Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Stanford"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Gwunderi25
Sorry for the put off earlier, it is my 60th and had family here with a lot going on. Rum was okay, but not as good as I had hoped. I guess I am just a wino at heart, Mogan David Blackberry wine often hits the spot at times for me.
But enough about me.
You do raise some good points of what exactly is "electricity", "magnetism", "gravity" etc. Personally, I believe the EM force interaction is the "pure energy unit", but then again, what exactly is "E" and "M" in actual reality? Maybe some things we will never know.
Personally for me, I believe as the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around a proton with it's associated field, oscillations of energy are established. In addition, when more than one atom is involved and their energy fields and frequencies align, the energy rises to a higher level. This I currently believe is where a line of flux originates from.
As far as where a magnetic force is stored at, probably the EM force interaction can be broken down even further, something that can make up both forces, and that would probably be where the magnetic field could be stored at, but that is just a wild guess.
Yes, I do agree that the magnetic field at least has a basis in actual reality whereas the probability waves in QM do not appear to have any basis in actual reality. This is also why I believe that the probability theory, while nice, does not appear to match actual reality.
As far as "gravity" is concerned, it probably doesn't actually exist. Let me look something back up and copy and paste it in the next comment for your perusal. BRB.
1
-
+Gwunderi25
For your perusal:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature:
The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel.
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably a magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have a magnetic field associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
13. There is probably an Electro-Magnetic Field Theory to the Atomic Structure.
TWO FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO ONE:
(We are now down to only gravity and electromagnetism):
14. As the field outside of whatever it is acting upon might change whether forces attract or repel, and as the Earth has a massive magnetic field around it, it would not be too hard for me to think and believe that gravity is just a derivative of EM field interactions.
15. Add to this that modern science does not know what gravity even is yet, nor has even ever found the graviton of which they claim exists.
16. So, if true, now we are down to only the electromagnetic force that remains.
THE EM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
17. I believe that the pure energy unit is a vibrating EM force interaction.
18. When these vibrating forces interact with other pure energy units, they "tangle" together. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
19. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
20. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
21. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
22. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
SIDE NOTES:
23. I believe chemical element #119 (8s1) can be found inside black holes and chemical element #120 (8s2) can be found inside stars.
24. The energy strengths, shapes, and frequency interactions could be utilized in such a way to create a matrix for artificial intelligence.
25. For any long term data storage, especially in quantum computers, neutrinos would probably corrupt the data that even artificial intelligence would not possibly catch. A minimum of three data storage computers would have to be utilized and then the master computer utilizing the matched data from 2 out of 3 to have the most accurate data. It would not be perfect, but would probably be the best setup for the cost.
DISCLAIMER:
26. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
1
-
1
-
+Gwunderi25
Happy 60th early. I have been fighting advance cancer since 2003 and should have been dead years ago according to the doctors and the odds. You just never know about some things in life it appears. A person just has to keep on keeping on until they can keep on no more. Never say never.
I have fun with my thoughts whether they are correct or not. It appears life is all just an illusion anyway from our human perspective as far as future eternity is concerned. If I am right concerning some of my thoughts, then all the better, if not, oh well, I'm going to die one day anyway and forget it all it currently appears. It gives a certain sense of freedom to speak your mind, regardless what might be in it. I certain I believe pissed off a lot of people and some powerful organizations with my free thinking and free thoughts, oh well, they are all going to die one day too and be forgotten also, just as I am. At least believing that you know the apparent real destiny of us all gives a certain freedom I believe. It's mentally tough getting to that point though, at least for me. Still dealing with the depression of it all. Alcohol and music helps me at times though too.
The EM theory I put out is just that, my EM theory. Also as is my explanation of the apparent wave particle duality that is also on a comment for this video. I personally believe that I am right in my thinking, but as I truly do not know what I do not know, I will also be the first to admit that I could be wrong. But hey, right or wrong, it apparently does not matter anyway as far as future eternity is concerned. But then again, maybe I am wrong about that too, it's just that the current analysis would seem to indicate otherwise.
