Comments by "DavePazz" (@davepazz580) on "PsycHacks" channel.

  1. The men themselves know this by that age anyway... they aren't complaining.
    1
  2. There's one thing you're leaving out of this analysis... which is the fact that women have inherent value, while all men must work to 'attain' value. In other words, men aren't just "handed" value just for being men or just for reaching whatever age like women are... So any man that doesn't put in the work to maximize his personal value (financially, socially, fitness-wise, appearance-wise, career-wise, status-wise, etc.) will just end up being another 50-year-old average nobody... Understand that the vast majority of men live very average lives and don't come anywhere close to maximizing their full potential... so they have to settle for whatever an "average" man can attract (which isn't much and what you typically observe). Now, no one is saying the highest value 50 yr old man is going to be dating 18-year-old women based on him just being 50...but I've known plenty of very successful men in their 50's with great careers, high-profile lives, very fit and in shape, ect. date hot women in their 20's - it certainly happens. But as I said, these are guys who put in the work to maximize their potential... most men do not bother to.
    1
  3. Women aren't "visual creatures" nowhere even close to how men are...
    1
  4. And very short-term sex at that...
    1
  5. Well, I wouldn't automatically believe a woman that said she was a virgin on day one... I'd have to know more about her over time to really know the truth. Virginity is undeniably valuable, yes... however, you still have to have compatibility on other issues plus there has to be physical attractiveness - virginity alone doesn't turn an unattractive woman into an attractive one. You first have to understand a typical man's "strategy" in dating... it's not the same as a woman's strategy at all because men have different objectives that are unrelated to what women want. For men, regular dating is the ultimate objective because that's really all that men require to feel "complete"... he knows some woman wants to go out and spend time with him and have sex - he's happy and content - end of story. This differs from women, who tend to view dating as a means to an end (a long-term, committed relationship). But for a man to feel compelled to take on a woman permanently and fully commit to her (as in marriage), she has to reach a pretty high standard, simply because men don't really want to take that step (because they know they become vulnerable should they choose wrongly). For a woman to get into this "serious" category, she has to be a full asset in his life (rather than a liability), the man has to see she's different from the other women he's been with in a variety of ways and comport herself with respect and shows she values him just as much... a woman has to be all these things so much so that the man has to become fearful of losing her to another man - hence, he knows she deserves marriage and a full commitment from him. But if the guy become involved with a woman who very likely has a high partner count and shows it... he's just going to do exactly as the previous guys did and regard her only as a casual sex partner and nothing more - basically, women dictate how they want kind of relationships they are good for based on their own past behavior, and men simply follow along. So the "standard" for a "casual relationship" woman and a "serious girlfriend who I might marry" are two entirely different things... this also differs from women, who tend to view the two as being the same. You mentioned about the changes in society and how men no longer need to "court" women for marriage... this is true, mainly because women these days by and large aren't even respecting themselves, so why should any man bother to respect them that much? As to your last question: The first thing on my mind of such a thing happened would be first and foremost to just relax and enjoy the experience as much as possible... But later on, after it's all over, I'd realize that if she did this with me right away, then it's likely true she's done the exact same thing with god knows how many other guys previously... And she'd effectively not be considered for a serious relationship... just a casual one.
    1
  6. Doesn't change anything said here though...
    1
  7. It's ok when you're really not taking the relationship seriously... as in casual f-buddies.
    1
  8. Cannot get enough of what?
    1
  9. So in other words, nymphomaniacs...
    1
  10. As long as the older man is getting sex, he's not goin to give 2 sh*ts that money is the reason she's with him... trust me on that.
    1
  11. No, it doesn't go "both ways"... What women really want is a man other women want as well... that way she feels extra special and prized when he chooses her to commit to. And no, a man's body is not prized and valued the way a woman's body is to a man... which is why women talk a lot of BS about "caring" for a man's body count, but no real evidence exists to actually prove this.
    1
  12. No, it's not called "jealousy" it's called "the norm"... The majority of men these days don't have any partner and (by consequence) don't attract any women... Yet the small percentage of men that do regularly get women, keep attracting and getting even more women... so it's clear which type of men women are going for, it sure as hell isn't the majority of dateless guys.
