Comments by "Danuta Hanyga" (@danutahanyga4834) on "Jesús Enrique Rosas"
channel.
-
31
-
28
-
26
-
18
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
@dvjfredmerc529
It's not really that complex. No software required. An average person with a reasonable education and the ability to think can estimate the consequences of our behaviour. You've worked it out; increased density of population, increased travel = increased transmission. There are already documented cases of disease transmission from animal to human and a number of known diseases that one can catch from domestic animals, add to this human expansion onto wildlife habitat, keeping and breeding wild animals then trading them for profit, and bingo. We have the perfect breeding ground for a cocktail of new diseases we will need to get acquainted with. Then, as bugs cross the species, they mutate to adapt to new hosts.
Unfortunately, 70-80% of people are mindless, entitled and unable to foresee the consequences of their behaviour, and cannot see what's coming. Google experimented with quantum computer and the outcome of their experiment was so scary, google decided not to continue. Especially that it doesn't matter anymore. It's done. Our self made fate appears to be sealed.
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@martinharris5017
If you had vision, focus and drive to achieve something that benefits people arounf the globe, you's also have money and your name would be a household name, like Bill Gates's. The truth is it isn't.. Many years ago, Bill Gates saw a computer in every household. The rest of computer community sai "rubbish'. It's Bill Gates vision that became reality. Despite his detractors and neysayers.
What philosophy are you talking about. Bill Gates uses computers like everybody else does. He made his money not from using computers but from creating software, being better than very good at it, then creating the entire corporation which employs talented people who create more products.
Originally, wayh back when he was starting out, his philosophy was that he'd rather make 1% of 100 products, than applying 100 % markup on one product. Hard to argue with this: more people can afford to buy, and he makes more money. The philosophy that too many others have and it doesn't take them very far.
2
-
2
-
@LilFisch1174
Rubbish! Bill Gates does have any vaccine production facility. How can he then produce vaccines? Bill Gates cannot test vaccines or any other medications, either. There is a protocol for it. The research is often done by universities, but mostly by pharmaceutical companies. Pharmaceutical companies test vaccines in clinical trials. Bill Gates Foundation donated funds to Oxford Uni for research into Covid19 vax in cooperation with AstraZeneca pharma. The research and clinical trials were botched. The less than desirable standard of clinical trials is 100% the responsibility of AstraZeneca.
If you have any problems here, you need to determine which pharma produced the offensive vaccine you claim is killing children.
One of the most problematic pharmaceutical companies is Pfizer. Pfizer paid the highest to date fine for fudging data and deceiving US Government. Pfizer is NOT Bill Gates, in fact, Pfizer has nothing to do with Bill Gates. He may own some shares but a lot of people do.
What is on public record, though, is that US and UK governments did medical tests on their own population, without informed consent, and on other, vulnerable nations. Again Bill Gates has nothing to do with it. In fact, at the time the unlawful tests first came to light, Bill Gates was a young child. You're barking up the wrong tree.
2
-
2
-
2