Comments by "Mat Broomfield" (@matbroomfield) on "Channel 4 News"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@timingmile7030 Men DO hold each other accountable. And yet again, you are blaming men. How about if I say "It's time for women to hold each other accountable for the majority of child murders that they commit?" You'd rightly be outraged. The LAW opposes rape and murder. Men in prison treat rapists and murders incredibly harshly. There's no place in society where a rapist or murderer would not be a pariah. Children of both sexes are taught that violence is wrong from the earliest age both at school and home. What more do you think "men" should be doing?
As for the law being consistent in locking violent men away, that's a complicated subject. I don't entirely disagree, but that's not entirely the law, that's social workers who turn up at court with sob stories. Ironically, due to an excess of compassion - a trait which, I would point out, tends to be associated with WOMEN not men.
Face it, women have NEVER and will NEVER be 100% safe alone. Just like you can never be 100% certain that you will not be attacked by a dog while you are out. But it's incredibly rare. Looking at the 1 in a million exception and using that to make broad declarations about society in general is unreasonable. Each of us needs to take sensible steps to ensure our own safety. This woman's horrible murder is a tragedy. I just don't know what else can reasonably be done. If this was YOUR town, would you be willing to sacrifice other services services to place monitored cameras along every inch of footpaths? If it was your son at school, would you be satisfied with him being assigned collective responsibility for all attacks, or taught as a teenager that he is a potential rapist?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@realthings5821 I know you think you're being clever, but you're really not. UK scientists went against WHO advice, and Bozo went against the advice of British scientists. The second they started talking about herd immunity it was clear to any remotely intelligent person that it was as ludicrous as Sweden's plan not to lockdown at all.
Similarly, when they told me I couldn't go out at all, or to the beach, or far away, or for long walks it was clear that these things were prohibitions designed (belatedly) to simplify the message, not because they decreased our odds of transmission. If I went for a walk of 200 miles but maintained distancing and touched nothing, there was zero risk to me.
Now when they say it's okay for schools to reopen, I will NOT be returning to the school I work at part time and whilst the science on schools is constantly evolving and sometimes contradictory, I will NOT be guided by a man whose prime objective is to get the drones working and supporting the corporate machine once more.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4