    1
  13. Shaming tactics won't work here...
    1
  14. Not specifically for "reproduction" but the act which leads to reproduction (which for nature, is really the same thing)...
    1
  15. Why?
    1
  16. Women are well known for saying one thing before doing the other... The fact is most "young" men aren't reporting back any special success simply for being that age... if they were, then most men would report back being highly in demand by women until they turn 30 (which is a far cry from what is actually happening).
    1
  17. And what counts as "good looking" to women will usually not be the same as what a man would think it is... women count a man's financial situation and status into his "looks". Men don't have to worry about "aging" as women by and large aren't even concerned as long as you have your status and financial situation in line... women aren't men, and therefore don't have a man's mindset on these issues.
    1
  18. Not if you go to extremes like this... of course, nobody would expect a teenager and a senior citizen to be together. But if you leave the extreme opposite ends and go towards the middle, there is plenty of room for a man's status and wealth to become very attractive and earn him attraction results... another factor is that not all "older" men (again, not talking about senior citizens) are perfectly identical to each other in physical shape and appearance.
    1
  19. Men aren't women... so no.
    1
  20. There is no incentive for men these days to be "warm, loving and respectful" when only a small percentage of men have the luxury of generating any serious female interest... and those fortunate few have no need to be any of those things either, as they can replace the women they have with another one at any time.
    1
  21. True but still doesn't change the overall effect...
    1
  22. That's how it is... women are instinctively concerned with a man's future and men are instinctively concerned with a woman's past. Men aren't women and women aren't men... so naturally, there will be two different mindsets applied.
    1
  23. Well yes it is a generalization, as most people try to make the best choices in those they are choosing to bring into their lives on a on such a close, personal level. There are women who "never gave a crap" about a man's income capability, social status or anything like that... but this doesn't mean the large majority of men can just go through life making low-to-average money, build no social status at all and expect to have plenty of women to choose from.
    1
  24. I agree every person is different, but if you step back and analyze all the factors together, certain patterns will always be consistent in most cases...
    1
  25. Wrong...
    1
  26. How so?
    1
  27. There is much to fear these days...
    1
  28. And it also happens to be the truth...
    1
  29. But I firmly believe that there is someone that will love each of us. This is only true for women statistically speaking... there has always been a much larger percentage of men that never end up with a life partner than women.
    1
  30. This is what bitter feminists say to make themselves feel better about their own poor choices in life...
    1
  31. I've also seen the other around happen, so it's a moot point... When a woman leaves a man, it's going to be because he's not longer doing the things that attracted her to him... she's going to simply find the same qualities in another man, she's not just going to leave for "youth" because as I said before, the largest majority of "young" men these days are dateless and sexless. It would be another story if men of this age range were reporting having the time of their life in dating, reporting that so many women were chasing after them day and night. But this isn't the case at all... which tells me being "younger" by itself is no real advantage. btw I never said anything about a 40-year-old man chasing after teen girls...
    1
  32. Yet the large majority of "younger attractive men who are fit" aren't doing well at all in the dating scene... most women are going after the top percentage of financially successful men with status (not even caring about how "young" these men are).
    1
  33. it’s at its peak when she’s underage therefore most men like children basically that’s grimy and sad asf. Complete bullsh*t and you know it...
    1
  34. @RanabirDan-op7un "Physical" attraction to a woman includes his social status and financial power... Gene Simmons of the rock band KISS is one of the most physically ugly guys ever, yet he used to have long lines of women waiting for him outside his dressing room following KISS concerts. And in case you are wondering, these women weren't there to just shake his hand and get an autograph if you know what I mean... So you can call this "physical" attraction since they were all interested in Gene Simmon's "physical" body, but the man is very hideous by most standards of beauty... But the truth is without his status and power as a rock star, none of these women would be lining up outside his dressing room... For women "physical" attraction takes into account a man's financial ability and social status... never think otherwise.
