Comments by "Thee Joe Kisonue" (@joeKisonue) on "Искаженное восприятие" channel.

The engine was designed in the 50s. Any possible design and corrections have been made. I believe the only real improvement is in shaping the combustion well on the rotor to improve efficiency.
1
You would need to use pure O2
1
That's actually not correct. Yes 3 voids are all active, but there is a mechanical reduction by the interior gear size. Wiki wankle and open design tab for an illustration
1
It's just called the Rotor. It dances around its center of mass in a way that doesn't cause much vibration. They can happily reach 1/3 higher rpm than piston engines. Did you realize that a 20 ounce piston has the effective weight of like 45lbs on the connecting rod at high revs? My figures are just for illustration but not to far from fact
1
@Deere2154D Do you have any objections to 2 stroke dirt bikes? I would say you might rebuild the top end many times in time but never have to do that on a 4 stroke. Most every one who complains about rotaries has never had first hand experience. I think they are far easier to remove and rebuild than a subaru.
1
They have. I'll bet you can find a forum that has had discussions
1
The force is produced ant applied to the center of the face. On larger rotors there is a large combustion well in the center/middle. Wiki Wankle
1
@maxhuber961 Well it would depend on the capacity of the single rotor multiplied by 8
1
@sandervanderkammen9230 Sure I got one. Is it difficult to find hats that fit?
1
@sandervanderkammen9230 right so besides the fill, fire, exhaust, there is one ignition per crank revolution. That's how I compare to a 2 stroke. A lot of people are saying it does 3 fires per revolution. It appears to make 4 fires per the same rotor face making it back to the starting point.
1
@sandervanderkammen9230 why compare it to a 2 cylinder? I feel it's comparable to a single cylinder 2 stroke. And then again why not compare to a 3 cylinder?
1
@PTSF_Jaeger I'd rather buy an engine than invest. But I'm broke so probably neither
1
@GregoryVeizades per rotor revolution, but it rotates at 1/3 the speed of the output shaft. It's orbiting on a gear reduction.
1
@invisibilezoe7295 I'm sure there is more r&d to be done. The rotor could be a carbon composite and banded in something exotic. They said there is excessive fresh air flow through the rotor and it gets cooled. Man just like carbon brakes this thing could be operating on a new level
1
@nigelwolfe6150 what is this? A school for ANTS?
1
@Dave5843-d9m so the rotary does 3 bangs per rotor Rev. The output shaft rotates 3 times per 1 of the rotor. Common misconception
1
@KingSheva-sh5qw tubes are generally stronger than solid shafts. Also it's not being pounded by reciprocal force. A hollow shaft is very strong on the longitudinal torque plane. Think drive shaft
1
@MrVaticanRag you never want to go the combustion route with hydrogen, only fuel cells. Just like that acetylene, if mixed with oxygen it's just to energetic for use like that.
1
@deusexaethera could be injected into the seal if they are exotic sintered
1
@edeltrautfeuerglut2243 why u say piston?
1
@jwserge correct but a Mazda wankle rotor rotates reduced speed because it's orbiting the gear on the shaft. Watch the animation on the Wiki wankle tab Design. It has marks for shaft position and if you pay attention you will see 3 revs of shaft per 1 of rotor.
1
@sheilaolfieway1885 yeah because it would perform like a 3 rotor wankle
1
@aryakia850 ports. Watch again
1
@keithromig957 synthetic oil burns
1
@KenBober no, fly the Aussie to you
1
@joeidan801 it makes sense for small or personal aircraft. We still can't get the energy density/weight as good as fuel for long flights. This thing would be awesome for ultra lights,paramotors, small helicopters. There are plenty of uses in the world where a Tesla won't fit the bill
1
@bmarvin6339 ok you went on a tangent but to address the in efficiency of EV right now. Yes everything you said was correct excluding solar farms that produce steam. But this is how it has to happen. No one is going to remedy all the issues unless there is money to be made. We wouldn't be this far if it wasn't for Tesla. The infrastructure will follow. A missing part of our power systems is storage. Tesla is addressing that. There is no way you can convince yourself that all the power plants have anything over the sheer number of personal vehicles in this world. If everyone that could rode a bicycle while we upgrade the civilized worlds power grid and production methods, that would be great.
1
@keithromig957 how can I trust a guy with no content?
1
@edeltrautfeuerglut2243 oh yeah
1
@KingSheva-sh5qw Right. And with rotational forces hollow would be suitable. Are we saying the same thing?
1