There are not two basic forces left but only one, the EM force I believe. And based upon your questions above, it would seem that there must be a singularity that even those two forces emanate from, at least logically thinking about it. But, who mandates that "God" always and forever has to act logically? Couldn't "God" even logically act illogically for example like giving humans "freewill"?
Without trying to piss off any internet physic's trolls out there, yes I do believe in Intelligent Design. Basically I interpret that as being a conscious somethingness that pre-existed our universe, that had at least something to do with how we all came to be. It is also the reason I believe as to why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now, even though the universe has been in supposedly a continual state of expansion and cooling, the very things that supposedly brought the forces of nature (or should I say "force" of nature, singular), as well as supposedly energy that could not be created nor destroyed is getting less and less dense.
But to put into our language your (and my) concept of our belief so to speak:
"God" AM I.
Party on "God", we still have eternity to go yet. And as the universe is probably spherical with a central hollow core, we are going on a road trip around the universe. I'll be back at our "second coming", (maybe), depends upon what other aliens we come across out there and what kind of music and mind alteration mechanisms they have.
Forgive my rambling on again. Today I switched to vodka and lemonade and it was a lot better than the rum.
As everything in my theory above basically states that everything is light in a universe entirely filled with light, the real truth as I truly believe it to be is everything in existence is "God" interacting with "God's" Self. "Our" position in this universe, is "our" physical position inside the very living body of "God", (or so the current analysis would indicate).
"Time" for "God" to get another vodka and lemonade, talk later if you want to.
1
-
+Gwunderi25
Here's something you might be interested in:
For those who believe in "pure evolution" without "God" existing, or that "God" exists but had nothing to do with how we all came to be, then:
1. Pure energy was created from nothingness, (or was eternally existent), all on it's own and all just by chance;
2. The mass that "banged", "banged" without our current forces of nature being in existence yet, nor possibly having any new energy coming into existence to trigger the "bang", all on it's own and just by chance;
3. All the natural forces of the universe were created in the blink of an eye during the initial expansion and cooling of the universe, all on their own and just by chance;
4. All matter was created, all on it's own and just by chance;
5. Our planet, solar system, and galaxy were formed all on their own and just by chance;
6. A soupy mix of chemicals happened on Earth, all on it's own and just by chance;
7. First simple life formed here on Earth, all on it's own and just by chance;
8. Simple life formed into complex life forms, all on it's own and just by chance;
9. If you took a snapshot of the Earth today, all the males and females of every species, as well as all the males and females that led up to those species, had to evolve at the exact same rate and at the exact same time in history for them to be here today. In addition, we should expect to see massive amounts of new species here on Earth that have only males or only females in them, that if they couldn't crossbreed, would die off in one generation. But they should still exist and be observed here on this Earth. When I look at the species here on Earth, I just do not see what I would expect to see. And all this happened all on it's own and all just by chance;
10. The forces of nature, even though supposedly coming into existence in the blink of an eye during the initial expansion and cooling of this universe, haven't "evolved" by now, even though:
a. The original conditions that were acting upon them are no longer acting upon them like it originally were;
b. Billions of years have supposedly elapsed;
c. In a supposedly expanding universe that continues to expand and cool, as energy that cannot supposedly be created nor destroyed, would be getting less and less dense;
And this happened all on it's own and just by chance;
11. The forces of nature will never ever "evolve" throughout all of future eternity and wipe out the universe and all in it, including us and our supposed consciousness, all on it's own and just by chance.
