Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Stanford"
channel.
-
@benjaminantoni1034 Thought about space time:
Consider the following:
a. Wavelength equals speed of light divided by frequency.
b. Wavelength is how far a single 'em' photon goes in space, or possibly is the size of space itself. (Especially since 'space' itself has not been defined yet). Possibly different sizes of space for different 'em' frequencies.
c. Speed of light: 'light' being 'em' photons, 'speed' being distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points.
d. Frequency being 'hertz', 'hertz being cycles per second, or how far an 'em' photon goes at a specific size during one second.
e. "IF" wavelength changes (the frequency changes) then the distance a single 'em' photon goes would change and/or the size of space itself would change (assuming that an 'em' photon makes up 'space' itself).
f. Possibly 'space' varies due to 'space' being made up of 'em' itself and as 'em' frequencies change, 'space' changes.
g. Another possibility would be that as the wavelength changes (frequency changes) then as the distance a single 'em' photon goes would also change in it's time of existence, 'time' would change for any given 'em' photon length. The effect of that single 'em' photon makes in it's given time of existence.
h. Possibly 'time' varies due to the wavelength of the 'em' photon.
i. So, possibly 'space' varies due to energy frequencies changing and 'time' varies due to the wavelength of energy changing, the 'em' photon being energy itself. And if as I currently believe that what is called 'gravity' is actually a part of the 'em' photon, then the 'gem' photon makes up the energy unit that possibly makes up everything in existence in this entire universe including the universe itself, including 'space' and 'time' or 'space time' itself. It is also how space and time can warp, bend and vary.
1
-
@benjaminantoni1034 SPACE IS FINITE AND TIME IS INFINITE:
('Space' being energy itself, 'Time' being the flow of energy):
Consider the following, utilizing modern science and logic and reason:
a. Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. Hence, energy is either truly eternally existent, or modern science is wrong.
b. An 'absolute somethingness' cannot come from 'absolute nothingness', 'absolute nothingness' just being a concept from a conscious entity in 'absolute somethingness'. Hence, an 'absolute somethingness' truly eternally existed throughout all of eternity past, exists today, and will most probably exist throughout all of future eternity. That eternally existent 'absolute somethingness' most probably being energy itself.
c. The universe ALWAYS existed in some form and will most probably ALWAYS exist in some form, with no beginning and possibly no end. Alpha and Omega, beginning and end, have been replaced by actual reality.
d. And for me, 'space' is energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is. They are one and the same thing. And 'time' is the flow of energy. Hence 'spacetime' being 'energy and it's flow'. 'Spacetime' had no beginning and will possibly have no end.
1
-
@benjaminantoni1034 Existence and non-existence, side by side for all of eternity:
"IF" my Theory Of Everything is really true, (that what is called 'gravity' is a modality that is a part of the currently recognized 'em' photon, 'gravity' acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other, 'gravity' actually causing the sine wave pattern of 'em'), AND "IF" my view of space and time are correct, ('space' being energy itself [which is the 'gem' photon], 'time' being the flow of energy), then I could see where it might be possible that the inner spherical shell of the universe could possibly be made up of the 'gravity' modality of the 'gem' photon which is 90 degrees to the electrical modality of the 'gem' photon, which are both 90 degrees to the magnetic modality of the 'gem' photon, the magnetic modality existing both inside of and outside of the inner shell, the complete 'gem' photon interactions making up the entire spherical shell of all of existence itself. And then of course, non-existence would exist beyond existence. So, existence and non-existence might possibly exist side by side for all of eternity. It all depends upon whether the gravity test for my TOE is really true or not and whether my view of space time is correct or not, and whether the universal spherical shell exists as I believe it might or not.
But 'if' true, and as no photons (currently 'em', 'gem' in my view) would be absorbed nor reflected by the spherical universal shell, then when we look at the blackness in the night sky that is beyond the light of the stars and galaxies, we might actually be perceiving in part the limits of existence and the universal shell of existence itself, with non-existence beyond.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
matantsu
If my theoretical idea concerning the "TOE" is correct that I recently formulated and revised, then photons and mass are the same thing and inter-relate. The following still has to be proved or disproved:
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity".
