Comments by "Jennifer Lawrence" (@jenniferlawrence2701) on "The New Culture Forum" channel.

  1. Any Conservative party worth its salt would have spent the last decade or so undoing everything Blair did. The fact that they haven't is shameful.
    440
  2. I can't think of a court system or government I'd trust with the death penalty.
    192
  3. The lesson for the few remaining parts of Europe that aren't yet so diverse is to hold on to their homogeneity for as long as possible, because the bitterness, envy, and division that come with diversity simply aren't worth it.
    159
  4. Once again, the Liberal Universalists have been shown to be the problem. They spent the last several decades facilitating the rise of China, while imposing Multiculturalism & mass-migration upon European countries. Both of which have been disastrous.
    113
  5. He and Dawkins chipped away at western Christianity - which, despite its (mostly minor) faults, was one of the last defenses we had against this madness (and against Islam).
    83
  6. With the greatest respect to Dr. Starkey, the Conservative Party is still the same one that refused to heed Enoch Powell's warnings, and effectively kicked him out of the party. The problem isn't just that the Party did virtually nothing of any use with the last 14 years of government, it is all the preceding decades when it could have prevented what was coming, but didn't. It is just as much an architect of the mess modern Britain is in as the Labour Party is. I wish him luck in his attempts to reform it from within, but I suggest conservative voters shouldn't go back to a lover who has cheated on them many times in the past, so to speak.
    76
  7. Muslims in the UK hold sex-segregated events regularly, and local Labour Party politicians have often happily attended them to remind the attendees to vote for them. The Guardian's outrage at single-sex spaces is selective and race-based.
    59
  8. I like the SDP's platform. They deserve more exposure.
    57
  9. I'd like to see all social media companies forced to block under 18s from using their apps. One of the greatest gifts we could give younger generations is to be able to grow up without social media.
    54
  10. the demonstrations have been very useful in an "enough rope" sort of way
    48
  11. In practice Multiculturalism just means the non-Europeans are encouraged to keep their distinct identities and to act in their own collective self-interest, while the only identity Europeans are allowed to have is one that welcomes their own replacement.
    46
  12. A friend of mine works in a Catholic school in Australia. They begin staff meetings by reciting an "acknowledgment that they are on stolen Aboriginal land" first before saying a prayer.
    44
  13. An Englishman could never be considered Aboriginal Australian or Native American, but anyone in the would can (apparently) be English if they wish. This double standard will be impossible to ignore indefinitely.
    36
  14.  @colincharlton9339  Yep. But it is true. This "Racism" concept needs to change. It is the source of many of the West's problems. It cannot be considered immoral for Western European ethnic groups to want to remain the large majority demographic in their own homelands.
    31
  15. How can a minority vote him out?  @SzTz100 
    31
  16. Decolonization for me but not for thee, it seems.
    30
  17.  @28pbtkh23  Noble-savage myth.
    29
  18.  @Mike-te8mo  Men did give women the vote, and there is no connection between women getting the vote and mass-immigration into Britain. Search for voting patterns at each election going all the way back to 1945 and you'll see that women voted Conservative at every election until 2017. The same cannot be said of men, who often voted for Labour.
    28
  19. The entire point of the progressive agenda, when you really examine it, is to demographically displace Europeans in their own homelands, and to do away with their nation-states.
    27
  20. Try calling yourself a native in Australia and see how far that gets you. Unless you're Aboriginal you aren't native.  @ModerateObserver 
    27
  21. What is being described as "Liberalism" could perhaps be more accurately described as authoritarian Cosmopolitanism.
    26
  22. It is interesting that the people introducing these laws usually describe themselves as Liberals.
    24
  23. The Tories aren't Conservative, unfortunately. They're Liberal, and Liberalism is why the radical so-called "woke" crowd has been allowed to succeed, backed by billion-dollar corporations and NGOs. There is no Liberal solution to this problem.
    21
  24.  @edwardbernthal160  First of all there are significant differences in crime rates between Pakistanis and English in Denmark. Secondly the English are closer to the Danes culturally and racially (the differences have a way of manifesting themselves, e.g. Identity Politics) than Pakistanis. The English also are also generally less of a cost to the Danish taxpayer in terms of welfare spending than people from the Middle-East. But even so, I wouldn't want the English to overwhelm the Danes demographically in their homeland any more than I'd want the reverse to happen. I'd like unique European peoples to be able to retain their own ancestral homelands in which they and their culture are the majority. Some diversity is alright. Too-much is unreasonable. There is already one Pakistan. There is only one England and one Denmark.
    20
  25. the Tory Party would rather cease to exist than do anything conservative. They'll get their wish soon.
    20
  26. The Tory Party could have defunded all of this stuff any time in the last 13 years.
    20
  27.  @EllieMaes-Grandad  What else was he supposed to do except warn us? He was kicked out of the Conservative party for it.
    19
  28. My aunt has been a school teacher all her adult life and is approaching retirement age. She told me recently that in the last few years she's had dozens of students claim that they are 'transgender' and insist upon different names, something she had never encountered in all her years of teaching.
    19
  29. As long as we're all afraid being being considered racist, we're still dancing to the Left's tune, even if you have 'Conservative' in front of your name. Native Europeans ("White people" if you prefer) need to seriously consider their own self-interest, because no one else will. If that is "Racist" then it begs the question: So what? What use to us is this "Racism" concept if it used to attack us by people who don't have our self-interest at heart, and if it prevents us defending said self-interest?
    19
  30. I noticed about a decade ago that there is a paucity of books and scholarly works defending Nationalism and the Nation-State. Plenty to be found condemning it, but few defending. This is quite odd when you consider that our globe is entirely covered in nation-states, and has been now for a very long time. Clearly they serve some useful purpose if they are so persistent. I shall have to read Mr Hazony's book.
    18
  31.  @AllanHinde-mb2pr  You've looked around at the modern world and concluded we're not self-absorbed enough already?
    18
  32. Here's the policy I would propose to any party staffers watching: call it the "80/20 Rule." The traditional populations of European countries must not fall below 80%. The other 20% can (and should) be treated fairly and decently. No violence or persecution is required. Calibrate immigration and citizenship policies to meet those demographic targets. No one could accuse this policy of persecuting minority citizens (though of course they will try).
    17
  33.  @saturationstation1446  'Grooming' gangs are not imaginary, sadly.
    17
  34. That is because Leftists have an egotistical need to see themselves as heroes for the least-fortunate, and gallant fighters against the powerful. There are people in the world far-less fortunate than White Europeans, so Left sympathies lie with them. Leftists are on a never-ending quest to find people more deserving of their solidarity. They can never be satisfied with the working people they have in their own countries.
    17
  35. It is Authoritarian Cosmopolitanism. That's why it unites both Leftists and Liberal/Capitalist corporations + NGOs: they both share Cosmopolitanism as an ideal. Though they differ on economics, they are united in their desire to do away with the nation-state and relatively homogeneous European societies.
    16
  36. There are 50 majority-Muslim counties in the world. Meanwhile there are only 44 countries in Europe. Are we not entitled to wonder how many European countries are to be allowed to remain only minority-Muslim?
    16
  37. You're not even allowed to say that there are "indigenous" people in Britain. The Left considers it false and racist.
    16
  38. They said the "white" working class, not the "working class" generally. The Andrew Neather revelations made it pretty clear how the Labour party feels about whites. Labour feels it's loyalties lie with a never-ending stream of arrivals from the non-white parts of the world who will eventually render the problematic whites an irrelevant, powerless minority.
    16
  39. Culture is largely a product of demographics.
    15
  40. the Liberal centre too.
    14
  41. I wonder where workers unions are in all this? Surely employers shouldn't have the right to impose their ideological beliefs upon employees. When was it decided it was now OK for bosses to lecture workers on political/philosophical matters as if they are the worker's parents? I guess if the unions are anything like the Labour party they're probably enthusiastically supporting the bosses in this.
    14
  42. I agree, if for no other reason that cramming the curriculum full of all this superfluous "Social Studies" stuff is taking away valuable time from literacy and numeracy. It is better for schools to do a few important things very thoroughly, than to do a lot of things not every well.
    13
  43. The lesson from all of this is that social change - even bad, unpopular change - comes from highly motivated small minorities who get off their backsides and get involved. Sitting on the sidelines is failure, and I'm as guilty of it as anybody.
    13
  44. "sex positivity" is a rebranding of hedonism. it argues there is something wrong with someone who dislikes hook-up culture.
    13
  45. I don't think anyone should be prosecuted for speech, but if speech is to be criminalized then what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
    13
  46. It would be nice to think that Identity Politics could be "opted out of" by all. But in reality Identity Politics is inevitable when you have diversity. Diversity + Proximity = different groups competing for dominance. The Martin Luther King Jr ideal (though admirable) was always unrealistic. Liberal idealists need a dose of Realism.
    12
  47.  @GlasPthalocyanine  You're not sure that Islam is a problem? Have you been watching what is happening in Western Europe in the last few weeks, let alone the last few decades?
    12
  48.  @mr.mayhem7402  Enough with the defeatism.
    12
  49. I agree. Although I appreciate him sticking his neck out publicly to the extent that he has. It's much easier for us who remain anonymous (and who don't have careers depending on being politically correct).
    12
  50. At some point during the Cold War, Conservatism became all about Capitalism, which is a problem. Economic Liberalism has it's benefits and its drawbacks. Social Conservatism is very difficult in a society dominated by Liberalism.
    12
  51. There are roughly 50 majority-Muslim countries in the world they could live in. They don't actually need to be in Europe at all. It is purely for financial gain that they move here.
    11
  52.  @Brian-om2hh  Russia isn't going to invade Britain (it couldn't, even if it wanted to, which it doesn't). The only invasion going on is by both illegal and legal immigration, and it has the enthusiastic support of the government.
    11
  53. what if they want to stay at home with the kids?