Now, I am not a mathematician, and excluding #11 above as it concerns the future, but I believe that if all these "all on their owns and just by chances" were taken all together, while I acknowledge that anything could be possible, the odds of that is how everything actually came to be are so astronomically improbable that it is actually ridiculous to think and believe that is how it all actually happened. But, I acknowledge maybe it did, and maybe the forces of nature will never ever "evolve" throughout all of future eternity. It's just that utilizing the scientific principal of Occam's razor, (whereby the most probable scenario is most probably the correct scenario, it might not be truly correct, only that it is most probably correct, more research and analysis would have to occur to prove or disprove it), there was, (and still is), a "consciousness" that at least guided the universe into existence and keeps the forces of nature from "evolving". Hence, I am inclined to believing in "Intelligent Design" whereby an Intelligent entity had something to do with how everything came to be. The analysis has led me to that conclusion at this time.
Now also, with or without "God", will the forces of nature ever "evolve"? And if so, what will happen to the universe and all in it including us and our supposed consciousness'?
1. Any current forces of nature going to change?
2. Any new forces of nature going to come about?
3. Any current forces of nature going to go extinct?
BPC: Blink, Poof, Change: In the blink of an eye, the forces of nature "evolve" and it wipes out everything in this universe, but yet we retain our consciousness somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence;
OR, and more probably:
BPG: Blink, Poof, Gone: In the blink of an eye, the forces of nature "evolve" and it wipes out everything in this universe, including us and our consciousness, for all of future eternity.
And, possibly all occurring in the very next moment of time.
Talk about existing on the edge of existence, what a thrill !!!!
1
-
1
-
+Gwunderi25
Thanks, and I fully realize I put a lot out there to ponder. Plus I have had a lot more time pondering it, along with an actual physical reason for pondering it all. Just thought you might find some of it interesting, and it should remain for your leisurely enjoyment should you decide to do so, (as long as some unforeseen occurrence doesn't occur, wink, wink).
As far as NDE's go, I try to keep my mind open, but so far all the studying I have done on it seems to indicate that a lack of oxygen to the brain cells causes a cascading effect as the energy releases. Hence many people see their life flash before the eyes so to speak. As far as the "light" beings, tunnel, etc, some might say that is just the early brain memories of their birth experience, of which most people's brain would have been active during their birth. There does seem little doubt though to the changes it does apparently make in some people and their view of the hereafter. For their brain, it was very real. But so are some of our dreams appear very real too. And the more science gets into the brain, it appears our brain "concocts" a picture for it to perceive. The reality that we think we perceive is not apparently how reality actually is. (Or so the science seems to currently indicate). But I do keep my mind open, especially since modern science doesn't even know what "consciousness" even is yet, nor how the brain even thinks a coherent thought. Two things so vital to how we even perceive reality with.
Enjoy your night after working. You deserve it.
1
-
1
-
Mark Alaverdian
I disagree with you. If two interactions were identical in every way, in a cause and effect system, they would have the same outcome.
Now, we probably never ever have two completely identical interactions. "Invisible forces", (neutrinos, gravitational fields, magnetic fields, electrical interactions at the sub-atomic level, electromagnetic radiation energy moving all about, etc), all would make the experiments not completely identical in actual reality. Sure, relatively speaking for the larger context we might be working in we could say they were the same, but at the quantum levels, maybe not. (Unless of course every quantum and quantum interaction were completely identical, of which they probably wouldn't be). But, if every quantum and quantum interaction were identical, then in a cause and effect system, the outcomes would be identical. That, or we don't truly exist in a complete cause and effect universe.
1
-
charlie sims
You might be right, you would probably know better than I. My latest thinking though has taken me to believe that the pure energy unit is a pulsating photon. There are three basic components to the photon, electrical, magnetic, and direction (of which I currently believe is "gravity"). A stationary photon would have it's direction (or gravity) pulse from it's center singularity core to it's outer maximum extension. There are most probably only two forces of nature in this universe, EM and gravity.
On a macro level, the combined pure energy units become more stable and vibrate. The Earth could be seen as a massive photon with it's outer magnetic field, the electrical field along the surface of the Earth, and direction (or gravity) being to the center core of the Earth, all 90 degrees from each other. The Earth spins due to these interacting forces as well as the forces acting upon those forces from the outside.