14. I also believe that a pulsating singularity (which is basically a pulsating photon) is the pure energy unit.
15. When these pulsating pure energy units interact with other pure energy units, they tangle together. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the pure energy units unite together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the pure energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting pure energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
1
-
+Rex Galilae
I am not familiar with "QFT" (Quantum Field Theory???). I am familiar with QED and also QCD somewhat. If so (that QFT is "quantum field theory"), I would agree at this time that modern science seems to be indicating that the very nature of reality appears to be more energy field interactions by various means rather than by "particles". It seems to me that many in modern science are stuck on a "particles" way of thinking, (gravitons, gluons, virtual particles, dark matter, etc), of which then carries over into the math formulas.
For me at this time:
"Space" is pure energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is.
"Time" is the flow of that energy.
I currently theorize that the pulsating photon is the pure energy unit in this universe and that gravity is the directional component of that photon as put forward in my TOE above.
At the pure energy unit (PEU) level, both space and time pulse in basically a 360 degree spherical fashion. When PEU's interact with other PEU's, they would tend to stabilize and vibrate, but still interact in basically a 360 degree spherical fashion. And hence "relativity" with space bending and time warping.
1
-
1
-
KEEPING TRACK OF KINSHIP:
a. The US Government has been and continues to build, underground safe bunkers and infrastructure, at tax payer's expense including in part ever increasing national debt.
b. The US Government is supposed to keep all Americans 'Safe and Happy' per the Declaration Of Independence'.
c. Not all American citizens can fit for a prolonged period of time in these safe underground bunkers.
d. The safe bunkers are not just for potentially WW3, but also for the upcoming 6th mass extinction event most probably starting this century, some even say has already started.
e. Of course the US Government is going to decide who gets saved or not, if 'We The People' let them do so.
f. So, who actually gets space in these safe underground bunkers, paid for with American tax payer's dollars, and who most probably dies potentially a horrible death upon the surface of this Earth?
g. The US Government is planning upon saving their own asses at their fellow American citizen's expense.
h. But, how has the US Government failed the rest of their 'Kinship' and fellow American citizens who most probably would die a horrible death on the surface???
i. What exactly does that say about how the US Government treats their "Kin" and fellow American citizens???
j. What exactly do 'We The People' want to do with the US Government, made up of our fellow American citizen 'Kin' too???
Truth is still truth and reality is still reality. Then we still all die in the end anyway, even those in the safe bunkers are only delaying the inevitable. ONLY those species that make it off of this Earth and out of this solar system can continue to consciously survive, EVERYBODY ELSE is going to die and go extinct. And then also, ONLY those species who make it out of this galaxy continue to consciously survive, EVERYBODY ELSE is going to die and go extinct. And of course, 'if' the modern main stream science's narrative is correct, (of which I could show how they might be wrong), then the universe ends in a 'big freeze' and no conscious life is left, or if it is, has the ultimate 'brain freeze' throughout all the rest of future eternity.
Just the 'Blue Monk of the North at Ice Station Charlie, USA' keeping track of it all.
1
-
I have to wonder how many 'scientists' are in it for the continued funding and job security in this economically driven world. Sure, maybe they even know some answers to certain issues. But then, if those answers get out, then what are they going to do for the rest of their life? They still have to live while they live. Certainly not all scientists, but I also have to believe at least some scientists.
In this DNA and genetic research, etc, one has to ask questions like:
a. Science claims that all matter is made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy.
b. A very complex human being with a very complex brain can come about but yet a very simple, even non-functional outhouse in the woods can't come about, even though the outhouse would also be made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy.
c. So, where in this universe can the DNA of an outhouse be found?
d. Support my research and I will go off into this vast universe to find out.