    11
  54. Most are coming in the front door.
    11
  55. It's just the inevitable conclusion of long-held Left-Wing ideas like Internationalism, Universalism, Anti-Nationalism, Anti-Racism, etc... No need to be nostalgic for a movement that hadn't yet carried out as much of its agenda as it would have liked. All of your beloved "old-Labour" parties abandoned white South Africans to the chaos and violence of black-majority rule. Why be surprised that they are now doing the same to you?
    10
  56.  @realMaverickBuckley  Politics & Culture are downstream from racial demographics. The Left knows this, which is why they seek mass-immigration and mass-diversity. If you want to control the culture & politics of a society, you must control the racial demographics. We can all point to nice, admirable individuals like Inaya Folarin Iman, but we need instead to look at what happens at a macro (rather than micro) level when societies become highly diverse.
    10
  57. The Tories seem to be under the mistaken belief that Liberalism is Conservatism. We've had several decades of Liberal immigration policies, could we have Conservative ones now please?
    10
  58. Glad to hear you were vindicated in the end.
    10
  59. Macron isn't really doing much either. He's just posturing to avoid being electorally replaced by the French Right. He's a Liberal who wants more Muslim migrants in France. His "reforms" make the French more Arab, not the Arabs more French.
    10
  60. Christianity should, tbh. Poland has the right idea.
    9
  61. Because they know that this whole Multicultural experiment hinges upon the ethnic English not objecting to their own demographic displacement and cultural erosion. The role the English are assigned is to be endlessly accommodating, to have unlimited tolerance, and to eventually get out of the way altogether.
    9
  62.  @hkvery3852  HK - Identity Politics is inevitable when you have diversity. Forget this Classical Liberal dream that everyone is going to adopt color-blind individualism. That is just not how humans are on a large scale. Humans are tribal. Diversity = division. The more diversity, the more opportunity for division. Liberals need to stop thinking about what seems morally or intellectually ideal on paper and start looking at how humans inevitably are in reality.
    9
  63.  @realMaverickBuckley  "Racist" is a fairly meaningless concept. Is it "racist" for Sweden and Norway to prefer that their countries have majority populations that are Scandinavian? (or at least European). Technically yes it is racist. But is it racist and a bad thing for the Swedes and Norwegians? No. Something can be technically racist and a good thing to do in your self-interest. By agreeing that we must never ever be "racist" we are allowing the Left to set the moral parameters that we must conform to. We shouldn't.
    9
  64.  @jackdeniston6150  Nonsense. From 1945 to 2015 women in Britain consistently voted more conservative than men. Blaming the current mess on one or the other sex is not accurate or productive.
    9
  65. There's a term for that, but it might fall foul of the Youtube censor: Cosmopolitanism
    9
  66.  @helloagain6243  Give it a rest. All of human history is groups competing with other groups. We're not about to apologize for doing well in that competition.
    9
  67.  @charleshayes2528  Obligatory mention of the Daily Mail. No Lefty rant would be complete without it.
    9
  68. If Muhammad had been White but still did all the things he did, Leftists would view him as hideously violent, imperialist patriarch who should be condemned whenever mentioned (even worse than Cecil Rhodes, gasp!) .
    9
  69.  @AllanHinde-mb2pr  You asked why a woman should stay at home. I gave a reason why a woman might stay at home: because she wants to. As a society we are currently optimized for the women who either don't want children at all, or who want to quickly shuffle them into child-care and go out to work full time. But we're not very good at accommodating those women (and there are many of them) who want to be at home for the most important years of their children's lives. No one is going to force the former group of women into the home.
    9
  70. I think it's almost a religious thing: they feel they are doing penance - atoning for the "sin" of their whiteness. There's an element of self-flagellation to it. People who don't have a religion sometimes make one out of politics.
    9
  71.  @edwardbernthal160  The differences in crime rates are not in dispute. Studies from all the Nordic countries, Denmark included, confirm than men from the Middle-East and Africa are dramatically over-represented as offenders compared to Europeans and Danes in particular. Out of interest, what is the origin of the Bernthal surname?
    8
  72.  @ayeshapyesha7301  A little bit of immigration is fine. No one but the most extreme bigot begrudges the presence of small minorities, or wants to see them mistreated. But having so much immigration that the ethnic English, Scots, Welsh, and Northern Irish are turned into minorities in their own homelands (2066 is the projection for when that will happen, on current trends), their identities and cultures eroded, is unacceptable. When the Windrush arrived in the UK, there was never any exception or consent on the part of the population that it would be anything more than a small minority.
    8
  73.  @MsChitterchat  So the English can become a minority in their own country at a slightly slower rate.
    8
  74. That's the nub of the issue though: Most people generally prefer their own. Expecting her to be content while white people are still a majority around her is as unrealistic as expecting you or I to like those advertisements. I don't like her, but I would probably feel the same in her shoes. She could leave, of course, but she won't because she enjoys the benefits of living around us AND being able to complain about us.
    8
  75.  @ncheedxx0109  No. There was an estimated one million Aboriginal people in Australia at the time of settlement and there are one million of them living there now. The Maori in New Zealand wiped out the previous inhabitants of those islands when they arrived.
    8
  76. No thanks.
    8
  77. I don't see that Boris deserves any praise whatsoever, least of all over Ukraine. British toadying to the USA has not not prevented war in Eastern Europe, it has encouraged it.
    8
  78. Too much tolerance is the problem in the first place. Liberalism cannot solve problems cause by Liberalism.
    8
  79. Sexual abuse/harassment is rife in Liberal Hollywood, and it was high time it was exposed. MeToo wasn't all bad (although some of it certainly was, namely the 'listen and believe' angle which demanded we take all accusations as automatically true).
    7
  80.  @ncheedxx0109  The Maori migrated to New Zealand and wiped out the humans who were there before them.
    7
  81. I think you're being a bit harsh. He's treading in deeper water than most currently dare publicly. Sure he isn't going as far as some of us would like, but it's better than nothing. I don't expect purity from any one individual. Every little shift to the Overton Window is welcome.
    7
  82. Richard Tice's actions don't surprise me at all. He seems like a very slippery character. I wasn't impressed by his answers to Peter's questions on this channel.
    7
  83.  @michaelspencer6318  there are more important things in life than GDP
    7
  84.  @christopher-bj8de  They do. But they also call the overwhelming migration of different cultures into an area Cultural Genocide of the native population (i.e in Tibet) or "Ethnocide." If it is wrong when it happens to some tribe in the Amazon then it is wrong when it happens to the English, or Swedes, or Dutch (etc). The forced repatriation that OP envisions may not be politically doable or morally excusable. But at the very least we should agree that the migration tap needs to be turned off.
    7
  85. Therein lies the problem: people who define themselves only as individuals rather than part of a collective are unable to organize collectively to defend their shared self-interest. Researchers into game-theory at McGill University in Canada using computer simulations showed that "ethnocentrism eventually out-competes its nearest rival, humanitarianism, by exploiting humanitarianism across group boundaries as world population saturates." In plain English: Groups that are somewhat collectivist will dominate groups that are highly individualist and altruistic. In even plainer language: We're screwed. Western Europeans have locked away the tools we need for our self-preservation in a box marked "Racism/WW2" so we're unable to assert any shared self-interest.
    7
  86.  @billgiles3261  Equality of Opportunity is an idea that is certainly not without merit. But it is worth recognizing that different outcomes lead in turn to different new opportunities. In other words: it is impossible for everyone to have the same amount of opportunities (in life) in a society where people freely achieve different outcomes. Instead, we should talk about a limited number of "minimum base-line" opportunities that everyone can have. i.e "You won't have all the opportunities in life that someone who's parents achieved 'xyz' does, but you will at least have these specific opportunities that everyone has as a minimum" One person having 4 opportunities and another person having 2 should not be seen as an injustice if everyone gets 2 (for example).
    7
  87. Meanwhile in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the USA, people of European ancestry (aka. whites) are told they are not (and never will be) native/Aboriginal, and will always be the descendants of land-thieves. Leftists see ancestry/race as crucial in defining non-European ethnic groups, but forbidden from defining European ethnic groups.
    7
  88. Modern Leftists and Liberals don't believe or accept that Europeans/"Whites" are native to anywhere. They fundamentally do not accept that an ethnic Swede even exists, let alone that he has more right to be in Stockholm than anyone else in the world. Trust me I've debated with many of them and it always comes down to that.
    7
  89. It is unhelpful to blame one sex for the mass-immigration into Britain, but if you really want to go down that road, search for voting patterns in Britain going all the way back to 1945. You'll see that most women voted Conservative in every election until 2017, while more men often voted Labour. Then you could look at which sex the vast majority of government ministers have been, and so on.... You're correct that most female feminists are Left-Wing, and therefore mostly supportive of the Left's immigration and diversity ideology. But that ignores all the men who are Left-Wing and supportive of the same ideology. It would be ludicrous to suggest that Germaine Greer had more influence on immigration levels than Tony Blair did, for example.
    7
  90. "Populism" is when the public votes for something that was mainstream and uncontroversial only a decade or two ago.
    7
  91. Always a pleasure to listen to John.
    7
  92.  @KemetledAfrica  How, in your mind, is that relevant to what should or should not happen now in Britain in 2024?
    7
  93. Nice to hear some good news about the NHS for once.
    6
  94. The association with skinheads and similar types didn't help.
    6
  95. Liberalism is the problem, not the solution. You cannot conserve anything of value under Liberalism. All Liberal Democracy does is cede victory after victory to the "social progressives." Europe doesn't need Johnsons or Macrons. It needs Salazars.
    6
  96. What absolutely must happen now is minor parties like Reform and the Social Democrats who want to stop this process should form a coalition to contest every Conservative seat. The Tory Party must be replaced with parties who will halt the demographic displacement of the English, Scots, Welsh, and Northern Ireland in their ancestral homelands.
    6
  97. Current ethnic tensions are the natural result of diversity. It was always naive for Liberals and (so-called) Conservatives to think the outcome would be any different. If you want cohesive societies without constant bitter identity politics you need homogeneous populations.