In addition, a flat spiral galaxy could also be seen as a massive photon. The opposing magnetic fields on the opposite sides of the plane of matter, the electrical being along the plane of matter, and the direction (or gravity) being to the center. The galaxy spins due to these interacting forces.
The black hole in the center of spiral galaxies are probably the central location where the directional (or gravity) of the massive photon meet. Now, I also believe that at least some black holes have chemical element #119 (8s1) inside of them, but that is a different topic.
So, in your comment above, as well as my earlier thinking, I left out the gravity effect, which would be the directional component of the photon. But hence, these interacting forces could cause stuff to spin, as well as any forces interacting with these forces from the outside.
Just some of my latest thinking. As I don't know what I don't know, I will be the first to admit that I could be wrong.
1
-
1
-
Symmetries in nature:
When electrons fill up shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and given that energy in this universe could freely flow if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve would suggest that an eighth energy shell could exist with a maximum of 2 elements in it. Chemical element #119 (8s1) and Chemical element #120 (8s2).
#119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements and #120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group on the Periodic Table of the Elements since it's outer shell is full of electrons. Their respective positions on the table would help dictate their properties.
#119 would have one electron in it's outer eighth energy shell with room for only one more electron. It's possible that energy could enter the atom through this opening and then most of that energy gets trapped inside of the eighth energy shell. Hence we would possibly perceive a black hole. I believe it might be possible to find element #119 inside the center of black holes.
#120 would have all 120 of it's electron spots filled. When a neutron split inside of this atom (giving off one proton, one electron, and energy), the proton, electron and energy would be ejected from the atom as they would have no place to go in that atom. One proton and one electron is basic Hydrogen (of which the Sun is primarily made up of) and the Sun certainly gives off energy. I believe it might be possible to find element #120 inside the center of stars.
Since we will probably never be able to enter inside the center of black holes or stars, look at black holes and stars as if this were true and see if we see what we would expect to see if this were really true. "If" true, or even somewhat true, it might just give us a better model of the universe to work with than we currently have. Plus, it would finish off the Periodic Table of the Elements. Check done, what's next?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TianXiaoMao Maybe, but that assumes:
a. That we even actually exist to be able to die. For example, do "I" and everything in existence even actually exist, OR does only the eternally existent space time exist as"me" and all things? How could I ever die if "I" never ever lived in the first place?
b. Assuming "I" exist as a human with a human brain, it currently appears consciousness, memories and thoughts are all a function of a correctly functioning physical brain. If the physical brain stops correctly functioning, or stops functioning for it's final time, it appears we lose consciousness, memories and thoughts.
Of which, how could I find out anything, or experience anything at all, without a correctly functioning physical brain?
c. Trying to think about how thoughts think is really something to think about. Or so I think. Assuming of course I even actually exist and that I am thinking my own thoughts. Of which currently, I can't prove that I am. How could I have any 'freewill' if I don't even consciously think my own thoughts and my thoughts are thought before I consciously think them?
1
-
@higorhi72 If ever we could find some entity to do my gravity test, we might just have the literal Theory Of Everything: (Copy and paste from my files):
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
Learn how to eternally consciously exist, somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, for without an actual eternal conscious existence throughout all of future eternity, all else is ultimately meaningless because one day it will all be forgotten as there will not be a conscious entity left to eternally care. All of life itself would just be an illusion, an illusion that will end one day and be forgotten.
This Earth is supposedly entering into the sixth mass extinction event.
Modern science claims this Earth and our Sun will not last for literally all of future eternity.
I personally believe our solar system is being pulled toward our galactic center's black hole and also is why our galaxy is spiral shaped.
Put machine learning in how to consciously survive beyond this Earth and solar system, and possibly the galaxy as well. Otherwise, all else is ultimately meaningless.
