Comments by "Dave Powell" (@davepowell7168) on "VICE TV" channel.

  1.  @dirkdiggler8260  Having read your curt and dismissive responses to others in this thread l have a gauge. Arrogance is a front for insecurity. People with sound education have no need to be disrespectful
    3
  2. Hijackers? 🤣
    2
  3.  @dirkdiggler8260  OK. I'm assuming that the twin towers were built to the structural engineers (John Skilliing) plans and that the planes were allegedly Boeing 767 's with standard engines and French landing gear? If that is the case...
    2
  4.  @dirkdiggler8260  Velocity is of great importance, we are not considering a missile with shaped charge, yet at the moment of impact the 'aeroplane' supposedly manufactured of CREP framed aluminum fuselage etc penetrates a steel frame comparable with tank armor fortified with floors of rebarred concrete 5" thick as blueprints of section elevations demonstrate How fast did you state your estimate of speed was?
    2
  5.  @dirkdiggler8260  Have you done any steel fabrication or engineering? There was a conflict in Argentina where ballistics were exchanged and the some of the ships had interesting deformation upon return When l was studying a hammerhead dockside crane collapsed accross two frigates which was amusing Not just keyboards and screen observations. With 9.11 I'm telling you that no way could I sign it off to planestrikes WTC7 was not structurally affected, look at the plan of the WTC , surgical disintegration by means unknown. Wood may confabulate and have people looking the wrong way but much of the evidence she uses stands Blind faith in mainstream media has led to destructive behaviour to society
    2
  6.  @dirkdiggler8260  The 'aircraft' fires could not destroy those buildings. People who have not experienced anything more energetic than a road vehicle accident are unfamiliar with ballistics Your opinion is that of NIST , look harder
    2
  7.  @dirkdiggler8260  Fact number one is extremely relevant. You state that the Marriot Hotel (WTC 3) which was between the mid points of the towers nearer the river had to be 'taken down', therefore did not disintegrate as tower 7did which was 100yds further away ? Try thinking logically , gravitational collapses fall to make 'pyramids' or big piles of debris and would have crushed the hotel easily. Look at the ground plan of the WTC to see how the Twin towers were almost 'on top' of the Marriot.
    2
  8.  @dirkdiggler8260  Your text analysis is weak. I stated very clearly that l begin with studying evidence, pictures, video and contemporary eyewitness accounts before reading reports accepted by government All of your parroted statements are now getting tedious. The cut and paste comments and repetition are a giveaway. Be as rude as you can, lm not wasting further time
    2
  9.  @youtube_chaplain  You create your own hell Christian Soldier, hell can be described as 'a place without God' . On your way
    2
  10.  @dirkdiggler8260  You claimed to have 'seen the footage' but have you really studied it WTC 911 videos a0247-26d122 r33- nist #0942 After the South tower disintegrated at 39:09 the adjacent side of the North tower emanates a neutrally buoyant thick powdercloud intermittently from below the explosion and damaged floors which gives a window on what is happening inside The video is 65 minutes long
    2
  11. Growing dope hydroponically using white diesel is genius tho
    2
  12.  @fuundfara  bogus journalism
    1
  13. Vice is a parentally advised 'safe' channel. Most adults look elsewhere when alone
    1
  14.  @mikebyrd8278  I caught covid and had a sore throat for hours. I'm retired so didn't need to 'self isolate'
    1
  15. White Diesel grows the best quality
    1
  16. You sharpwit 😋
    1
  17.  Jake Korol  AGM 12 Bullpup on pentagon. WTC buildings done with thermitics and linear shaped charges. There were also '2 planestrikes' which appear far from civilian aircraft Usually the tail snaps
    1
  18.  @mikebyrd8278  You'll have to try harder? How can I help you sonny
    1
  19.  @mikebyrd8278  Well from you that's a compliment. Don't forget your Chinese batflu crazy jab
    1
  20.  @mikebyrd8278  Obviously a generalised grouping but the the motivation for vaccination is fear of the invisible as portrayed in the mainstream media. The nonsensical 911narrative although clearly visible has been effectively brainwashed into the population and cognitive dissonance also terror that the Islamic fundamentalists were only a decoy will fade... Give it 5 years
    1
  21.  @mikebyrd8278  Your deleting your attempts at insult 😒 No fun
    1
  22.  @mikebyrd8278  No, read properly
    1
  23. US military has become the plaything of oligarchs. Heinz Pommer
    1
  24. The official narrative is nonsense
    1
  25.  @timshea4279  Study physics, then engineering and then look at the evidence
    1
  26.  @timshea4279  lf you believe that a planestrike can level a building as seen on 9.11 you have not. Education is key
    1
  27.  @timshea4279  You obviously have no real world experience of structural engineering or catastrophic failures leading to collapse. Please take my advice, this will not be a long conversation
    1
  28.  @timshea4279  l would guess that the NIST story of vierendeel trusses pulling in the outer columns as the concrete rebarred floors sagged initiating collapse is your choice today
    1
  29.  @timshea4279  The video of the North tower (amongst many other anomalies with that idea) show the antenna descent first indicating failure of steel in both hat truss and all core columns
    1
  30.  @timshea4279  Who? Connection of floor trusses is not impossible
    1
  31.  @timshea4279  Was it not clear that I wasn't referencing. Unlike you apparently l form opinion from looking carefully at the forensic evidence. Suggest a blueprint of WTC towers showing dimensions of the cross beams between the core columns above the third mechanical floor
    1
  32.  @timshea4279  l take it that no such blueprints are available to you. Speaking of the vierendeels, do you want them strong enough to deform the outer columns, or weak enough to fail at your cherrypicked moment ?