    6
  98. Deportation and Remigration must be made part of the public discussion. Break the taboo.
    6
  99.  @laurenceBDontYaNo  And there we go: justifying unlimited migration is the object of the exercise, as always.
    6
  100. Britain has long had an unhealthy addiction to bureaucracy. Endless committees, government bodies, "advisory boards", peers, task forces...mostly un-elected. These groups are always looking for more power to grab and exert upon the populace.
    6
  101. Bit of a myth, actually. From 1945 to 2015 more British women than British men voted for the Conservative party - the party that for most of that time had been the party of lower immigration, and the party that went into all the elections since 1997 promising to drastically reduce the Blair-level immigration numbers. More men voted for Labour. Even since 2015, if you look at the racial breakdown in voting patterns white British women are not hugely different to white British males in voting. What has happened is we have a lot more non-whites voting now, and among university educated young women (under 30) there has been a drift towards progressive politics. I'd put that down mostly to the influence of social media and university culture. Still it is incorrect to say that women "overwhelmingly vote for open borders"
    6
  102. The UN doesn't consider the English, Scots, or Welsh indigenous to the UK. Look it up. They have a list of who they officially consider indigenous, and with the exception of maybe the Sami people in Lapland, none of them are white/European.
    6
  103. That's one massive whole in the Liberal world view: there's no "Plan B" - no backup plan for what to do if the irreversible change they brought about doesn't lead to the happy unified Liberal utopia they assumed.
    6
  104. The migration still wouldn't be ok even if they were all non-religious. Why must the English be made into minorities in their own homelands?
    6
  105.  @jrd33  War between nuclear powers is not in anyone's self-interest, which is why it should be avoided. The fact that we're not sending flesh & blood to fight by Ukraine's side is proof of this. So it raises the question: Why did anyone think it was a good idea to offer an Article-5 NATO guarantee to a country we won't risk fighting for, and one that Russia was always going to try and prevent entering NATO?
    6
  106.  @AllanHinde-mb2pr  Quote where I've chosen what women should do? I've said there are women who want to stay at home and those who'd prefer to go out and work. Currently a single income isn't really enough to raise a family, therefore current society is tougher on those women who want to be stay-at-home mothers.
    6
  107. It sounds like you have a personal ethnic interest in Western countries not restricting immigration. Australia's system doesn't work for them either.
    6
  108. She's founder of the "Women's Equality Party"
    6
  109. Can the various minor parties against the mass-immigration form a coalition to replace the Tory Party? (Reform, Social Democrats, Ukip if they're still around) The Tory Party must be punished at the ballot box.
    6
  110. Lenin, though, spoke in favor of it, saying that it (mass immigration, open borders) had the revolutionary potential to undermine nationalism and capitalism.
    5
  111. Calling people like O'Donnell and Thompson "Anywheres" is polite (and I can see the utility in that) but lets be honest: such people very probably have a lot of sympathies with global Communism. They'd scoff at that, and want to distance from something so "6th form", but the goals of modern Liberals are almost indistinguishable from Trotsky's Internationalism. They only really disagree about the road to the utopian destination of global equality. The West really let it's guard down against such people after 1989.
    5
  112. Banning Universities from taking foreign students should be in there too. Student visas are being used as a way to migrate. Family reunification allowances are also heavily exploited.
    5
  113. Charles has been like this for years.
    5
  114.  @shelleyphilcox4743  "Tribalism can be formed around anything...including culture and values. It doesnt have to be physical characteristics" Of course race/ethnicity isn't the only thing that humans can be tribal about. But it is a major one, and a particularity dangerous one. If we wish to minimize the amount of things humans can be tribal about it would be wise to keep diversity to a minimum. We shouldn't be so naive as to assume we can have mass-diversity and social harmony at the same time.
    5
  115.  @shelleyphilcox4743  "I've got nothing in common with people of any real value relating to physical characteristics" I think you might be surprised to find that you have at least some. Imagine you are a Black woman growing up in a country that is 95% White. You will inevitably have experiences that are unique because of that minority status. For example you may grow up being frustrated that White, blonde, slim girls are the beauty standard in society rather than Black girls with dark frizzy hair and large figures. This might push you towards Intersectional Politics (feminism, racial identity politics) or worse: to work at the Guardian or Huffington Post. Of course you'd still be an individual, and there is a chance that you grow up to be a Inaya Folarin Iman or Candice Owens rather than a Michelle Obama or Dianne Abbot (i.e bitter at White people and driven by identity politics). But your experience growing up will tend to shape your opinions, values, and politics. You will have some experiences in common with the 5% of the country that is non-White, even if you disagree with them on other things. This is (sadly) why Identity Politics is inevitable with diversity.
    5
  116. I think it is folly to pretend any great power is benevolent, rather than self-interested. That's just not how the world is, or ever has been or will be. What we should be doing is telling those who try to guilt us over the British Empire where to get off.
    5
  117. At the time I wouldn't like it, sure. But given what is happening to Britain now I can't imagine it would be much worse or better if we were speaking German. Look at Birmingham in 1945 and look at it now. We may as well not have bothered defending the country.
    5
  118.  @Brian-om2hh  Labor or Tory. What a choice.
    5
  119. Come off it Bruce she couldn't even win an election.
    5
  120. From where I'm sitting it looks like the USA and Britain cynically used Ukraine as bait to damage Russia. Look at what we've been telling Ukraine for years: "You can have it all, you can be members of NATO and the EU, you can become just like Western Europe, and you can ignore the demands of your more powerful neighbor to the East, you don't have to make compromises with them." If we were willing to fight Russia on Ukraine's behalf, or if Ukraine was powerful enough to avoid invasion by Russia, those would be reasonable things to be telling them. But we aren't willing to fight Russia (and never were), and Ukraine is simply not powerful enough to prevail against a really determined Russia. So our approach was either grossly irresponsible or worse: deliberately designed to lead Ukraine down a very dangerous path. Which is it? Well, consider that we all saw Russia was willing to use force in Georgia in 2008, we've heard the Kremlin saying for years that they view Ukraine being made into a bulwark of Western power to be utterly unacceptable, we knew that we were infuriating Moscow by trying to take Ukraine out of their orbit, and we saw from 2014 onward that Russia was willing to wreck Ukraine before they allowed that to happen. It was always obvious that in any tug-of-war between the West and Russia over Ukraine, it would be Ukraine that would suffer the most. So given all that, I find it very hard to believe the approach taken by Washington and London was simply naive, accidental, or mistaken. It looks very much like the intent was to force Russia to either fight for Ukraine or lose it. Now we give (or sell, it isn't quite clear) Ukraine just enough weapons to prolong a fight we know they can't win. Have we been good friends to Ukraine in all of this? It doesn't look like it.
    5
  121.  @LvtLoshi  Rights don't exist in nature, they're an abstract human construct that require force to mean anything. Cuba had a "right" to form an alliance with the USSR. Didn't make the USA any more keen on the idea. That's not to say the "rights" concept is entirely without its usefulness, but having the right to do something doesn't necessarily mean it is a good idea, and looking at international relations only through the prism of "rights" is a mistake. Just as WW1 didn't just start because some Serb shot a duke - there was decades of events leading up to that moment which produced conditions that made war likely. Likewise, follow the chain of events with regard to Ukraine starting at the end of the USSR and it should be clear to any fair-minded person that Moscow, Washington, Kiev, and even London all share blame for the current war. Pointing this out is hardly war-apology.
    5
  122. Repatriation needs to be mainstreamed into the public debate.
    5
  123. It's a never ending feedback-loop: The more migrants you have the greater the pressure on services, which in turn means importing more migrants to prop up service industries. It's like a dog chasing its tail but never quite catching it.
    5
  124. He's just as bad as the next Met chief will be, and the next....and so on.
    5
  125. There can be more than one problem at a time.
    5
  126. Because she's pursuing exactly what Lord Frost advocates: Free Market Capitalism.
    5
  127.  @Globaldave1970  It is about race. The fear of being seen as "racist" is the major European weakness.
    5
  128.  @pauljones5066  He's been speaking out about this for more than 20 years.
    5
  129.  @KemetledAfrica  I'm aware of what the word hypocrisy means. Can you explain how you think it is relevant? If you believe something that happened a few hundred years ago was bad to one group of people, do you also believe it should happen to another group of people in 2024?
    5
  130.  Kevin Twine  Yes, both parties are rotten. Not exactly an argument for Labour though.
    4
  131. The constant references to "1930s Germany" made whenever someone wishes to argue morality are so tiresome. It's as if that period has replaced Christianity as the dominant Good vs Evil story of the West.
    4
  132.  @Test_Card_Tom  No, that's a "Liberal Democracy." Democracy and Liberalism aren't one and the same thing. Democracy is far older than Liberalism.
    4
  133. I think what has happened is by accident or design, Liberal and Communist strains of thought in the West have mixed into something calling itself Progressivism (what some call "woke"). Part of the reason for its success is it isn't hamstrung with the baggage of either of those older labels (Communism, Liberalism) though it retains elements of both. This means it is harder to pin down and combat. It presents vaguely as being for seemingly benign, positive things like "kindness" "fairness" "tolerance" (lol) "justice" "progress" "empathy" etc... This is why it can be supported both by Capitalists in the corporate world and by Socialists on college campuses or in Left political parties. Too-often modern Conservatives have thought their role is simply to uphold Liberalism. But Liberalism and Conservatism aren't one and the same, and in many ways they are at odds with one another. Conservatives can (and should) be deeply concerned about preserving inherited liberties, of course. But that is only one part of their proper mission.
    4
  134. It seems like the Liberals are desperately trying to avoid using the term "Rootless Cosmopolitan", and more broadly: to admit that the Nationalist Right have been correct all these years.
