Comments by "bakters" (@bakters) on "Discussing the Strategic Bombing Campaign WW2, Order 270 and more... Patreon Q&A 7" video.

I consider fire bombing to be abhorrent and I defend Germans when it comes to that. I'm from Poland and I warn you to not call me pro-nazi if we'd ever meet in person. If fire-bombing was even effective, I could stomach it easier, but despite all this weird intellectual and moral contortionism you've done in this video, you did not show it was really worth the effort! Regardless of morals. You didn't show it even worked well enough to justify the costs for the Allies . Soviets won the war and they didn't do that shit.
3
@prof_kaos9341 That's what Britain did anyway, isn't it? Regarding options, you buy planes by the pound. For the amount of money required for a strategic bombing campaign Britain could have had an incredible flotilla of tactical bombers with fighter escorts. For every Lancaster they could build two or three Mosquitoes, four fighter-bombers and so on. That's what Soviets have done. And they won the war. Without burning women and children alive.
2