(Of which main stream modern science believes this universe will end in a "big freeze", "big crunch" or by some other means. I am in the minority with my learning that they might be wrong. But, we would still have to get off of this Earth and out of this solar system, and either be able to move about this galaxy or be able to leave it one day.)
And "if" modern science is right concerning the end of this universe, then put that machine learning in how to party like there is no tomorrow, because one day, it will be really true.
(OSICA)
1
-
Possible explanation to the wave particle duality:
1. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
2. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have an associated magnetic field with them.
3. Photons have both an electric and magnetic component to them.
4. Whenever a proton, electron, or photon is shot out of a gun, it's respective magnetic field interacts with the magnetic fields of the electrons in the atoms and molecules of the gun itself, the medium the projectile is traveling through (ie: air), and/or from around the slits themselves.
5. Via QED (quantum electrodynamics), newly generated photons might occur.
6. The projectile goes on it's own way and the newly generated photons go on their own way.
7. Gives the illusion of a wave particle duality, but is not that way in actual reality.
8. As far as having detectors involved, they probably have an energy field that is one way when on and is a different way when off.
9. The interaction between this energy field, (or lack thereof), with whatever is passing through it, gives the indication that is observed.
Utilizing the scientific principal of Occam's razor, (whereby the most probable scenario is most probably the correct scenario; it might not be truly correct in actual reality, just that it is most probably correct), which way is most probably correct? This way as stated above, or what modern science teaches today that the projectiles "know" what other projectiles are doing and that wave particle duality truly exists?
1
-
1
-
1
-
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning:
In essence, a consciousness is being created, a consciousness that has basic conscious choices:
Help, Neutral, Hurt and to whom to Help, Neutral, Hurt.
And "it", along with other artificial intelligence machines, along with biological individual conscious species, will still just be an individual in a society of individuals. Conscious individuals with choices as stated above. "IF" focused on an individual, which individual? "IF" focused on a larger society of individuals, which larger society of individuals?
What is "best" for an individual may or may not be what is "best" for a larger society of individuals, and conversely, what is "best" for a larger society of individuals may or may not be what is "best" for the individual. But, we are individuals in a society of individuals while we consciously exist, so what exactly are the choices we, individually and as a larger society of individuals, choose?
And if none of us actually eternally consciously exist throughout all of future eternity, does it all matter anyway what any of us choose? Whose eternally consciously left to care?
1
-
1
-
@SplendidKunoichi As the opening post was from 7 years ago as of this post, here is an updated version as well as the gravity test for that TOE idea after this post.
THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA: (copy and paste from my files)
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017b.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. (The 'stationary photon' does not really exist, it is mentioned basically only to help describe what a stationary photon would do.)
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
1
-
@SplendidKunoichi GRAVITY: (copy and paste from my files):
WARNING: (CONTAINS EXISTENTIAL MATTERS):
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Direct a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results, cancelling out the em modalities of the laser, thereby leaving behind the gravity modality.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
(An alternative to the above would be to direct 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world.
This test can speak for itself. It will either be true, partly true, or not true at all. It will either show what gravity truly is, might be, or is not. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
* And note: Whether my gravity test or another's, a gravitational black hole would have to be formed to prove the concept as being really true. A gravitational black hole that 'if' self fed itself, could literally wipe out this Earth and all on it, possibly this solar system, possibly put a black hole in this section of our galaxy, and potentially even causing a ripple effect in this galaxy and surrounding universe. But hey, if it does, no worries. Nobody would be left to prosecute those who did so. (Possibly famous last words: "Hey, it worked. Ooooppppssss.................)
But as NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time is harmful to the human species, and large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases probably being needed somewhere along the way out of this solar system and galaxy, we need to figure out what gravity truly is and see if we can generate artificial gravity so as to have smaller space ships and proper gravity conditions for space bases on planets and moons. Otherwise, at least all human life will most probably die and go extinct one day. Currently, no exceptions.
