Comments by "XYZ ABC" (@123xyzabccba) on "ThePrint" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. Tanmay Sangtani : nobody doubts Savarkar patriotism & sacrifice But he was not the only 1 who faced torture as there were many who didn’t ask for clemency n faced d gallows with their heads held high. Savarkar it is told was not anti Muslim earlier but his bad experience with the Muslim inmates - who he thought mistakenly represent the common Muslims - in the Andaman jail convinced him that Hindus n Muslims cannot exist together and therefore it was his Hindu Mahasabha which supported the idea of partition. Savarkar was also accused as an accomplice in the assassination of Gandhi in the commission which was set up to investigate Gandhi’s killing after Savarkar was acquitted by the court for want of sufficient evidences. How can indians accept anybody as their hero who is accused of the assassination of a pious man like Gandhi who believed in universal harmony and had the guts to stop the warring donkeys from both the Hindus & Muslim communities by entering the bloody streets of Navkhali without any protection; So much was the believe of Gandhi in the principles of nonviolence that he didn’t just preach but also offered himself to the religious bigots baying for each other’s blood. It is sad but true that a social reformer like Savarkar will be known more for his alleged involvement in Gandhi’s assassination and less for his guts to cleanse the Hindu religion of all its dirt n filth even at the cost of distancing the Hindu fundamentalist who formed the core of his support base. Even Gandhi never had the guts to openly call the bluffs of the caste Hindus fearing noncooperation But Savarkar didn’t mince his words when it came to criticising the ill practices of the sick Hindu mindset. Unfortunately the Savarkar worshippers are highlighting his revolutionary episodes - which gets undermined by those 8 letters seeking clemency - instead of promoting the scientific temper for which he steadfastly stood all through his life. As far as comparing with Shivaji is concerned, let it be known that signing treaties in case of victory n defeat is part of the politics of kingdoms and there just cannot be any parallel between Shivajis political manoeuvring to save his kingdom with that of Savarkars clemency for saving his own life. Sadly for Savarkar the present n future generations regardless of their caste creed n religion will always compare his Clemency with the Supreme Sacrifices of Bhagat Singh, Rajguru & Sukhdev and will no doubt be inspired by the latter rather than the former ....
    2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 30:00; Muslim bashing is just a pretext as it serves 2 purposes (1) continue the subjugation of the poor Muslims who majorly, almost upto 90%, are from the shudra stock and had embraced Islam to escape atrocities from the minority Hindu oppressing castes (2) keep poisoning the minds of those shudra castes which hv chosen to accept their substandard status under bamman dominated Hinduism and to keep diverting their attention from their socio-eco-political exploitation - at the hands of the manuwadi minority oppressing castes of bamman-Bania-kshatris, who together comprise just 20% of Hindu population - by portraying the Muslims and their growing population ( when factually the muslim rate of population growth is lower to that of Hindu ) as a threat to their nation and religious existence. This is exactly how the white racists in US portray the blacks back home to instigate racism. Muslims per se aren’t beneficiaries of any socio-economic affirmative actions provided by the constitution for the majority Bahujan castes but deeply resented by the minority oppressing castes, therefore apparently there shld not be any reason for this anti-Muslim rhetoric. In fact the Muslims are the most hardworking and self reliant population of india who contribute handsomely towards the nation GDP without expecting any doles from the government unlike the oppressing castes Hindus, who, despite being dominant in business and employment have secured 10% reservations, whereas no such reservations exists for Muslims. The real target of these oppressing castes parties like bjp as well as the congress is to scuttle the socio-economic-political progress of the majority shudras and that is why they nominated a fake obc as their PM through whom all the affirmative actions guaranteed by the constitution are being diluted clandestinely under the din of Hindu-Muslim communal strife. The Shudras unfortunately have been divided and sub-divided into several subcastes making them easily vulnerable to political manipulation’s by playing one caste against another and bjp has time and again proven to be the master at this game. The present Loksabha is packed with members from the shudra castes but having got ejected on BJP’s ticket they don’t hv the gall to act against the party’s objective of maintaining bammanical patriarchy at any cost .
    2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. The credit for laying the strong foundation for industrial growth should go to the Nehruvian policy of mixed economy comprising of the public sector which was entrusted with the task of undertaking the establishment of core industries requiring huge investment and the private sector for which the consumer goods sector was kept reserved and insulated from foreign competition. The public sector succeeded in accomplishing the task but the private sector was pathetic baring a few notable exceptions. So long as the income disparities continued the casteist bureaucracy from middle to top level didn’t mind the socialist flavour of the Indian economy but as the distribution of income started becoming less skewed and more egalitarian and when indira gandhi, to survive the political storm brewing against her, embarked on the journey of full scale socialism by nationalising banks - which till than were the preserve of the dominant Bania-Bamman lobby - and insurance companies the casteist bureaucracy started doing everything possible to scuttle the positive effect of socialism. In China the bureaucracy played an important and positive role to ensure the success of its public sector as well as the pvt sector, but such was not the case with the casteist Indian bureaucracy which had never aligned with the socialist objective of the economic policy propounded by the congress under indira and therefore played spoilsport covertly. Today even after more than 30 years of liberalisation not a single product manufactured by the Indian private sector commands international respect, including software industry where Indians are more visible as cyber-coolies rather than inventors of new-age IT products like Twitter , facebook, WhatsApp , insta, youtube etc. The only dubious record the Indian private sector has made is the massive creation of NPAs and gigantic bank frauds and here also the culprits are from the minority castes of bamman + Bania who are just over 10% but maintain their stranglehold over 80% of nations wealth …..
    2
  50. 2