    4
  135.  @andrewnetz3680  "Norway still mainly homogenous" For now, thankfully. But that won't last if they continue on the same path as the rest of Western Europe. (other than that I agree with the rest of your comment)
    4
  136. My worry is that even if a good government gets into power the civil service, Blair's supreme court, and various interest groups with deep pockets will prevent them from achieving anything.
    4
  137. The illegal immigration, yes. But on Islam he'd likely punish you for insulting it. Russia has a large Islamic population and Putin is very careful not to upset them, given the wars they had in the 1990s.
    4
  138.  @yehldyehld  Neither of those countries are even remotely likely to invade Britain.
    4
  139. He's probably half-way through a journey of leaving the Left altogether. Many of us have gone through that process.
    4
  140.  @stephaniefarrant  Perhaps that number is skewed by women on average living longer in old age.
    4
  141. That's a solution for individual families, but it leaves the school system in tact, which is bad for the country.
    4
  142. You shouldn't be guilty. You're doing a wonderful thing. Not just for your own family but for society.
    4
  143. The Ukraine conflict has always been a proxy struggle between the USA and its allies versus Russia for regional power. Using Ukraine to get at Russia is one of the most cynical and disgraceful things I have ever witnessed in international politics. American and British politicians have knowingly led Ukraine to its destruction, and now they cast themselves as its defenders. Don't be fooled. Watch Mearsheimer's speech. Consider the timeline of events going back decades. Consider that US Intelligence (Fiona Hill's testimony in the NYT) knew even in 2008 that trying to drag Ukraine out of Russia's sphere would lead to war. Know that the US still pushed ahead with their plans despite this, and despite all the warnings from Russia and warnings from figures within the US like George Kennan, Henry Kissinger, Stephen Cohen, and foreign leaders like Angela Merkel. The inescapable conclusion is the US & Britain knew Russia would fight to keep Ukraine from becoming a US bulwark on their border, and wanted to provoke them to do so.
    4
  144. "no worries just my didgeridoodle, fellow-Sheilas"
    4
  145. Great interview. Thank you Peter.
    4
  146. Still pushing the "European migration shouldn't be privileged above Commonwealth immigration" line. Disappointing. Regardless if we're in the EU or not, we're European, and it makes more sense for the (ideally low number of) migrants we should take to be from countries like Poland rather than Pakistan. You're going to be called "Racist" anyway regardless, so you may as well do what is right for British society and preference the most-culturally compatible migrants.
    4
  147.  @honestjohn6418  Exactly. The modern Left has a strong anti-White, anti-Western streak. If something is non-White = Good, victim, underdog, needs protection and promotion. If something is White = Oppressor, wicked, powerful, must be deconstructed, etc... It's all getting very tiresome.
    4
  148. That's the Free Market Capitalism Frost advocates in this interview. He would probably view your concerns about immigration as emblematic of the fringe kind of nationalism that makes him uncomfortable.
    4
  149.  @GibSonLoGic  Pride can be good or bad. It is something people have to be careful with, I agree. The bad kind of pride is arrogance. The good kind is appreciation and gratitude. I don't feel personally responsible for the achievements of previous generations, but I do appreciate them and am grateful for them.
    4
  150. Sons aren't safe either.
    4
  151. That might be good for individual children, but leaving the loonies in charge to teach the masses isn't good for the country. The system must be forcibly changed.
    4
  152. I think he was actually a Kiwi. Judith Butler was also very influential.
    4
  153. Fear of being called "Racist" is the Western European weakness. That weakness is being exploited by people who wish to see Europeans made into minorities in their own homelands by the unlimited immigration of people who already have homelands of their own.
    3
  154. Improper comment.
    3
  155. Kinda highlights why you should have cared before though, doesn't it.
    3
  156. The SNP isn't really Nationalist. They're just Globalists using anti-English sentiment for tactical reasons. Ask any SNP member if (a) there is an identifiable ethnic/ancestral group called the Scots, and (b) if those people have a right to remain the large majority of the population within Scotland's borders. You'll find out pretty quickly what they're really about.
    3
  157. Arguably a lack of genuine democracy got us into this mess. Most of the public agreed with Enoch Powell. Had their will been manifest in government we'd have avoided so much trouble. Most of the really damaging social changes have happened against the will of the majority public.
    3
  158.  munchkin42  No one is claiming 100% purity ever existed. Arguing that the ethnic Scots, English, Welsh, and Northern Irish shouldn't be turned into minorities in their own countries is not an argument for 100% purity.
    3
  159.  @stevbosh102  I suspect Blair is of the "to make an omelet you must break a few eggs" school of thought. That's certainly the impression he gave in all other endeavors (the Iraq War for example). He just does not seem to care about collateral damage of policy. Maybe I'm wrong and they really were spectacularly naive. But it seems more like carelessness.
    3
  160. Interesting to know. Thanks.
    3
  161. The further away we get from an era of genuine white racism (e.g. segregation in the USA) the more extreme the excuses for certain people's continued failings have to become, as the only alternative is self-responsibility. So a BAME person born in the late 1990s and living in the UK can't just be a failure due to their own incompetence, they have to be a victim - at least according to progressive belief.
    3
  162. That Conservatism sounds an awful lot like Classical Liberalism.
    3
  163. Leftists believe Palestine belongs to Arabs because they have lived there for a very long time. However when it comes to countries that were historically white since time immemorial the Left rejects the same logic and instead argue that those lands must belong to everyone and anyone. This double-standard reveals the fundamentally anti-white nature of the Left.
    3
  164. John O'Sullivan is a great thinker and speaker. Thanks for this.
    3
  165. We must have watched 4 or 5 different Holocaust movies when I was in high school, but nothing that covered Communist atrocities. The result, intended or not, is that I came away thinking only "Right-Wing bad."
    3
  166.  @maurituomisto8007  You're referring to what is now called Libertarianism. There has always been a split between those modus vivendi Liberals who believe in negative rights and a small "night-watchman" state, and those Progressive Liberals who believe in positive rights and that the state should be involved in social engineering. Sure, it's easier to get to Socialist Egalitarianism from the latter position, which is why we see so much overlap between Progressive Liberalism and Marx-inspired Socialism, and why followers of those two beliefs often agree on many things. But it would be wrong to call Progressive Liberals Marxists, or even really Socialists. They aren't interested in state ownership of the means of production, they're broadly comfortable with making lots of money in Liberal economies, they want their kids to go to expensive private schools, and so on. But they feel some guilt about the inequality that naturally exists in Liberal societies and try to reconcile their Liberalism with their egalitarian sympathies. Someone like Soros is the archetypal Progressive Liberal Capitalist.
    3
  167. Important work. The slander (which is what it is) needs to be corrected.
    3
  168.  @realMaverickBuckley  I didn't say anything about forced repatriation (I don't think it is even doable, even putting aside the moral concerns). I suggest that the nations of Europe - like England, Sweden, Norway, Ireland - could simply say: "That's enough immigration and diversity for us, thanks. We will be turning away people who seek to come here from now on." Is that racist? Of course it is. But is it in the self-interest of the Swedes, the Norwegians, the English and Irish (and so on_? Yes. So how about we stop caring so much that considering our own self-interest will get us called racist by people who don't have our self-interest at heart anyway, and calmly, politely, but firmly assert our right to control demographics in our favor. Bear in mind we're going to be cursed as "racist, supremacist, privileged, colonialist" anyway regardless of what we do. There is nothing wrong with preferring relative homogeneity to mass-diversity.
    3
  169. Good point.
    3
  170. "Multiculturalism" means the incoming migrants get to keep their culture, while traditional inhabitants must have no other culture or identity than one that welcomes their own demographic displacement and cultural erosion.
    3
  171.  @Neil-z7n  Individualism can be taken too-far. For much of Western history the family - not the individual - was the most important unit of society. Moving from that model to our hyper-individualist societies has produced mixed results. Some positive, some negative.
    3
  172. He's a moderate, and therefore "Far-Right" to the woke crowd.
    3
  173. "You may be turned into minorities in your homeland, but at least GDP might improve" - Tory party campaign slogan.
    3
  174. Not all countries have the good fortune to be surrounded by water.
    3
  175. When people say Cancel-Culture doesn't exist I point them towards the example of Sir Roger Scruton being sacked from his government advisory position in 2019 after a Left-Wing journalist made up a series of lies about things Scruton allegedly said in an interview (he hadn't, it eventually tuned out). After the sacking, that journalist posted a photograph of himself sipping champagne on social media celebrating "claiming an enemy scalp" so to speak. That's cancel-culture.
    3
  176. Didn't she?
    3
  177. How did Stonewall get so much power in the first place?
    3
  178. Less American influence.
    3
  179. Put your real name to those opinions publicly then. You can hardly condemn an individual for not risking his neck when you won't yourself. He's taking this debate further into politically-incorrect territory than most would dare. Not far enough for many of us, sure. But it's a welcome development. Change won't come from one individual, but from many people gradually dragging the debate in the right direction.
    3
  180. All public broadcasters in western countries need to go. Such institutions inevitably become nests of a particular class of people who will always use their positions to advance their agenda. There's no reason why ordinary taxpayers should be forced to pay their wages.
    3
  181.  @louislemar796  Washington and the Federalists were clearly, unambiguously Nationalists. There's no denying this. They consciously created a nation-state, inspired in large part by England. Nationalism doesn't argue the nation-state is the primary unit of moral value. It argues that nations should either be created or upheld where they exist, and that the liberties and self-interests of individual citizens must be balanced with their collective-interests as a nation. Individual rights are a contributor to the USA's success, but by no means the only or sole cause. Try this thought experiment: In 1789, take the exact same set of ideas - the exact same constitution - and put it in Iceland. Would Iceland have become become exactly as powerful as the USA? No. Not even remotely. Geography being the first of many reasons. Location matters, as does population size (and content), as do natural resources. The vast, resource-rich, continental United States was obtained by violent conquest. That's isn't a criticism of it or a call for Americans to feel shame, just an acknowledgment of historical fact. The individual liberty stuff came later. Take the violent conquest of that land by Europeans out of the equation and you don't get the USA's success, or even the USA at all. Then there's the USA's geopolitical competitors in Europe destroying themselves in two world wars, and so on... In short, it isn't just a set of ideas or rights that explain the USA's success, though they are undoubtedly an important part of the explanation.