(Now there is job security). :-)
1
-
Speaking of being mocked by the public: Here is my latest Theory Of Everything idea along with the associated test for what I believe 'gravity' truly is. The gravity test would need to be done to prove or disprove that portion of the TOE, and the gravity test will speak for itself. It will either be true or it will not be true. Here is a copy and paste from my files:
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
________________________________________________________________
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
Here is a copy and paste from my files for the math part of the TOE as to where I am currently at with that math:
The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows:
The formula has at least 3 levels to it:
1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable.
2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle.
3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it.
4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects.
Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be.
____________________________________________________________________________
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
SINGLE POINT ATTRACTOR: Our solar system is being pulled to a single point attractor in the center of our galaxy, hence a spiral shaped galaxy. (Orbital velocity plus gravity, spiral shape). ONLY those species that make it out of this galaxy continue to consciously survive, everybody else dies and goes extinct. And once out of the galaxy for those who make it, where are you going to go next and how long will it take to get there?
Also, in our chaotic life at times, the single attractor is 'death' that comes to us all. We need a strange attractor to defeat death and have eternal life. Basically, per the graph, we need to become a butterfly. But, a butterfly in a never ending predestined path dictated by what came before it in a cause and effect sort of way? Is that really the 'eternal life' we expected or wanted? Basically, a universe that cycles over and over and over ..........???
1
-
Consider the following:
a. More and more cosmic radiation is going to be impacting the Earth this century.
(Hence, more QED and QCD interactions occurring).
(And this is due to in part:
1. The Earth's magnetic field weakening, thus allowing more cosmic radiation energy to reach the surface of this Earth. Currently projected to be at it's lowest around 2035, just 17 years from now.
2. The Sun going into grand solar minimum, projected to be at it's lowest around 2075 - 2080. Losing some of the Sun's protective shield will allow more cosmic radiation energy to reach this Earth.
3. Our solar system is supposedly moving into an area of the galaxy without a 'dust cloud' protection, thus allowing more cosmic radiation energy to reach this solar system.)
b. While this cosmic radiation energy increase might seriously contribute to the 6th mass extinction event that has already started on this Earth, it might also contribute to the next jump in evolution of species.
c. Basically, as dark colors absorb energy while light colors reflect energy, AND as a women supposedly has all the eggs in them that they will ever have from birth, AND how electromagnetic radiation energy is stronger at the equator where a large percentage of new species are discovered, THEN while evolution could potentially occur basically anywhere, it has a higher probability of occurring to a dark skinned colored woman that has lived possibly their whole child bearing years along the equator. Take that 'white supremacists'. You will be replaced by the offspring of a black woman.
(Of which also though, supposedly ALL humans came from the east coast of Africa, so even 'white supremacists' are 'black' on the inside deep down).
Truth is still truth and reality is still reality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@poetryflynn3712 This conversation might be over for you, but it's not for me, it's my thread.
An absolute somethingness cannot come from absolute nothingness, absolute nothingness just being a concept from a conscious entity in absolute somethingness. So, an absolute somethingness truly existed throughout all of eternity past, exists today, and will most probably exist throughout all of future eternity.
As modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, hence, either energy is truly eternally existent, or modern science is wrong. And if eternally existent, then the absolute somethingness that eternally existed is most probably energy itself. And if my TOE idea is correct, and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time, the gravity test still has to be accomplished for that portion of the TOE idea, but 'if' true, then the 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of our existence.
Basically, the universe ALWAYS existed in some form and NEVER had a beginning, and most probably will ALWAYS exist in some form and NEVER have an end.
Your fairy tale 'God', or 'Universal Consciousness', or 'Intelligent Designer', or whatever, is not needed nor desired.
Have a very nice deluded existence. Then you will still receive the same fate as the rest of us. Denying reality and future reality will not make those realities any less real.
1
-
The more and more I study, the more and more I realize that all of life itself is all ultimately meaningless.
1. We are ALL going do die one day from something.
(The observable evidence for this is overwhelming).
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
(While science does not know what consciousness actually is, nor how memories are stored and retrieved, nor how thoughts actually occur, they do all appear to be functions of the physical brain. When our brain dies for it's final time, 'we' die, for all of future eternity. There is no conscious afterlife and certainly not an eternal conscious afterlife. The sum total of our existence is only what we leave behind, including how our existence affected the larger society that we existed in).