    1
  35.  @adk5997  The thing that contradicts what you're saying is most "young" men in today's dating world are not enjoying any special "advantage" with women just for being younger... most are in fact, leaving the dating scene behind from lack of positive results. The men that are enjoying the dating scene very well (i.e. enjoy plenty of choices in women and always out dating them one by one) are men with a high-status level, very good financial producers or have some sort of flashy career... their looks matter as well, but for sure it's a secondary factor to the main ones (and as you know, it takes a certain amount of years for a man to get to this level, you're not going to see a bunch of late teen early 20's men in such positions). That tells you everything... Not sure why you had to mischaracterize older men the way you did... people tend to get wiser as they get older, and as I said before: Older men don't give 2 sh*ts if younger women are "after their money" as long as they get theirs. You're projecting all the negative qualities about older women onto older men... that's not how this works - men aren't women and women aren't men.
    1
  36.  @adk5997  Women in general don't really care for men's bodies to begin with... it can in no way be compared to (or even close to) the intensity of how men feel about women's bodies. Granted, nobody here is talking about the body of a senior citizen... so don't go to that extreme. Most end up with people within their particular sphere of interchange, which would naturally be people not too far out of their age range.. but as I said before, so-called "young" men aren't reporting back any special "advantages" with women of any age group just because they themselves happen to be of a certain age. If they were, then I'd agree that all this youth is super beneficial to getting women... but there is no evidence that actually shows this, as most "young" men are just dropping out of the dating scene altogether from lack of positive results. Old men are shallow... sure... so are women. Everyone is "shallow" in some regard, men prioritize certain things and women prioritize certain things... none of it is "good" or "bad", it just is - and that's life. The fact you would a void a man that dates one woman after the other really doesn't make any difference... such men exist and they are enjoying the dating scene, and I can guarantee you they aren't getting these results just because they are "young" - they got a lot of other qualities that keeps the women coming.
    1
  37. Which part didn't he have right?
    1
  38. It depends how you interpret not "caring" about a woman's past... The thing is, all men want sex partners first and foremost... a woman's past doesn't interfere with this aim at all, if anything, a man will assume "Well she's let other guys bang her before without paying any real price for it, so I can do the same now..." But such women don't inspire men to commit to a serious, long-term relationship... unless of course, the man is low-status and feels such a woman is the best he's ever going to get (i.e. he has no other choices since he isn't attracting any other better-quality women).
    1
  39. It is true when it comes to which woman to value more for a serious relationship... not for casual dating.
    1
  40. Bullshit...
    1
  41. No, women don't care and there is zero evidence to back up these silly claims...
    1
  42. All men are primarily looking for sex... so of course, if you show up with porn star-level skills thanks to so much "previous experience", no man is going to reject this and will even appreciate it much. But this doesn't mean such skills and experience is an absolute requirement to satisfy a man... women are anatomically designed to provide a man sexual satisfaction simply by laying there and opening her legs. Satisfying a man sexually isn't rocket science... it literally requires no effort or past experience just to accomplish that. But I promise you, "previous experience" in bed is not a quality men assess when deciding which woman to get serious with long-term... Those men "unnerved" and "put off" by lack of experience in women are simply playing mind games with women... nothing more.
    1
  43. Women are anatomically designed to provide a man 100% sexual satisfaction even if the only thing she does is lay back and open her legs and not move... No "experience" is required for this... there is no "learning curve" for women at all, unless your goal is to become a porn star or prostitute. Men are the ones that need experience to improve their sexual performance... women do not. "You did with others, therefore you have no value to me” is based on the fact that no man wants to pay a single penny more to receive the same benefit the last guy did from that woman... only bitter feminists believe otherwise.
    1
  44. Are you saying all the males of that culture aspire to become life-long celibate monks?
    1
  45. @ So you never spread your legs?
    1
  46. Nah, the analogy is perfect...
    1
  47.  @paulcashew5795  That's why it's called an "analogy" i.e. not meant to be a literal representation encompassing every little aspect.
    1
  48.  @paulcashew5795  It is comparable to the original and a pefect representation of value...
    1
  49.  @paulcashew5795  I'd instead argue that yes, a woman with multiple partners in her past is "damaged" in the sense that instinctively, men generally won't view such a woman as serious partnership material... And a proper lock woman is precisely what is required for things like marriage... it's the most basic requirement men look for at the start, otherwise I don't even see the point of it all. The analogy wasn't about anything being "damaged" however... just a simple comparison of values based on outcomes, and locks that can be opened by more than one key hold much less value than a master key that can open many locks.
    1
  50. Wrong...
    1