    3
  182. Yes, and you'll be surprised to know it wasn't women. Look for an article titled "Women used to more likely to vote Conservative than men but that changed in 2017." It has figures going back to 1945.
    3
  183. I imagine he's choosing his words very carefully so he isn't labeled a Nazi by the sort of people he has to work with. The bar for being convicted of thought crime is very low these days: see Morrissey.
    3
  184. I won't hold my breath for the Tories to do it.
    3
  185. Remember back in the 1990s when Left-Liberals used to virtue signal for Tibet? Perfect example. Now the same people are shocked to discover the Dalai Lama is a Nationalist. "Well duh!" I fully expect the same people to one day be shocked to discover the Palestinians might not be keen on being outnumbered in their own lands by Africans (to say nothing of their attitude to homosexuals).
    3
  186. Spreading the very positive burden = "Last night's riots were mostly peaceful"
    3
  187. My suspicion is that most of the people within Britain who attack the British Empire also want to build an empire based upon "woke" Neo-Marxism. They aren't against empire in principle. They would happily sign away all British sovereignty to international bodies.
    3
  188. One thing you can be certain of, no matter how bad things get, Liberals and Leftists will declare it wonderful and denounce anyone who disagrees. School children will be taught that the past was horrible and everything is better now. This happens already.
    3
  189. I'm currently reading Professor Biggar's book on Colonialism and it is fantastic. Extensively researched, well-argued. Recommended.
    3
  190.  @richardsinclair9449  Things that are important often cost money. Importing labour is a cop-out, a dereliction of duty to our fellow countrymen.
    3
  191. The UK seems to be run by unaccountable bureaucracies and NGOs, rather than by elected governments.
    3
  192.  @Fenristhegreat  Those (natural rights) are abilities. I'm not sure why they should be called rights. It seems needlessly confusing. A bear has the ability to take a dump in the woods, but to say it has a right to do so seems like an abstraction.
    3
  193. Good interview this one. Thanks Peter and team.
    3
  194. Good show. Thanks all.
    3
  195.  @cnrspiller3549  Easier to pick them out of a line-up. "That's her, officer....the 6 foot lady with the adams-apple"
    3
  196. Absolutely spot on.
    3
  197.  @dave161256  Internal borders in Europe, sure. But it's only relatively recently that mass-immigration from outside Europe has become common. Also I think you're discounting the role of the Cold-War and NATO in keeping Western Europe largely conflict free since WW2.
    3
  198.  @dave161256  Europeans more or less learned (after much bloodshed and a very long period of time) how to live side by side with one another. Adding millions of Arabs and Africans to the mix is madness that will throw Europe into violent conflict yet again (and already is: terrorism). Right-Wing "Populism" as you call it, is a much needed reaction to the mad path Europe is on. If you're seriously worried about the Right-Wing backlash (which I doubt) there is a simple solution. Cut the immigration from outside Europe. Reduce it back the levels it was several decades ago before the Neo-Liberal Era (1980s onwards). Of course the Left will never agree to this, because they can never accept that their (as they see it) good intentions could produce unintended consequences. You could have sat down the German Left in the 1910s and 1920s told them: "Look, if you carry on trying to push this Communism stuff, and the extreme social degeneracy, you will - as night follows day - produce an extreme Fascist reaction that could lead the country to disaster and cause the death of millions" and they'd still continue pushing it.
    3
  199. Glad to see this video is getting plenty of views.
    3
  200.  @hooligan9794  Depends how you're using the word "Pride" in that context. You can be proud to be your father's son without taking personal credit for his achievements or blame for his sins. To do so involves understanding the value of what you have inherited, being grateful for it, cherishing it, and passing it on in turn to your children. That's the Conservative project in a nutshell, and what we mean by "Pride."
    3
  201. Well it can't be nice wondering if you're going to wake up in the morning and see hit-pieces in the Guardian about yourself. The guy probably still has to work in London.
    3
  202. Deportation / Repatriation must be on the agenda of any genuinely Conservative party. Far too many people have been allowed to immigrate. Many should be encouraged to emigrate.
    3
  203. "Sex Positivity" is progressive-speak for hedonism. They contrast it with "Sex Negativity" i.e caution, restraint, temperance. They view a desire not to take part in hook-up culture as backwards and dangerous.
    3
  204.  @etiennelabeille  Plenty of people on the Left do say mass-immigration is a good thing. Big business is also quite enthusiastic about it.
    3
  205. He seems like a nice, polite Liberal. Unfortunately Liberalism is largely the problem, not the solution. Economic Liberalism means mass-immigration and allowing mega-rich corporations (usually American ones) to dominate culture. Social Liberalism means endless calls for unlimited diversity (at the expense of the tradition population), the promotion of all manner of sexual kinks and dangerous gender-ideology, the celebration of hedonism and shallow individualism, the decline in significance of the family, etc.... In short, it isn't Conservative.
    3
  206. thinking Youtube is going to allow you to grow I admire your optimism fellas
    3
  207. Yes, "diversity" to a self-styled progressive just means people of different skin shades who all think the same and vote the same.
    3
  208.  @colindant3410  So you'd be happy to be made into a minority in your own homeland by the mass-migration of African Christians?
    2
  209. A bit too conspiratorial and reductive.
    2
  210.  @bushwhacked7112  You are getting the cart before the horse. Who brought Islam into places where it previously wasn't? Liberals & Leftists. Which European countries are still free from Islam and the worst of the "social progressive" agenda? Places like Hungary & Poland. Why? Because they're not as Liberal as Western Europe. Liberalism conserves nothing but the profits of the richest few.
    2
  211.  @bushwhacked7112  Sorry. I thought you were being sarcastic. Islam is also a problem though.
    2
  212. I occasionally have to pinch myself and remember that we, the West, supposedly won the Cold War.
    2
  213. and you're encouraged not to ask what happened to the people who were there before the Maori.
    2
  214. Much easier just to wait until the working classes are no longer majority-White/European. ("Yes I'm a Labour party strategist, how could you tell?")
    2
  215. The "White Privilege" thing is just blatantly about making European people feel guilty for their demographic majority, with the aim of ultimately dispossessing them of it.
    2
  216. One of the most important things to understand about humans is they like to have their cake and eat it too.
    2
  217. To be fair, he saw it a long time before most Liberals from his social background (although perhaps that's damming with faint praise). Most still have their fingers in their ears.
    2
  218. Great interview, Peter. Thank you.
    2
  219. In modern Britain, the only identity the English are allowed is one that welcomes their own replacement.
    2
  220.  @jenniferbate9682  It seems to me what the Royals will do is increasingly try to pander to "new British" in an effort to extend their support, but in doing so will alienate more of their core white-British supporters. The Royals see which way the country's demographics are heading, and likely want to appeal to the changing demographics. But I think that is a doomed strategy. The people they're trying to reach won't ever care for them, regardless of how much pandering is done.
    2
  221.  @christinerussell113  It's a bit dubious to assign blame for everything that happened in the USSR to Russia, especially at times when much of the leadership was made up of people who weren't ethnic Russians (e.g., Stalin), and when Russians very often also suffered from the same policies. The Soviet Union was a multi-ethnic internationalist empire, rather than a Russian nationalist project, and its leadership reflected that from the beginning. The Holodomor is contested history (at least as far as the intent, scale, and the categorization of it as a genocide are concerned). It's also worth mentioning that prior to 2014 (and even for some time after) most Ukrainians polled had favorable or neutral views towards Russia. The extreme anti-Russian, Stepan Bandera enthusiasts were a small fringe, mostly confined to the West of the country. Obviously the war has changed everything since. One thing I've learnt over the years listening to nationalists from Eastern Europe is they all remember the times their nation or ethnic group was wronged by a neighbor, but often selectively forget the times their nation or ethnic group wronged their neighbors. You can't throw a rock in that region without hitting someone who could (if they wished to) adopt a historical grievance against virtually all of their neighbors.
    2
  222. Regardless, it isn't worth launching a 20 year war in Afghanistan over. Our countries are our business. The state of women's rights in a far-off tribal backwater that has historically been the graveyard of empires that have tried to rule it isn't worth our resources/efforts, and it certainly isn't worth the influx of (mostly male) refugees/migrants into our countries - with the implications for female safety it entails. If Afghani society is to progress, it will have to do so itself, or with the help of its immediate neighbors. Not us.
    2
  223. @Raw Engineer That US money came with strings attached for the Germans though. The USA insisted Germany take in Turkish "guest workers" over the protests and concerns of German politicians at the time.
    2
  224. @GameStonk test. other comments have disappeared
    2
  225. Not really. Voting has very little impact on what governments do.
    2
  226.  @ivanconnolly7332  calling people weasels is quite hateful.
    2
  227. Charles saw himself as a "dissident" or something while she was alive. He's been woke for years. It's likely where Harry and William get it from.
    2
  228. I expect there will be a lot more of that in the coming years. The Royals are going to try to appeal to Britain's changing demographics, hoping it will keep them in power as their native supporters die off.
    2
  229.  @someoneelse.2252  They tolerated small minorities on the assumption that they would always remain small minorities. The English being made into a minority themselves in their own homeland was never something agreed to when the Windrush arrived.
    2
  230. If France hasn't already descended into all-out civil war by then.
    2
  231. Or at the very least, to turn the tap off (so to speak) halt the inward migration. Reduce it to a very small trickle.
    2
  232. "You just need more funding" - Jeremy Corbyn
    2
  233. The Scots, Welsh, and Northern Irish are also counted as White British.
    2
  234. I think his comments about vets were more nuanced than that.
    2
  235. I see England is dammed when it is global and dammed when it is local. England may be geographically small, but nothing about its influence on the world is little.