The thing is though, there ALWAYS has to be at least one conscious entity left in the larger society for anyone or anything to have continued meaning to. Based upon current analysis, with the 6th mass extinction event coming this century, and the 6th won't be the last, and that science tells us that this Earth and it's Sun will not last for literally all of future eternity, and our solar system is most probably being pulled toward our galactic center, hence existing in a spiral shaped galaxy in a cause and effect universe, and due to other issues in the analysis, it is highly doubtful any species from this Earth are going to consciously survive one day. Of which:
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
(As one day, there won't be a consciously existent entity left to care).
Hence, life itself being all ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things, at least from Earthling's species perspective.
Life itself only matters to life itself as long as life itself still exists. It's just that the analysis would seem to indicate that life itself will not always exist, at least not from this Earth. Life itself is an illusion, and like an illusion, only matters to a conscious entity while it lasts. It's just that one day, per the analysis, it will all be over as there won't be a conscious entity left from this Earth to care.
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
1
-
@rcc3574 (Copy and pastes from my files):
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
** Hence also though, legalizing suicide (or at least make suicide not illegal) so as to let people leave this life on their own terms if they wish to do so. Many people and species are going to die in the 6th mass extinction event that has already started, at least some, horrible deaths. Many will wish they could die, and all will, eventually. And the 6th mass extinction event will not be the last mass extinction event for this Earth. But if suicide were legal (or at least not illegal), at least some people would not have the added guilt of breaking societies' law before doing so. Just trying to plan ahead here. Giving people an 'out' if they wish to take it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rcc3574 The Golden Rule: Basically, we are supposed to treat others how we ourselves would like to be treated. Society taught me that.
a. I have been fighting advanced cancer officially since early 2003, in 2004 was given two years to live, with less than a 5% chance of living beyond two years, along with other medical issues.
b. While society has been prolonging my life, society has also been prolonging my suffering. (No legal suicide in the State where I currently live). I even finally stopped treating the cancer in 2018, hoping to die in 2019, and yet here I still am, still suffering. Society puts animals to sleep who are suffering and call it 'humane', but humans society keeps alive no matter how much one might be suffering.
c. So, since society has been prolonging my life, and thereby prolonging my suffering, and society did it to me first, then that must be how society wants to be treated. I am only doing what society taught me to do. And what is fair is fair.
d. I am trying to prolong societies' life by my theory of everything idea including what gravity truly is, and am trying to prolong societies' suffering by telling them the real apparent truth about life and their future.
e. Nope, don't have to reconsider. I just want to legally die so I can end my suffering. Otherwise, I will continue on my theory of everything idea and telling society the real apparent truth about life and their future. I have a plan either way. The ending is still the same.
f. Best to you also. Then we will all die one day from something, will forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and will be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place. Just a matter of time. ("Time' being the flow of energy by the way).
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
g. Have a nice day.
1
-
@rcc3574 Don't those people who do those things still die one day from something? And I am in the VA Health Care system, (US Navy veteran), whom I believe have 'saved' my life numerous times, (really just delaying the inevitable).
What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to? The current analysis would indicate that pertinent facts matter, but that one day, there will be no conscious life left for those facts to matter to, at least not from this Earth and solar system.
Humans have to figure out how to have artificial gravity for space bases on planets and moons (and large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those bases probably being needed somewhere along the way out of this solar system, and galaxy too if my other analysis is correct, NASA already proving that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time is harmful to the human species).
Plus humans have to figure out how to have proper protections from harmful cosmic radiation, including the effects from long term neutrino impacts, otherwise, not only won't humans survive long term in outer space, but neither will AI robots and computers.
Along with thousands of other things that have to be successfully done to have a successful space program beyond this Earth and solar system. Otherwise, we all eventually die one day from something and go extinct. Maybe microbes might survive, but maybe not even microbes.
See my other posts after this one.
