Comments by "Antony Wooster" (@antonywooster6783) on "Emil Cosman"
channel.
-
122
-
68
-
"It doesn't allow competition"
For once you are talking ignorant rubbish. About half the Chinese economy is private, The private sector makes about 40% of the GDP, employs about 60% of the work force. There is consequently a lot of competition. You are making a typically western mistake, you think that China is modelled on the USSR. It's not and it never has been. From well before the declaration of the PRC 2/10/1949. the communist part of China, has had a mixed economy, part state, part cooperative, part capitalist. The Chinese Communists, realized from the start of the revolution that they could not plan everything and it would be a bad idea to try, so they nationalized the foundations of the economy and left the rest to private enterprise. The result was many more of the peoples' needs were catered for than happened in the USSR. At the same time they ensured that the foundations of the economy, food, education, transport, electricity, medical services, roads, railways, canals, water supply, the military, the police and so on were under government control or were government owned, but most consumer goods were made by privately or cooperatively owned firms.
By the time I went to China, I had visited many of the countries in the Warsaw Pact and I had also been to Moscow and I knew of the poor selection of goods available or missing in those economies. I had worked for a while in the DDR, so I was rather surprised on first seeing China (In 1964.) The first thing that struck me was that everything looked freshly painted in bright colours! Then when I went shopping there was an amazing selection of goods on offer. It formed a rather odd contrast to the people, who at that time were all dressed in blue or grey Mao suits. But the variety of goods was certainly there. Now, of course, there is "rampant capitalism" as is, I would have thought, pretty well known. The difference from the West is that the capitalists are not allowed anywhere near the levers of power. Those that get carried away by their huge wealth and think that they can tell the government what to do, get put in their place fairly quickly. E.g. Jack Ma.
38
-
28
-
9:16 I think this is characteristic of modern Western weapons. A Russian pilot I read, said that Western fighter jets were beautifully made, like Swiss watches, but like Swiss watches, very delicate. When I was an infantryman, for the first part of my service, we used Lee-Enfield rifles that, I should think, were of no later than 1914 vintage. I don't remember one of them ever going wrong. Towards the end of my time we were given FN (Belgian made) rifles which were lighter, easier to carry and fire, were self-loading, could fire multiple shots. (IIRC, officially, you could fire up to three shots in a burst, but if "fixed" it with a matchstick, you could fire the whole magazine (10 shots) in one burst.) It was more accurate, in match shooting on a firing range too. However, in a sandy environment it was forever jamming.
28
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
20
-
20
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
When I was a child(a long time ago) there was an advert by the Wool Utilization Council, (of the UK) which proclaimed: "There is no substitute for Wool!" I oftern think that equally, or perhaps even more so, "there is No substitute for Information!". Alas, it is easier to find wool than reliable information. People like you and Alex and Alexander and Earl Grey and Gonzalo Lira,, ScottRitter, Jason Hinkle, and some half-dozen others are doing a really valuable service in providing different points of view from the MSM. In addition I find that the picture can also be filled out by WION and VFT although they are rather anti-Russian- and very anti-Chinese biased, do provide another view on the situation which is different from "our" MSM and consequently valuable. So, of course do Press TV, TASS and Global Times. I find the MSM almost unreadable because they usually strart off any article with such whopping lies that one feels inclined to disbelieve everything that follows and it feels like a complete waste of time.!
Also, unlike the MSM which seems to get its "Information" from a very few sources such as "an anoymous spokesperson for the State Department or Bellingcat or No.10 Downing St, you alternative sources collate, for internet browsers like myself, vastly more sources of info than I could ever hope to do. Thank you very much!
15
-
15
-
When the USSR collapsed, there was a referendum in Moldova to decide whether people wanted to remain part of the Russian Federation or become independent. They voted to remain part of the RF. The vote was, (Surprise, surprise!) ignored. There was, when the USSR was formed, and before Stalin got what is now Moldova, a Republic in what is now Ukraine and Transdniestria called the Soviet Socialist Republic of Moldova (or some such). When, post USSR, Moldova was declared independent the part that had been part of the SSRM (Transdniestria) fought to become independent of Moldova and there was a civil war. I do not know how it ended but it did and the peace was kept by Russian peacekeepers and has been ever since. Last time I saw it, about four years ago, it looked very peaceful, well-run* and moderately prosperous.
15
-
15
-
15
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
The importance of this statement by Reznikov is, simply that it unequivocally contradicts, repeated statements out of the West, that "Russia is attacking Ukraine", without reason, without justification. Multiple statements that "The Russians have No Reason to attack Ukraine" and so on and so forth. The Media war is an important part of this war, particularly in the Collective West, and that is what gives this statement, by a Ukrainian Minister of government, its importance, which, Emil, I agree, comes as no surprise to me or you!
4