    2
  236.  @highlands  This is war is essentially a continuation of a long struggle between Moscow and Washington over the alignment of Ukraine. The Europeans have only in the last week started to grasp how irrelevant they are. I think source of Yushchenko's poisoning is still not determined, but it wouldn't surprise me if it were Russia, and nor would it surprise me if it were Ukrainian rivals.
    2
  237.  @chriswatson1698  Perhaps the wants of employers should be less relevant. If it comes down to a choice between European women not having children and European employers being forced to employ mothers returning to the workforce, I'd prefer the latter. The mothers don't have to be promoted above their abilities, just given opportunities to get back on the ladder.
    2
  238. An unfortunate truth about the late monarch is she and her husband didn't do a very good job of raising children. All her kids and grandkids are duds.
    2
  239. No, is the answer to those questions.
    2
  240. Interesting topic. Thank you.
    2
  241. Repatriation must be on the agenda for all Western European nations now.
    2
  242. It's all very feminine too, it must be said. Note the emphasis on "kindness, empathy, tolerance, fairness, inclusion" etc. That's why it has spread like wildfire through the most female-dominated fields (e.g. Human Resources).
    2
  243. It's a downside of Liberalism (which is also not without its upsides, of course). All these rich NGOs and Corporations are free to push their agendas in Liberal Democracies. Less-Liberal states don't allow them to do so.
    2
  244. What would be your economic preference? Also it's hardly accurate to say neoliberalism is the sole driver of the economy. The UK is a mixed economy with significant public education, health, and social welfare sectors (to say nothing of all the various government-paid contractors and "charities" that the ONS refuses to count as government employees in official statistics, but who are receiving taxpayer funds).
    2
  245. If we absolutely must have some foreign exchange students, it should be capped at something extremely low, like 2%.
    2
  246.  @Michael-ns1ey  I agree that in all things a balance is needed. Too-much individualism and too-much collectivism can be a problem, as can not enough of either.
    2
  247. The only thing that might change Tory policy is electoral defeat. They must be punished for this decision. Vote for anyone but them.
    2
  248. "Free Market Capitalism" and Conservatism are not one and the same, Lord Frost. Capitalism is Liberalism.
    2
  249. Weird how Liberal Democracies have to jettison free speech due to Liberal diversity. Perhaps it's a flaw in Liberalism.
    2
  250.  @helloagain6243  "no one wants an apology" There are many non-white activists demanding "reparations" and official apologies for all sorts of things white people are alleged to have done at some point in history, so that claim is obviously incorrect.
    2
  251. Good definition of beauty.
    2
  252. Britain and the British Empire are not the same thing. People born in other countries cannot "return" to Britain.
    2
  253.  @sbaby-kg8hn  There was a time when no humans existed at all. Mind-blowing, isn't it.
    2
  254. The USA's material success has many causes. Also the constitution of 1787 differs quite a bit from the articles of confederation or the declaration of independence a decade earlier, and is a more conservative document. After a decade of chaos it was decided a more nationalist document was needed, with less of Jefferson's liberal idealism.
    2
  255. He seems to think the USA is a model to follow, which is unfortunate.
    2
  256. Good work, Amy.
    2
  257. Classic tactic.
    2
  258. The only identity the English are currently allowed to have is one that welcomes their own disenfranchisement and demographic displacement.
    2
  259. @Chardonnay Smith Well that's alright then
    2
  260. Deconstruction. Straight out of Critical Theory.
    2
  261. Will the sight of open antisemitism on the streets of European cities be enough to convince the Tories to abandon Liberal immigration policies? Probably not.
    2
  262. He's done a hell of a lot more than you ever have.
    2
  263. When Labour wins they will say that the election was a referendum on immigration and the fact that Farage and the Tories lost is proof that the public don't care much about it.
    2
  264. Some people really do have out-group preference, but they are in the minority in any large population, and shouldn't push their preference on the rest of us.
    2
  265.  @ENGLISHMURPHY  Authoritarian state, innit. I'd prefer not to have to choose between that and diversity.
    2
  266.  @steve-xx6or  I've spent time in Russia too. It has an autocratic government. No point denying it.
    2
  267. Now you're getting it.
    2
  268.  @jeremysmith8035  So refuse.
    2
  269. And he was speaking from experience, having being subject to a death sentence and mock execution in Siberia.
    2
  270. Since the 1990s the Left have become accustomed to their opposition being Neo-Conservatives and Neo-Liberals (not much difference), so when they encounter something more like real Conservatism it seems extreme and unfamiliar to them.
    2
  271. We really need laws to deal with the power of NGOs (non-government agencies). They're a massive chunk of the problem in this issue. Billions of dollars are flying around financing social campaigns, often with opaque origins. Democracy is supposed to be one vote of equal value per person. The unrestrained power of money undermines that democratic principle.
    2
  272. meanwhile migrants and their offspring will still be able to shout about white people
    1
  273. If historical figures that are European cause anger in non-Europeans (either for justifiable or non-justifiable reasons), then that is all the more reason to reduce non-European immigration into Europe.
    1
  274. I hate to depress anyone about the monarchy, but as the demographics of the country change, it seems to me inevitable that the Royals will increasingly try to appeal to non-white-British people in an effort to prolong their reign. It wont work, of course, but that's likely what they'll do.
    1
  275.  @Mike-te8mo  Actually is was men who gave women the vote. Also the idea that female voters are the cause of the modern mess our countries are in is a myth perpetuated to turn European men and women against each other. British voters down the decades - male and female - have consistently expressed a desire for lower immigration, and they have been betrayed by both major parties (male and female members among them).
    1
  276.  @jeremysmith8035  If the Labour Party weren't so pro-Immigration they'd probably be in government now. They lost the north largely because they give the impression a majority-white-British country is something to be ashamed of and done-away with. Instead of berating native Europeans for wishing to broadly conserve the demographic makeup of their countries, how about accepting their wish and removing a massive road-block to removing the Tory Party from power? Left parties in Denmark & Sweden have begun to realise the folly of supporting large-scale immigration against the wishes of their would-be voters.
    1
  277. It's worth noting that Labour is willfully passing up a golden, once-in-a-generation chance to win back masses of white voters from the Right by using their majority in parliament to shut down immigration. All they have to do is come out and say "There's nothing wrong with the white British remaining the majority in Britain, so we're going to massively reduce immigration while also protecting non-white minorities" - this would be welcomed by most voters.
    1
  278. Good speech. Though I suggest that "Identity Socialism" is probably a more accurate description than "Culture Socialism."
    1
  279. The problem with the "Race isn't important" thing is it is always selectively applied - e.g. only really ever applied to white people. Everyone else's race apparently is very important and must be highlighted and celebrated, but white people must not notice their own, unless it is in some negative or apologetic way. Perhaps the ideal that we all look past race is unrealistic, if noble?
    1
  280.  @gweilospur5877  Not just white, but north-western European. This deconstruction game could be played with any ethnic group anywhere, but is only every done to white people who express reluctance to be made into minorities in their ancestral homelands by the mass arrival of people who already have ancestral homelands of their own.
    1
  281. Boris gained the largest parliamentary majority in generations, and proceeded to do absolutely nothing of any value with it.
    1
  282. no need to nit-pick
    1
  283. Nothing needs to be done to them. You just count them and adjust immigration numbers accordingly. So if births push the percent below 80, immigration levels are reduced to compensate.
    1
  284. My comments in this chain are being deleted for no apparent reason.
    1
  285. I think it's important we note that people can realistically only have a bare minimum amount of opportunities in common. Some people will always have more opportunities in life than others because different outcomes naturally lead to more and better opportunities. The child of parents who achieved "X" are going to have more opportunities than a child of parents who achieved "Y". To the Left this is unjust, but for the rest of us it shouldn't be seen as such.
    1
  286. Enthusiastically continued by the Tory Party
    1
  287. Party, but also in the melting pot are influential Liberals like John Rawls, John Dewey, and Ronald Dworkin.
    1
  288. Well said, Rafe. Thanks.
    1
  289.  @variousresearch5054  Australia or Canada, but the sound of it.
    1
  290. We don't know if he's innocent or guilty of some or all of the accusations. I wouldn't be at all surprised if he is (guilty), but let's not get ahead of ourselves.
    1
  291. Specifically younger, childless women.
    1
  292. I don't think it would collapse, just as it didn't collapse after the 1940s and 30s. Instead it will be an ever-present phenomenon that must be managed. It can't be eradicated, and attempts to eradicate it just make the problem worse, as they did from 39-45.
    1
  293. I like you guys, but you haven't worked out yet that Liberal Democracy is the problem, not the solution. Britain doesn't need a Johnson. It needs a Salazar.
    1
  294.  @Soul_of_a_Robot  ....with the enthusiastic support of the Labour party. Labour & the Conservative party both love mass-immigration, as they have demonstrated both in government and in opposition.
    1
  295. That was a wonderful interview. Thanks
    1
  296. Agree with the message, but the music is a bit over the top
    1
  297. The Liberals won't do anything about it. They're not a socially conservative party. Neither are the UK Tories. If it isn't tax cuts and migrant workers for corporations they're not interested.
    1
  298. From her point of view it's a win-win situation: She gets all the benefits of living in a country created by white people AND gets applauded and promoted for bad-mouthing it. She won't suffer any significant downsides.
    1
  299. Good points made.
    1
  300. I'd be interested to know which particular classes it is being taught in. History? English?
    1
  301. Historical Revisionism is very popular on the Left these days. Mark my words, you will in your lifetimes see Leftists claim that England/Sweden/France (etc) were never majority-White in the past.
    1
  302. Who ever said it wasn't? (a more fundamental unit than the nation-state)
    1
  303. Human Rights are make-believe social constructs. They don't exist in nature. Therefore they can very easily become a laundry-list of wants that someone else must provide (e.g., a "right" to good health, a 'right' to happiness, a 'right' to housing, a 'right' to enter a women's changing room and whip your penis out, etc...)