    1
  33.  @timshea4279  The trusses were visibly pulling down from core collapse? Have you examined the welding in the construction of the prefabricated components of the outer columns. Look harder
    1
  34.  @timshea4279  Puerile attempts to insult have no weight in physics Perhaps you should reevaluate your position if you ever expect to be taken seriously. The trusses and seat plates were welded in situ externally as evident from construction standards and video evidence US standards of construction do not permit steel fixing to be like a game of Jenga with high-rise buildings where strength to weight is imperative Steel columns do not concertina, redundancy was included by design. I wish to educate you Timothy and have no wish to be disrespectful or adversarial ad hominem Yes, 5/8" bolts were used for installation of components prior to fixing by arc welding
    1
  35.  @timshea4279  A building of such height is designed for purpose, primarily wind resistance but also the possibility of a civilian aircraft impact. John Skilliing stated his position in '93 post basement explosion. You suspect that he was incompetent/deceptive and/or the US steelworkers didn't follow instructions to code during construction? This is not a game of football, thousands were disintegrated by unknown method and I find that your attitude is disrespectful
    1
  36.  @timshea4279  Does that stuff work with anyone Timothy? Have seen your replies before... You type the type.
    1
  37.  @timshea4279  l suspect that you have seen most of the information in your mind regarding steel, which is a fundament of this discussion on screen or maybe paper We are not in Hollyworld now The politics are also irrelevant, let's stay on material physics We have linear expansion and softening of trusses under given loads + aeroplane mass x speed etc Let's assume that the alleged aircraft guided itself into a building for arguments sake, floor 98, fuel tanks all vaporise and ignite, the coded office furnishings are coated in aviation gas and also ignite. The hot steel structure becomes so plastic that it folded down a floor.. This process would not be symmetrical because the planestrike was asymmetric Or we can discount damage from initial impact to even things out?
    1
  38.  @timshea4279  You wish to avoid the laws of physics, angular momentum ceased . You suspect that the healthy unheated building below the impact site just conveniently jumped out of the way? Please apply a hammer to a nail Get back to me ASAP
    1
  39.  @timshea4279  Dear Timothy, perhaps you try to insult people with rude comments, images of children, references to a ball game and quote a potential energy ratio repeatedly which is crudely calculated by someone else routinely Is this normal for you ? Without prejudice l feel that this is not productive
    1
  40. Obviously an inside job. References available
    1
  41. Description of physics applicable to building collapse incongruous with planestrike + fuel fed fires providing enough heat to initiate catastrophic failure of steel frame resulting in levelling of 3 towers
    1
  42. There are some errors in point list. 2) Most but not all evidence was destroyed,3) Mrs Silverstein is claimed to have booked the appointment with the dermatologist, 6) Jane Stanley BBC World News report, 13) just to add that floor 23 of WTC7was reinforced as a command and control point for CIA, 14) the alarm later functioned until collapse and the 2 storey Edison electrical substation which WTC7 was built on failed 4.20 according to the fire department , 15) Larry Silversteinaa did not make a slip..
    1
  43.  @joshd3192  You are suggesting that the US government just tied up all of its dogs and looked the other way for years and that building code in the US is optional? Look harder.. My position is that the WTC buildings were not destroyed by hand luggage carried on internal flights
    1
  44.  @joshd3192  You think that you will make 'shill team 6' with that reply? Try harder with less cut'n paste
    1
  45.  @joshd3192 'proof' can be a subjective term ,however l don't believe that the Islamic terrorist conspiracy theory if accurate would give the 19 guys life after death to finish the show. You bring your intelligence into question by suggesting so
    1
  46.  @joshd3192  The video evidence is proof
    1
  47.  @joshd3192  3 towers collapsed symmetrically on video, perhaps you haven't noticed
    1
  48.  @joshd3192  A burden of proof is required is required by the prosecution to press the case beyond reasonable doubt
    1
  49.  @joshd3192  The 9.11 sacrifice was in breach of the declaration of human rights 1947,crimes against peace and humanity. Treason is a heinous crime and why choose to subvert justice?
    1
  50.  @joshd3192  A study of building collapse or demolition shows how the process occurs, comparing previous examples with the 9.11 event is not difficult. An entire building of steel components and rebarred concrete do not disassociate because of compression when an area is heated enough to cause a failure.
    1