1
-
@rcc3574 (Copy and paste from my files):
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
@rcc3574 If numbers themselves do not exist in this universe by this or some similar way for math to do what math does in this universe, then how exactly would numbers exist in this universe for math to do what math does in this universe?
(Copy and paste from my files):
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
1
-
@rcc3574 Math so far for the TOE idea:
(Copy and paste from my files):
The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows:
The formula has at least 3 levels to it:
1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable.
2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle.
3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it.
4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects.
Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be.
1
-
@rcc3574 Possible completion of the Periodic Table of the Elements:
(Copy and paste from my files):
I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2).
Chemical Element #119 (8s1):
#119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell.
Chemical Element #120 (8s2):
#120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars.
When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way.
In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically).
If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better.
1
-
1
-
@rcc3574 How spacetime could warp, bend and vary:
(Copy and paste from my files):
Thought about space time:
Consider the following:
a. Wavelength equals speed of light divided by frequency.
b. Wavelength is how far a single 'em' photon goes in space, or possibly is the size of space itself. (Especially since 'space' itself has not been defined yet). Possibly different sizes of space for different 'em' frequencies.
c. Speed of light: 'light' being 'em' photons, 'speed' being distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points.
d. Frequency being 'hertz', 'hertz being cycles per second, or how far an 'em' photon goes at a specific size during one second.
e. "IF" wavelength changes (the frequency changes) then the distance a single 'em' photon goes would change and/or the size of space itself would change (assuming that an 'em' photon makes up 'space' itself).
f. Possibly 'space' varies due to 'space' being made up of 'em' itself and as 'em' frequencies change, 'space' changes.
g. Another possibility would be that as the wavelength changes (frequency changes) then as the distance a single 'em' photon goes would also change in it's time of existence, 'time' would change for any given 'em' photon length. The effect of that single 'em' photon makes in it's given time of existence.
h. Possibly 'time' varies due to the wavelength of the 'em' photon.
i. So, possibly 'space' varies due to energy frequencies changing and 'time' varies due to the wavelength of energy changing, the 'em' photon being energy itself. And if as I currently believe that what is called 'gravity' is actually a part of the 'em' photon, then the 'gem' photon makes up the energy unit that possibly makes up everything in existence in this entire universe including the universe itself, including 'space' and 'time' or 'space time' itself. It is also how space and time can warp, bend and vary.
1
-
@rcc3574 Hopefully these items will help humans and other species to survive beyond this Earth and solar system. (To help prolong human's life). But does it ultimately matter? If so, to whom eternally to? Currently, the analysis indicates that we are it. We either figure out how to actually exist throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous stream of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and we all die one day from something, will forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and would all be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place. It wouldn't even matter that any of us existed much less how we existed while we existed. Life itself would all be ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Life itself would only matter to life itself only as long as life itself still existed. It's just that life itself will not always exist. Or so the current analysis would indicate.
I currently consider my self to be an 'existentialist', defined as one who studies topics related to existence itself, including ceasing to exist and non-existence. I can even show how it's possible that existence and non-existence can exist side by side for all of eternity. (Dependent on the gravity test results, which will speak for itself). But does it ultimately matter? If so, to whom does it eternally matter to throughout all of future eternity? Here again, the current analysis would indicate that we are it. And when we die, we are dead for all of future eternity. Game over. Thanks for playing the game of life, but no conscious entity is left to care.
Legalize suicide, or at least make suicide not illegal. There are at least 6 US States that have legal suicide in some form, but why not all?
1
-
@rcc3574 a. "You seem to be stuck in your mind ie mental reasoning. Belief systems limit us greatly."
You say I seem to be stuck in my mind ie mental reasoning. Well, so are you for you to even type the sentences you type. Your language is your belief system that you seem to be stuck in. Why do you limit yourself so?
b. "I feel that all the questions you're asking and all the hopelessness and fear you're feeling will ultimately lead you to where you need to be because we can only experience what we allow ourselves to."
Currently, the ultimate answer to ALL questions in existence, including questions never ever even asked is: "It Does Not Ultimately Matter", or in today's vernacular "IDNUM".
c. "I find that life can get the better of us when we're not flexible with our thoughts and attitudes."
