General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Asbestos Muffins
LegalEagle
comments
Comments by "Asbestos Muffins" (@AsbestosMuffins) on "LegalEagle" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
@Eudaletism no tresspassing near railroad tracks is an even older holdover from the days when unionist strikers would rip up railroad tracks and block trains to coal mines
362
I absolutely love how when asked about mara-largo he basically described hypothetically committing another fraud when on trial for committing fraud
297
"No taxation without representation!" Supreme Court to territorial citizens: well actually...
94
totally believable, the system is incapable of dealing with malicious actors, it still gives deference to people out of fear of being too heavy handed
26
ah but see batman updated the terms of service allowing him 100% access to their phones
19
"No one will be above the law." Man that statement didn't age well given how he constantly insists he is above the law
18
she's absolutely pushing ethics codes to the limit by continually insisting trump is an extra special boy
15
imagine if he had gotten the judge he wanted, this thing would still be ongoing
9
@SkiDaBird ya they say that they should seek legislative remedy while also reminding them that they're 2nd class citizens with no legislative remedy.
9
@QuestionEverything-qp6kw unfortunately with the clock being only 4 years, the limited time for a person installed temporarily should be days, if not only a handful of weeks not the 24-48 months that they can pull with the current 'rules'
8
sadly these days there's more than a few lawyers out there being completely dishonest and dragging down their whole profession
6
omg their new theory is that church and state should in fact not be seperated, and the state should be melded by the chuch, also apparently its put forth by "young conservatives" who happen to be all in their 60s
5
or going looking for corn in Iowa
4
this is a disgusting opinion where the justices will be remembered as being partisan actors
3
I never get that too, like mcdonalds manufactures 'fries' in the US, but in the EU they just use potatoes and salt... why can't we get that!
3
its weird they would even be able to make such a claim because usually the owner of the media said character appears in first are the ones who have claim over that character. Idk what agreement they had with the studio at the time but the studio almost certainly would own the right to the character being that they own the movie and the rights to all the characters in the story portrayed there. This seems like a bit of a side hustle that the studios haven't needed to stop bc they're not the ones getting sued
3
given the way textbooks are written in this country, there'll be 20 chapters on hillary clinton, and 1 small footnote about trump's impeachment
3
I really think the courts have maybe gone a bit absurd with the notion that political speech is somehow more protected than regular speech. I understand the need, a lot of authoritarians shutdown opponents using speech restrictions, but its like, racist guy says racist things to incite violence, isn't protected, racist guy suddenly runs for office, suddenly its all just politics, he's not literally calling for people to be exterminated, even when he says he is literally calling for people to be exterminated
3
@zachrodan7543 does unwind a lot of his executive privilage drama
3
it was a bold strategy to not raise a defense at trial, didn't seem to pay off though
3
16:00 Wait so he's using the Enron system of future profits to valuate realestate holdings
2
I really feel like what trump and his campaign were attempting to do smacks of being RICO
2
Can we stop for a moment and appreciate John Soloman was the reason why Trump did the things that got him impeached, and he hires him only to mishandle a really damaging letter as well.
2
shell companies and corporate persons as a whole were a mistake and the judges and lawmakers that insist they are actual persons are insane because you cannot physically punish a corporation
2
I'm starting to think a loyalty pledge to the GOP is part of the Federalist Society's criteria to be put on their approval list. No republican appointed judge has been put on the bench in the last 40 years without their approval and that's scary
2
My dad used to drive everywhere with a detector, never understood that since by the time its beeping, you've already been scanned, and those don't detect lasers or other non radar guns
2
In britain, their constitution doesn't say anything, because they don't have one, instead its just an endless series of laws
2
one head speaks only lies, one head only speaks the truth
2
this seems to be the best use of tax dollars from what I've seen. Stopping a fraud, pissing him off in the process.
2
sadly unlike anyone else in the country he will get a slap on the wrist 'because we can't prosecute presidents, former or otherwise'
1
I swear every hollywood and modern lawyer tv show uses the same 5 office sets including the same corner office
1
and then the court decided the thousands of complaints were improper and will not consider any further complaints at this time
1
yes I have waited for this for a long time, glad you found an episode that actually had enough court to analyze
1
funny enough the judge CAN declare him guilty when you don't bother to show up to your multi billion dollar civil laswuit
1
well at least alex jones can sleep soundly knowing its only technically illegal to lie to congress because the court isn't going to do anything
1
using the WTO and these supernational treaties to overturn smoking bans is just about one of the more horrible things you can do for the world
1
Trump "I want a special master" FBI "it was 15 boxes of documents, we finished searching it 4 days ago like we already told you." Trump "I still want a special master!" FBI "We already know everything we're allowed to know"
1
can't wait till that gets illegalized and goes back to the court and they mysteriously decide freedom of movement, interstate commerce, and privacy are not in the constitution either...somehow
1
shockingly cheap to buy a scotus justice
1
Unitary Executive Theory AKA The President is actually a dictator. this is also why it should be laid out by statute that the president CAN be prosecuted for criminal behavior by the department of justice, because currently its only by opinion of Richard Nixon's own DOJ that prevents such a thing happening
1
"skillshare doesn't violate the rico statute" oh please, we all know their prices are criminally cheap and that they have a pattern of doing so, and are an enterprise
1
she specifically only quotes the one sentence in Nixon vs GSA that hints at privilaged presidential records but again those have been by statute made government property after that ruling!
1
roberts should resign right now and let a democrat president appoint the chief justice if he truely believes there's no democrat/republican justices, and that the court should be above the political marass, otherwise he's just acting as partisan as his fellow conservative justices.
1
this hit so hard, that lady sounded exactly like my grandmother
1
Short answer: No, because they had direct knowledge as stated by the IG, not that it was even necessary to begin with. (I know your video probably was made before that correction)
1
you had fun with this intro, admit it!
1
I think its implied that the lyrics are exactly the same which is a copyright issue as lyrics are also protected by copyright
1
ya you have at least 3 justices that don't seem to know whats in the constitution, because their opinion rests on not finding the word privacy in a document that has at least 6 amendments regarding the right to some kind of privacy from government intervention
1
protect the rich, eat the poor. the system works again.
1
this is what happens when you compare everything remotely leftist to communism, enough people believe it that you can't even save them from themselves without being Stalin
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All