Comments by "Elias Ziad" (@eliasziad7864) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Why you evil?
    2
  2. I hope they recreate the soviet union.
    2
  3. S-400 isnt deployed in Ukraine. Edit: sorry, it was actually used in Ukraine war but not in Ukraine lands, the only wartime it saw was when an S-400 SAM system downed a Ukrainian SU-27 over Kiev, from the Belarus border, very impressive.
    2
  4. First week of war and everyone is jumping to conclusions...
    2
  5. LOL, you think Ukraine has the economy to handle such a war like this? Russia has 10x the economy of Ukraine and Ukraine is the poorest country in Europe... Their soldiers would eventually run out of ammunition and guns which would make Russia steamroll their nazi asses!
    2
  6. They never made big arrow attacks.
    2
  7.  @NickCorruption  Ukraine is a corrupt vile poor country.
    2
  8. Russian airforce was absent in Ukraine so how could he call it "abysmal"
    2
  9.  @jeffreyexposito3803  Snake island? I don't see Ukraine over their either.
    2
  10. Not true at all, have you heard of AT guns during ww2? They were even more deadly against tanks of that time than modern ATGMs are today. And this same argument can be said about the air force, in which a helicopter or a fighter jet worth tens of millions of dollars could be destroyed mercilessly by a MANPAD worth less than 100k.
    2
  11. The King Of Demons Lol now explain how they lost to Yemen!!!
    2
  12. Billy Blob Exactly, how can Saudi shitfuck be more powerful than Israel if they lost to Yemen.
    2
  13. The King Of Demons LMFAO THE SAUDIS KILLED 100,000 PEOPLE IN YEMEN AND STARVING THEM TO DEATH WHILE THEY DENIE IT, WHILE THE YEMENI MILITARY CAN’T DEFEND THEIR COUNTRY AND SHOOT MISSILES INTO SAUDI ARABIA BECAUSE THE YEMENI MILITARY DOESNT WANT TO KILL INNOCENT PPL IN SAUDI ARABIA, SO STOP LYING!!!
    2
  14. The King Of Demons LOL THE SAUDIS ARE BOWING DOWN TO THE USA, SAUDI ARABIA IS USA PUPPET!!!
    2
  15. What if they face an mbt
    2
  16. UAVs cant go fast and can easily be shot down.
    2
  17. Just like Vietnam and afghanistan.
    2
  18.  @letsdebate839  Lol, Russia is ahead of US in technology, they just need a good economy to mass produce and USA wouldnt even get past minsk.
    2
  19.  @maggotman9100  How would anybody use satellites to destroy anything? Russia uses satellites to detect, and then their ground forces are notified.
    2
  20. Yet, Russia would continue supplying Crimea with ships and transport aircraft no problem. And repeatedly hit the bridge??? Man, Russian air defenses would shoot down most of Ukrainian rocket fire towards critical infrastructure. Short range air defenses such as Pantsirs have a 90% success rate in shooting down HIMARS rockets, its why Ukraine has given up in trying to shoot towards strategic targets far behind the frontlines and are now using HIMARS as battlefield weapons which are ineffective.
    2
  21. Poland will forever be a weak country.
    2
  22.  @mr.waffentrager4400  India has immense manpower against measly uk... how did they get conquered?
    2
  23. Not really. As long you have air defenses, tanks can win you the war.
    2
  24. China has to fight the US navy...
    2
  25. Why don't you mention how the Russian air force bombs tactically, not strategically? Giving air support to the troops?
    2
  26. Nah. Tanks and artillery.
    2
  27.  @saumyacow4435  So far, only 74 russian planes are participating despite the thousands readied. We dont know why Putin isnt sending in his air force.
    2
  28.  @Elgerino  Actually, the modernized T72 B3 is more than enough to take on a Leopard 2a4, thicker armor, bigger gun penetration, and tank shells are much better than the export shells NATo will be providing to Ukraine. Meanwhile, Leopard 2A4s wont able to penetrate the frontal armor of the T72 B3 unless they got a lucky shot. Looks like you're the one on copium.
    2
  29.  @Elgerino  Dont be a loser man, the t90m have better frontal armor than most, if not, all Western tanks, the Tungsten shell is more than enough to penetrate the turrets. While the ERA plus the thick armor will repel so called uranium rounds.