I have taken my mind from eternity past to future eternity and to a realm I call 'The Realm Of All Concepts' where nothing at all exists, not even space, time, logic nor reason, and yet everything that could ever be exists. I have even taken my mind outside of this spacetime dimension into 'absolute nothingness' which is beyond our universal existence. It was quite a mind trip, and 'no', no drugs utilized for the trip. How much more do you want my mind to be flexible? Keep traveling into eternity past, or into future eternity, or stay in the realm of all concepts, or stay in absolute nothingness beyond this existence? Why do you limit yourself only to this existence?
d. "Hope you choose to experience a lighter and brighter side life..."
Funny you should say that, consider the following:
1. Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Hence, energy is either truly eternally existent, or modern science is wrong.
2. Modern science claims that we have new cells that come into existence inside of our body on a daily basis. This appear to be really true.
So, since I have a body with energy and cells in it:
* A part of me is eternally existent and a part of me is being born anew on a daily basis.
* My current body extends from eternity past to now.
* Rising to a higher level of thought, the 'now' that I exist in is 'eternal'.
* I am currently existing in the 'eternal now'.
* I am currently an actual eternally existent conscious entity existing in the eternal now.
And if my TOE above is really true, then:
* I am currently an actual eternally existent conscious being of light existing in an environment entirely made up of light and interacting light, all existing in the eternal now.
But then again, if my definitions of spacetime is correct, then:
* I am eternally existent spacetime existing as 'me'. "I" don't even actually exist but eternally existent spacetime existing as 'me'. How could "I" ever die if "I" never ever existed at all in the first place? And if eternally existent spacetime wanted to exist as 'me' throughout all of future eternity, whom am "I" to argue since "I" don't even actually exist in the first place? Eternally existent spacetime would only have to will it to be so. But why would it want to? Just to experience all of future eternity as 'me'? (Whatever form of 'me' it decides to take? Shape shifter?)
e. "It's your life after all!"
Is it?
1
-
1
-
@rcc3574 For reference, I am east coast USA time zone. Almost midnight here and going off to bed. If you write back, will check back tomorrow, assuming spacetime does not decide to end 'me' this night.
Speaking of my country and freedom, here is a copy and paste from my files:
Consider the following: Here in America: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
If an American citizen does not have the legal 'Liberty' to end their own 'Life' if they and they alone believe it would make them 'Happy' to do so, then are they truly 'Free'?
If an American citizen does not have the legal 'Liberty' to end their own 'Life' if they and they alone believe it would make them 'Happy' to do so, then they are nothing more than a slave to the larger society. Humanity puts animals to sleep who are suffering and call it 'humane' and yet keep humans alive no matter how much the human might be suffering and who wants to die.
If a person wanted to die, and was allowed to legally die, then that would also allow more resources to be left for those people who wanted to continue to live. Dying can be a charitable act to those who want to continue to live.
Legalize suicide or at least make suicide not illegal. There are at least 6 US States that have legal suicide in some form, but why not all?
* 'Nite.
1
-
At about 40:00 in the video:
Wiping out the sense of uniqueness: Science claims all matter is made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy. We are made up of matter. And of course also, if my latest Theory Of Everything idea is correct, that what is called gravity is a part of the currently recognized 'em' photon, gravity being a force that acts 90 degrees to the em forces which of course act 90 degrees to each other, and that the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in this universe, then we are all beings of 'light' in a universe made up of 'light' and interacting 'light'. We are basically all the same and basically no different than anything else in existence.
Edit:
Consider also: Science claims that everything in existence came into existence from an expanding singularity, including the very forces of nature this universe functions by. But now, does everything in existence even exist per se, OR does ONLY the singularity exist in the form of all things?