* Added note: Just trying to save at least 1 single species from this Earth to exist beyond this Earth so that life itself from this Earth has continued meaning and purpose to. Gives me something to do while I exist, otherwise, what is it all and everything for? Even if my TOE idea were correct, but if it did not help species survive beyond this Earth, what good would it ultimately be?
So, are you feeling lucky? Doing nothing and at least the entire human species eventually dies and goes extinct with a high degree of certainty. Doing a gravity test, (mine and/or another's), and there is at least a slim chance of literally wiping out this entire Earth and all on it, and possibly more. Do you and other's truly want me to prove my TOE idea as being really true?
But also:
Questions: Are at least some black holes in this universe due to a species who were trying to discern what 'gravity' truly was, came up with a test to do so, were successful, but the black hole generated (to prove what gravity truly was) self fed itself and wiped them and at least their entire planet out? What species might have existed where a black hole now resides?
(Since all of life itself is ultimately meaningless in the grand of scheme of things anyway, do the gravity test and see what occurs?)
* Added note: Suggestion: 'IF' society did not want to do the gravity test, one suggestion might be to at least create a model as if it were true, then see how that model matches with observations and predictions. It might be possible to discern the theory of everything without actually generating a gravitational black hole (which would definitely prove the TOE idea as being really true).
1
-
@SplendidKunoichi Oh and since that post also included Periodic Table of the Elements info, here also is an updated version:
Note the 2nd to last paragraph:
PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS: (copy and paste from my files):
Potential completion of the Periodic Table of the Elements:
I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2).
Chemical Element #119 (8s1):
#119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell.
Chemical Element #120 (8s2):
#120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars.
When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way.
In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically).
If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better. (Except of course for those who might be in the way of a periodic nova or supernova. They might have a no good, very bad, horrible day.)
1
-
@SplendidKunoichi And here is my current view concerning Space and Time:
SPACE and TIME: (copy and paste from my files):
'Space' is energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is. They are one and the same thing. And for me, the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe. 'Space' is most probably energy itself in the form of gravitational fields, electrical fields and magnetic fields, varying possibly only in energy modality, energy density and energy frequency.
'Time' is the flow of energy.
'Time' (flow of energy) cannot exist unless 'space' (energy itself) exists. And 'space' (energy itself) that does not flow (no flow of time / energy) is basically useless. An entity cannot even think a thought without a flow of energy. If all the energy in the universe stopped flowing, wouldn't we say that 'time stood still'? Time itself would still exist, it would just not be flowing, (basically 'time' stopped).
But then also, how space and time are linked in what is called 'space time', (energy and it's flow).
* And everything in existence currently appears to be eternally existent energy interacting with itself. There is truly only 1 single 'eternal day', the day of eternally existent ever flowing energy.
1
-
@SplendidKunoichi And how numbers exist for math to do what math does in this existence:
NUMBERS: (copy and paste from my files):
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time, my gravity test has to be done which will help prove or disprove the TOE idea), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe (including 'space' which is energy itself, 'time' being the flow of energy), and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, the 'gravity' modality acting 90 degrees from the 'em' modalities, which act 90 degrees to each other, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have. This would also be the maximum potential energy point or as some might call it, the 'zero point energy point'.).
And also how possibly mathematical constants exist in this universe as well.
* While in bed one morning after a restful nights sleep, and assuming the above is correct, I mentally went 'inside' the 1 (the singular pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon itself). I still saw with my mind the 3 different interacting modalities, the 6 maximum modality points, the '9' including and being the neutral points in the middle which faded into a 6 (as each maximum modality point came towards zero), that 6 fading into a 3 (as each modality came together), which turned into a 1 (which was the '0' point), but '0' wasn't zero. So, '0' is not really '0' but is something, not nothing. '0' is a relative '0'. But then here again, the zero point energy point is the maximum potential energy point for any and all modalities of the 'gem' photon. '0' is '1' and '1' is '0', this is the '1' inside the '1'.