    1
  304.  @Hindu_power_200  and Labour
    1
  305.  @khankrum1  If we try to appease critics by switching from calling it "Anglo-Saxon" to something else (like "Anglo-Celtic"), in a few years time we will have similar academics telling us that doesn't exist either. Why? Because the motivation of the academics is not accuracy, but to attack the idea that white people are native to Europe, therefore making it easier to promote mass-diversity/mass-immigration.
    1
  306.  @laurenceBDontYaNo  Plenty, in fact. But I call it as it is. Many of us here have heard all of these arguments before and we know why they are deployed.
    1
  307. Gerry Adams is a raving Leftist. He almost certainly supports these new laws.
    1
  308. He didn't try to establish a "safe space for Europeans" that's revisionist nonsense. He was just a common or garden imperialist who wanted his specific European tribe to subjugate and ethnically cleanse many others.  @jonsimmons4150 
    1
  309. Ah yes, the old "two wrongs make a right" argument. Popular with children. I note that it is only ever applied to white people. Everyone's ancestors have at some point done something bad.  @thekilla2885 
    1
  310. Revolting rarely does the French any good. They're in the same mess.  @sararichardson737 
    1
  311. test
    1
  312.  @TheConcretecoffin That's a myth. Aboriginal people were already legal citizens long before 1967, and in most cases could already register to vote. There is a persistent myth floating around that Aboriginal people were classed as "flora and fauna" but there is no truth to it at all.
    1
  313. Everything I disagree with is propaganda.
    1
  314. going to have to either build a new Conservative party from the ground up, or do what Corbyn's supporters did to the Labour party and join the Party en masse, forcing the Blairites out of the way.
    1
  315. Agree 100% it has to go
    1
  316. Both. Left-Progressives view white people as the global upper-class who must be stripped of their power so a better world can be ushered in. That's at the heart of their diversity fetish.
    1
  317. Massive and sustained non-violent protest would be very hard for the Left to effectively counter.
    1
  318. Imagine being so married to the concept of "Blackness" etc.....
    1
  319.  @easytoassemble54321  Only two countries in the world have the military capacity to invade and occupy Britain: the USA and China. It's not going to happen. When politicians say "fight for Britain" they mean sending young men to Ukrainian trenches to sit under Russian artillery. There's an outside chance that something might happen in the Baltics, but that's about it.
    1
  320. These "Blue Labour" types are just people in the process of waking up and abandoning the Left altogether. They have one foot out the door, but still cling to some of their old beliefs because they want to still think of themselves as Leftists. They'll get there eventually.
    1
  321. The 'Racism' concept has been the most useful weapon in the arsenal of Liberals & Leftists to browbeat other native Europeans into silence. It equates caring about our ethnic group's collective self-interest with immorality and a lack of intelligence.
    1
  322. When everything or everywhere majority-white is defined as Racist, it starts to look less like anti-racism and more like anti-white sentiment.
    1
  323. There is absolutely nothing to be gained by apologizing for history. There will never be any kind of forgiveness. History will always be used as a stick to beat those who are timid enough to feel ashamed of it. These calls for penance are not about righting wrongs, they are simply cynical tribal power games. Europeans need to stop allowing their altruism to be used against them.
    1
  324.  @dolphin069  Not really. Few hundred years by now. More than enough time for books to be written.
    1
  325.  @dolphin069  I didn't say they were the norm throughout the millennia of human history
    1
  326. Good points, but really demands for penance need to be met with a simple "no." No further explanation is owed or required. Western Europeans ("Whites") have become too willing to entertain people who are playing the game of identity-politics for their own teams.
    1
  327. Only the British believe there is a "special relationship" between the US and the UK.
    1
  328.  @davidmorris3981  There is a thin line between tact and cowardice. "Conservatives" have tried being politically-correct for a few decades now. It hasn't done anyone any good. But naturally that doesn't mean anything that is politically-incorrect will automatically be tactically wise.
    1
  329. From 1945 to 2015 more British women voted Conservative than men did.
    1
  330.  @loganblackwood2922  From 1945 - 2015 more British women than men voted Conservative. I know there is a meme floating around the manosphere that everything bad under the sun can be traced to women voting, but it is complete ahistorical bollocks. In the 1997 election that produced the Blair government, more men than women voted for the Labour party.
    1
  331.  @rahuldahoob  Problems have causes. The Supreme Court was created by him specifically to undermine the power of Parliament. It needs to be scrapped.
    1
  332.  @richardjames5147  His foreign policy is better than that of his predecessors. An improvement.
    1
  333.  @faraway_lights3691  The point is that supposed historical wrongdoing is merely a stick to beat European/white people with in the current era. Don't play their game. No guilt. No apologies.
    1
  334. If that is racist, then the concept is not fit for purpose, as it has become little more than a tool to keep native European ethnic groups from considering their own collective self-interest and well-being.
    1
  335. Not a word of truth in your post.
    1
  336. Careful now.
    1
  337. Race and culture are usually inseparable, especially when we're dealing with large numbers. A foreigner who moves to a 98% homogeneous Japan will feel enormous pressure to assimilate into their culture. However, someone moving to a future Japan that is only 40% ethnic Japanese will feel nowhere near the same amount of pressure, and therefore will be more inclined to retain their own identity, or to adopt a vague globalized identity. Numbers are everything.  @darkbrotherhood3607 
    1
  338.  @therightarmofthefreeworld4703  One problem I can think of is it inevitably leads to Progressive Liberalism. We've run the experiment in many countries and this seems to be the outcome everywhere.
    1
  339. but that just leaves the problem intact. it saves one's own kids but does nothing about the entire country's kids.
    1
  340. Ask Singapore and Hong Kong. As for Marxism, the Soviet Union pushed that all over the world during the cold war.
    1
  341. We can't come together unless the Left abandons most of what it believes. Therefore it won't happen. There is a sizable chunk of the general public and the Socially-Conservative Right (as opposed to the Liberal Right) who are against excessive Economic Liberalism and would be open to state ownership of some industries, higher taxation of the very rich, economic protectionism, and a few other economically-Left policies. But you can't gain our support while attacking us for being white, or trying to demographically displace us in our own ancestral homelands via mass-immigration, etc... Almost everything non-economic the Left stands for is awful.
    1
  342. You've noticed the asymmetrical nature of this phenomenon: "White" (European) people's identities are subject to an endless barrage of criticism/deconstruction, while non-white identities are taken at face-value treated as sacred by the same people doing the deconstructing.
    1
  343. This is only half of the picture. The other part of the problem is "Capitalism"/Economic-Liberalism itself. It isn't just the Left that has brought Western societies to this point, it is the Center-Right as well.
    1
  344. The Pride flag is the flag of Globalism. Liberal Hegemony. It's no accident US embassies everywhere use it.
    1
  345. No.
    1
  346. Because the Scots in his party and Labour, the Greens, and the Lib Dems also vote for it. Sad but true.
    1
  347. *Woman
    1
  348. The fear of being considered "Racist" is a weakness in white people that is being successfully exploited by opponents.
    1
  349. Already paid.
    1
  350.  @ellenoneill7853  Tunisia?
    1
  351. Leftists have an egotistical need to see themselves as heroes for the least-fortunate, and as gallant fighters against the powerful. They can never be satisfied with the working people they have in their own countries because there is always someone somewhere in the world less fortunate (and powerful) than White Europeans. Leftists are on a never-ending quest to find people more deserving of their solidarity.
    1
  352. "Free Market Capitalism" in practice mean mass-immigration and relinquishing control of culture to mega-rich corporations (usually American ones) who push woke values.
    1
  353.  @skymanifest8339  You are entirely correct.
    1
  354. As long as we pretend the problem is only extremism and not Islam itself this will continue. Remigration must be part of the conversation. If migration can be incentivized, then so too can emigration.
    1
  355. looks like a garage, and possibly is
    1
  356. I'd argue it isn't really guilt, but vanity, pride, ego. The apologetic white person casts themselves as "one of the good ones," a morally righteous defender of non-white people in need of their generous help (or so they like to think).
    1
  357. You're going to be seen (and treated) as "White" regardless if you use the word or not. Atomized individuals cannot defeat an opponent that is tribal.
    1
  358.  @helloagain6243  Where's the lie? Are black people going to stop referring to themselves as "black" and drop identity politics anytime soon? Of course not. Tribalism is what humans inevitably do, and it is foolish to think it will go away if European ("white") people just sit it out while everyone else carries on doing it.
    1
  359. I must admit I've never really understood why there is a distinction made between "the culture war" and anything else that is a matter of political debate. Surely all politics is cultural?
    1
  360.  @ulissesbraga-neto2123  Yes, people do survive that particular form of restraint because although it may look painful, it doesn't restrict breathing. There are videos out there of people having it done to them. The coroner testified at the trial that Floyd did not die of asphyxiation. He died of heart failure. The contributing factors in that heart failure were listed as (1) the dangerous and often lethal amount of drugs he had taken, (2) his underlying chronic heart condition (dangerously clogged arteries), and (3) the physical stress of struggling with police and then being restrained. The last bit (the restraint) was used to convict Chauvin of murder. We'll never know, but it seems likely that had the trial taken place in a less politically charged climate - one in which jurors could be certain they could offer any judgment without the threat of personal repercussions later - he may have been convicted only of lesser charges, or perhaps even acquitted. Why? Because it can't actually be proven beyond reasonable doubt that Floyd wouldn't also have died had Chauvin's knee been nowhere near his neck. The drugs and the stress of the fight with police (that Floyd himself chose to engage in) on his chronically ill heart could have been enough on their own to kill him. Had Chauvin's knee been on Floyd's shoulder we might not be having this discussion, but Floyd would likely still be dead.