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
About the middle of this lecture: Consider the following:
a. We appear to be individuals in a larger society of individuals.
b. What is best for an individual may or may not be what is best for the larger society of individuals, and conversely, what is best for the larger society of individuals may or may not be what is best for the individual.
c. The larger society of individuals normally outlasts any single individual.
d. Hence, the larger society normally gets their way in the end as the larger society is normally still existent while the individual is dead.
e. Over time, those that support doing what is best for the larger society outnumber those who focus only on the individual. (Basically, natural selection).
f. Eventually, a society of individuals who support doing what is best for the larger society of individuals over doing what's best for any single individual would be the natural direction of a society.
(Side note: The USA's Republican party often focuses on doing what's best for the individual whereas the USA's Democratic party often focuses on doing what's best for the larger society of individuals. Also, as the Republican party would tend to focus individual wealth over a small amount of individuals, there would be more middle class and poor people in the larger society. So, in a fair and free democracy, where every valid voter gets a vote in a system of self governance, the Republican party would tend to suppress the American citizens inherent right to vote whereas the Democratic party would try to ensure every valid American citizen would be allowed to vote. Eventually though, the Democratic party would 'win' and eventually do what's best for the larger society. Even rich and powerful people still die one day from something while the larger society would still be in conscious existence.)
But now also, since we are individuals in a larger society of individuals, we have to exist somehow, someway while we do all exist. If a choice had to be made concerning a certain topic, who's 'best' should take precedent over the other's 'best'? If for an individual, which individual? All individuals? If for a larger society of individuals, which larger society of individuals? A certain group? A certain state? A certain nation? A certain species? All species in existence? Which larger society? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
This natural tension between the individual versus the larger society of individuals, who decides, and by what authority they and they alone get to decide, is the cause of much strife, suffering and death in this world.
But still, as individuals in a larger society of individuals, how do we all want to exist while we do exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
Are we going to sit down and discuss these issues or fight it out with our aggressive tendencies? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
(And for those who believe 'might makes right', does that mean that bullies in school are okay? Mass murderers are okay? Genecide is okay? Is that the society we as a society want to have? And if 'might makes right' is not 'right', then what exactly is 'right'? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?)
And then no matter what is decided, it currently appears by analysis that:
1. We are still ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are still ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are still ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things as one day there is not going to be a conscious entity left from this Earth to care about anything or anyone ever again throughout all the rest of future eternity.
But still, while we exist, how are we all going to exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
1
-
More and more, this series seems to be leading to the 'butterfly effect' so to speak. Tiny changes early on in our existence, can potentially have dramatic influences later in life. So in the 'nature and nuture', 'nurture' even being a part of 'nature', 'nature' is obviously key in so far as an entity of some sort (made up of nature) being in an environment of some sort (also made up of nature). And so far for me at this time, what is called 'gravity' is a part of the currently recognized 'em' photon, and the 'gem' photon (which is probably just a singular force with 3 different modalities), is the basic energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe. 'Us' as 'nature' being in an 'environment' made up of 'nature', or basically 'gem' photons interacting with other 'gem' photons. Everything in existence is energy and energy frequencies interacting with other energy and energy frequencies. And as 'space' is energy itself, energy being the 'gem' photon, and 'time' is the flow of energy, 'we' are basically space and time interacting with our self. And this 'space time' has a consciousness, at least as evidenced by the consciousness we are supposedly experiencing.
But now, do only entities with a physical properly functioning brain have 'consciousness', OR does possibly even the 'gem' photon have some sort of consciousness, albeit at possibly the lowest level of consciousness in existence, and later more evolved consciousness' come about due to the energy interactions within nature itself?
And then also, if at least one consciousness does not truly exist in some form throughout all of future eternity, (future eternity being a never ending flow of energy that has yet to flow in that respective flow at that time), then do all things cease to matter one day as one day there wouldn't be a conscious entity left to care?
'What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to? (If even to any conscious entity at all). Currently, it appears that all conscious life is going to cease to exist from this Earth, and possibly even this solar system, and possibly even from this galaxy, and even possibly from this entire universe. Life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things, at least from Earthling's perspective. It all depends upon what is really true or not. Basically, what exactly is existence itself and what exactly will the future entail, (assuming 'time' is as stated above)?
1