Comments by "Hobbs" (@hobbso8508) on "Fox Business" channel.

  1.  @williamabbott9437  No, it's not a constitutional issue. In fact if you read the constitution you would know that nobody is above the law.
    1
  2.  @williamabbott9437  Yes, a criminal being convicted is a good thing.
    1
  3.  @williamabbott9437  It's a felony. He was not in office. Presidential Immunity applies to actions taken while performing the job of President, not any actions taken. Presidents can still get speeding tickets.
    1
  4.  @williamabbott9437  Obama was acting as the President, not paying off people before an election. Biden cooperated fully with officials. He didn't hide the documents. He was even the one that altered the government that he had the records. Trump was allowed to call whoever he wanted, including himself I might add.
    1
  5.  @matthewmaning4859  He's a hack and has been for years. L
    1
  6. The Russian bear?
    1
  7.  @kpizzlemynizzle922  Patriots don't vote for felons.
    1
  8.  @kpizzlemynizzle922  Lol, you're just nationalists.
    1
  9.  @kpizzlemynizzle922  Yeah, that's not a good thing 🤣
    1
  10.  @Gigi1111Layna  Pull the other one.
    1
  11. ​ @jrooksable  10% over 10 years doesn't even match inflationary increases. GDP will increase more than that easy. The investment will also surge massive increases.
    1
  12. What's to get to the bottom of? The study is public, anyone can see what they did.
    1
  13. @fomerly patriotic The US is the only country to actually call in NATO. How is it not a benefit?
    1
  14. One of the jurors stated that their only source of news is Truth Social. Even that person voted to convict.
    1
  15. Well that's just a lie. May was 5%, April 4.2%.
    1
  16.  @sblijheid  So you're saying we should instead invest in the economy? Maybe through some kind of spending bill?
    1
  17.  @sblijheid  "Those are direct taxes that will be paid for indirectly by those making less than 400K a year." You can't pay for personal income taxes indirectly, that's just silly. "When taxes on corporations or the wealthy go up, the prices are marked up" So that businesses can make more profits. Bigger corporations pay no taxes anyway so why would they change their prices at all? "people get fired" Why would people be fired. You don't pay corporate taxes on employee wages. Wages count as expenses and expenses offset corporate taxes. Employee wages stay the same because the money being used to pay them is not taxed anyway. "more manufacturing moved overseas" That's to do with the cost of manufacturing. As those are all expenses and not anything to do with profits this would happen anyway and doesn't effect corporate taxes. In fact if you lower taxes this happens more as there is more incentive to invest less and profit more as you pay less taxes on said profits. If you increase taxes you encourage businesses to reinvest and raise wages to stay competitive as it ends up being better value for money than paying taxes. You also seem to support this odd notion that businesses aren't already doing everything they can to save money. If they could pinch a penny by moving overseas then they would. "and the wealthy still get their same income on a net basis and the middle class tax payers carry the burden" By this logic when taxes go down do the price of products reduce. Or could it be that item costs are based on a competitive marketplace with material costs and manufacturing costs and have absolutely nothing to do with taxes on profits. It's a mystery I know but think hard. "The bottom 50% welfare receivers are oblivious to all of this since they don't work and don't pay taxes." Didn't you just say the cost of products will increase though? That will effect those at the bottom the most. Maybe learn what corporate taxes are before commenting again.
    1