    1
  361. You're ignorant of voting patterns. From 1945 until 2017, more women voted Right-Wing than men. Secondly you might want to look at which sex the majority of Prime Ministers and other government ministers have been.
    1
  362. Tate is barely worth discussing. He seems to appeal only to the lowest-IQ teenage boys, and their adult equivalent. "Dude, just shag lots of chicks and buy expensive toys" - eternal adolescent. One of these guys comes around every few years. Before it was someone calling himself Roosh. Eventually they have some epiphany and convert to Islam, or something, renouncing their former lifestyle.
    1
  363. The BBC cannot be reformed. It will never be neutral because it will always be staffed by metropolitan cosmopolites. Get rid of it. There is zero reason to continue allowing our cultural enemies to use public money.
    1
  364. @microfarming8583 Varoufakis is a self-described communist, so it is funny seeing him getting a dose of his own medicine.
    1
  365. Education campaigns have (in concert with other measures) been able to reduce cigarette smoking. A similar thing could be useful for increasing birthrates.
    1
  366. White People. Not "British Identity". It is an attack on White People - Europeans.
    1
  367.  @hendilman  all the more reason not to import more men from the places you mentioned, I'd have thought
    1
  368.  @MC-nu9dv  what's SWI?
    1
  369.  @louislemar796  Nationalism is NOT the theory that a society needs a nation state Yes it is. Or rather, it is one form of nationalism. There are multiple. At it's most basic, a belief in the value of nation-states is nationalist, as is the desire to create or uphold one. One cannot desire to create a nation-state without being a variety of nationalist. I disagree entirely, If Iceland had a set of founding fathers, who held the same ideas and implemented them in the same way then Iceland would be as successful. Impossible. Iceland does not have the size, location, population, or resources as the USA. The argument is not over whether Iceland would have any success at all. It is that Iceland would not be anywhere near as successful as the USA (because the USA's success depends on more than just a set of ideas). Hong Kong was not unsuccessful. But Hong Kong was/is nowhere near as successful as the USA. Europe destroying itself was also a massive hindrance to the USA Not when it came to becoming the world's dominant superpower. The previous holder of that crown was the British Empire, which destroyed itself in two world wars. Had that not happened, the USA would have to contend with a world in which the British were still at least as powerful, if not more so, than them.
    1
  370.  @wolfgangvonlichtenstein5222  Free Market Capitalists believe that more migrants = higher GDP, lower inflation (incl. lower wages). People voted to leave the EU in the hope that a British government would reduce immigration once they had complete sovereign control of Britain's borders. Instead the government has just used Brexit as an excuse to bump up the numbers of migrants from outside Europe.
    1
  371. A little misleading. For many decades per-capita violent crime in Western countries has been trending down because we have aging populations. Most violent crimes are committed by men under 30, so an aging population means a relatively smaller pool of such men. However, bringing in young men from certain parts of the world results in higher rates of crime than we otherwise would have without that immigration, in places that otherwise would be more peaceful and pleasant to live. That's the issue here: the crime rates we have versus the ones we could have if we weren't so intent on importing large amounts of low-skilled young men from parts of the world with even worse attitudes to women than our men generally have. There are many examples from the Nordic countries where we can see previously peaceful areas become worse due to such immigration.
    1
  372. Man in his natural state has abilities. Rights are an abstraction. We can choose to believe that we are endowed with Rights, but this is a utilitarian argument. We can't know if God does (or doesn't) exist. It requires a leap of faith.
    1
  373. Excellent speech, Harrison.
    1
  374. British women consistently voted Conservative more than men did from 1945 to 2015. What you're describing is a very recent phenomenon, probably due to the influence of social media.
    1
  375. Well then the chickens must be dealt with.
    1
  376.  @GRIMVEL  So you acknowledge that affluent immigrants are less of a crime-burden but still want to import masses of non-affluent immigrants anyway? As for economics, only certain kinds of immigration is economically beneficial, and much of what we (and other European countries) have been getting is economically detrimental. Let's say we do blame billionaires (among others) for mass-immigration. Now what? Is the Left ever going to reduce immigration, even if we significantly raise taxes on billionaires? (no) For the Left, immigration is ideological. For the Tories it is business.
    1
  377. People are going to conclude that democracy is useless.
    1
  378. RCN President Sheila Sobrany's comments were (like Sadiq Khan's) racist towards white people.
    1
  379. Nonsense. It is unhelpful to blame one sex for the mass-immigration into Britain, but if you really want to go down that road, search for voting patterns in Britain going all the way back to 1945. You'll see that most women voted Conservative in every election until 2017, while more men often voted Labour (including in 1997 when Blair won). Then you could look at which sex the vast majority of government ministers have been, and so on.... You're right that most female feminists are Left-Wing, and therefore mostly supportive of the Left's immigration and diversity ideology. But that ignores all the men who are Left-Wing and supportive of the same ideology. It would be ludicrous to suggest that Germaine Greer had more influence on immigration levels than Tony Blair did, for example.
    1
  380. "Anti-Racism" and "Social Justice" in reality just mean trying to get as much as possible out of white people - their money, their land, the fruits of their labour, and ultimately their countries.
    1
  381. the "they will assimilate in a generation or two" argument only makes sense if you have a small amount of initial immigration and then halt further immigration for decades. By definition it cannot work if instead you have a constant, steady stream of 1st generation migrants.
    1
  382.  @genghisthegreat2034  The immigration doesn't sustain services, it strains them.
    1
  383. I have always strongly disliked Russell Brand and could easily see him being guilty. However it is alarming that a government is, on the basis of anonymous accusations, essentially going after someone who has not yet been charged with anything let alone convicted, pushing for him to be de-platformed and attacking his livelihood. Shades of East Germany. We must defend due process even for unsympathetic characters.
    1
  384. Saying something for decades doesn't make it true.
    1
  385.  @josevictorribeirolisboa7576  It is worth caring about your ancestors in this sense: if by their actions you have inherited something good worth cherishing and passing on to your children. "Pride" can have different meanings. If you use the word to mean a personal feeling of achievement for the actions of people long dead who may only be very vaguely related to you anyway, I agree it is foolish. However that isn't quite what a lot of people mean. To take pride in something can be to understand its worth. I can feel proud of my parents without taking personal credit for their achievements, or blame for their misdeeds. I can take pride in what they passed down. This is, I think, what many people mean by the term - feelings of appreciation, gratitude, admiration.
    1
  386. not a particularly pleasant comment
    1
  387. That's the "two wrongs make a right" argument. Also the dubious idea of inter-genrational punishment, in which grandchildren deserve punishment for the sins of...not even necessarily their grandfathers, but often just people who looked like their grandfathers, are of the same ethnic groups. These standards seem only ever to be applied to white people, oddly.  @nomxhosapekani7966 
    1
  388. So when can you be punished for the sins of your ancestors? I didn't colonize anyone and you were never colonized. You're talking about people who are long-dead. You use this "justice" argument to mask your own self-interest: You personally benefit from being in majority-white countries. Justice isn't your motivation, self-interest is.  @user-wm2tw 
    1
  389. Political parties don't have to voluntarily associate with someone if they think it will hurt their electoral chances.
    1
  390. Good to know. The IQ debate should be fun then.
    1
  391. Karma doesn't exist. It's just a concept spiteful people use to justify things they agree with. @selvamthiagarajan8152 
    1
  392.  @ЯрославЛ-ф1ж  I doubt the OP is committing any genocides from his council house.
    1
  393. don't be fooled. they both want unlimited immigration.
    1
  394. From 1945 until 2017, British women voted more conservatively than men.
    1
  395. Which subject are those cultural lessons taking place in?
    1
  396. Could large scale entryism work in the Conservative party? Corbyn's supporters managed to wrestle control of Labour for a while.
    1
  397. 'cos he's working class Labour innit
    1
  398. Notice how asserting your white identity prompts certain people to immediately try to dissuade you with childish insults about genitalia.
    1
  399.  @NG-dc2pk  Stop spamming that comment. We've all seen it now.
    1
  400. Correct.
    1
  401. Does he have to seek your approval before attending an event he was invited to?
    1
  402. There's no pleasing some people, it seems.  @thelikesofus324 
    1
  403. Nigel controls the Brussels police force?
    1
  404.  @evolassunglasses4673  No. It's too convenient to place all, or even most of the blame on them. The undeniable fact is that white people in north America and Western Europe bought into Liberalism. Maybe not always the whole of the general public, but definitely the middle and upper classes and the political class. Scapegoating is a cop-out.
    1
  405. Get over it.
    1
  406.  @kellysouter4381  or employment
    1
  407. Election data from 1945 to the present day shows that women voted more conservatively than men until 2017. A higher percentage of men voted for Left-Wing parties. More men were in government. More men were Prime Ministers, etc... The suggestion that mass-immigration is a result of women voting is simply not born out by the facts, at least in Britain's case.
    1
  408.  @douglas_gemini  Tell that to the Labour party and its supporters.
    1
  409.  @boysiedent6149  South Africa is a disaster. Australia and New Zealand succeeded because they were majority-white.
    1
  410. It is quite clear that Left solidarity is with the developing world, not the developed, Western one. This is an inevitable result of the Left self-image as being heroes for the least-fortunate, and gallant fighters against the most powerful. There will always be people in the world less-fortunate than White Europeans, therefore the Left are on an never-ending search to replace White Europeans with people they see as being more deserving of their sympathies.
    1
  411. A few years ago a feminist in Austria was fined for saying that Muhammad's marriage to a 6 year old girl made him a pedophile. She took her case to ECHR on the grounds of freedom of speech. I don't even have to tell you what their ruling was. You can guess. It's a farce.
    1
  412. Many years from now, historians - if they are honest - will portion blame for the conflict to pretty much all sides involved: Moscow, Washington, London, Kiev, Berlin, Paris, Brussels. Each in their way made war inevitable.
    1
  413. I've yet to hear anyone explain why it is in our self-interest to pay reparations. All arguments rely upon altruism.
    1