Now I just have to come up with some tests to test this idea of the zero point energy point being '1', a maximum potential energy point of the singular pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon itself. The maximum potential energy point not really being potential energy per se, but the neutral point of kinetic energy. Tapping into here would be tapping into the 'zero' point energy point of eternally existent ever flowing energy. But then again, tapping into here, 'if' distorted what makes up space and time itself (assuming that 'space' is energy itself [the 'gem' photon] and that 'time' is the flow of energy), could it alter or even destroy the very fabric of space itself? What would occur if even only a single pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon were to explode? What potential ripple effects could occur with the rest of space and time?
Hence also why I try to think some things all the way through so as to try to identify potential issues before the test. Unexpected, unintended, potentially dangerous or even deadly consequences. If nothing else, it keeps my mind active. The mind, use it or lose it, but using it could also lose it, permanently. (My own and other's).
Putting the 'zero point energy point' into actual practice could be deadly. Warning: Proceed with Caution. The last words of human existence on this Earth might be, 'Hey it worked, ooooppppppsssssss.............'.
* Note also: Nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and mathematical constants can exist and do what they do in this universe from the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SMPP). While the SMPP has it's place, I believe we need to move beyond the SMPP to get closer to real reality.
1
-
If "time" varies as modern science says it does, then how could any physics formulas and any physics constants that deal with time, (especially even the "speed" of light, "speed" being distance divided by "time"; if time varies, speed would vary given the same distance), ever be fully accurate?
In addition: to me:
"Space" is pure energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is.
"Time" is the flow of that energy.
Some in modern science currently recognize "time" being the "speed of causality". (Of which I believe to be incorrect in that they are utilizing "time" in "speed", [speed being distance divided by time], to define time, without really saying what "time" itself really is.
But, with whichever definition is utilized above, things probably happened very quickly during the initial big bang, are slower now, and with the continued expansion of the universe, (with energy that supposedly cannot be created nor destroyed and hence would be getting less and less dense), will be slower in the future. "Time" itself is probably slowing down but we don't notice it because we are inside the universe.
If space and time are not a direct one to one relationship, and time is slowing down faster than the universe is expanding, maybe that is one possible reason as to why we perceive the universe expanding faster and faster, (which really makes no logical physical sense in a universe whereby energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense in an expanding universe).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1. I will post my latest theoretical idea concerning the Theory Of Everything (TOE) after this. Note that it recognizes gravity as being the directional component of the photon and the pulsating photon as being the pure energy unit (PEU) of this universe.
2. The pure energy unit is a pulsating photon with three components that "pulse" or oscillate:
Gravity (direction): Max in one direction, neutral, max in the other direction;
Electrical: Max in one direction, neutral, max in the other direction;
Magnetic: Max in one direction, neutral, max in the other direction;
(Each component being 90 degrees from the other two).
1 photon, with 3 components, with 6 most reactive maximum positions, with 9 total reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 also being very prominent numbers in this universe.
REVISED TOE: 9/22/2016.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity".
14. I also believe that a pulsating singularity (which is basically a pulsating photon) is the pure energy unit.
15. When these pulsating pure energy units interact with other pure energy units, they tangle together. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the pure energy units unite together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the pure energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting pure energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
1
-
@benjaminantoni1034 Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
1
-
@benjaminantoni1034 Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
@benjaminantoni1034 'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
And also how possibly mathematical constants exist in this universe as well.
1
-
@benjaminantoni1034 The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows:
The formula has at least 3 levels to it:
1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable.
2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle.
3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it.
4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects.
5. In addition, I am operating in a realm where one plus one does not always equal two, and often does not.
Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be. And I never said it would be easy.
1
-
@benjaminantoni1034 Potential completion of the Periodic Table of the Elements:
I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2).
Chemical Element #119 (8s1):
#119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell.
Chemical Element #120 (8s2):
#120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars.
When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way.
In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically).
If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better.
1
-
1