could be attacking heavily defended positions held by 2x or more Ukrainians. Please, would love to know.
1
So Ukraine lost like 100 soldiers. Russia lost 450 soldiers. Kiev is to fall within 24h or so. UK is lying through their teeth, lying so hard that its no longer funny. Or Ukraine is lying and they lost like 1500 troops ;) Realistically Russia lost around 50 soldiers killed in the first day offensive.
1
LOL, Putin would love that - once they enter Russia he can use over 100k troops that have conscripts in them. Essentially doubling his army.
1
Sure, maybe they should first try to make sure they don't loose half of their country to Putin.
1
It would be a bit crazy if Russians took Kiev by driving in - maybe then the pp of the west would realize that Ukraine is not resisting. I think they cut city off first from outside - probably doing this right now. Then do probing attacks supported by drones from multiple sides - they need to try to take out any long range AA so they can use airforce freely to bomb any buildings with resistance fighters in them. Kiev defenses are very weak and Russians are know to be brave / foolish / who cares about casulties mindset so they may take it and take Zielniski very shortly.
1
@NesseratiousChannel Who uses Oryx? Look at some videos where they show UA losses. Oryx never shows these.
1
Yes, and imagine that tiny force that is left just forced collapse of whole Lugansk front. These few Russians still alive must be Rambo types!
1
Better yet, notice that Nikoliv has only TWO bridges and no barges for Ukrainians to run off .... just pointing that out.
1
Yes - it was a honest moment - but not good for Trump as he is in the US. I do not think it was genius due to timing - I would have attacked say in summer, June of 2021. Not towards end of winter! Putin's timing was simply strange. But other then that, like economic war calculus, were excellent.
1
its so called "inconvenient truth".
1
Why? They are doing their duty. They are fighting for their homes. Well, these in the east literally are fighting against occupier and their homes they can see behind them.
1
Nah, 87% of the world is not against Russia. BRICS, the largest economic block on earth is with Russia.
1
they did shell some villages and killed at least one boy.
1
Counter offensive started around 24h ago. Ukrainian units are attack all along the front line in Donbass. Zaporozia offensive to start soon. So far Ukrainians failed to break through Russian defenses but took from the Russians some advance positions. No news of losses - but I expect Ukrainian losses to be heavy.
1
and imagine they are so good they still manage to push forward!
1
And yet they made whole Lugansk front collapse - not bad for immobile troops!
1
Problem is that right now Russians are heavily reducing Ukrainians. I.e. losses are close to 10:1. So if this continues for more then a week Russians will take Nikoliv.
1
No its not - the tank video was from Donbas. So they are the invader. Not sure about the actual troops video - I think it is 3 weeks newer than the tank part. A lot of defenders are from Donbas i.e. they are defending their homes.
1
@EpicCrust I do not think Kurds have any good words for US - they were thrown under the bus.
1
@telebubba5527 But how did they fake dead Ukrainians???
1
Idiot wear a uniform!
1
No. Rocket range max at 45km. Like half of what Ukraine has right now.
1
This would imply Ukraine actually has tactics ;)
1
They been almost in NATO since 1994. So them doing it formally is not exactly a big deal.
1
But they refused to withdraw. Which confused Ukrainians ;)
1
@davidpowell3691 Also its industrial heartland and richest area.
1
He has no choice - its either that or sanctions.
1
@edmundpasan529 Donbass belongs to the people of Donbass. Not to Ukraine, not to Russia not to Zielinski and not to Putin. To the people that live there. Its not longer colonial times - land belongs to these that live there not to some abstract government or colonial power.
1
Well, Ukraine "win" is to take back all territory - which US commander said would be very, very difficult --- impossible. Russia win is to prevent NATO expansion & liberate Donbass - they are quite close to both of these. Russia can simply take few more cities and just like that they can claim a win - than if Ukraine gets 300km missiles they can move 300km to create a buffer zone.
1
And be replaced by better and stronger leader!
1
Yes, we see that right now with Ukraine were losses cannot be sustained for more then few days. If they go on this attack for more then a week we see Nikoliv in Russian hands by October.
1
@Muzakman37 I speak the truth - whatever someone likes it or not. I like freedom and will stand up for it.
1
@kovacevic6870 But conquered territory is friendly!
1
They control it to 12nm just as everyone else.
1
And died while trying to go down.
1
That is how they are "loosing" - they control too much of Ukraine and then ... they choke on it :)
1
So far Ukraine failed at even small counter attacks unless they have huge man power advantage. Once Russians take over these Donbass defenses I doubt Ukraine will ever have offensive power to take it back.
1
@r.j.dunnill1465 LOL, and do pray if Oryx numbers are true, why are Russians on the offense! I counted well over 100 captured Ukrainian tanks on Russian videos, probably closer to 150. Where is Oryx on this?
1
It is a bit foolish to say "its a big offensive" given quite clear indication that it fully failed. So is media is going to say "it was a big failure" in say two weeks??? I doubt it!
1
Nah, only the west somehow hates Russia despite doing the same on multiple occasions and not facing sanctions. Remember when US invaded (with help of UK and others) sovereign state of Iraq under false pretense of WMD? How legal was that? Or how about occupation of Afghanistan and installing puppet government there for 20 years? Hypocrisy at its finest. Finally we have Kosovo - where US and NATO kicked Serbs out to protect ethnic minority. Why can US protect minority but Russia cannot? Why Kosovo was recognized as a free state, but Donbass cannot? Sure this is more complex, but one can see the ugly truth of global politics and wide spread propaganda from every corner. Its not about people and their freedom, its just a global game run mostly by US.
1
Too bad they just like about to doubled them.
1
Why would they do that ;)
1
LOL. That is proper response to this myth. LOL.
1
Why would he need money when he can use any resource in Russia. Such stupid western thinking. Stalin did not even own more then his clothes. The war was 100% necessary. He had no choice.
1
Well if they start something Russia seems well prepared as well.
1
They were smart in 1949 - especially Fins. But now they lost their heads and are idiots.
1
Most, almost all, want to run or surrender. Russia will encircle tomorrow, if not now. The start going for the kill.
1
Previous
3
Next
...
All