Comments by "Antony Wooster" (@antonywooster6783) on "Emil Cosman" channel.

  1. 12:17 Yesterday I saw a video made by a man who said he had invented the World's best mouse trap. He had covered the mouth of a plastic bucket with a transparent plastic film. He then cut a little hole in the middle of the film and put some grain in the bucket. He put two little ladders (Mouse-sized ladders) to help the mice climb up to the film surface, set up his camera and went away. After a while some mice came and investigated this thing. A couple of them climbed up the ladders and looked down at the bottom of the bucket and saw the grain. They found the hole and jumped down to get the grain. Other mice noticed and followed them. Then crowds of mice arrived and followed the first ones. Then more and more and more came and jumped into the bucket, until it was almost full! Watching them, I was struck by how like people they were.
    4
  2. Never mind chemical weapons! Who provided Iraq with BIOLOGICAL weapons?
    4
  3.  @Lipi19821  It is fascinating how much one learns from reading the comments!
    4
  4. "NATO has unlimited resources" That's not what they are telling Zelensky!
    4
  5. 6:00 We did not vote for Ursula, Mario, Josip, or Christina.
    4
  6. What makes you think that there is a word of truth in Ukrainska Pravda?
    4
  7. Not "may", will.
    3
  8. How about the ancestors of Ursula von der Leyen?
    3
  9. Are you taking bets on that?
    3
  10. 9:39 Perhaps, what is taking them so long, is deciding whether to try to pin it on someone or to simply keep quiet about it. A difficult choice!
    3
  11. Stoltenberg also said: "A defeat for Ukraine would be a defeat for NATO." NATO declared war on Russia? Russia declared war on NATO? Not that I have heard. "Barbaric attacks" What would you call shelling the civilians in the Donbas for eight years? What would you call the SBU "Hunting Russians (Aka Russian-speaking Ukrainian civilians) down like pigs." (To quote The Daily Mail.)
    3
  12. "Even the UK" You joke surely! Britain has been inflating rapidly, all my life.
    3
  13. I have heard, that when an F-16 is idling at the end of the runway, waiting for the order to take off, it is using 600 pounds of fuel an hour, just to keep the engines warm.
    3
  14. Well said!
    3
  15. 1:57 I don't know if you know, but I have heard that the CIA was deeply involved with the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. I had a school friend who worked there as a secretary and she said to me: "If you visit me at work and you see, on the stairs, someone who looks sane you can be sure they are a patient."
    3
  16. The two evil geniuses that drew up that treaty were two American lawyers, the brothers Dulles, John Foster Dulles and his brother Allen, (though Wikipedia does not mention their role, it does say that John FD was there.)
    3
  17. Thinking further about you and the other alternative sources of information; I think it may well be that you are literally saving the World from disaster by informing us about reality. You are a real "spoke in the wheel" of the evil plans of the people in charge of world events!
    3
  18. 11:09 According to a Moldovan I know, at the dissolution of the USSR there was a referendum in Moldova in which a majority opted to remain part of the USSR. The result of the referendum was ignored and they got independence. According to a correspondent in the internet All the states of the union (USSR) voted the same way, i.e. to remain together and all the others were ignored just as the Moldovans were. Incidentally, Moldova was part of Romania for a relatively few decades before it was seized by Stalin.
    3
  19. 13:17 To say "There can be no NA*is in Ukraine because their President is a Jew" sound to me exactly like Racism! Isn't it?
    3
  20. Hello Emil. I would like to discuss an idea that I have had. There is in Washington a set-up, which as far as I know has as yet no proper name. I will call it :The "Vicious Circle". It is a circulatory structure, hence the name, and it consists of various interconnected groups, These are: the amrs-making industries, the lobbyist industry, the members of Congress (The "congress-critters") & the United States Government (USG). In action, the Congress-critters vote to tell the USG to order some weapons from the arms manufactureres. The USG then orders the arms from the arms manufacturers and send them money. The arms manufacturers then send some money to their employees, some to their shareholders and some to the lobbyists and use some for advertising themselves. (Many of the congress-critters and members of the USG are their shareholders. Many Ex-congress critters and ex military and ex-government people, are sinecured employees of the arms industry, the so called "Revolving Door".) The lobbyists use some of the moneyfrom the USG to pay their employees and their shareholders and some to persuade congress critters to vote the "Right" way to keep the money flowing to the arms manufacturers. This whole "Merry-go-round" is financed by the Taxpayers, who have almost no influence on it at all. This Vicious Circle is very powerful and completely ruthless and therefore very hard to break up - under normal circumstances. However, we are approaching a very abnormal set of circumstances, or so it seems to me. What I am refering to, is that it looks as though, in the near future, the US (N@0) is going to be defeated by the Russians. This means that the Russians are going to have a once-in-a-century opportunity to be able to impose conditions on the US and its sattelites, vassals, proxies and puppets. I suggest that if the Russians were to insist that all the arms manufacturers in the World had to be nationalized entities, and that no private individual or corporation would be allowed to have any share in an arms manufacturing industy or firm, then it would cut the financial lifeline of thw Warmongers in Washington, London, Berlin and Brussels (Or anywhere else.) and thus would destroy the Vicious Circle. This would I believe, be an enormous step towards bringing real peace to the World. What do you think?
