Comments by "Christian Baune" (@programaths) on "Timcast" channel.

@Deltaworks23 we have "hermits" who also uses our services, but are secluded in all other aspects. They only bring a financial contribution (by paying services and very few good). Most people do not even know they exists! What makes it harder to understand is that people think of an elderly man deeps in the wood/mountain and living in full self-sufficiency . Without even going that far, we have "travellers" (manouch?) who have their own rules and do basically the same: take a space, pay for water and electricity and do not want to interact for other things. They are much more common! So, yes, there is quite a bunch of people avoiding our societies. And they connect to Internet, own computers and phones. That's not because you make use of a system facilities that you are part of it OR agree. You can be a parasite and not a symbiot. And a parasit can have no effect on the target system.
1
Shit, Tim, I am using Pools in my software. Hope it doesn't offense you that I use "Pool" :-D I am also using bad words like Kill, killChild, terminateParent, startDaemon, removeChild, ruleViolation... Ouch! Replacement, devitalize, requestParentToStop, startBackgroundNonAttachedProcess, freeChild, ruleNotFollowed. Much more bearable !
1
To be honest, people can't read sentences containing "some", "may", "could", "many", "few". They just skip these words and it totally change a discourse. When writing, you have to use inserts like they did in their first paragraph. People will either skip it entirely or read it fully. That's also means it had becoming harder than ever to convey nuances. That's why a lot of words gets redefined and context is not accounted anymore. It's not about vocabulary, it's about nuances. As an example, "fucking" is often used as a punctuation or accent. Like in "it's fucking good". You have an axis where you can say "quite","very","unexpectedly"...and then you have a perpendicular axis which is the tone. The use of "fucking" can translate some excitement and/or surprise in a colorful way. That is the thing: colors! Before that, it was not "ok" to say such words in the presence of less than 8 year old kids because they are not totally developed and can't understand it fully. Now, it's problematic with adults for the very same reasons! Coincidentally, that's also the level of writing in your regular tabloid! (which is a good thing: write for the audience, not for yourself!)
1
For the 2+2=5, there is a way around by defining that "5" means "...."; What they fail to recognize, it's that it doesn't do anything as they merely just changed the signifier, signified stays the same as does the relations between signified (an intrinsic property). All it shows is that they have no understanding of linguistics at its most basic level. Wouldn't trust them with mathematics which are also a language. I am also very confident that what I wrote here will not make any sense to then because of the signified/signifier concepts. Too subtle.
1
Funny how I can say "black people" to black people and also say "white people" without being called racist when I speak with black people. But it annoys a white girl over there who feel the need to find an excuse to shut us down. Those speaking about diversity ARE racists.
1
@gabri888 You had to string many conditions together to balance "honest". You know why ? Because you're not believing what you wrote, so your subconscious tried to make it more believable by adding more constraints. It's a tell-tale bias you can use with kids too. 🤣 You're illustrating the issue that was raised! Oh, and women being deceptive is a normal thing in evolution. Little girls learn quickly that they have to use mind games, because they can't win a fight with little boys. Also, chemicals not being the same, girls tend to be less physically aggressive while it's part of little boy development to play fight. It's also why girls develop a much richer mental toolkit, while boys don't. All the lies from the inclusivity troop just made intersex relations harder as both boys and girls are confused. They are told things that are not relatable and brainwashed with it. To make it clear: you were dishonest and that's human sciences that told that.
1
He schifft the truth.
1
@Timcast the word you are looking for is "plumber" :-D (5:25)
1
One of the most dangerous weapon was just some heavy dart. Those things went straight down and just pierced whatever was in their path. Bunkers, thanks, whatever...you're dead! Also, too late when "it rains". And dirt cheap to produce...
1
They have to censor sex in a legal document that will be read by adults ?! I am having course were "anal", "phallic", "sex" are all used without any censoring. Those are normal words. I can understand that fool language is censored for younger audience (<12). Crazy country there!
1