    2
  30.  @istillusezune82  Not true at all whatsoever. NATO would have never gotten air dominance or superiority at all. That almost sounds like cope. The USSR and their allies had many well trained pilots and warplanes that are more advanced than Western ones, but with fewer numbers. But advanced Soviet air defense systems would pick off these NATO planes like flied. They would never be able to destroy any Soviet artillery unless a pilot gets lucky. Soviet air defenses will make sure that NATO warplanes will never cross into Warsaw Pact controlled territory. This has been proven in Vietnam, where Soviet air defenses shot down and destroyed more than 3000 US warplanes and more than 6000 helicopters destroyed.
    2
  31. @Istilluse Zune  The T90m will spot the Leopard much farther away than the Leopard can lmfao. And the T90m along with every other Russian tanks have great stability, probably not as good as leopards, but is good enough regard less.
    2
  32.  @cacogenicist  NATO wont do shit, Ukraine isnt in NATO and is just mostly cannon fodder to fight Russia.
    2
  33. But sophisticated air defense systems like S-300 S-400 and S-500s already makes the airforce significantly reduce its role in warfare.
    2
  34.  @decentish8546  Are you a virgin?
    2
  35. 2000 Ukrainian casualties in the past 5 days in Soledar alone...
    2
  36. Would give justification for China to strike back in the future.
    2
  37.  @leviellingson991  Actually, the videos you see of Russian tanks out of fuel was just a mistake as battalions went further than they were supposed to go or got lost. Russia can easily take the airspace, Ukraine also lost 70 drones, and half their planes were bombed when it was on the ground. Russian air force is mysteriously largely absent though, nobody knows why. But Russia is still doing plenty of airstrikes on Ukrainian formations.
    2
  38.  Stan Theman  I dont think so, the T72s that Iraq had were so terrible, no optics, less armor, less powerful gun, and the tank shells were old and cannot penetrate anything. You switched the tanks and the Iraqi M1 Abrams would still destroy many of the American T72s which are monkey models.
    2
  39.  @zix_zix_zix  Not true at all.
    2
  40. Ukraine is literally using Russian stuff to fight Russian stuff...
    2
  41. Tactical nukes just effect 1km radius.
    2
  42. I am not sure if this is a joke or can SAM systems actually shoot down asteroids?
    2
  43.  @epicgamer3614  Exactly...
    1
  44. Russian air defenses were unfamiliar with HIMARS rockets at first, but they got the right interceptors for the rockets and also destroyed a warehouse storing hundreds of HIMARS rockets. It's why HIMARS didn't hit any Russian targets the past weeks.
    1
  45.  @MmvV762  How can you prove that Russia did Bucha? Like how Ukraine killed their own soldiers in Yelonivka?
    1
  46.  @MmvV762  Terrorism is when you kill innocent civilians to spread your ideology, the US and NATO killed one million civilians in Iraq in the name of spreading "democracy" (an ideology) along with killing tens of thousands of civilians in Libya, Afghanistan, Serbia, Syria, and supporting the Wahabi terrorists in genociding the Yemeni population. Meanwhile, when russian missiles kills civilians (they barely do anyways) this is considered a basic war crime. The reason why is because Russia didn't go to war with Ukraine to spread ideology, Russia went to war to "liberate" the Donbass. This is not terrorism. This is also why you can't consider Nazi Germany as a terrorist state despite them killing millions of Soviet POWs 18 million Soviet civilians and millions in the holocaust, because they didn't do all that to spread Nazism in fascism. So these killings are considered war crimes, worst in history.
    1
  47.  @bluemarlin8138  Yet, they still have many times more armor than Ukraine...
    1
  48. To bury the Ukrainian dead, maybe a couple hundred thousand.
    1
  49. Tell that to the 30k dead Ukrops.
    1
  50.  @marcop1563  😂😂😂Oryx is fake, they are very pro ukrainian and they use photos that are even from simulations or photos from other wars and uncomfirmed photos. Ukraine has basically lost most of their tank forces, numbering 1500 tanks... And you completely forgot the totally superior Russian SAM technology that is the S-400 and S-500 which recently got put into serial production, These S-400 and S-500s are airforce killers, the S-500 makes the F22 and F35 obsolete.
    1