    3
  21. The word is "traitor".
    3
  22. 6:32 If you wade through the British MSM you should invert everything you read and you will be fairly near the truth. As far as the Ukrainian media is concerned, I leave reading and interpreting that to you. As far as I can see, it is fiction from start to finish. With the US media it is mostly projection.
    2
  23. Even if there were a mechanism by which Russia could be "kicked out" of the UNSG, it would not pass the Chinese veto. As somebody said the other day: "Russia and China do not stand shoulder-to-shoulder, no, they stand back-to-back". Russia China and Iran know that if if they allowed the USA to defeat any one of them, one of the survivors would be the next to be attacked. I disagree with you that the Russians would not fight a convential war, as they are much better at it than NATO. The War in Ukraine has gobbled up so much of NATO's arms and ammunition that NATO's members' militaries are complaining that they are being disarmed. The Russians are using far more ammunition than the Ukrainians, but they show no sign of running short.
    2
  24. I wonder whether while Navalny was in the West recuperating from his poisoning, he was vaccinated with Pfizer or Astra-Zenecker vaccine, against Cov-19?
    2
  25. Prediction? It Is now 1624 31/10/22.
    2
  26. The most important factor in any dog-fight, is the skill of the respective pilots.
    2
  27. How do you like the idea of an additional quotient, a Stupidity Quotient or SQ for short? This would of course be independent of the IQ, because everybody has both! Some have a higher IQ and some lower while the same is true of the SQ.
    2
  28.  @Puffball-ll1ly  Yes probably. That would account for how successful British industry is!
    2
  29. 1:41 There is the story of a geralist medical doctor who found himself at a conference of cosmetic surgeons. After the formal meeting there was a cocktail party for the participants. Our doctor found himself next to a stranger and asked what his field was. "I am a nose-man." was the reply "Interesting!" said the generalist "Which nostril?"
    2
  30. 5:30 I agree with you, about attacking Belarus, provided you believe what Ukraine says. The Ukrainians had the best-trained and the only battle-hardened NATO type armed forces. last February and they cannot defeat a small part of the Russian armed forces. The rest of NATO is running low on weapons, providing Ukraine with replacement weapons and ammo. Which NATO country is going to take on the Russians and who is going to supply them with the weapons they will need? Not the US! That's for certain! "Too risky" Starting a nuclear war, taking into account the Russian's "Dead Hand" system is also certain death. So there is no point in discussing how a nuclear war would unfold. I think that, probably, in the end, we are looking at a security treaty which will give everybody security. I know that the US will struggle desperately against it, but I do not see that they have a viable alternative. If they cannot keep up with the Russians' production of armaments, what chance have they against China + Russia + Iran? Because if they push it, that is what they will face.
    2
  31. S-300 is an anti-aircraft & anti-missile system, not usually used to attack ground targets.
    2
  32. The point about that was, that RUSSIA WAS NOT A PARTY TO THE MINSK AGREEMENTS! Therefore, there was NO way that Russia COULD "Implement the Minsk accords". (Cunning! Eh?)
    2
  33. I have never had an interview quite like yours but, when I was very much younger, every time I went through a border I was questioned about what I was doing and where I was going etc. Then one day, I was looking at my passport and I noticed that the corner of one page was "dog-eared". I wondered how that had happened, as I was very careful of my passport and I turned it back and smoothed it out with a finger nail. Since then, I have been through many borders but have never been questioned about anything.
    2
  34. 9:22 The group that may not be named because to do so would be Rac**t!
    2
  35. In my opinion, Kuleba is right to ask the question, if he is talking about the Collective West fighting the Russians. It is now becoming very clear that the Collective West is really struggling to find the arms and troops to fight the Russians. Not to put too fine a point on it, they are losing the fight in Ukraine. If they are contemplating a more general fight against Russia, there seems little reason to think they would do better and even if by some strange chance they did, the Chinese would not see Russia lose. If they cannot defeat Russia, what chance would they have against Russia and China together? This question does not even address the problem of "what would the CW fight the Russians with?" Would the Oil rich countries supply them with the oil they would need? How long would it take the Russians and Chinese to destroy the CW's arms/oil dumps, or their electricity systems? Really it's a no brainer. If they fight a conventional war with the Eurasian "Axis of Evil" they will lose. If they fight a nuclear war everybody will lose.
    2
  36. 9:50 "When the sands are all dry He's as gay as a lark And will talk in contemptuous tones of the shark. When the waters rise high And the sharks are around His voice has a timid and tremulous sound." Lewis Carrol, "Alice in Wonderland"
    2
  37. 1:40 Bundeswer is the German armed forces, Bundestag is the German parliament.
    2
  38. In UK English there are really two verbs "to hang". There is the verb "To hang". Which basically means to suspend and there is the verb "to hang" which means to execute someone by putting a rope found their neck and then suddenly removimg the supoort from under their feet. The verbs have two past participles which are slightly different "hung" which is the pp of "hang" to suspend, and "hanged" which is the pp of "to hang" the method of execution. The English themselves, often confuse the two.
    2
  39. If you were a policeman investigating a crime and you had one suspect who had said, at least three times, that he would commit this crime, he had motive to commit this crime, he was seen, around the time that the crime was committed, at the scene of the crime, he rejoiced publically that the crime had been committed, he benefitted financially from this crime in at least two ways, he and his friends were guarding the scene of the crime at the time the crime was committed, he had the means to commit the crime and nobody else had a motive to commit it, WHO would you suspect? I think at least you would make an arrest, "pending further investigation"!
    2
  40. 5:15 Talking about the Skripals: That story, as told by the British government and its lacky media is so full of self contradictions that it is impossible to take it seriously. Theresa May, the British PM, sdaid that it was "Highly likely that it was the Russians who poisoned the Skripals. I would disagree. I think it is "virtually certain" that the whole affaire was a "Put-up job". &BTW whatever became of the Skripals?
    2
  41. It occurs to me that perhaps it is not that the engine is weak, nor that the airframe of the F-16 is heavy, but that the air intake is too close to the ground and is , so to say, sucking the plane down onto the runway?
    2
  42. 8:10 I forgot to put in which part of the video this remark applies to.
    2
  43.  @mariussima8500  So, It was Mike Jones? Thanks for the correction.
    1
  44. 15:14 The "Tone" of the Media, is set by an offshoot of the 5-eyes, called "The Integrity Initiative" (Google it) that has an asset in every major Western "News" organization, who tells the chief editors, on a daily basis, what is "News" and what Is misinformation.
    1
  45. "If in any processthere are a number of contradictions, one of these must be the principle contradiction playing the leading and decisive role, while the rest occupy a secondary and subordinate position. Therefore, in studying any complex process, in which there are two or more contradictions, we must devote every effort to finding its principal contradiction. Once this principle contradiction is grasped, all problems can be readily solved." "On Contradiction" August 1937 p.224, Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung.
    1
  46. Easier said than done. They can buy enormous amounts of publicity and finance endless smear tactics. They have the MSM on their side.
    1
  47.  @dw4956  ?
    1
  48. 1:58 Exactly! These organs are not there to inform us, they are there to influence our thinking in the "Right direction"!
    1
  49. Yeah! We have Freedom of speech! Freedom to say anything they like! Big Pharma is a particular hate of mine. On another channel I wrote this. I thin it might interest you. The need to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry It seems to me, that there is an obvious and extremely serious objection, to privately owned pharmaceutical industries. Namely that there is a fundamental, built-in Conflict of Interest. To put it as simply as possible; to a privately -owned pharmaceutical firm, a cured customer is a lost customer. The ideal customer, is one who buys a drug that is still "in-patent", which is moderately expensive and needs to be taken indefinitely to "stabilise" the disease. A drug which does not cure the disease, but enables the patient to be well enough to earn a living. The treatment for stomach ulcers before Dr Barry Marshall's discovery of Helicobacter pylorii and the fact that the disease could be cured in a couple of weeks, was a text book example of just such a drug. The pharmaceutical industry fought hard to keep knowledge of this discovery from the public and succeeded in suppressing it for ten years! The obvious cure for this problem is to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry in its entirety. (Better still, would be to internationalize it but that is a step for another time.) The point is, that a government has quite different priorities from those of a private firm. Whereas the job of a private company is to make money for its shareholders The job of a publicly owned pharmaceutical firm is to produce the best range of medicines that it can, as cheaply as possible. To research cures for diseases that are troubling the public and to make sure that their products are safe or at least, that its side effects are known. As far as a government is concerned, the ideal drug is one that will quickly cure a disease, that costs very little and causes the least possible trouble to the patient. Having a nationalized pharmaceutical industry would avoid wasteful duplicated research, price gouging and neglect of "rare diseases" because there is no money to be made from treating them. Above all, such an industry has no motivation to suppress a cure, because it is making money from treating a disease. Another advantage of a nationalized pharmaceutical industry is that it would not have to worry about the cost of trials of experimental drugs in the same way as a private firm. If a new or repurposed drug was very cheap, but showed promise, the fact that it would not make money for the firm would not be an obstacle to setting up a test of it. Some people will object that "nationalizrd firms are always inefficient" and that such an industry "would be bogged down in burocrasy." Personally I think that removing the the "Conflict of Interest" would make running those supposed risks worth running.
    1
  50. 13:01 It always used to work. These days however, it is less likely to work because the fearsome, all-conquering, NATO Tiger is beginning to look a bit, ah, tired? Papery? Tattered? I notice that ta lot of small, 3rd world countries are much more likely to say "No." to US requests than previously.
    1